Aiming to bolster food safety evaluations, Commissioner Olivér Várhelyi has outlined plans for the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) to deliver updated scientific opinions on aspartame and related sweeteners by mid-2026. This development directly impacts consumers, food producers, regulatory agencies, and public health advocates who closely watch the safety and approval status of artificial sweeteners commonly found in food products.
This communication comes in response to a parliamentary question posed by MEPs Jutta Paulus and Tilly Metz from the Verts/ALE group, seeking clarity on the timing and scope of EFSA's latest review of the salt of aspartame-acesulfame (E962) and its components.
Unlike vague or purely declarative statements, Várhelyi’s reply provides specific timelines, including the planned adoption of EFSA's scientific opinion during the plenary session of the Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings scheduled for 30 June to 2 July 2026. It confirms the incorporation of a comprehensive literature review covering studies up to June 2025, including all relevant evidence regarding aspartame since the previous assessment in 2013. The use of EFSA’s revised hazard identification protocol adds a methodical, standardized approach to the evaluation.
Politically and regulatory-wise, this constitutes an extension of the EU’s food safety oversight, yet it balances scientific rigor with procedural transparency by maintaining risk assessments under EFSA's established protocols. The update could lead to re-examining the acceptable daily intake of aspartame, thus potentially influencing future EU regulatory thresholds.
Stakeholders poised to be most affected include EU food manufacturers—who may face adapted labeling or formulation requirements; consumer advocacy groups, awaiting reassurances or calls for greater precaution; public health regulators, tasked with enforcement; and ultimately, consumers seeking clear safety information. While the review process promises thoroughness, it also maintains continuity by using existing frameworks, potentially easing compliance burdens but signaling careful regulatory scrutiny ahead.
Following this reply, attention will turn to EFSA’s plenary session and the publication of its updated opinion. The Commission’s formal answer within parliamentary timelines is a critical step shaping subsequent EU food additive policy developments.
← Atlas › News › Agri-food