Two European Parliament members have asked the European Commission whether paintball marker guns, reportedly used by Iranian security forces to identify and injure protesters, should be classified as equipment for internal repression under EU sanctions law. The written question, submitted on 8 April 2026 by Danuše Nerudová (PPE) and Daniel Attard (S&D), cites open-source investigations showing that Iranian units linked to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and Basij forces have modified these recreational devices to fire harder projectiles. The MEPs also note that the models appear traceable to a small number of manufacturers, including companies in North America and Europe, and raise concerns about possible indirect supply chains involving intermediaries and distributors.
The question, addressed to the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative, contains three concrete asks. First, it seeks clarification on whether paintball marker guns fall under Council Regulation (EU) No 267/2012, which imposes restrictive measures on Iran, including a ban on exports of goods that could be used for internal repression. Second, it asks whether the Commission is aware of any direct or indirect exports of such equipment from EU-based companies to Iran since 2022. Third, it requests an assessment of whether such equipment should be explicitly listed under the EU regime on goods used for internal repression.
Policy orientation and ambition The question signals a push to tighten EU export controls on dual-use or ambiguous items that can be repurposed for repression. By focusing on traceability and explicit listing, the MEPs aim to close potential loopholes in the existing sanctions framework. The reference to specific manufacturers, including the French-Italian ammunition producer Cheddite, indicates a desire for targeted enforcement.
Expected follow-up The Commission is required to respond within approximately six weeks. Its answer will clarify whether it considers paintball marker guns as covered by existing rules, and whether it plans to update the relevant regulation. A positive response could lead to stricter export licensing or an explicit ban, impacting EU-based manufacturers and distributors of such equipment. Conversely, a narrow interpretation may leave the current regulatory gap open, prompting further parliamentary pressure.
← Atlas › News › Foreign affairs