Commissioner Dan Jørgensen has signalled that the European Commission will take a pragmatic approach to enforcing new sustainable mobility infrastructure obligations under the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD), offering flexibility for member states facing economic or practical constraints. In a written answer to a parliamentary question, Jørgensen indicated that the Commission will assess compliance with Article 14 on a case-by-case basis, taking into account technological progress such as fast charging and specific circumstances like buildings with high turnover.
The answer responds to a question from MEPs Julie Rechagneux (PfE) and seven co-signatories, who argued that the directive's quantitative requirements for electric vehicle chargers and bicycle parking do not sufficiently reflect actual building use. They asked whether the Commission would propose targeted amendments to allow member states to adapt requirements where justified.
Jørgensen declined to propose immediate changes, noting that the transposition deadline is 29 May 2026 and the Commission's priority is supporting member states through guidance, dialogues, and technical assistance. However, he confirmed that the Commission will evaluate and review the EPBD by end of 2028, with preparations starting in 2027, and will consider possible simplification in that framework.
Policy orientation and expected follow-up The answer reveals a policy orientation that balances ambition with pragmatism. While reaffirming the goal of delivering effective recharging infrastructure, Jørgensen emphasises proportionality and cost-effectiveness. The Commission will monitor transposition and may take enforcement action, but the case-by-case assessment suggests a willingness to accommodate national circumstances.
Expected institutional follow-up includes continued guidance before the May 2026 deadline, a review exercise beginning in 2027, and potential legislative simplification by 2028. The answer does not commit to specific amendments but leaves the door open for adjustments based on implementation experience.
Impact on stakeholders - EU regulatory bodies: The Commission retains discretion in enforcement, avoiding rigid quantitative benchmarks. - National authorities of EU countries: Gain flexibility to adapt requirements to local conditions, reducing administrative burden. - EU construction and real estate sector: Benefits from potential cost savings if charging power rather than number of points is prioritised, but faces uncertainty until review. - EU consumers and building users: May see more practical infrastructure (e.g., fast charging for short stays) but risk slower rollout if flexibility delays investment.
← Atlas › News › Transport & Infrastructure