EU education ministers on 11 May 2026 adopted a partial general approach on the Erasmus+ regulation for 2028-2034, with divergences emerging over budget allocation, governance, and simplification. The compromise text, presented by Cypriot Presidency Chair Athena Michaelidou, focuses on governance, the European Solidarity Corps, talent development, and values. Executive Vice-President Roxana Mînzatu urged simplification and flexibility, warning against multiple work programs and complex partial association provisions that could increase administrative burden.
Germany's Karin Prien (EPP) welcomed the compromise on scholarships (TEDOs) but questioned European added value. Belgium's Zuhal Demir stressed member state flexibility and vocational education. Austria's Christoph Wiederkehr (NEOS) supported including the European Solidarity Corps in Erasmus+. Sweden's Oscar Wåglund Söderström (EPP) praised member state influence and TEDOs. Poland's Barbara Nowacka (EPP) called for increased budget and geographical spread as a 'vaccination against populism'. Netherlands' Rianne Letschert highlighted continuity, inclusion, governance, and vocational training. Slovenia's Janja Zupančič (EPP) demanded stronger synergies with the European Competitiveness Fund. Portugal's Helena Canhão (PS) stressed inclusion for outermost regions. Latvia's Dace Melbārde (NA) backed member state governance and budget predictability. Italy's Giuseppe Valditara (Lega) welcomed vocational scholarships and clear budget allocations. Romania's Mihai Dimian (PSD) supported European university alliances. Finland's Anders Adlercreutz (EPP) emphasized mobility and vocational education. Greece's Sofia Zacharaki (EPP) highlighted inclusion and diversity. France's Cyrille Piquemal (LFI) insisted on union values, outermost regions, and sectoral budget distribution. Luxembourg's Fabien Raum (CSV) called for balanced financing across youth, sport, and culture.
The Council agreed to open trilogues once the Parliament adopts its position. No major clashes occurred; divergences centered on budget allocation, governance, and simplification. Affected stakeholders include students, teachers, youth workers, national agencies, and vocational training providers.