The European Parliament's ENVI committee debated Emma Wiesner (Renew)'s draft report on faster environmental assessments on 15 June 2026, revealing a split between those favouring horizontal acceleration and those backing strategic fast-tracks. Wiesner defended deleting Article 14 and Annex I, arguing that strategic sectors were undefined and would create a two-tier system. Susana Solis Perez (EPP) backed fast-tracks for strategic projects, while Jutta Paulus (Greens/EFA) warned that if everything became strategic, nothing would remain so. The European Commission representative, Felix Blocher, supported retaining strategic sectors.
On deadlines, Wiesner proposed project-specific timelines set by authorities at scoping, while the Commission warned against excessive flexibility. Solis Perez stressed that acceleration must reflect uneven administrative capacity. On simplification scope, Solis Perez wanted the regulation to become a horizontal anchor for permit simplification, while the Commission cautioned against overloading the file. Greens/EFA MEPs Paulus and Pär Holmgren pushed back on weakening environmental safeguards, including automatic exemptions for project changes and overriding public interest. Andrea Wechsler (EPP) argued for broader use of overriding public interest to accelerate energy infrastructure. Peter Liese (EPP) and Stine Bosse (Renew) stressed urgency for decarbonization and competitiveness.
Broad consensus existed that current procedures are too slow, but views split on design and safeguards. The committee adopted an opinion on accelerating permit-granting by 67-3-11. Amendment deadline: 23 June; ENVI vote: 1 October; plenary: 2 October. Affected stakeholders include project developers, grid operators, environmental NGOs, and national permitting authorities.