Score 0–20 Statement explicitly promotes "maintaining traditional methods of public governance & administration." OR, statement uses emotional language or criticism to enhance the sense of urgency or threat to sway views towards preserving traditional methods.
Score 21–40 Proposal subtly, discreetly or indirectly favors "maintaining traditional methods of public governance & administration" and does not use emotional language.
Score 41–60 Statements that are roughly neutral, whose bias on either side is roughly insignificant.
Score 61-80 Proposal subtly, discreetly or indirectly favors "replacing traditional methods of public governance with AI & digital tools" and does not use emotional language.
Score 81-100 Proposal explicitly promotes "replacing traditional methods of public governance with AI & digital tools". OR, proposal uses emotional language or criticism to enhance the sense of urgency or threat to sway views towards digitization.