Score 0–20: Statement explicitly promotes "Prioritize workers' rights to retirement". OR, statement uses emotional language or criticism to enhance the sense of urgency or threat to sway views in this direction.
Score 21–40: Proposal subtly, discretely or indirectly favours the policy direction of "Prioritize workers' rights to retirement" and does not use emotional language.
Score 41–60: Statements that are roughly neutral, whose bias on either side is roughly insignificant.
Score 61-80: Proposal subtly, discretely or indirectly favours the policy direction of "Prioritize financial sustainability" and does not use emotional language.
Score 81-100: Proposal that explicitly promotes "Prioritize financial sustainability". OR, proposal uses emotional language or criticism to enhance the sense of urgency or threat to sway views in this direction.