EU energy strategy under scrutiny

MEP Afroditi Latinopoulou from the Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats (PfE) is stirring political waters by questioning the European Commission on its position regarding Greece’s energy sovereignty and the broader EU energy strategy in the Eastern Mediterranean. This region’s rich natural gas deposits are seen as pivotal for Europe’s energy independence, sparking intense debate involving energy producers, EU policy makers, and countries like Greece and Türkiye.

Questioning EU energy commitments

Latinopoulou directed a parliamentary question to the European Commission on August 12, 2025, highlighting Greece’s natural gas potential amidst regional geopolitical tensions and the EU’s green transition agenda. She asked how the Commission ensures Greek national interests aren’t sidelined, what measures counter Turkey's provocations, and why Mediterranean energy self-sufficiency is not being prioritized over northern dependence.

Concrete proposals mostly absent

The Commission’s reply, delivered by Mr. Jørgensen, stresses the balance between security of supply, affordability, and sustainability within EU energy policy. Citing Article 194.2 TFEU, it reaffirms Member States’ sovereign rights over exploiting energy resources under international law. It highlights support for regional cooperation frameworks like the Eastern Mediterranean Gas Forum and financial backing for infrastructure projects, including the Great Sea Interconnector with a substantial EUR 657 million grant. However, the response lacks detailed policy changes or new measurable targets.

Policy orientations and trade-offs

The Commission’s stance prioritizes respecting national sovereignty and environmental commitments while promoting regional cooperation. It implicitly endorses an integrated, but cautious approach balancing energy diversification with climate goals, and with a focus on international law adherence. This approach reflects a trade-off between strengthening regional energy infrastructure and maintaining diplomatic stability with neighboring countries such as Türkiye.

Stakeholder impacts

EU Member States with domestic energy resources, especially Greece and Cyprus, stand to gain from greater infrastructure funding and cooperation potential. Conversely, tensions with Türkiye could complicate exploitation efforts. EU taxpayers are contributing financially to infrastructure projects, while the European Commission must navigate the delicate balance between environmental commitments and geopolitical realities.

Next steps for the Commission

Under parliamentary rules, the Commission must formally respond to such questions, providing political signals regarding its policy direction. While the answer establishes current policy frameworks and ongoing project support, the sector awaits further concrete measures to reconcile green policies with regional energy resource exploitation.

← Atlas › News › Energy