The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has published the results of its Common Supervisory Action (CSA) on sustainability-related aspects under MiFID II, identifying significant shortcomings in how firms integrate sustainability preferences and risks into their advisory and portfolio management processes. The findings, released on 6 May 2026, impact investment firms, asset managers, and distributors across the EU, highlighting the need for improved compliance and investor protection.
The CSA, conducted in 2025, involved 30 national competent authorities (NCAs) and covered over 200 firms. ESMA found that while most firms have adopted sustainability-related policies, implementation remains inconsistent. Key issues include inadequate assessment of clients' sustainability preferences, insufficient product governance, and a lack of clear documentation on how sustainability factors are considered in investment decisions. ESMA emphasized that these shortcomings could lead to mis-selling and undermine investor trust.
Document type and scope The document is a statement summarizing the CSA results, not a binding regulation. It serves as a supervisory briefing for NCAs and firms, outlining common weaknesses and best practices. ESMA calls for enhanced supervisory convergence and expects NCAs to take follow-up actions, including potential enforcement measures, to address the identified gaps.
Policy orientations and trade-offs The CSA reflects ESMA's push for stronger integration of sustainability into financial markets, balancing investor protection with market efficiency. The findings underscore a trade-off between regulatory ambition and operational readiness: while firms have made progress in adopting sustainability frameworks, the practical application lags. ESMA's recommendations aim to tighten supervision without imposing new legislative burdens, relying on existing MiFID II rules. This approach may increase compliance costs for firms but aims to reduce greenwashing risks and enhance transparency for investors.
Impact on stakeholders - Investment firms and asset managers: Face pressure to upgrade systems and training to meet sustainability requirements, potentially increasing operational costs. Non-compliance could lead to sanctions. - Investors: Benefit from improved alignment of products with their sustainability preferences, but may experience reduced product choice if firms streamline offerings to manage compliance. - National competent authorities: Required to intensify supervision and coordinate with ESMA, straining resources but fostering harmonized enforcement. - EU regulatory bodies: ESMA strengthens its role in supervisory convergence, but success depends on NCAs' willingness to act on findings.
Expected institutional follow-up ESMA will monitor NCAs' follow-up actions and may issue further guidance or update its Q&As on MiFID II sustainability aspects. The results will feed into the European Commission's review of the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) and broader sustainable finance framework. ESMA also plans to conduct a follow-up CSA in 2027 to assess progress.
← Atlas › News › Industry, Innovation and Internal Market