EU Matrix Atlas › Legislative file
EU Legislative File · ATLAS

Framework of measures to facilitate the transport of military equipment, goods and personnel across the Union

COD - Ordinary legislative procedure (ex-codecision procedure)2025/0847(COD)Committee: Security and Defence;Transport and TourismDG: [DEFIS] Defence Industry and Space

Policy topics

Relations with NATODefence spendingEU competences on defenceEU-UK security and defence partnership

What this file does

Overview

The analysed initiative is the legislative proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on establishing a framework of measures to facilitate the transport of military equipment, goods and personnel across the Union (2025/0847(COD)). The file, forming the core of a "Military Mobility Package," is currently at the first reading stage in the ordinary legislative procedure, awaiting a committee decision in the European Parliament. The source document analysed is the Commission's legislative proposal (Council document ST 15794 2025 INIT). According to this proposal, the Regulation aims to create a comprehensive EU framework to remove persistent barriers to swift military movements within the EU, a capability deemed essential for European security, deterrence, and crisis response, as called for by the European Council and the Defence Readiness Roadmap 2030.

Legislative timeline

The procedural history of this file began with the Commission's formal proposal, documented by the Council on 25 November 2025. The European Parliament referred the file to its responsible committee for a first reading on 19 January 2026. The next key procedural milestone is the preparation and adoption of the committee report. No further calendar events are specified at this stage.

Institutional handling

The European Parliament has assigned responsibility for this file to the Committee on Security and Defence, with the Committee on Transport and Tourism also involved. Shadow rapporteurs have been appointed. Within the European Commission, the proposal falls under the portfolio of Commissioner for Security and Defence, Andrius Kubilius, and is managed by the Directorate-General for Defence Industry and Space (DG DEFIS). In the Council of the EU, the file is handled by the Foreign Affairs Council configuration.

Stakeholder reactions

Stakeholder engagement on this proposal has been active, with 27 documented meetings held between stakeholders and EU policymakers. These involved 21 meetings with Members of the European Parliament, 5 with Commissioners, and 1 with European Commission staff, representing 20 distinct organisations. The most frequently engaged organisations include the Community of European Railway and Infrastructure Companies, SEA Europe, the European Transport Workers' Federation, DHL Group, and Fincantieri. On the specific topic of EU competences on defence, positions vary. For instance, SEA Europe has expressed opposition to certain aspects, while simultaneously emphasising the role of naval assets as key infrastructure for EU-wide military mobility. Similarly, the Association for Freight Transport Solutions (AFTS) has indicated opposition while promoting digital solutions for EU-wide customs processes and engaging with the proposal's objectives.

Media coverage

Media coverage of the policy context includes 9 articles from 7 countries, including Brussels, Hungary, Ireland, Latvia, Lithuania, and Poland. One report notes that the European Economic and Social Committee's March plenary underscored the link between civil-military cooperation and European security, advocating for the Military Mobility Package and stronger coordination across EU institutions. Another article details Lithuania's push for faster EU-wide military mobility funding and streamlined permits, alongside a national infrastructure upgrade plan valued at €1 billion. Further analysis covers Latvia’s Riga Freeport decision regarding tug requirements and situates this within the broader EU policy context on military mobility and emergency readiness.

Institutional status

ParliamentAwaiting committee decision
CouncilFirst reading

Official documents (5)

View the full interactive file on Atlas →
© EU Matrix · atlas.eumatrix.app · Sign in for the full analysis: positions, scores and stakeholder engagement.