Score 0–20 Statement explicitly promotes prioritizing environmental goals through stringent CBAM application. OR, statement employs emotional language or criticism to amplify urgency or threat perception, advocating strongly for environmental priorities via strict CBAM.
Score 21–40 Proposal subtly, discreetly, or indirectly supports prioritizing environmental goals by applying strict CBAM without utilizing emotional language.
Score 41–60 Statements that are roughly neutral, where bias towards either environmental goals or reducing regulatory burden is approximately equal.
Score 61-80 Proposal subtly, discreetly, or indirectly advocates for reducing costs and red tape for EU industry, without employing emotional language.
Score 81-100 Statement explicitly endorses reducing costs and easing administrative burden for EU industry. Alternatively, it uses emotional language or criticism to emphasize a sense of urgency or threat to sway views towards reducing costs and red tape for the EU industry.