Impact on Fruit Growers Sparks Political Alarm MEP Raffaele Stancanelli, alongside Isabella Tovaglieri and Anna Maria Cisint representing the PfE (Identity and Democracy) group, raises urgent concerns about new EU rules lowering the maximum acetamiprid residue levels to 0.07 mg/kg. This change, under Regulation (EU) 2025/158, directly impacts fruit growers across Italy and Europe facing difficulty due to pest infestations and an ongoing agricultural crisis. The regulation's reduction stirs debate between agricultural producers needing effective pesticides and regulators prioritizing consumer health.
Parliamentary Question Sought Clarifications from the Commission This response followed the parliamentary question filed on 3 September 2025, where the MEPs asked the European Commission to urgently assess the impact of the residue reduction and identify equally effective alternatives. They also called for greater involvement of Member States and regional stakeholders in data collection to guide future plant protection legislation.
No New Quantitative Measures, but Open Channels for Data and Revisions The Commission's reply, articulated by Commissioner Várhelyi, references EFSA's risk assessments prompting the stricter limits and emphasizes regulatory processes involving Member States, SCoPAFF votes, and legislative scrutiny. While no fresh targets or budget figures were proposed, mechanisms exist for submitting requests to adjust residue limits for specific crops anytime under current legislation.
Balancing Health Risks and Agricultural Viability The Commission underlines the dual priorities of safeguarding consumer health by reducing residue levels while preserving farmers’ access to authorized active substances like acetamiprid, even allowing emergency authorizations. Upcoming legislative reforms aim to streamline approvals, especially to foster biocontrol alternatives to chemical pesticides.
Stakeholder Implications and Institutional Follow-up Fruit producers face tighter constraints potentially raising operational challenges and adaptation costs, whereas EU consumers may gain enhanced protection from pesticide residues. Member States and EU regulatory bodies maintain significant roles in monitoring and implementing these standards. The Commission is expected to provide further responses in upcoming weeks, signaling future direction on this delicate trade-off between public health priorities and agricultural resilience.
← Atlas › News › Agri-Food