Setting the Stage for Institutional Dialogue In his opening remarks to the European Parliament’s Committee on Constitutional Affairs, Commissioner Maroš Šefčovič emphasized the importance of strengthening cooperation between the European Commission and Parliament, presenting this as a priority for the von der Leyen Commission. Šefčovič highlighted the success in responding positively to all 24 Parliament resolutions under Article 225, illustrating a concrete effort to address parliamentary concerns and foster legislative shaping roles.
Concrete Steps and Challenges in Framework Agreement Revision The Commissioner informed that discussions to revise the Framework Agreement governing relations between the Commission and Parliament are well underway, mentioning nine technical and three political meetings. Though progress has been made, the process faces delays due to the volume of amendments. Šefčovič signaled that reforms may require adjustments to internal working methods and procedural rules, aiming to balance institutional prerogatives as outlined in the Treaties. His mandate is to respect existing agreements without presuming future revisions.
Advancing Parliament's Right of Inquiry and Ethics Standards Šefčovič outlined readiness to "Lisbonise" Parliament’s right of inquiry, a procedural reform to align it closer with Treaty principles, and welcomed ongoing informal talks. He stressed that any formal interinstitutional negotiations require a clear, Parliamentally endorsed mandate. On ethics, the Commissioner reaffirmed the Commission’s commitment to establish a joint Ethics Body alongside other EU Institutions, noting the rejection of a related Committee report and seeking clarity on next parliamentary steps.
Political Significance and Stakeholder Impacts This speech signals a potential shift toward deeper institutional integration by revising interinstitutional cooperation frameworks, which would increase Commission transparency and parliamentary involvement, enhancing democratic oversight. National authorities may experience smoother legislative processes, while EU producers and civil society groups could benefit from clearer, more effective governance. However, administrative burdens might rise due to procedural reforms and expanded parliamentary engagement, potentially slowing decision-making in the short term. The debates around Parliament’s right of inquiry represent a tension between enhancing parliamentary oversight versus preserving Commission and Council prerogatives, impacting interinstitutional power balances.
Overall, Šefčovič's remarks outline concrete commitments with measurable deliverables like completing the Framework Agreement revision and operationalizing the Ethics Body, advancing EU institutional cooperation while navigating the delicate balance of powers essential for EU governance.
← Atlas › News › EU affairs & Institutions