Commissioner Michael McGrath, in a written answer on 1 July 2026, declined to provide information on alleged obstacles faced by the European Public Prosecutor's Office (EPPO) in its investigation of the OPEKEPE case in Greece, citing the EPPO's operational independence and the Commission's lack of access to ongoing criminal investigations. The answer, responding to a question from Renew MEP Sandro Gozi, reaffirms the Commission's support for the EPPO and reminds Member States of their duty of sincere cooperation under the EPPO Regulation and the Treaty on European Union.
The question, based on Greek press reports, detailed allegations that Greek authorities deliberately delayed the investigation by providing incorrect data and withholding intercepted communications involving political figures. McGrath's response, however, offered no confirmation or comment on these specific claims, instead emphasising that the EPPO does not consult the Commission on investigations and that the Commission cannot comment on active cases. The answer reiterates the legal obligation of national authorities to actively assist the EPPO under Article 5(6) of the EPPO Regulation, but stops short of addressing whether any breaches have occurred.
As an answer to a parliamentary question, the response contains no concrete proposals, numerical targets, or deadlines. It is a declarative statement of principle, reinforcing the EPPO's independence and the existing legal framework. The policy orientation is one of deference to the EPPO's autonomy and a general call for compliance, without signalling any Commission action or follow-up. No institutional follow-up is expected beyond the answer itself, as the Commission has effectively deferred to the EPPO and national authorities. The answer impacts stakeholders such as the EPPO (whose independence is affirmed), Greek authorities (reminded of their obligations), and EU taxpayers (whose financial interests the EPPO protects), but offers no new information or concrete steps.