Score 0-20: Statement openly defends CSDDD as adopted (or calls to strengthen it) and attacks Omnibus weakening as deregulation: defends civil liability with broad standing, defends full value-chain coverage including tier-2+, opposes scope-threshold increases, denounces simplification as 'pure deregulation' / 'chainsaw' / 'impunity'. Often emotional language naming named harms (child labour in mining, forced labour in Xinjiang, fruit pickers in Morocco, fossil fuel industry backing). Anchors: 13823 Aubry, 5355 Matthieu, 16895 Chaibi, 26962 Ceulemans, 4216 Lange, 5314 Wolters, 5290 Bischoff, 8156 Repasi (corrected). Score 21-40: Substantively defends CSDDD core (scope, value-chain, liability) but allows technical/administrative simplification; or focuses on a single sub-aspect (e.g., reporting harmonisation, mirror clauses, double materiality narrative-data, traceability) without challenging the regime. Includes substantive MEP questions to Commission pushing for stricter enforcement. Anchors: 19436 Repasi (corrected, S&D shadow), 13928 Wolters (corrected, rapporteur scope concerns), 11138 Lange (corrected, scope-reduction-vs-objectives question), 18719 Andrews (CSDDD journalism + responsible disengagement). Score 41-60: Genuine balance — speaker explicitly engages BOTH poles (defends some elements + names some concessions), advocates no specific tilting measure, and is not deferring. RARE: should be <= 5% of surviving rows on a real polarising trade-off. Anti-example: 'we support the framework but call for SME caps / tech-neutrality / civil-liability removal' — score on substance (61-80), not on framing. Stewardship-of-Omnibus rapporteur summaries (rapporteur listing diverging amendments) sit at 60. Anchors: 19433 Warborn (rapporteur stewardship summary), 8165 Canfin (SME-shield calibration). Score 61-80: Substantively supports Omnibus simplification — SME shields, narrow tier-1 cap, raise scope thresholds, scale back civil liability, harmonisation framed as simplification — but stops short of full repeal. Anchors: 8163 Canfin (tier-1 simplification, 'let's not be ideological'), 8164 Canfin (corrected, civil-liability harmonisation = simplification), 11129 Hahn ('we're not achieving competitiveness by overregulation'), 11135 Warborn (corrected, rapporteur harmonisation+timetable question), 11123 Aaltola (Omnibus 'critical and strategic'), 5384 Ferber (corrected, 'CSDDD not serviceable, more ambition needed'), 5390 Ruissen (exempt SMEs, Omnibus 'correction we were looking for'), 19780 Donazzan (simplification = reviewing CSDDD because it sends companies out of Europe). Score 81-100: Calls for full repeal of CSDDD/CSRD or wholesale gutting; framed as 'true simplification = deregulation'. Anchors: 13815 Pimpie ('repeal both CSRD and CSDDD'), 8158 Piera ('delete reporting requirements and due diligence requirements'), 13817 Crosetto ('completely get rid of due diligence obligations'), 8174 Niebler (hard-simplification questions framed around bureaucracy + legal certainty + competitiveness).