EU transport, telecommunications and energy ministers meeting on 9 June 2026 under the Cyprus Presidency adopted a general approach on the European Business Wallets proposal, while noting progress reports on the Digital Networks Act (DNA) and the cybersecurity package. The three digital files, presented by Executive Vice-President for Tech Sovereignty Henna Virkkunen, were linked to simplification, competitiveness and resilience, but the DNA and cybersecurity texts exposed persistent divisions over how much national flexibility to preserve.
On business wallets, ministers broadly supported reducing administrative burdens and enabling cross-border activity through a trusted digital tool. However, many delegations insisted the wallet should complement, not replace, existing national systems. Poland, Estonia, Malta, Croatia, Spain, Latvia, Portugal, Slovenia, Bulgaria, Hungary, Austria and Slovakia stressed interoperability and voluntary use. Germany supported harmonisation but reserved its position on cybersecurity and equivalency for trilogue. France saw the wallet as a simplification tool for the 28th regime. Finland urged integration with enterprise systems and AI. Cyprus recorded unanimous backing for the general approach.
The DNA proved more contentious. Cyprus noted disputes over harmonisation depth and national flexibility. Germany argued the proposal does not sufficiently reduce bureaucracy and may add complexity. France contended the balance was wrong, transferring security and sovereignty competences to the Commission. Spain, Finland, Latvia, Estonia, Hungary, Slovenia, Sweden, the Netherlands, Luxembourg, Portugal and Slovakia pushed for national discretion on spectrum, security and the single passport. Many delegations called for simplification of the single passport and avoidance of new administrative layers. Virkkunen defended the updated general authorisation and single passport as necessary to reduce fragmentation.
On the cybersecurity package, Cyprus identified the trusted ICT supply-chain framework as the most sensitive chapter. Virkkunen defended it as a risk-based method to de-risk critical supply chains. Portugal, Poland, Finland, Estonia, Czechia, Sweden, the Netherlands and France supported stronger EU coordination but insisted member states retain a central role in supply-chain decisions and national security. Many delegations backed strengthening ENISA as a complementary, not displacing, body. Ireland committed to steering work toward a robust, implementable text. Greece and Poland underlined the need for adequate EU funding.
Consensus emerged on strategic aims despite implementation disputes: wallets should complement national tools; DNA should simplify without adding layers; cybersecurity should strengthen EU capacity while respecting national competences. Cyprus handed the cybersecurity files to the incoming Irish Presidency.