Tomas TOBÉ

Policy topics Tomas TOBÉ is active on

What Tomas TOBÉ has said (45)

• 2025-09-12 “E-003530/2025 Answer given by Mr Jørgensen on behalf of the European Commission When the market and grids are more closely aligned, it supports security of supply and the better integration of renewables. Thus, locational signals through bidding zones can play a key role in keeping overall system costs down. A report reviewing the Bidding Zone configuration 1 was published in April 2025. The recent European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) opinion 2 estimates that the benefits of a reconfiguration could be 70% higher than the Transmission System Operators’ assessment in the April report. Well-planned, deeper market integration will bring significant benefits to European consumers. The International Monetary Fund has estimated that savings from the shift to renewables and further electricity market integration could amount to EUR 40 billion annually by 2030 3 . However, price spikes in some Member States, e.g. in southeast Europe in 2024, indicate a need to fully consider all aspects of deeper market integration to protect consumers. As announced in the Affordable Energy Action Plan, the Commission launched the Energy Union Task Force to enhance coordination 4 to achieve a genuine Energy Union. The Commission will also publish a White Paper on deeper market integration. Price convergence demonstrates a low level of congestion in the electricity grid, which is positive for market integration. However, as more renewables are deployed, new congestions may appear depending on the weather conditions and energy mix in Member States. In these hours, price differences ensure that electricity flows to where it is needed and act as a useful tool for the market to support security of supply. 1 European Network of Transmission System Operators for Electricity, ‘Bidding Zone Review of the 2025 Target Year’, April 2025, https://eepublicdownloads.blob.core.windows.net/public-cdn-container/cleandocuments/Network%20codes%20documents/NC%20CACM/BZR/2025/Bidding_Zone_Review_of_the_2025_ Target_Year.pdf. 2 https://acer.europa.eu/news/electricity-system-operators-bidding-zone-study-significantly-underestimatesbenefits-reshaping-europes-bidding-zones. 3 https://www.imf.org/en/News/Articles/2025/01/13/sp-integrating-the-eu-energy-market-to-foster-growth-andresilience. 4 The Task Force aims to address structural challenges, monitor efforts to implement the Affordable Energy Action Plan and, when necessary, allow for rapid political coordination: https://energy.ec.europa.eu/strategy/energy-union/energy-union-task-force_en.”
  EU approach to electricity market and prices · EU energy infrastructure integration
• 2025-07-01 “E-002666/2025 Answer given by Mr Tzitzikostas on behalf of the European Commission As announced in the Industrial Action Plan for the European automotive sector 1 and in the Communication ‘Decarbonising corporate fleets’ 2 , the Commission is preparing a legislative proposal to increase the share of zero-emission vehicles in corporate fleets, to be adopted by the end of 2025. The administrative burden and possible impacts on the small and mediumsized enterprises (SMEs) are being addressed as part of the impact assessment in preparation of the proposal, with the aim of avoiding the creation of unnecessary burden for SMEs. As noted in the Communication, several key measures to facilitate the transition to zeroemission vehicles in corporate fleets – including with regards to SMEs – can also be taken at local, regional and national level, including through targeted financial incentives as well as improved enabling conditions. 1 COM (2025) 95 final. 2 COM (2025) 96 final.”
  Corporate fleet electrification: binding zero-emission quotas vs. voluntary approach · Overall simplification of regulation in the EU
• 2025-05-14 “E-001926/2025 Answer given by Mr Brunner on behalf of the European Commission In its letter of 28 February 2023, the Commission informed the European Parliament on the Member States’ implementation of the Recommendation 1 on investor citizenship schemes and investor residence schemes in the context of the Russian invasion of Ukraine. In this letter, the Commission reported on the information submitted by several Member States 2 concerning their mandatory checks in the framework of the review of residence permit applications under their national investor residence scheme. Furthermore, the Commission organised a meeting on investor residence schemes with the Group of Member States Experts on Citizenship and Residence Schemes on 1 March 2023 3 . During this meeting, Member States shared updates on their respective schemes, but also discussed the measures taken to address the risks of investor residence schemes and to ensure transparency of their schemes. In addition, the Commission has taken several initiatives to address the risks of investor residence schemes for security, money-laundering, tax evasion and corruption: the proposed recast of the Long-Term Residents Directive 4 includes rules to prevent third-country investors from abusively acquiring EU long-term resident status, and the Anti-Money Laundering package 5 introduces strict obligations on involved actors and requires Member States running these schemes to put in place mitigating measures and to monitor and assess the risks. The Commission will continue monitoring the development of this matter in Member States and take action as appropriate and within its competences. 1 Commission Recommendation on immediate steps in the context of the Russian invasion of Ukraine in relation to investor citizenship schemes and investor residence schemes, C(2022) 2028 final. 2 Estonia, Spain, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta and Portugal. 3 Minutes of the meeting: https://commission.europa.eu/document/1069f501-27a0-403f-bcf4-e2e2d346955a_en. 4 COM(2022) 650 final. 5 In particular: Directive (EU) 2024/1640 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 May 2024 on the mechanisms to be put in place by Member States for the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purposes of money laundering or terrorist financing, amending Directive(EU) 2019/1937, and amending and repealing Directive (EU) 2015/849; Regulation (EU) 2024/1624 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 May 2024 on the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purposes of money laundering or terrorist financing.”
  Anti-money laundering regulation · Legal migration
• 2025-03-28 “E-001308/2025 Answer given by Mr Tzitzikostas on behalf of the European Commission Regulation (EU) 2024/1679 1 introduced the obligation for the Member States to ensure, by 31 December 2040, the development of safe and secure parking areas (SSPAs) certified in accordance with EU standards along the roads of the core and extended core trans-European transport network (TEN-T), with an average maximum distance of 150 kilometres between two SSPAs. The Commission supports the Member States in their efforts to build more SSPAs, notably by providing funding under the Connecting Europe Facility (CEF). For the realisation of projects across the EU, CEF Transport made available EUR 250 million each in 2022 and 2023, and EUR 320 million for the call for proposals of 2024, supporting both the creation of new SSPAs and the upgrade of existing parking areas in line with EU safety and security standards. Since 2022, when the Commission adopted the Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1012 2 , 35 SSPAs have been built and certified in the EU, providing 4,943 parking spots. Furthermore, the realisation of 49 CEF projects is currently ongoing, with 4,614 parking places in SSPAs expected to be added. The Commission recognises numerous advantages in public-private partnerships (PPPs) for accelerating the implementation of SSPAs. Firstly, PPPs can alleviate the financial burden on governments while introducing expertise and innovative technologies, thereby enhancing project efficiency and quality. Secondly, by transferring certain risks to private partners, PPPs ensure more reliable and timely project delivery. Lastly, leveraging private financing reduces the reliance on public funds, thus expediting the development process and fostering economic growth. 1 Regulation (EU) 2024/1679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 on Union guidelines for the development of the trans-European transport network, amending Regulations (EU) 2021/1153 and (EU) No 913/2010 and repealing Regulation (EU) No 1315/2013 (OJ L 2024/1679, 28.6.2024). 2 Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1012 of 7 April 2022 supplementing Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to the establishment of standards detailing the level of service and security of safe and secure parking areas and to the procedures for their certification (OJ L 170, 28.6.2022, p. 27).”
  EU transport infrastructure integration · EU funding for transportation
• 2025-03-25 “E-001238/2025 Answer given by Mr Brunner on behalf of the European Commission The Commission is aware of the migratory challenges faced by Spain and follows the situation closely. The European Border and Coast Guard Agency and the EU Agency for Asylum adopted operational plans to support Spain in migration management. Spain benefits from various EU funds for asylum and migration and border management, including the Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund (AMIF) 1 , the Border Management and Visa Fund (BMVI) 2 and the Next Generation EU funds. In recent years, the Commission allocated to Spain funding under the AMIF and BMVI as emergency assistance specifically to address the situation of the Canary Islands (EUR 52.3 million for the financial programming period 2021-2027). In addition, the Commission allocated 3 to the Member States additional resources to implement the Pact on Migration and Asylum 4 . Also, these resources can be used by regional authorities in accordance with the rules set at national level. Furthermore, both national and regional authorities can allocate resources from the European Social Fund Plus (ESF+) and the European Regional Development Fund for migrant integration. ESF+ will invest over EUR 142 million in Spain from 2021 to 2027 to support the socio-economic integration of migrants, including EUR 2.4 million in the Balearic Islands, EUR 5 million for family-based care of unaccompanied minors and EUR 15 million to improve employment opportunities for vulnerable groups in the Canary Islands. The Interreg Madeira-Azores-Canary Islands Cooperation Programme 2021-2027 5 supports cross-border cooperation to tackle migration challenges. 1 Regulation (EU) 2021/1147 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 July 2021 establishing the Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund. 2 Regulation (EU) 2021/1148 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 July 2021 establishing as part of the Integrated Border Management Fund the instrument for financial support of the Border Management and Visa Policy. 3 https://home-affairs.ec.europa.eu/news/european-commission-provides-additional-eur-3-billion-supportmigration-and-asylum-management-2025-05-12_en. 4 https://home-affairs.ec.europa.eu/policies/migration-and-asylum/pact-migration-and-asylum_en. 5 The cooperation area is comprised of three outermost regions – the Azores, Madeira and the Canary Islands and seven third countries - Cape Verde, Ivory Coast, Gambia, Ghana, Mauritania, Senegal and São Tomé and Príncipe.”
  Asylum & border control
• 2025-03-12 “E-001063/2025 Answer given by Mr Brunner on behalf of the European Commission 1. The Commission considers that the new Schengen Evaluation Regulation 1 offers a meaningful and important tool to ensure an effective response to situations that may impact the functioning of the Schengen area, including fundamental rights violations. 2. Since 2022, the Commission has carried out several unannounced visits. These visits revealed that while the required 24-hour notification may allow authorities to prepare, this does not compromise the integrity and effectiveness of the unannounced visit. For example, in one case, serious deficiencies in the quality of border management were identified. 3. The Commission has strengthened the Schengen governance framework to ensure robust monitoring of the Schengen acquis. This includes increased scrutiny of Member States through verification visits, with reinforced oversight by the Schengen Council through regular exchanges on key priorities identified for each Schengen cycle, supported by the Schengen Coordinator and tools, such as the Schengen Barometer+ and Scoreboard. The reinforced governance framework seeks to address the most pressing needs by making the most of the existing resources, by strengthening operational scrutiny, promoting more active political engagement, and fostering synergies at all levels, including with EU agencies. 1 Council Regulation (EU) 2022/922 of 9 June 2022 on the establishment and operation of an evaluation and monitoring mechanism to verify the application of the Schengen acquis, and repealing Regulation (EU) No 1053/2013, OJ L 160, 15.6.2022, p. 1–27.”
  Asylum & border control
• 2025-02-25 “E-000832/2025 Answer given by Mr Síkela on behalf of the European Commission In 2025, the Commission will focus on scaling up Global Gateway through the implementation of ongoing Global Gateway investment projects and the identification of new sustainable, high-impact investments that will further strengthen EU partnerships with third countries. The second Global Gateway Forum, to be held in June 2025, will also be a key moment in 2025 to showcase steps being taken to scale up Global Gateway. The Commission will continue its active engagement with Member States, their cooperation agencies and development financing institutions to emphasise the necessity of building a Team Europe approach to scaling up investments. The Commission will also continue its work to enhance the coordination of its and Member States financial tools, including those of export credit agencies, and to increase collaboration with the European private sector through investment facilitation mechanisms and business matchmaking initiatives. The Commission tracks and reports on EU support to Global Gateway investment projects through the annual report on the implementation of the EU's external action instruments, as well as providing information through a dedicated public website 1 . Global Gateway flagship projects which have been identified by the European Council as projects which showcase Global Gateway, are monitored by the Council’s Working Party of Foreign Relations Counsellors. In addition, regular exchanges take place between the Commission and the European Parliament, notably the Committee on Development. 1 https://international-partnerships.ec.europa.eu/policies/global-gateway_en”
  EU policy on the Indo-Pacific region · EU foreign policy approach
• 2025-02-12 “E-000670/2025 Answer given by Mr Šefčovič on behalf of the European Commission The Commission registered China’s apparent refusal to issue export licenses for the export of artificial graphite to Sweden as an official trade barrier in 2023 following an internal investigation. The Commission has thereafter been in close contact with Sweden and has raised the issue with China on multiple occasions, during both bilateral contacts with China and at the World Trade Organization. On these occasions, the Commission has also expressed its deep concern regarding the overall increase in Chinese licensing requirements targeting critical raw materials in recent years, and the negative effects these measures have on the perception of China as a reliable trading partner. To ensure secure, resilient and sustainable supply of strategic raw materials, the Critical Raw Materials Act (CRMA) 1 sets out benchmarks for extraction, processing, recycling and diversification and introduces measures to achieve these. Regarding the long-term availability of graphite, designated as a strategic raw material under the CRMA, the Commission inter alia maps with Member States the projects in the EU; calls for strategic projects; develops and implements strategic partnerships on raw materials; invests in innovative raw material production projects under Horizon Europe 2 ; and concludes EU bilateral trade agreements for fair and unrestricted trade in raw materials. Further improvements on recycling can equally increase the availability of critical raw materials. The first list of strategic projects was published on 25 March 2025 3 . three of them are located in Sweden, and two concern graphite. Regarding overall availability of raw materials, the Geological Surveys of Europe provide a detailed overview of minerals deposits in the EU 4 . 1 Regulation (EU) 2024/1252, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1252/oj/eng 2 https://research-and-innovation.ec.europa.eu/funding/funding-opportunities/funding-programmes-and-opencalls/horizon-europe_en 3 https://single-market-economy.ec.europa.eu/sectors/raw-materials/areas-specific-interest/critical-rawmaterials/strategic-projects-under-crma_en 4 https://maps.europe-geology.eu/”
  Trade relations with China · Chinese clean tech competition: trade barriers and investment caps vs. open market
• 2025-01-27 “E-000335/2025 Answer given by Mr Tzitzikostas on behalf of the European Commission The Solidarity Lanes (SL) have demonstrably delivered for Ukraine and the EU, maintaining essential trade flows amidst Russia’s full-scale invasion, with over EUR 211 billion 1 in goods having been transported between Ukraine, the EU and global markets. The SL are, and will continue to be, a strategic imperative for Ukraine's economic resilience and security. As Ukraine looks towards recovery and reconstruction, the SL will also be instrumental in swiftly and efficiently moving essential goods, materials, and facilitating the return of Ukrainians to their homes and communities. The SL have successfully included various measures to enhance the capacity and smooth functioning of logistics routes through the borders between the EU, Ukraine and Moldova including the Road Transport Agreements with Ukraine and the Republic of Moldova, and streamlined procedures at border crossing points. The Commission’s investment in the SL infrastructure and connectivity now exceeds EUR 2 billion. This includes ~EUR 1.6 billion from the Connecting Europe Facility for projects focused on strategic border crossing points on the TEN-T and infrastructure on Member States and Ukrainian/Moldovan territories. In parallel, the international financial institutions made a pledge to provide at least EUR 0.7 billion 2 to support the SL, and the Ukraine Facility and the Ukraine Investment Framework will also trigger investments and reforms in the transport sector 3 . The Commission will continue to pursue the SL including through further work on coordinated border controls, promoting the Common Transit Convention, supporting digitalisation of procedures and documents, and the identification of short-term infrastructure and equipment needs. 1 Estimation based on the data from the Ukrainian customs registers on products that received customs clearance between May 2022 and January 2025. 2 This amount follows the joint pledge of the Commission, World Bank, the European Investment Bank (EIB) and the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) made in November 2022. More information at: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/el/statement_22_6825 3 Under the Ukraine Facility, the completion of four major transport reforms and budgeting at least 350 million EUR for transport projects will enable crucial payments to Ukraine’s budget. The Ukraine Investment Framework is designed to trigger further investments from public and private sector, including projects fostering the reconstruction and the development of an efficient transport system in the country.”
  EU-Ukraine relations · Agricultural trade: Ukraine imports · Russia-Ukraine conflict (10th term)
• 2025-01-16 “E-000169/2025 Answer given by Mr Brunner on behalf of the European Commission The Commission has been committed to improving the flow of communication between the EU Agencies involved in the fight against serious cross-border crime, within the limits of their respective mandates. The announcement by the European Data Protection Supervisor concerns issues that were notified to Frontex already in an audit report from May 2023, and which Frontex took steps to immediately rectify. The existing rules do not preclude the competence of the two Agencies to exchange data, including operational personal data, and in fact this and other forms of interagency cooperation are already foreseen in their respective governing Regulations 1 . The Commission has encouraged better cooperation and data sharing between agencies and has urged Frontex and Europol to prioritize agreeing on a new Working Arrangement which is currently under discussions. Interagency cooperation, notably between Europol and Frontex, is also one of the main objectives of the Commission proposal on ‘enhancing police cooperation in relation to the prevention, detection and investigation of migrant smuggling and trafficking in human beings, and on enhancing Europol’s support to preventing and combating such crimes and amending Regulation (EU) 2016/794’ 2 which is currently being discussed in the European Parliament. 1 Regulation (EU) 2016/794 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2016 on the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (Europol). OJ L 135, 24.5.2016, p. 53–114. Regulation (EU) 2019/1896 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 November 2019 on the European Border and Coast Guard. OJ L 295, 14.11.2019, p. 1–131. 2 COM(2023) 754 final.”
  Privacy & law enforcement · EU law enforcement cooperation in criminal matters
• 2024-10-14 “E-002059/2024 Answer given by High Representative/Vice-President Borrell i Fontelles on behalf of the European Commission The EU is aware of the very disturbing reports about increased illegal and security-threatening activities of Iranian state bodies on the European territory. The EU position and actions will continue to be based on the outcomes of investigations and legal proceedings conducted by the competent national authorities who are responsible to establish facts, culpabilities and the level of threat in line with their national legal order. The EU relies on national authorities to complete the respective ongoing investigations and prosecutions into recent cases. The EU remains vigilant and continues to coordinate policies at the level of its 27 Member States, as well as ensuring an appropriate collective response where national processes are completed. In this regard, the EU has put in place sanctions regimes to target all aspects of Iran’s negative behaviour and will continue to use them whenever appropriate.”
  Foreign interference in Europe · EU-Iran relations
• 2024-10-01 “E-001896/2024 Answer given by Mr Hoekstra on behalf of the European Commission Driving licence tourism, i.e. the practice of changing residence for the purpose of acquiring a driving licence in another Member State, is a matter of concern for the Commission. The current Driving Licence Directive (2006/126/EC) 1 sets out clear rules on the issuance (including residence requirements) and the mutual recognition of driving licences which reduce the risk of driving licence fraud and driving licence tourism, as the ex-post evaluation of that Directive 2 has shown. The Commission’s proposal 3 for a revision of the Directive further contributes to that policy objective. In particular, it is intended to strengthen the EU network for the exchange of information on driving licences, RESPER, which, since its introduction, has significantly improved information exchange between Member States, and thereby helped to reduce driving licence tourism. Moreover, the parallel proposal for a Directive on the Union-wide effect of certain driving disqualifications 4 addresses the absence of an EU framework for the mutual recognition of driving disqualifications which has previously been identified as one of the key enablers of driving licence tourism 5 . Independently of the ongoing negotiations on both legal texts, the Commission frequently exchanges views and information with national authorities in order to ensure the correct implementation of the current Driving Licence Directive. The Commission is aware of the recently published report by the Swedish Transport Authority on the exchange of driving licences and the risk of ‘driving licence tourism’. The Commission services are currently studying all the relevant information in order to gain clarity in the matter and assess if there is a potential misapplication of the Directive. 1 https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32006L0126 2 SWD(2022) 17 final. 3 COM(2023) 127 final: https://transport.ec.europa.eu/document/download/964d4edc-5eea-49e1-ae082d1e38705713_en 4 COM(2023) 128 final: https://transport.ec.europa.eu/document/download/de81e25a-a4f8-42e6-a41cc063b5b4145b_en 5 SWD(2022) 17 final.”
  Driving licences
• 2024-09-26 “E-001846/2024 Answer given by Mr Schmit on behalf of the European Commission The Working Time Directive 2003/88/EC 1 applies to all sectors of activity and lays down minimum safety and health requirements for working time. The Directive offers significant flexibilities to establish derogations in sectors and situations where this is necessary or where provided for by collective agreement at national or regional level. Notably, in the case of activities requiring continuity of production, which may include the defence industry, Member States can derogate from several provisions of the Directive 2 , provided that the workers concerned receive equivalent periods of compensatory rest or, in exceptional cases, appropriate protection 3 . Under strict conditions, Member States may also allow individual workers to opt out of the 48-hour average maximum weekly working time 4 . The Court of Justice of the EU has moreover held that the Directive may be temporarily disapplied for certain activities in circumstances whose gravity and scale are exceptional 5 . The Commission considers that these provisions provide for sufficient flexibility for the European defence industry. Article 18 of the Commission’s proposal 6 leading to Regulation (EU) 2023/1525 7 encouraged Member States to use the flexibility as regards working time in the defence industry as provided for by Directive 2003/88/EC, without modifying it in substance. The Commission considers that Directive 2003/88/EC allows for sufficient flexibility to accommodate the legitimate needs of the sectors to which it applies, while safeguarding workers’ occupational safety and health. It does not intend to propose a revision of the Directive. 1 Directive 2003/88/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time, OJ L 299, 18.11.2003, p. 9‐19 - https://eurlex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2003/88/oj 2 Articles 3 (Daily rest), 4 (Breaks), 5 (Weekly rest period), 8 (Length of night work), and 16 (Reference periods). 3 Article 17 of Directive 2003/88/EC. 4 Article 22 of Directive 2003/88/EC. 5 Judgment in Case C-742/19, Ministrstvo za obrambo, ECLI:EU:C:2021:597. 6 Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on establishing the Act in Support of Ammunition Production, COM(2023)237 final - https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legalcontent/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A52023PC0237 7 Regulation (EU) 2023/1525 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 July 2023 on supporting ammunition production (ASAP), OJ L 185, 24.7.2023, p. 7-25 - https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2023/1525/oj”
  EU competences on defence · Defence spending
• “(16:38:07 – 16:39:23): Thank you, Cher. I will be speaking in Swedish. Commissioner Jurgenson. Perhaps I don't share the joy that you have over the new Danish government, but, of course, you're a neighbor to Sweden. So I'm sure we'll continue to have good relations. As you know, in Sweden, we're not a massive country when it comes to level of population, but we're the second biggest exporter of electricity. We have created an electric system which is 99% fossil free. And obviously, in the grid package coming from the commission, there was the consideration to try and shift 30,000,000,000 Swedish crowns to other countries. This was completely unacceptable. Now it's good that this proposal seems to have been taken off the table. But I would like to ask today, are you and the commission open to the idea that bottleneck income can be used for support for electricity prices because that would be supporting Sweden rather than punishing them, and that would be good for Europe too.”
  EU approach to electricity market and prices
• “Thank you. President. Vice president. A clear EP priority for the coming years is to make Europe safer and more secure. We need reforms that ensures an independent, free and prosperous Europe. Speedy investments in security and defence. And we also need to pave the way for economic growth and job creation. Keep cutting red tape. And citizens also rightfully want to have a European migration policy that is firm, fair and enforced. The EPP called on the Commission to take decisive action in the first 100 days. We now welcome that we have concrete proposals on the table, but this is just the start. In Parliament, the EPP Group will push to make these initiatives even more ambitious. We need a new European security architecture. We need it actually. Now. I would say the omnibus needs to be a true game changer for our European companies. The new regulation on returns must come with strong and effective measures to ensure that those who do not have the right to be in Europe should be returned, and future initiatives from, for example, the Internal security strategy and the strengthening of Frontex and Europol will be crucial to protect our union and citizens. Europe must step up and the EPP is ready to do the task. Thank you.”
  Asylum & border control
• “Democracy is the promise that every voice matters, that every citizen can shape their own future. Today that promise. Our European democracy is under attack from foreign interference, from disinformation, from cyber threats. The enemies who wants to destabilize Europe are many. It's not only Russia and they are determined, but Europe is not powerless. With the European Democracy Shield, we can rise to defend what is most precious to us. The shield must be something more than a protection. It should be a pledge that elections in Europe will remain free and fair. That truth is stronger than lies, and that no voice will be silenced of our citizens, and also that we can stand up for our values also around the world. Colleagues, for me, I see the democracy shield as a symbol that should give a clear message that your vote counts, Ounce. Your freedom is safe. Your future belongs to you. So I hope that we together can deliver the democracy shield not in fear, but in confidence that Europe is. That Europe is tall, strong and free. And now we call on the commission to, of course, deliver. But I would say, even more important, be bold and be courageous, because this is about protecting the European democracy. Thank you.”
  Foreign interference in Europe
• “Thank you. President. Commissioner, colleagues, the EPP Group is committed to a simple but very important principle. What is illegal offline must be illegal online. This is not just common sense, it is a matter of justice. Yet across Europe today, this is still not reflected in the law. Last month in this chamber, we listened to Jackie Fox from Ireland about the horrific impact of online abuse, which ultimately led to that. Her 20 year old daughter, Nicole Coco Fox, took her own life. Unfortunately, her story is not an isolated tragedy. Cyber bullying is one of the most pressing online safety concerns of young people in Europe today. But Jackie Fox also showed us something else that justice is possible in Ireland. Coco's law has made severe online abuse a crime. It has closed a legal gap and provided victims with clearer protection. And this is the standard that we should uphold across our entire union, because protection and justice should not depend on where you live. It should be the rule across the union. That is why the EPP group is calling on the commission to start the work with a proposal to have a European caucus law. We need a clear, strong, enforceable EU rules that criminalise severe online abuse. And finally, colleagues, it is unacceptable that since the start of this month, we lack a clear legal framework to stop the spread of child sexual abuse material online. Also here. We need an initiative from the commission and of course together in this House. Let there be no doubt. Abusers must be held to account and let us stand on the side of victims. Thank you.”
  Safety features & content control for child protection online
• “Well, thank you, sir, and thank you to Rapporteur Wilms for what I would say, a very solid draft report, which I think goes in the right direction. I mean, EPP, we welcome the Commission proposal because, of course, we need to make sure that we have a stronger Euratom programme. I would, though, like to highlight that. I think we also need to put some time to discuss and also on content the importance of stronger focus on efficiency, because of course, we know that we need to have a discussion in Europe on lifetime extensions of existing facilities on development and demonstration of small modular reactors. And of course, also that we can make sure to have more advancements. Also when it comes to efficient technologies, and I think Euratom here has a role to play even stronger when it comes to research standardization and also skills development. I would also like to mention that I do think that we need to strengthen European capacity when it comes to our supply, and that basically means with nuclear and nuclear fuel in the value chain. Of course, here we need to think both on resilience but also on the issue of security. I would say, and I fully, of course, are in favor of that. We have to work with fusion, but I think this needs to be even more in parallel with the more immediate needs, which we also see in efficient. So from EPP, myself and many colleagues, we will work on amendments. And of course, we look forward to a very constructive cooperation together. Thank you.”
  Nuclear energy
• “Well, thank you, chair, and dear colleagues, thank you for this opportunity to present my working document. And I would like to say immediately that I would like to thank already shadow rapporteurs for different inputs and proposals and ideas. I'm fully aware of that. This working document is my responsibility, but I must say that it has been very helpful even now, to get, uh, the view of many of my, my colleagues in this committee. Let me also start by saying that, uh, I'm proud to be European. Here we can enjoy democracy, freedom of speech, fundamental rights. But these are also values that need to be defended. And we need to acknowledge that democracy in itself can actually be quite fragile. And I think it is clear that we do see, uh, different actors who wants to harm and destabilize Europe. And I think that we need to be a bit clear about this. That is why I have titled this working document Protecting European Democracy and Our Values. Coming to some of the proposals in the working document, I truly believe that we need a new, uh, independent, uh, structure, uh, at EU level to coordinate efforts against foreign information manipulation and interference. Fema. I know that important steps have already been taken both within the Commission and also at eeaS, but in order to take the next step, I think we need a comprehensive approach. We need something that is actually more effective than what we see today. And I think at the heart of this new structure, we should have the ability, of course, to detect and to act early against ongoing threats.”
  Foreign interference in Europe
• “I find that quite interesting comment, I must say. I understand, of course, that we need to be mindful with the implementation of DSA, but of course it needs to be enforced. And this is not saying social media platforms in general is a problem. Let me take Hungary for example. In Hungary now, social media platforms are the only opportunity that we have, I would say, for the opposition to get views across that are not Orban controlled. That is also true. So of course it is important to have freedom of speech also on social media platforms. I agree with that. On migration, of course, this is not a migration report. I understand the comments, but I think it is important to acknowledge, of course, that we do have instrumentalisation happening and that is something that we need. I would say to combat on the question of NGOs, and I heard even calls for an EP hearing on NGOs. If I would, if I would give a clear view where you have EP on this EP, do you think that NGOs are extremely important? Civil society is part of a vibrant democracy. But of course we also need to discuss some of the transparency of NGOs. Of course, this Parliament needs to at least learn something from Qatar gate.”
  Disinformation & online freedoms
• “Well, thank you, sir, and thank you. Commission for your presentation. Let me just be very clear that the the EPP Group very much welcomes the increased level of ambition when it comes to nuclear research. Uh, and, and what it means for the Euratom programme, because we think it is essential if we want to be competitive, if we want in the end, to reach our climate goals, and also, of course, to have energy security. We also very much welcome, uh, now what we see on the language in the proposal on stronger cooperation with the private sector. We think this is essential if we're going to move in a way from from research to deployment, which of course, also include fusion. However, I am concerned about one thing, and that is the budget balance. And what I'm talking about is that, as we all know, fusion is a long term priority and of course very important. But we also know that existing nuclear technologies, I mean, already now deliver secure, low carbon energy and contributes to our competitiveness. Let but but when I look at the proposal and correct me if I'm if I'm wrong this technology the existing technology receives very limited support. 9% of the funds, if I'm correct. So my question is basically how do you justify what is, in my view, this imbalance? Uh, because I fear that with this proposal, even if I in general would like to welcome it, uh, it is a risk that we don't that we don't ensure that proven nuclear technologies are not left behind. Thank you.”
  Nuclear energy
• “In my view, much of the work at the current organization is we do understand that we see disinformation campaigns and we analyze them, and we can conclude a lot of things after they have occurred. And this is, of course, important and necessary. However, what we need is also to act against ongoing operation and threats. And I think that this new kind of structure could be very helpful for member states, member states, and also from for EU institutions. I have left it open if this should be operational function at the European level, or if this should be at member state level. Let's discuss that. But we need something stronger than what we have today. And I know that we immediately will have a debate about costs. But let me put it like this. The cost for this kind of new structure is peanuts. If we compare it to what hostile foreign actors invest in film operations in Europe. If I move to the digital, uh, issues, uh, here, I would like to to underline that I know that this is a matter of different opinions, even in this House, but I think it is very clear for the clear majority of us in this House, we do not have a problem with free speech in Europe, but we have a problem with is Russian and other actors interference? When we see hundreds of thousands of spam accounts or fake accounts that are systematically used by foreign powers to influence democratic elections in Europe, as we saw in Romania in last autumn, this has nothing to do with freedom of speech.”
  Transparency and oversight of AI-generated content
• “Well thank you, chair, and thank you to all our guests for your introductions. Today I think in in my opinion, lawful access to data is the big game changer that we that we need for law enforcement. If we are serious with trying to to stop the criminal networks. I mean, we all know that the criminal networks are extremely advanced in exploiting, of course, new technologies and also the digital platforms. And with this background, perhaps to firstly to executive Director Ebner. I mean, where would you say today when it comes to access to data, is where do you lose time? Is it because we have fragmented national procedures? Is it limitations in technology? Is it legal obstacles? Or is it all above? That is my question. And perhaps to commission. I mean, we do know that we have a level of cooperation between member states, and that is, of course, good, but perhaps it could be a bit more specific with your overview when it comes to the level of cooperation between member states and perhaps what we can do from a commission side to make sure that this is even more effective than today. And also, I would say the cooperation with the private sector, which is of course, crucial. And you touched on it earlier, but, I mean, what can we do to to enhance it? Thank you.”
  Privacy & law enforcement
• “Mr. president, Commissioner, the EPP Group is determined to make Europe safer and more secure for our citizens. Because without security, there is no freedom. And it is clear that immediate action is required. Organized crime is on the rise. Hybrid attacks have intensified. And illegal migration remains a key challenge. The EPP Group welcomes the Commission. Have heard our calls. We are fully committed to deliver together on a stronger and more effective return policy for people who do not have the right to stay in Europe. We will push to implement a new internal security strategy that makes Europe safer now and for future generations. And as rapporteur for the European Democracy Shield, I am personally committed to make sure that we more strongly defend the values on which our union is built. These are important steps, but more will be required, not least when it comes to stepping up the fight against organized crime and securing our external border. The EP will continue to fight for a strong Europe that protects its people. We have the mandate from our citizens and we will deliver. Thank you.”
  Asylum & border control
• “Smes threshold reviews and require its consistent use across future omnibus and simplification initiatives. This is a future proof, proportionate and legally sound framework that supports small mid caps without compromising the integrity of SME policy. Regulatory enforcement of the internal market. Thank you.”
  Overall simplification of regulation in the EU
• “(16:20:22 – 16:22:22): Thank you, Cher, and, thank you to our, distinguished speakers, today. I think it is clear, for all of us, here that Islamic extremism poses a serious threat, to Europe. Of course, we have seen the horrific, consequences, with the numbers of of terrorist attacks. But like mister Randstorb also also mentioned, I think it is important that we see, the the seeking to, increase the influence in our societies from, Islamistic groups like the Muslim Brotherhood. And then I think it's, for us, also important, to really come together and understand that this fundamental agenda is totally incompetitive incompetible, with our values, and principles of our union. And yes, we are getting better. I mean, I follow the work closely, in many member states, and I agree that we are, getting better tools to make sure that we can do scrutiny. We can do more of a mapping of Islamist influence. But here, we are sitting as European lawmakers. And of course, the big question, from my side, to you is, what would you recommend to us to do at European level? Because, of course, we understand that we need to have information sharing. Every member states needs, to make sure that, they create security for their own citizens. But this is not a single issue for 1 member state, in this union. And therefore, at least for myself, I think it is clear that we need to take new initiatives at European level, and it would be interesting to hear your recommendations if you have any. Thank you.”
  EU policy on Islam
• “Well, thank you, chair, and thank you all colleagues for your comments and statements and of course, all the amendments. Um, just a few points from from my side. Um, I fully agree that of course we need to make sure that we apply our digital legislation. I think this is one of the key points, which of course we need to to stress. Secondly, I think I stopped saying, let's continue discussing, uh, who and what is a threat to democracy and what should be mentioned in the report. I see that there are some different flavors, uh, of that, and I have no problem in further discussing that. On the question of freedom of expression, for me, this is a cornerstone of democracy. I have no interest in repressing opinions, but I would like to make a clear distinction that for me, Russian troll factories will never be freedom of expression. That is the distinction that I would like to make. Then, of course, to the question of is it given that the European Union, when it comes to our digital infrastructure, needs to be in the hands of US and Asia? I mean, that is, of course, a very big question. I don't know if we will solve it in this report, but for sure, this is one of the key things that we need to discuss, because as long as we have this amount of this information and we still see, uh, that, uh, the actors are not taking responsibility, it does not work for us. And of course, it also means that we need to discuss the fact that we want to decide about the rules in our own continent. Lastly, I mean, I can fully agree. Um, perhaps in the end, if we are still friends in the end, if we have a clear majority, um, I would say that perhaps we should also have a more strategic discussion. What should be the impact of this report? Because of course, now we have a rather holistic kind of broad way of working with it, which I think is helpful. But of course, we won't have an impact with this report, especially towards commission. Thank you.”
  Disinformation & online freedoms
• “We do have actors that want to influence European democracy, and this is happening, and this is something that we also need to acknowledge and that we need to have proposals coming out. On the question of structure, I'm very pragmatic to discuss this, and I try to be quite open in the report. But my main thing and what I think that we need to make sure that we deliver on is that we are starting to act on ongoing threats. The time for us to assess that we have this information in Europe. The time for us to assess that we have election interference needs to stop, and we need to act because this is really what this is about. And lastly, I mean, I'm willing to work with everyone who wants to strengthen European democracy. A good starting point is that you support European democracy and not Russian disinformation, that you vote in favor of, that Russia should give back the kids that have been kidnapped from Ukraine. That could be a good starting point. And I think that in general, in this committee, we have a big, big responsibility now to try to deliver with a big majority of this House, that we are ready to take actions to protect our democracy. Thank you.”
  Foreign interference in Europe
• “Thank you. President, vice president, colleagues. I think we all can agree that Europe should not only adapt to the digital age, we should shape it and we should lead it. But if we are honest, I think the European Union today remains too slow. Where speed is needed and also too fragmented, where unity is also vital. So now is of course, the time to move faster, to cut red tape that strangles innovation and also makes us lack when it comes to competitiveness, but also who hampers ordinary life. And that is why I really think that this digital omnibus is very much welcome. And I would like actually to thank also Vice-President Wilkinson and her personal engagement on this, because we need to simplify rules of data, cybersecurity and artificial intelligence and the General Data Protection Regulation. Gdpr, at least in my view, is perhaps the very symbol for where we have overregulated and not really find the correct balance. Of course, data protection is important, but today's design hinders us from combating organized crime, providing administrative burdens for business. And, as the Vice-President said, has made us all very tired of constantly accepting cookies. We should be able to come together and deliver on this in this House for EPP. It is clear that we want a competitive and prosperous Europe in this digital area because digitalisation is not only about data, code or platforms, it is actually about people and the freedom to express, to create, to connect. And that is the foundation for free speech and democracy. Thank you.”
  GDPR
• “President, commissioner, colleagues, cross border organized crime now pose a systemic risk to our union. And we are now come to the situation where the criminal networks even recruit children, children to pull the trigger. This is not business as usual. And, of course, we see that commission sees how serious this is, and we do welcome the initiatives. But I do want to underline that we must do more. We need a strong European response. We need to overhaul our legislation at EU level to crack down on the criminal networks and their ruthless operations across our union. This is not a single issue for the member states. My home country, Sweden, is doing a lot, but we know that the criminal networks, they are active in more member states at the same time. So we have to have a strong European response. And here, I would like to take the chance to turn to my colleagues to the left. Please work together with EPP to make sure that we can get a strong Europol. And to my colleagues to the right, even if we are talking about European solution, it doesn't need to be bad. We have to come together now. We are talking about children that are being exploited by ruthless people, and I think it's time for this house to show that we will not stand for it. Thank you.”
  EU law enforcement cooperation in criminal matters
• “Well thank you chair. Thank you Commissioner. As you know, I presented my draft to political groups and major amendments, and we have started the negotiations. And I think it is fair to say that we are asking for even a higher level of ambition, that we want more far reaching reforms. But I want to be very clear that we are here to support you, because we do think that this is a very crucial initiative from the commission, because we need to better defend our democracies in Europe. I have two questions. And firstly, on the on the centre, I think it is clear from the communication that you look at the centre as a coordination hub with the existing structures for combating Fehmi. And my question is, is more basically, do you think in the future that you will perhaps even more clarified the mandate from your point of view of this centre? Why, perhaps, uh, the choice has been made that the centre should not, uh, I mean, basically assume the responsibilities and rather be alongside the existing entities. And the follow up question to that is, of course, because the only concerns and worries that at least I personally have is will this be more efficient? Will we actually make more results? And that is my my first question. Secondly, on the communication, it was also clear that you said that there will be measures to protect election related infrastructure. That is critical. I know the cybersecurity package has been presented, and perhaps the commissioner could clarify if that was what you referred to in the communication, that this was the follow up, or can we expect additional initiatives? Because I do think we need to protect election related infrastructure. Thank you.”
  Surveillance equipment & spyware
• “Well, thank you, chair and colleagues. As the chair said, 1655 amendments. I choose to see that as a proof of a strong commitment in the European Parliament to defend our democracy. I can admit that the sum of amendments is somewhat a challenge as rapporteur, but at least it shows that there was a need for this committee. Since we last discussed in this format, we have had one shadow meeting. We have had five additional technical meetings and we have actually three planned just before Easter Green Week. And of course, we can already see now that there are some issues where we disagree and it would be strange otherwise. But I would like to state that I do see a broad support for the overall direction of travel within the negotiations. I do see that the majority of the committee wants to send a clear message to the member states and to the Commission that we expect a more ambitious reform agenda in defense of democracy. On behalf of the EPP, I have tabled 20 amendments to update the draft report. As we all know, the world around us is not standing still. For example, I felt a clear need to update it in regard to our EU cybersecurity legislation. I do look forward now to listen to Into the political groups and all my my colleagues. But let me already now express my appreciation for SMEs strong commitment to restoring societal trust. I appreciate Iker's clear focus on Russia as an aggressor. I appreciate Renew's willingness to clearly name and call out the actors that undermine our democracy, and I appreciate the Green's strong focus on fair rules online. It is my conviction that we together, even if we have some different approaches and priorities, that our final product can be stronger than the sum of our individual priorities. With that, I'm now going to let the political groups explain their priorities and amendments in their own words. Thank you.”
  Disinformation & online freedoms
• “Thank you, Mr. President. Colleagues, the development in the Middle East remind us of one simple truth. Europe cannot afford to be weak in an unstable world. And let us also be clear the people of Iran deserve freedom, dignity, democracy, not the tyranny of the ayatollahs. This is yet another wake up call for Europe. We must strengthen our defence capabilities so that Europe is prepared for modern threats, including drone attacks like the one that targeted the air base in Cyprus. Secondly, we need to reinforce our internal security and regain control of our external borders. We need to protect ourselves from Russian hybrid attacks and the proxy networks of the Iranian regime. Thirdly, we need major investments in energy, not only renewables, but also nuclear, because energy is fundamental to our security. And finally, we must secure a competitive Europe now and for future generations. A strong economy is essential in these times of uncertainty. Now is the time for the EU leaders to double down on defence and security, simplification and continued support for Ukraine. This is how we will keep our union and citizens safe.”
  Defence spending
• “Well thank you, chair. And thank you, colleagues for all your views. You comment a lot of the different issues in the in the report, and I will try to go through them all. Let me let me start by perhaps one of the main political issues that we are discussing. And that is of course, freedom of speech. This is a cornerstone, I would say, of our democracy in Europe. And I don't think anyone here has a problem if we want to spread nonsense. You can spread views that I don't agree with. That's not a problem. That's part of democracy. Please do that. But should we do nothing about the fact that we saw 175,000 fake accounts spam accounts in Romania? Is there no responsibility for the social media platforms on that? That is the question that we're asking. Yes, Mr. Elon Musk. He can choose to support AfD in Germany if he wants. He could choose even to do an interview. But is it correct if he use his social media platform in a way to make sure that they get a favorable attention? That is the question that needs to be answered in the investigation that is upcoming. And we also need, of course, to make sure that we help our candidate countries to combat FEMA. I find it quite interesting that some colleagues want to defend the right for third country actors to interfere in Europe, but Europe can do nothing to help our candidate countries.”
  Disinformation & online freedoms
• “Well, thank you, president and colleagues. Europe is falling behind in growth and competitiveness, and in these uncertain times, we must act decisively and, of course, try to boost our economy. Europe needs a game changer. An omnibus proposal is a step in the right direction, but more is needed. Growth, not bureaucracy, will drive our economy forward and empower the green transition to deliver. We need two key things. First, clarity and breathing room for our European companies to stop. The clock proposal must enter into force as soon as possible. That is why the EPP is calling for a faster approach. Under an urgent procedure. Second, we have to deliver on content. We can do more to simplify these legislation, and the EPP will push for further measures in the upcoming negotiations. We can and we also call on all constructive forces of this House to join us in this. Europeans expect us to protect their jobs and improve their lives. The EPP is ready to lead and try to unlock the potential of our economy. And this is also what is best for climate and for sustainability. I would argue that a growing European economy is the best climate policy that we could have on our continent. We have the highest standard and also the most ambitious Climate policy in the world, taking down European economy is counterproductive. So the big debate here now, and especially I am turning to my friends and colleagues on the left. Now, the question is, will you stand for growth and jobs or red tape and bureaucracy? Europe cannot afford to wait. It is time to act. Thank you.”
  Overall simplification of regulation in the EU
• “President. Commission. Prime Minister, I first, I would like to say that you have my deepest respect for your leadership on Ukraine. From a Swede to a Dane. I would also like to state that the EPP have very high expectations on the Danish presidency. We need a stronger defence. S&D Group. Please. Your Prime Minister is here. Welcome to this debate from the EPP Group. We need a stronger defence. We need to tackle and combat organised Organized crime. We need to take back control of migration, and we need to make Europe more competitive with more growth instead of decline. Therefore, we need to deliver on the omnibus proposals and also make sure that we sign more free trade agreements. Prime Minister, if you deliver on this, you will have an ally in the EPP. We will support you and we will work with you. And I would say that I hope that the voice of the Danish government, the Danish S&D, would also be the voice of Sad in this House, because then we could really get things done. We wish you luck and we will like to cooperate with you.”
  Defence spending
• “Thank you, Mr. President. Commissioner, colleagues as rapporteur, but also from EPP, we welcome the European Democracy Shield. We see this as a commitment to defending our democratic values and also strengthening trust between citizens and institutions. But perhaps the most important message is to Russia and other hostile actors and to them supporting them. Stop interfering in our elections. On the Communication commissioners, I see this as a good starting point. And we are willing in this House to work with you. But I want to be clear that we want to see more reform, more drive and more actions. Firstly, on the external communication that we are doing, we need to be more proactive and strategic. This is not only about defending us against disinformation. We also need to be clear that we want to promote our values. Secondly, on Europol and Frontex, I think that what we need to see is a clearer commitment to counter hybrid hybrid threats. Thirdly, on the proposal of the centre, I think we need to make clear that we have a clear legal basis, that it is independent, and that we also have a proper funding for me in general. This is about protecting free speech, protecting independent media, building resilient societies so that we can stand up to actors that are actually here to destroy Europe. We will not let them win. Thank you.”
  Foreign interference in Europe
• “Well thank you, chair. And thank you, panelist, for your interventions. I have basically two questions. I mean, in our committee's work with the European Democracy Shield, on one hand, we of course bond to strengthen civil society and also promote civic space. But of course, we also want to make it harder or I would say, impossible in a way, to hide between the facade of a civil society and as a as a legislator or in this committee. Preparing our initiative report. This is, of course, a balancing act, and it would be interesting to hear your perspective. Or I would ask for perhaps your recommendations on this, because we need to do both. We want to strengthen civil society, but of course, we cannot have foreign actors using civil society in a way to destroy our democracy. That's my first question. Secondly, together with colleagues, I had the opportunity to travel to to London and learn from some of the experience there. And one thing I learned, that, at least for me, was new. We also had a foreign colleague in this House. The foreign colleague, MEP Ferrari, is now leading the Reform Party in UK, and we learn now that he opened up for his party to be. Financing by crypto. Crypto financing of his party. We already know that President Trump has opened up also for crypto financing, at least of his own personal wealth. And of course, this raises some questions about transparency and the opportunities, perhaps for foreign actors now to actually, through crypto, also try to influence the political landscape in Europe. And it will be interesting with your experience. How do you see and how should we meet this challenge with also crypto financing of parties? Thank you.”
  Regulation of NGOs in Europe
• “Well thank you chair. Thank you Commissioner. As you know, I presented my draft to political groups a major amendments, and we have started the negotiations. And I think it is fair to say that we are asking for even a higher level of ambition, that we want more far reaching reforms. But I want to be very clear that we are here to support you, because we do think that this is a very crucial initiative from the commission, because we need to better defend our democracies in Europe. I have two questions. And firstly, on the on the centre, I think it is clear from the communication that you look at the centre as a coordination hub with the existing structures for combating Fehmi. And my question is, is more basically, do you think in the future that you will perhaps even more clarified the mandate from your point of view of this centre? Why, perhaps the choice has been made that the centre should not, I mean, basically assume the responsibilities and rather be alongside the existing entities. And the follow up question to that is, of course, because the only concerns and worries that at least I personally have is will this be more efficient? Will we actually make more results? And that is my my first question. Secondly, on the communication, it was also clear that you said that there will be measures to protect election related infrastructure. That is critical. I know the cybersecurity package have been presented, and perhaps the commissioner could clarify if that was what you referred to in the communication, that this was the follow up, or can we expect additional initiatives? Because I do think we need to protect election related infrastructure. Thank you.”
  Surveillance equipment & spyware
• “(10:53:28 – 10:54:35): I'm happy to share. Thank you. Colleagues, the aviation agreement, with, Morocco is an important element of our external, aviation policy. We have actually tripled our connectivity between, Morocco and the union. However, this agreement was concluded, before Croatia's accession to the union. And, of course, this needs, to be addressed. So what we're trying to achieve, with this protocol is that we amend the agreement between Morocco and the EU to also include the Republic Of, Croatia. So, of course, they also, can enjoy the same benefits, as other, member states currently do. So in conclusion, my recommendation is that we give our, consent to the conclusion of this, protocol. But of course, I'm I'm ready to, listen to other colleagues, but I do hope for, support, for this line. Thank you.”
  EU policy on aviation safety
• “Well thank you chair. Thank you Commissioner. As you know, I presented my draft to political groups a major amendments, and we have started the negotiations. And I think it is fair to say that we are asking for even a higher level of ambition, that we want more far reaching reforms. But I want to be very clear that we are here to support you, because we do think that this is a very crucial initiative from the commission, because we need to better defend our democracies in Europe. I have two questions. And firstly, on the on the centre, I think it is clear from the communication that you look at the centre as a coordination hub with the existing structures for combating Fehmi. And my question is, is more basically, do you think in the future that you will perhaps even more clarified the mandate from your point of view of this centre? Why, perhaps the choice has been made that the centre should not, I mean, basically assume the responsibilities and rather be alongside the existing entities. And the follow up question to that is, of course, because the only concerns and worries that at least I personally have is will this be more efficient? Will we actually make more results? And that is my my first question. Secondly, on the communication, it was also clear that you said that there will be measures to protect election related infrastructure. That is critical. I know the cybersecurity package have been presented, and perhaps the commissioner could clarify if that was what you referred to in the communication, that this was the follow up, or can we expect additional initiatives? Because I do think we need to protect election related infrastructure. Thank you.”
  Surveillance equipment & spyware
• “Thank you. Chair. Colleagues, I have the pleasure of speaking on behalf of the labor rapporteur, Lucas Mandel. Unfortunately cannot attend today. First, uh, Mr. Mandel, I would like to thank the co-rapporteurs, uh, in econ and envy Miss Vivaldi and Mr. Hansen. Uh, for the great cooperation on this important file. This report takes an important step towards strengthening legal clarity and coherence and supporting the competitiveness of European business. This. At its core, this initiative introduces a harmonized and operational definition of small mid-cap enterprises across across selected EU legislation. The Parliament's proposed SMC definition sets clear and measurable thresholds. Fewer than 1500 employees, an annual turnover of up to €450 million, or a balance sheet total up to €387 million. These figures reflect the real economic scale of Mid-caps within the European economy, and they align proportionately with existing SME criteria. Importantly, extended targeted simplification to these enterprises does not dilute existing support for SMEs, nor does it weaken the think small first principle. The report also extends selected regulatory reliefs to SMEs which are currently available to SMEs, while ensuring that micro and small enterprises remain fully safeguarded. Furthermore, our simplification proposals clarify an important point. The processing of special categories of personal data does not automatically and in every case constitute a high risk activity. We emphasize the need for individual assessment rather than blanket assumptions. At the same time, organisations are encouraged to implement robust privacy enhancing technical safeguards. Finally, to ensure long term legal coherence, we establish a five year review cycle for the Smc's definition. Align with existing SMEs thresholds.”
  Overall simplification of regulation in the EU
• “Well thank you chair. Thank you Commissioner. As you know, I presented my draft to political groups and major amendments, and we have started the negotiations. And I think it is fair to say that we are asking for even a higher level of ambition, that we want more far reaching reforms. But I want to be very clear that we are here to support you, because we do think that this is a very crucial initiative from the commission, because we need to better defend our democracies in Europe. I have two questions. And firstly, on the on the centre, I think it is clear from the communication that you look at the centre as a coordination hub with the existing structures for combating Fehmi. And my question is, is more basically, do you think in the future that you will perhaps even more clarified the mandate from your point of view of this centre? Why, perhaps, uh, the choice has been made that the centre should not, uh, I mean, basically assume the responsibilities and rather be alongside the existing entities. And the follow up question to that is, of course, because the only concerns and worries that at least I personally have is will this be more efficient? Will we actually make more results? And that is my my first question. Secondly, on the communication, it was also clear that you said that there will be measures to protect election related infrastructure. That is critical. I know the cybersecurity package has been presented, and perhaps the commissioner could clarify if that was what you referred to in the communication, that this was the follow up, or can we expect additional initiatives? Because I do think we need to protect election related infrastructure. Thank you.”
  Surveillance equipment & spyware
• “Well, thank you, Sharon. Thank you, Commissioner, for engaging with us and for your presentation. Let me be clear, of course, that I, and I think I speak on behalf of many colleagues in this room, of course, we support the objectives of the Democracy Shield. But of course, I would like to use this exchange of views perhaps to make sure that we clearly understand everything that is in the communication because I think it is fair to say that certain parts remain a bit unclear. Let me start perhaps my first question concerns the Center for European Resilience. My question is basically, what kind of entity will this center become and how independent will it be? I mean, you said yourself, Commissioner, that it should support and coordinate. I, of course, listen to that, but I mean, when I read the communication, it doesn't explicitly link it to any kind of action. It seems to be that in a way it could remain already in the existing structures. So basically, my question is, what role would the center have in relation to the current Counterfeit Me and this information architect that we already have? So that is my first question. Secondly, on the electoral infrastructure, yes, in the communication it is identified as vulnerable, but it's also clear that you do not suggest a reform of the Critical Entities Resilience Directive to perhaps include electoral infrastructure in its scope. So I was wondering, what is the reasoning behind that? And lastly, of course, I welcome that we now also, for the first time, also that Europol is now mentioned in regards of the Democracy Shield, but I don't really see any conclusions yet. I mean, I think we all know that we need to counter hybrid threats, and of course, we would like to kind of perhaps, if Commissioner could elaborate a bit on in what way do you think Europol in the future should take a larger part than it does today in regards to the Democracy Shield. I think that is my main questions for now, and I see my speaking time is over as well, so I hope I get some more clarity, Commissioner. Thank you.”
  Foreign interference in Europe
• “This is election interference, and we need to be clear about this. And I must say that I find it truly remarkable. Frankly, I would say unacceptable, that I even see colleagues in this committee, in this committee that should work for democracy shield at European level, that the interest is in defending those who want to spread Russian disinformation or even make promotional videos that we should go to study visits to Moscow to learn about peace. I find this very interesting. I think that what we need to do in this committee is more to make sure that we have a timely and correct implementation of the EU digital acquis with the focus on implementing DSA. And I think it is clear that a leading platform at this stage are not taking enough responsibility. If I move to the situation that we have on many of our new candidates countries, I would like to highlight the EU visit this info project that we have at ease at the moment. At the moment, I think this is very important for us to continue with. I think it is clear if we look, for example, in what we saw in Moldova. We need to take responsibility here to act and also give our support to many of the candidate countries, because of course, here you also see a big interest for different actors to work with this information and try to create division within the countries and try to interfere in their elections.”
  Foreign interference in Europe