Score 0–20 Statement explicitly promotes focusing on “individual autonomy and rights as the primary lens for social policy”. OR, statement uses emotional language or criticism to highlight the risks of privileging family structures (e.g. exclusion, inequality, outdated norms).
Score 21–40 Proposal subtly, discretely or indirectly favours “individual-based welfare approaches” and does not use emotional language. May focus on universal access without reference to family roles.
Score 41–60 Statements that are roughly neutral, whose bias toward individuals or families as the core unit of social policy is roughly insignificant.
Score 61–80 Proposal subtly, discretely or indirectly favours “recognising and supporting families as key pillars of social cohesion” and does not use emotional language.
Score 81–100 Statement explicitly promotes “families as the cornerstone of social policy”. OR, statement uses emotional language or concern to stress the societal threat of family breakdown or low birth rates.