A note from France, circulated for the Council (Environment) meeting on 25 June 2026, calls on EU environment ministers to reaffirm essential parameters for the International Treaty on Plastic Pollution. The request comes ahead of the Heads of Delegation meeting in Nairobi (30 June–3 July 2026) and the next formal negotiating session scheduled for March 2027. France warns that failing to cover upstream production and ban the most problematic plastic products and chemicals would result in a costly treaty for donor countries and citizens without ending plastic pollution.
The note highlights that plastic pollution is a growing disaster for human, animal, and environmental health, with only 15% of plastic waste currently recycled and production projected to triple by 2060. France argues that progress in recycling is structurally insufficient to offset rising volumes placed on the market, even in countries with advanced infrastructure. Ambitious action covering the full life cycle, including production, is indispensable to end plastic pollution, as per UNEA Resolution 5/14.
France points out that the two most recent INC sessions failed to reach consensus, and informal meetings in restricted formats gave disproportionate visibility to least ambitious states opposed to a full life-cycle approach. There is a risk of partial agreements only on consensual issues, leaving difficult topics unaddressed and undermining the overall balance. France urges ministers to clarify EU orientations and defend the outcome before citizens.
Stakeholder impact - EU member states: May face pressure to adopt ambitious positions that could affect domestic plastic production and waste management industries. A strong treaty could impose costs on producers but reduce long-term environmental liabilities. - Plastic producers and chemical industry: A treaty covering upstream production would directly impact business models, potentially requiring significant investment in alternative materials or production caps. This could increase costs but also create opportunities for innovation. - Waste management sector: A full life-cycle approach could reduce the volume of plastic waste needing management, potentially decreasing revenue from recycling but also lowering operational costs. - EU citizens and taxpayers: A weak treaty would leave them bearing the costs of plastic pollution and cleanup; a strong treaty could lead to higher prices for plastic goods but reduce environmental and health damages.
Institutional follow-up The Council is expected to discuss the French note on 25 June 2026. The outcome will inform the EU position at the Nairobi meeting and the March 2027 negotiating session. The European Parliament and Commission may also weigh in ahead of these events.