A single amendment submitted by the European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR) group to a European Parliament resolution on reducing work-related fatalities proposes to narrow the definition of workers at risk of attack from "public service workers" to "public authority officials performing law enforcement duties." The amendment, published on 19 May 2026, targets Recital F of the resolution, which addresses attacks against workers. If adopted, the change would exclude many public service workers such as teachers, social workers, and administrative staff from the specific mention in that recital, focusing instead on law enforcement personnel whose duties involve the exercise of state authority and the legitimate use of force.
The amendment is the only one submitted to the resolution, indicating broad consensus among other political groups—including the European People's Party (EPP), Socialists and Democrats (S&D), Renew Europe, Greens/EFA, and The Left—on the original text. The ECR's intervention signals a divergence on the scope of protection and the framing of occupational risk. The group appears to prioritize a targeted, security-focused approach, emphasizing the unique dangers inherent in law enforcement roles. Other groups likely prefer the broader "public service workers" language, which aligns with a more inclusive view of workplace risks or avoids singling out law enforcement.
Policy orientations and trade-offs The amendment is substantive rather than stylistic. It redefines the primary subject of the recital from a broad occupational category to a specific functional role. This narrowing of scope has implications for how the EU defines high-risk professions in future occupational safety and health (OSH) initiatives or funding programs. The new phrasing explicitly ties the risk of attack to the exercise of "public authority" and "legitimate use of force," framing the issue as a challenge to state authority rather than a general workplace safety problem. While a single recital change does not alter operative paragraphs, it signals the ECR's preferred framing for subsequent legislative or non-legislative actions.
Impact on stakeholders - Law enforcement personnel: Positive impact, as the amendment explicitly recognizes their distinct risk profile and may lead to targeted protections or resources. - Other public service workers (e.g., teachers, social workers): Negative impact, as they are excluded from the specific mention in the recital, potentially reducing visibility of their risks in future policy discussions. - EU regulatory bodies: Moderate impact, as the amendment could influence how the European Commission defines high-risk professions in OSH directives or funding criteria. - National authorities: Minor impact, as the recital change does not impose binding obligations but may affect national framing of workplace safety for public employees.
Expected institutional follow-up The amendment will be debated and voted on in the European Parliament plenary session. If adopted, the amended resolution will be forwarded to the European Commission and the Council for consideration. The Commission may take the resolution into account when reviewing OSH legislation or proposing new initiatives on work-related fatalities. No trilogue is required as this is a non-legislative resolution.
← Atlas › News › Employment & Social policy