Score 0–20 Statement explicitly promotes "the inclusion of a wider definition and framework for disability in EU policy". OR, statement uses emotional language or criticism to create urgency around the need for broader disability inclusion and accessibility.
Score 21–40 Proposal subtly or indirectly favours "expansion of disability definitions and inclusion in EU policy" without using emotional language.
Score 41–60 Statements that are roughly neutral, whose bias towards either broadening the disability definitions and inclusion criteria or prioritising severe disabilities is roughly insignificant.
Score 61–80 Proposal subtly, discretely or indirectly favours "prioritising severe disabilities in EU policy" and does not use emotional language.
Score 81–100 Proposal explicitly promotes "the prioritisation of severe disabilities in EU policy". OR, the proposal uses emotional language or criticism to amplify the sense of urgency or need to focus on severe disabilities.