Commissioner Costas Kadis addressed the Agrifish Council on the need to revise the Western Mediterranean Multiannual Plan (MAP) to enhance its effectiveness. He announced the initiation of a reflection process and instructed immediate procedures to update the WestMed MAP, signaling a push towards policy refinement in fisheries management.
Scientific Advice as a Pillar of Policy Commissioner Kadis emphasized the importance of scientific advice as the foundation of decision-making within the Common Fisheries Policy. He highlighted the hake stock benchmark process, noting it should provide high-quality input for stock assessments by the Scientific, Technical and Economic Committee for Fisheries (STECF). This approach reflects a preference for evidence-based policies, maintaining science as a non-negotiable basis for regulatory actions.
Multiannual Decisions and Uncertainty Addressing calls for multiannual fishing opportunities, Kadis detailed the challenges posed by scientific uncertainties surrounding stock statuses, especially under current fishing effort regimes. He cautioned that multi-year fishing effort reductions could exacerbate uncertainties, potentially destabilizing stock management. This stance suggests a cautious approach, favoring adaptive, possibly shorter-term measures rather than extended commitments.
Policy Orientation and Political Clashes Kadis reiterated the Commission's non-support of the Council’s recent political agreement on fishing opportunities for 2026, which he considered inconsistent with WestMed MAP provisions. The Commission plans an in-depth analysis of the regulation, including its compensation mechanisms, to guide implementation by Member States.
Stakeholder Implications This speech signals increased regulatory caution for fishers and national authorities, who may face stringent scientific scrutiny but gain clearer ecological guidance. Environmental stakeholders might welcome the commitment to sustainability and science-based rebuild trajectories. EU producers in the fishing industry could encounter operational challenges due to potential tighter regulations, while consumers might benefit from improved long-term stock health. The Commission’s stance reveals tension between EU-level regulatory rigor and national-level political compromises, indicating an ongoing cleavage between centralized EU oversight and member states’ fishing interests.
← Atlas › News