Score 0–20 Statement explicitly promotes "Strengthening EU coordination on criminal matters". OR, statement uses emotional language or criticism to enhance the sense of urgency or threat to sway views towards deeper EU integration.
Score 21–40 Proposal subtly, discreetly or indirectly favours the policy direction towards "Strengthening EU coordination on criminal matters", avoiding emotional language.
Score 41–60 Statements that are roughly neutral, with a bias on either side being roughly insignificant.
Score 61-80 Proposal subtly, discreetly or indirectly favours the policy direction towards "Preserving national judicial autonomy", without using emotional language.
Score 81-100 Statement explicitly promotes "Preserving national judicial autonomy". OR, statement uses emotional language or criticism to enhance urgency or threat to incline views towards preserving national sovereignty.