A Member of the European Parliament has submitted a written parliamentary question to the European Commission regarding the implementation of Article 25 of Regulation (EU) 2016/429, which mandates animal health visits. The MEP, whose name and political group are not specified in the available text, seeks clarity on how the Commission ensures Member States comply with this requirement, which aims to prevent and control animal diseases.

The question, dated 28 April 2026, focuses on the practical application of the regulation, which entered into force in April 2021. Article 25 requires competent authorities to carry out regular animal health visits to holdings, including those keeping aquatic animals, to monitor compliance with biosecurity measures and disease prevention protocols.

The MEP's inquiry appears to target potential gaps in enforcement, asking whether the Commission has assessed the frequency and quality of these visits across Member States. The question may also probe whether the Commission has identified any disparities in implementation that could undermine the single market for animals and animal products.

As a parliamentary question, the Commission is expected to respond within approximately six weeks. The answer will signal the Commission's view on the current state of implementation and whether further guidance or enforcement actions are planned. Stakeholders such as livestock farmers, veterinary authorities, and the broader agri-food sector will be watching closely, as inconsistent application of animal health rules can affect trade and disease control efforts.

Policy orientation The question reflects a concern for uniform enforcement of EU animal health law, which balances disease prevention with the free movement of animals. The MEP's approach suggests a preference for stronger Commission oversight, potentially leading to more detailed reporting requirements or infringement procedures against non-compliant Member States.

Expected follow-up The Commission's reply will clarify whether it considers the current implementation adequate or if additional measures are needed. This could influence future legislative proposals or administrative guidance on animal health visits.

← Atlas › News › Miscellaneous