EU Policy Topic · ATLAS

EU restrictions on unfair commercial practices

Score 0–20 Statement openly promotes stricter requirements on unfair commercial practices within the EU. OR, statement uses emotional language or criticism to enhance the sense of urgency or threat about unfair practices, swaying views towards tighter control.
Score 21–40 Proposal subtly, discretely, or indirectly favours stricter requirements and does not use emotional language.
Score 41–60 Statements that are roughly neutral, whose bias on either stricter or softer requirements is roughly insignificant.
Score 61–80 Proposal subtly, discretely or indirectly favours softer requirements and does not use emotional language.
Score 81–100 Proposal openly promotes softer restrictions on unfair commercial practices within the EU. OR, proposal uses emotional language or criticism to enhance the sense of urgency or threat about over-regulation, swaying views towards leniency.

How positions are measured

One poleWe must impose stringent, binding EU-wide regulations to eliminate unfair commercial practices, with heavy penalties for offenders and mandatory compliance audits. No company should be allowed to exploit consumers or suppliers for profit, and those who do should face immediate suspension of their operations across the Single Market.

Other poleUnfair commercial practices should be left to market forces and consumer choice to address, not heavy-handed EU intervention. We need to eliminate restrictive regulations, allowing businesses to innovate freely and letting competition naturally drive out unethical behavior without stifling growth and entrepreneurship.

Legislative files on this topic (3)

See where policymakers stand on this topic →