MEP Estelle Ceulemans (S&D) has submitted a written parliamentary question to the European Commission, urging it to assess and strengthen EU tools to shield the European steel sector from unfair global competition. The question, filed on 15 April 2026, targets the effectiveness of existing measures such as the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) and trade defence instruments, and calls for additional initiatives to ensure the long-term viability of competitive and sustainable steel production in Europe.
Ceulemans frames the steel market as heavily distorted by massive subsidies from non-EU countries and protectionist policies, notably those of the United States. She warns that the EU is particularly exposed to unfair competition, leading to plant closures, job losses, and increased import dependence. The question is a direct challenge to the Commission to demonstrate whether current safeguards are sufficient or need reinforcement.
The MEP's three-part query asks the Commission to evaluate the effectiveness of CBAM and trade defence measures, to state whether it intends to bolster these tools, and to propose additional initiatives for the sector's long-term viability. The question does not set specific numerical targets or deadlines, but its broad scope signals a demand for concrete policy action rather than vague commitments.
Policy orientation and expected follow-up Ceulemans' question reflects a protectionist-leaning stance, prioritising the preservation of domestic steel production and jobs over free trade principles. It implicitly advocates for stronger EU intervention in the market, potentially through tighter CBAM rules, expanded anti-dumping duties, or new subsidy controls. The Commission is required to respond within approximately six weeks; its answer will signal whether it shares the MEP's urgency or favours a more cautious approach balancing competitiveness with trade relations.
Stakeholders most impacted include EU steel producers, who would benefit from enhanced protection but may face higher compliance costs; EU downstream industries using steel, which could see higher input prices; non-EU steel exporters, who would face stricter market access; and EU consumers, who may bear costs from reduced competition.
← Atlas › News › International trade