Dialogue on Rule of Law and Corruption Reforms Commissioner Michael McGrath addressed the European Parliament on the ongoing dialogue between the European Commission and Slovakia concerning the country's adherence to EU rule of law standards. Highlighting Slovakia's realignment of its 2024 criminal law reform with EU financial interest protections as a positive outcome, McGrath also expressed concerns raised in the 2025 Rule of Law Report about the reform's potential weakening of mechanisms to combat high-level corruption. He drew attention to the closure of Slovakia's specialised anti-corruption bodies (NAKA and SPO), resulting in delays and fewer corruption investigations, noting the Commission's conclusion that no progress had been made on this front in the past year.
EU Funds Management and Civil Society Involvement McGrath confirmed that Slovakia has received 61% of its Recovery and Resilience Facility funds, encouraging timely completion of agreed reforms and investments. While implementation of Cohesion Funds is accelerating and deficiencies are being addressed, challenges persist with the "Partnership Principle," which ensures civil society's role in fund management. The Commissioner underscored the Commission's stance against weakening these guarantees at national and regional levels.
Agricultural Funds and Oversight Responding to recent media reports of irregularities in Common Agricultural Policy funds disbursement, McGrath outlined the Commission's ongoing audits, financial corrections totaling EUR 27.7 million, and cooperation with Slovak authorities. Investigations of potential fraud rest with independent bodies OLAF and EPPO. The Commission continues to monitor these issues closely.
Policy Orientation and Stakeholder Impact McGrath's speech signals a strong stance on reinforcing the rule of law in Slovakia, particularly focusing on independent anti-corruption investigations and civil society involvement in EU funds management. The policy evolution reflects a tension between national sovereignty and increasing EU oversight, with potential institutional strengthening of supervisory bodies. For Slovak authorities, this means meeting tighter EU conditionally rules and demonstrating compliance, which could increase administrative burdens but also potentially improve governance. EU taxpayers and civil society actors appear likely to benefit from stricter controls and transparency, while Slovak political actors face challenges in accommodating EU legal frameworks and maintaining internal reform momentum. Overall, the Commissioner’s outlined approach exemplifies a cautious but firm push towards strengthening EU regulatory supervision in line with rule of law priorities, without prescribing new institutional structures or budgetary increases, leaving room for negotiation and monitoring.
← Atlas › News › Justice & Citizenship