The EU Council has published a note summarising the mid-term review of the Cohesion Policy for 2021-2027, assessing how the policy has adapted to new priorities such as competitiveness, defence, and the green transition while maintaining its core mission of economic, social, and territorial cohesion. The review, prepared for the Council meeting on 18 February 2026, draws lessons for future programming and highlights the widespread voluntary reprioritisation by Member States as evidence of the policy's flexibility.
Document Context and Scope
The note, released on 2 December 2026, is a Council document that provides an assessment of the Cohesion Policy's performance at mid-point. It references key legislative instruments including the European Social Fund Plus (ESF+) and new tools such as Important Projects of Common European Interest (IPCEI) and the STEP Seal of Excellence. The review focuses on how the policy has responded to emerging challenges and identifies areas for improvement in the next programming period.
Key Findings and Policy Orientations
The document finds that voluntary reprioritisation was widely adopted by Member States, demonstrating the policy's flexibility in responding to crises and new EU priorities. However, it emphasises that effective implementation requires strong administrative capacity and well-developed project pipelines. The review also notes that the integration of new priorities like defence and competitiveness has been uneven across regions, raising questions about how to balance these with the traditional cohesion goals.
Trade-offs and Impact on Stakeholders
The review highlights a trade-off between maintaining the original cohesion objectives and accommodating new EU-level priorities. For EU regulatory bodies, the flexibility demonstrated by Member States suggests that the current framework allows for adaptation, but the uneven integration of new priorities may require stronger guidance or incentives. National authorities of EU countries face the challenge of balancing local development needs with EU-wide strategic goals, and the emphasis on administrative capacity may strain less-resourced regions. EU producers, particularly in defence and green technology sectors, could benefit from increased funding and support through IPCEI and STEP, but the focus on competitiveness may divert resources from traditional cohesion projects. EU consumers may see long-term benefits from enhanced competitiveness and green transition, but short-term impacts on regional disparities could persist.
Expected Institutional Follow-up
The Council's note is expected to inform the European Commission's proposals for the post-2027 Cohesion Policy. The European Parliament will also play a key role in shaping the legislative framework, with debates likely to focus on the balance between flexibility and accountability, and the integration of new priorities without undermining cohesion objectives.
← Atlas › News › Regions & Rural areas