In a written answer on 18 June 2026, Commissioner for Health and Animal Welfare Olivér Várhelyi, on behalf of the European Commission, stated that the Commission is not aware of any cases of a new or emerging disease affecting dogs linked to cross-border transport or international events. The answer, responding to a priority question from MEP Christine Anderson (ESN), noted that no such disease has been reported by Member States' competent authorities, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), or the World Organisation for Animal Health. The Commission's response aims to reassure stakeholders that existing EU legislation provides a robust framework to detect and manage potential animal health threats, while avoiding unnecessary disruption to lawful activities such as animal movement and trade.
The question, submitted on 29 April 2026, raised concerns about unverified reports circulating among breeders and veterinary networks in several Member States regarding a possible emerging canine disease associated with cross-border transport and participation in international events. Anderson asked whether the Commission was aware of any verified cases, what surveillance mechanisms exist for companion animals, and how the Commission would ensure proportionate communication if a serious risk emerged.
In his answer, Várhelyi pointed to Regulation (EU) 2016/429 (the Animal Health Law), which establishes harmonised rules for preventing, controlling, and eradicating diseases, including new and emerging threats, through enhanced surveillance, early detection, reporting, biosecurity, and traceability. He emphasised that the framework is quickly adaptable and can involve actions from both Member States and the Commission, with scientific support from EFSA if needed. For coordination, the Commissioner cited existing structures such as the Standing Committee on Plants, Animals, Food and Feed as natural fora for evidence-based communication among Member States.
The answer contains no concrete proposals, numerical targets, or deadlines, but reaffirms the Commission's reliance on existing legal and coordination mechanisms. The policy orientation is one of reassurance and continuity, signalling that the Commission sees no need for new measures at this stage. Institutional follow-up is likely to involve continued monitoring through existing channels, with no immediate legislative or regulatory action anticipated.
Stakeholder impact: The answer provides clarity for dog breeders, exhibitors, and veterinary professionals who feared potential movement restrictions; it also reassures Member States' veterinary authorities that the current system is deemed sufficient. However, some may view the lack of proactive investigation or communication as a gap, given the unverified reports that prompted the question. The response maintains the status quo for cross-border animal movements, avoiding economic disruption for the pet transport and exhibition sectors.