Score 0–20 Statement openly promotes maximising subsidies for farmers. OR, statement uses emotional language or criticism to enhance the sense of urgency or threat to sway views towards increased farmer subsidies.
Score 21–40 Proposal subtly, discretely or indirectly favours maximising subsidies for farmers and does not use emotional language.
Score 41–60 Statements that are roughly neutral, whose bias on either side is roughly insignificant.
Score 61-80 Proposal subtly, discretely or indirectly favours cutting subsidies to farmers and does not use emotional language.
Score 81-100 Proposal openly promotes cutting subsidies to farmers. OR, proposal uses emotional language or criticism to enhance the sense of urgency or threat to sway views towards reducing farmer subsidies.