The Threat to Critical Infrastructure Commissioner Henna Virkkunen addressed the European Parliament on the need to tackle sabotage inflicted on critical undersea infrastructure in the Baltic Sea, allegedly by Russian 'shadow fleet' actors. Highlighting recent incidents, including damage to power and data cables between Finland and Estonia, Virkkunen framed these attacks within the broader context of geopolitical tensions and hybrid warfare against the European Union.
Concrete Proposals for Coordination, Governance, and Funding Virkkunen outlined three pillars of EU response: improving coordination, enhancing governance, and increasing funding. On coordination, she emphasized the existing legal framework provided by the CER Directive and NIS 2 Directive, which impose physical security and cybersecurity requirements on critical infrastructure providers, including undersea cables. A call was issued for rapid transposition of these directives across Member States. Further, the Cyber Solidarity Act introduces digital preparedness testing and an EU Cybersecurity Reserve to respond to major cyber incidents.
Governance gaps remain, particularly regarding the management of cable technologies and rapid repair capabilities. The Commission is working with NATO—a key partner for deterrence—to develop coordinated actions such as patrols and surveillance in the Baltic Sea.
Funding-wise, €35.6 million is currently invested in 8 submarine cable projects in the Baltic via the Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) Digital programme, with an additional €540 million earmarked for 2024-2027 connectivity infrastructure. Investment in smart cable systems is aimed at early threat warning, alongside plans to develop a responsive repair fleet.
Stakeholder Impacts and Policy Direction The proposals place greater responsibilities on EU producers and providers of digital infrastructure to enhance physical and cyber resilience, potentially increasing compliance costs and operational demands. National authorities face pressure to accelerate directive transposition and enhance coordination with military and EU bodies. EU consumers and businesses stand to benefit from strengthened security of data, energy, and communication channels, although short-term disruptions and investment reallocations may occur.
Virkkunen’s speech leans towards strengthening EU powers in critical infrastructure protection, advancing integration between civil and military sectors, and emphasizing preventive governance over reactive measures. The approach blends diplomatic firm stance—via sanctions including the blacklisting of Russian vessels—with pragmatic institutional enhancements. This policy trajectory underscores a shift towards comprehensive EU-wide resilience and accountability mechanisms against hybrid threats.
Overall, the speech charts a multifaceted response strategy poised to recalibrate the EU’s safeguarding of strategic undersea networks against sabotage risks while balancing the demands of security, governance efficiency, and financial investment.
← Atlas › News › Digital & Communication