A political maneuver is underway as European Commission Vice-President Maroš Šefčovič outlines steps aimed at terminating bilateral investment treaties (BITs) between EU Member States and Russia, spotlighting a fraught mix of international law, investment security, and geopolitics. This move critically affects EU governments with active BITs, Russian investors, affected businesses in Europe, and the Ukrainian reparations effort — each poised for a reaction ranging from support to concern over legal and economic fallout.
The statement is an official response to a parliamentary question posed by S&D Group MEP Raphaël Glucksmann, who pressed the Commission on actions concerning existing BITs with Russia and Belarus, particularly in light of ongoing controversies such as the blocking of Russian assets as collateral for Ukraine and infringement claims from civil society.
Šefčovič’s answer stops short of listing detailed policy blueprints like binding deadlines or precise financial commitments but confirms ongoing analysis of infringement complaints and a clear policy stance that current treaties contradict the EU’s investment policy under Article 207 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU. The Commission's position underscores a tilt toward maximizing legal and regulatory conformity with geopolitical realities rather than gradually phasing out the treaties.
Policymaking leans toward reinforcing EU control over investment protections, minimizing exposure to Russian breaches of international norms, and prioritizing support for Ukraine's reparations loan. This delineates a cleavage favoring increased EU intervention in foreign investment matters involving Russia, contrasting national sovereignties maintaining BITs.
Member States with BITs may encounter legal and diplomatic strains from treaty termination; Russian investors lose a layer of protection; the Ukrainian government potentially benefits from stronger reparations mechanisms; and EU institutions bolster regulatory oversight amid heightened geopolitical tension.
The Commission has promised continuing scrutiny and implies potential infringement procedures, signaling follow-up actions likely within upcoming months to manage the delicate balance of EU law, national treaty obligations, and geopolitical strategy.
← Atlas › News › Foreign affairs