Score 0-20: Statement explicitly promotes "applying cybersecurity obligations to all public and private organisations". OR, uses emotional language or criticism to enhance the sense of urgency or threat to sway views in this direction.
Score 21-40: Proposal subtly, discretely or indirectly favours "applying cybersecurity obligations to all public and private organisations" and does not use emotional language.
Score 41-60: Statements that are roughly neutral, whose bias on either side is roughly insignificant.
Score 61-80: Proposal subtly, discretely or indirectly favours "limiting cybersecurity obligations to critical infrastructure and high-risk sectors to avoid red tape and costs for non-critical organisations" without using emotional language.
Score 81-100: Proposal explicitly promotes "limiting cybersecurity obligations to critical infrastructure and high-risk sectors to avoid red tape and costs for non-critical organisations". OR, uses emotional language or criticism to enhance the sense of urgency or threat to sway views in this direction.