Commissioner Costas Kadis addressed the Agrifish Council on January 26, 2026, highlighting urgent concerns regarding the Northeast Atlantic mackerel stock. Kadis expressed full agreement with Ireland's concerns over a recent 4-Party partial arrangement between the UK, Norway, Iceland, and the Faroe Islands set without EU consultation. This agreement proposes a total allowable catch exceeding scientific advice from ICES, threatening the sustainability of a stock already near collapse due to years of overfishing and unilateral share inflation by some coastal states.
The EU's Position and Negotiation Strategy Kadis emphasized that the EU is currently examining the arrangement's compliance with international law and the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement. Though many coastal states have yet to set their 2026 quotas, implementing the current high catch limits could endanger both fish stock sustainability and EU fisher livelihoods. The EU, as chair of coastal States consultations, called a meeting in London and is actively engaging all parties at technical, diplomatic, and political levels. Kadis stressed the importance of allowing space for negotiations but affirmed that "all options are on the table," signaling potential shifts in policy enforcement or diplomacy.
Emergency Measures and Policy Implications Regarding support for fishers affected by this crisis, Kadis clarified the limited applicability of the European Maritime, Fisheries and Aquaculture Fund (EMFAF) crisis mechanism—reserved for exceptional market disruptions akin to the COVID-19 pandemic. However, emergency conservation measures are possible, with compensation for temporary fishing cessation under certain conditions.
Political Significance and Stakeholder Impact Kadis’ speech underlines a cleavage between the EU’s drive to strengthen sustainability and biological stock protection versus coastal states’ apparent preference for higher quotas reflecting economic and national interests. EU fishers and coastal communities face major risks from overfishing, while the EU regulatory bodies are poised to enforce sustainability policies. Non-EU coastal states involved may encounter diplomatic pressure or legal challenges, potentially affecting fisheries governance.
The speech signals possible future increases in EU supervision and regulatory intervention in fisheries management, balancing environmental sustainability against economic interests within a complex international negotiating environment.
← Atlas › News