Green MEP Thomas Waitz has questioned the European Commission on plans for new fossil gas infrastructure in EU accession countries, specifically Kosovo, warning that such investments could undermine the bloc's climate goals. In a parliamentary question submitted on 15 July 2026, Waitz highlighted that Kosovo lacks a gas market, network, storage facilities, or identified demand, yet political discussions are promoting new gas projects. He asked how the Commission assesses such proposals in light of the Green Agenda, Energy Community obligations, and Kosovo's National Energy and Climate Plan (NECP).
The question, addressed to the Commission, seeks clarity on whether support from third countries and international partners for energy investments should align with nationally adopted strategies and local context to ensure coherence with EU-backed energy transition pathways. Waitz also asked how the Commission intends to foster evidence-based public debate in enlargement countries where fossil gas discussions are gaining political traction despite long-term decarbonisation commitments.
The MEP's intervention targets potential contradictions between EU climate policy and investment in fossil fuel infrastructure in candidate countries. It raises concerns about the impact on Kosovo's renewable energy deployment, energy efficiency, and greenhouse gas reduction targets. The Commission is expected to respond within six weeks, and its answer will signal the EU's stance on aligning enlargement policy with climate objectives.
Stakeholders affected include Kosovo's government and energy sector, EU institutions, international investors, and environmental groups. The question underscores a tension between short-term energy security considerations and long-term decarbonisation goals in the Western Balkans.