The European Parliament's Committee on Budgetary Control aims to scrutinize and potentially grant discharge to the European Ombudsman for managing the EU budget in 2024. This report sets the stage for lively reactions from EU institutions responsible for budget execution, oversight bodies, the Ombudsman's office, and taxpayers interested in transparency and efficiency. Stakeholders from the Ombudsman's administration to national auditors will be watching closely.
This detailed draft report, published on 15 December 2025, is a motion by the European Parliament's Committee on Budgetary Control. It delivers the legal and factual foundations for Parliament's discharge decision concerning the European Ombudsman’s spending of the EU general budget under Section VIII for 2024.
The document functions as an orientative motion, not binding legislation. It contains concrete budget figures, performance metrics, and procedural recommendations but does not impose new mandatory rules. Key numerical details include a 4.77% budget increase to €13.84 million for the Ombudsman, a high 97.55% budget execution rate, and a notable 75% rise in energy costs, signaling shifting operational expenses.
Policy orientations signal an emphasis on enhanced governance, transparency, and digitalization. The report pushes for stricter ethics and recruitment transparency, strengthened oversight of budget execution, improved complaint handling times, and cost-efficient IT system access, notably regarding SUMMA. It prioritizes public access to documents balanced against efficient administration, addressing delays particularly with Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF) cases.
the Ombudsman's office faces budgetary pressures from rising energy costs and IT expenses, combined with demands for improved recruitment transparency. EU taxpayers and oversight bodies benefit from stronger controls and transparency assurances. However, these demands may increase administrative burdens and compliance costs for the Ombudsman. Increased public complaints due to outreach efforts may challenge complaint processing efficiency.
Institutionally, the report marks a continuation of Parliament's discharge oversight process, requesting further follow-ups on audit recommendations and procedural transparency. The European Commission and Parliament will likely respond regarding IT system access costs, and the Ombudsman must address governance concerns, especially recruitment transparency and ethics policies.
← Atlas › News › Budget & Administration