On 3 July 2026, the European Commission adopted two urgent decisions by written procedure, covering joint defence projects and a temporary data-processing derogation to combat online child sexual abuse. The measures were approved under the written procedure covering the period from 22 June to 5 July 2026.
The first decision, proposed by DG DEFIS, is a proposal for a Council Implementing Decision identifying European Defence Projects of Common Interest under Regulation (EU) 2025/2643 (ref. PE/2026/4829 - COM(2026) 358). This aims to advance collaborative defence capabilities among member states, building on the European Defence Fund framework.
The second decision, from DG HOME, is a communication to the European Parliament under Article 294(6) TFEU regarding the Council's position on a regulation that temporarily derogates from Directive 2002/58/EC. This would allow providers of number-independent interpersonal communications services to process personal and other data to combat online child sexual abuse (ref. PE/2026/4835 - COM(2026) 357). The measure is designed to enhance detection and reporting of child sexual abuse material while respecting privacy rules.
Non-legislative acts adopted as regulations, directives, or decisions without addressees are deemed signed by the President upon his signature on the next weekly summary note. Those needing immediate publication and entry into force are deemed signed by the Director of the Registry under delegated authority.
The two decisions reflect the Commission's dual focus on bolstering European defence cooperation and strengthening child protection online. The defence proposal will now proceed to the Council for adoption, while the child safety measure will be transmitted to the European Parliament as part of the ordinary legislative procedure.
Defence industry stands to benefit from clearer identification of joint projects, potentially unlocking EU funding. Tech companies providing communication services may face new compliance obligations under the temporary derogation, balancing privacy with child safety. Civil society groups focused on child protection may welcome the measure, while privacy advocates could raise concerns about data processing scope. National authorities will need to implement the derogation if adopted, affecting their oversight of digital communications.