MEP Sebastian Everding (The Left) has challenged the European Commission on the scientific basis and proportionality of the five-day deadline for non-commercial pet movements from listed non-EU countries, arguing that the rule effectively subjects private deferred transports to the full import regime. The written question, dated 3 June 2026, targets Regulation (EU) No 576/2013, which governs the non-commercial movement of pet animals. Everding asks whether the Commission can justify treating a properly vaccinated and documented pet differently under animal health legislation solely because the five-day window has been exceeded, given that animal health requirements remain unchanged. He also questions the proportionality of requiring private cases—such as those involving illness, flight cancellations, or force majeure—to use border control posts and the TRACES system after the deadline. The MEP further presses the Commission on whether it will proactively seek applications from countries for derogations under Article 13 of the regulation, and whether it will use its empowerment to propose an extended deadline—for instance, 30 days—for proven private movements with no transfer of ownership. The question signals concern that the current rules disproportionately burden pet owners facing unforeseen delays, while the underlying health risks remain identical. The Commission is expected to reply within approximately six weeks; its response will indicate whether it considers the deadline scientifically justified or open to revision.
Source📩 Open question ↗
Asked bySebastian Everding (The Left)