The European Union is setting its sights on a stable financial footing for the civil aircraft sector by proposing a permanent fix to the credit adjustment spread in export credit calculations. This move will significantly impact aircraft manufacturers, exporters, EU trade regulators, and national authorities, likely stirring debate on regulatory certainty and market competition in a sector sensitive to financial benchmarks.
The proposal takes center stage in a document published on February 3, 2026, by the Directorate-General for Trade. It outlines the EU’s official stance in the written procedure of the Sector Understanding on Export Credits for Civil Aircraft (ASU), group participants overseeing export credit norms.
This is a legislative proposal, specifically a Council Decision (COM(2026)67), aimed at making a temporary financial adjustment—a Credit Adjustment Spread (CAS) of -29 basis points—permanent in the calculation of the Market Reflective Surcharge (MRS). This surcharge influences the Minimum Premium Rates (MPR) on export credits, which are essential for financing aircraft exports. Concrete policy measures include embedding the fixed CAS into the ASU's framework and updating EU Regulation No 1233/2011 accordingly.
The decision reverses the inflationary impact on export credit premiums caused by the transition from LIBOR to SOFR—a shift that inflated Median Credit Spreads (MCS) used to calculate these premiums. The amendment prioritizes regulatory stability and market fairness at the potential cost of lowering financial returns on export credit premiums. It emphasizes EU integration at the expense of flexibility for market-based benchmarks, consolidating EU power in export credit governance.
For aircraft manufacturers and EU exporters, this promises increased predictability and potential cost relief in financing. However, financial institutions and insurers may face squeezed margins due to the capped surcharge. National trade authorities gain clarity on enforcement but might see reduced scope for discretionary adjustments. EU trade regulators solidify their role in overseeing these export credit standards, enhancing institutional strength yet accepting administrative burdens.
This proposal marks a continuation of ongoing negotiations within the ASU framework, with the Council Decision paving the way for an official, binding update to EU law. Next in line for action are the other ASU Participants, whose consensus is required, and the formal update of Regulation (EU) No 1233/2011 by the EU’s legislative bodies.
← Atlas › News