On 12 May 2026, the European Parliament published amendments to the draft report on the implementation of the Maritime Spatial Planning (MSP) Directive, proposed exclusively by the Patriots for Europe (PfE) group. The amendments sharply criticise the current balance in maritime spatial planning, arguing that the regulatory and economic framework systematically disadvantages fisheries and aquaculture in favour of state-backed offshore energy projects, particularly wind farms. The changes would directly impact EU fisheries, aquaculture operators, offshore renewable energy developers, and national authorities responsible for maritime planning.
The two amendments target the Parliament's own-initiative report (A10-0120/2026) by rapporteur Stéphanie Yon-Courtin. Amendment 1 inserts a new recital citing a 22% decrease in return on investment for aquaculture between 2017 and 2022, attributing the decline to a 'considerable administrative burden' from EU regulation. Amendment 2 modifies paragraph 31 to specify that 'more powerful' sectors in maritime spatial planning are 'state-backed', singles out 'wind farms' as the primary problematic offshore energy, and adds a clause stating that the 'vast majority of offshore energy infrastructure has significant disadvantages and does not compensate for the damage caused to fisheries and food sovereignty.'
Policy orientations and trade-offs The amendments reframe the relationship between fisheries and offshore renewable energy as a zero-sum conflict, rather than a co-existence challenge. They portray offshore wind as a state-subsidised imposition that harms food production without adequate compensation. This position diverges from the likely centrist consensus (EPP, Renew, S&D) that generally supports the EU's Green Deal and offshore renewable energy expansion as a public good. The trade-off is between accelerating renewable energy deployment to meet climate targets and protecting the economic viability of traditional maritime sectors. The amendments would, if adopted, signal stronger parliamentary scepticism toward the energy transition's impact on fisheries, potentially slowing permitting for offshore wind projects or increasing compensation requirements.
Impact on stakeholders EU fisheries and aquaculture operators would benefit from stronger recognition of their economic struggles and potential for greater compensation or reduced administrative burdens. Offshore renewable energy developers, particularly wind farm operators, would face increased regulatory risk, potential delays, and higher costs if compensation obligations are expanded. EU regulatory bodies and national authorities would need to rebalance maritime spatial planning processes, potentially prioritising food sovereignty over energy goals. EU consumers could face higher energy costs if offshore wind expansion slows, but also potentially benefit from more resilient domestic food production.
Expected institutional follow-up The amendments will be considered by the European Parliament's Committee on Fisheries (PECH) before a plenary vote on the final report. The Council and Commission will take note of the Parliament's position, though the report is non-legislative. The outcome may influence future revisions of the MSP Directive and national maritime spatial plans, particularly regarding the treatment of fisheries in offshore energy zones.
← Atlas › News › Environment