The European Commission has clarified that the EU is not a member of the US-led Board of Peace, a body established to facilitate Gaza reconstruction and governance, and expressed doubts about its governance and alignment with the UN Charter. In a response to a parliamentary question from MEPs Ville Niinistö and Maria Ohisalo of the Verts/ALE group, Commissioner Dubravka Šuica confirmed that she attended a Board meeting as an observer, alongside representatives from half of EU member states and regional actors. The Commission also acknowledged routine consultations with the Tony Blair Institute but denied any direct funding or ongoing collaborative projects with the Institute.
This clarification follows the EU's broader cautious engagement with the Board of Peace, which was launched under the US 20-point plan endorsed by UN Security Council Resolution 2803 on January 15, 2026. The EU has consistently emphasized alignment with UN frameworks, as seen in Commissioner Šuica's February 11, 2026 statement condemning Israeli West Bank land procedures as counterproductive and incompatible with international law. The EU's observer role also comes amid ongoing diplomatic efforts, including the EEAS-hosted 9th Ministerial Meeting of the Global Alliance for the Implementation of the Two-State Solution on April 20, 2026, co-chaired by High Representative Kaja Kallas and Belgian Foreign Minister Maxime Prévot.
The Commission's response explicitly states that the EU's non-membership in the Board of Peace reflects concerns over its legitimacy and governance, reiterating the EU's preference for multilateral oversight under UN auspices. This stance aligns with prior EU positions, such as the EEAS condemnation of Israeli settlement expansion on April 10, 2026, and the demand for compensation for demolished EU-funded structures in the West Bank and East Jerusalem, reiterated on April 17, 2026. The EU has also consistently opposed Israeli actions in occupied territories, including the Knesset's death penalty bill on April 1, 2026, and the demolition of the UNRWA compound in East Jerusalem on January 20, 2026.
Policy-wise, the Commission's answer signals a measured approach—engaging selectively to influence Gaza peace outcomes while preserving EU sovereignty and avoiding formal institutional ties to the contested Board. This reflects a preference for coordination across international actors, as seen in the EU's support for the US Phase Two Gaza peace plan on January 15, 2026, and its readiness to deploy humanitarian, security, and diplomatic tools. The stakeholders impacted include EU member states opposed to the Board, who gain reassurance; the US, seeing some EU engagement; Palestinian civil society wary of legitimacy; and the Tony Blair Institute, facing clarified limits to its influence. The EU's refusal to fund or formally endorse the Institute or Board underscores restrained involvement, balancing influence with caution.
Institutionally, the response sets expectations for ongoing dialogue and monitoring, allowing the EU to remain flexible in a politically sensitive environment. This follows the EEAS announcement on April 17, 2026, of ministerial meetings on the two-state solution, and Chancellor Merz's April 13, 2026 call with Prime Minister Netanyahu urging no de facto annexation of the West Bank. The Commission's clarification marks the EU's careful navigation between diplomacy and principle, maintaining a critical yet engaged posture toward the Board of Peace.
← Atlas › News › Foreign affairs