v1-final. 0-20 Explicitly opposes or rolls back digitalization of a governance function: deletes/blocks a mandate to use electronic systems, demands non-digital/in-person remain the DEFAULT channel, or bars mandatory full-automation of routine administration outright. Binding, unconditional. | 21-40 Conditionally favours restraint: accepts digitalization in principle but attaches binding safeguards/carve-outs (mandatory non-digital fallback for elderly/disabled/digitally-excluded, opt-outs), asserts national/local discretion over pace, or slows/defers a specific rollout on cost/reliability/inclusion grounds. No emotional language. | 41-60 Genuinely balanced: explicitly weighs aggressive rollout AND safeguards and advocates no measure tipping either way. RARE (<5%). NOT for rows that merely name 'digital/AI' without a position (WRONG_TOPIC); NOT for deferral (leans by the direction of what is deferred). | 61-80 Subtly/indirectly favours aggressive digitalization: endorses online-by-default, AI decision-support, automation of routine tasks, or interoperable digital public services as efficiency gains, without binding safeguard conditions. No emotional language. | 81-100 Explicitly/forcefully promotes comprehensive digitalization: mandatory online-by-default, AI/automated case-handling, 'digital-first/once-only', binding targets or absolute/urgency language.