Victor NEGRESCU

Policy topics Victor NEGRESCU is active on

What Victor NEGRESCU has said (80)

• 2026-07-14 “(10:17:56 - 10:20:04): Thank you, chair. 1st of all, I would like to thank our rapporteur, mister Ajay Pandela, for his work and constructive cooperation. I believe we all have to agree on 1 fundamental point that health must remain a genuine European priority. But, if that is our political commitment, it is also has to be reflected, in the 2027 new budget. Our main concern is the EU for health program. The issue is not only the level of payments, but above all the level of commitments because commitments determine our capacity to finance new health actions in the years ahead. The draft budget reduces UFO health commitments from €661,000,000 in 20 26 to 606000000 euros in 2027, a cut of more than 8%. At a time when Europe is facing growing health challenges, it sends the wrong signal. This is why we will table amendments to reinforce U for Health and ensure that our financial decisions are consistent with our political priorities. We'll also propose strengthening support for health civil society organizations, in particular patient organizations. Their operating grants represent only a small share of the program, but they have an enormous impact on prevention, awareness, patient representation, and better access to health care. In addition, we'll table amendments reflecting key priorities supported by the public health committee. With regards to prevention, reducing health inequality, strengthening the health workforce, primary care, rural mountain, land reserve areas, mental health, rare diseases, cancer, cardiovascular health, critical medicines, Hera preparedness, and medical countermeasures. Europe cannot claim that health is a strategic priority while reducing the resources that will finance future actions. I look forward to working with everyone involved to deliver a stronger and more ambitious 2027 EU budget for health. Thank you.”
  EU funding and budget allocation for health programmes
• 2026-07-14 “(17:36:16 - 17:38:52): Thank you, chair. I will 1st, start by thanking, the corruptors and colleagues for their interventions, underlining something that was clearly expressed also in the public health committee. The fact that, there is still a lot of work to be done in order to improve, the framework for the future national, regional, and partnership plans. In this regard, we also emphasize the need to actively involve local authorities, civil society, social partners in defining those plans, but also in monitoring the implementation of those respective plans. We also have to define the role of the European parliament, but in the same time, making sure that, the access to funding will not be conditioned by, reforms that could go against, the social development of our societies. In this regard, of course, in our opinion, we, call for the creation for the possibility to create dedicated health chapters in the national plans with clear milestones, with clear targets, with financial allocations. We also come up with numbers, and numbers are important. We cannot ignore them. We are asking in the national plans all over Europe to have at least €20,000,000,000 allocated for health priorities. This will reinforce key topics that are of specific importance for our citizens, and we can continue to invest in hospitals, primary care, emergency services, prevention, mental health, pediatric care, medicine in remote, rural, and mountain areas, making sure we are dealing with staff shortages, digitalizing our systems, but also ensuring strategic reserves. We can do that right now, so there is no reason why not to continue doing that, in those future partnership plans. We also, will like to make sure access to funding will be simplified. We want visibility. We want traceability. We want accountability. And I think, we think this can be, insured by having a clear, definition of all those elements in what the parliament is going to present. Last but not least, my kind call to the coraporters is to integrate the opinions in the report, not ignore the opinions. The voices of colleagues in those respective committees, are important. Thank you.”
  EU funding and budget allocation for health programmes
• 2026-07-14 “Thank you chair. First of all, I would like to thank our rapporteur, Mr. Mandela, for his work and constructive cooperation. I believe we all have to agree on one fundamental point that health must remain a genuine European priority. But if that is our political commitment, it is also has to be reflected in the 2027 EU budget. Our main concern is the EU for health programme. The issue is not only the level of payments but above all, the level of commitments, because commitments determine our capacity to finance new health actions in the years ahead. The draft budget reduces euro for health commitments from €661 million in 2026 to €606 million in 2027, a cut of more than 8%. At a time when Europe is facing growing health challenges. This sends the wrong signal. This is why we will table amendments to reinforce EU for health and ensure that our financial decisions are consistent with our political priorities. We will also propose strengthening support for health, civil society organisations, in particular patient organisations. There are operating grants represent only a small share of the programme, but they have an enormous impact on prevention, awareness, patient representation and better access to health care. In addition, we will table amendments reflecting key priorities supported by the Public Health Committee with regards to prevention, reducing health inequalities, strengthening the health workforce, primary care, rural and underserved areas, mental health, rare diseases, cancer, cardiovascular health, critical medicines, Hera preparedness and medical countermeasures. Europe cannot claim that health is a strategic priority while reducing the resources that will finance future actions. I look forward to working with everyone involved to deliver a stronger and more ambitious 2027 EU budget for health. Thank you.”
  Size of EU budget
• 2026-07-14 “(15:26:49 - 15:27:04): I wanna have an intervention on on The Republic Of Moldova on the facility, and I will do it in Romania. Sorry for having to do that, but, it is also important what we are doing here for the people over there, and sometimes it's good for them to understand this.”
  EU-Moldova relations
• 2026-07-14 “(15:27:11 - 15:30:03): 1st of all, many thanks for this presentation, and I'm delighted with the progress that's been made so far. And as you said in your intervention, the fact that the Republic Of Moldova is respecting the timetable, There are 24 stages of reform, which have been implemented in a very tense situation, and we can see their commitment and their resilience. But we can also see that the this goes beyond financial assistance. What they really want is to bring Europe closer to all the people of Moldova, developing infrastructure, creating deeper, institutions, and improving day to day life for the people in Moldova. As the vice president of the European Parliament and in charge of relations with Moldova and so a member and also a member of the budget committee, I think that this path for the Republic Of Moldova should be an inclusive path, which brings concrete improvements for the people. And I am convinced that this is what we are doing to get and we're doing the right thing to reach those goals. In our budget, we have budget, we have made changes which we're integrating into the agreement. And we're talking about a number of important areas, and I'd like to know what the European Commission's opinion is about this. We're talking about the need to have concrete steps for supporting young people and children and also a greater role for the diaspora of Moldova, strengthening partnerships with local groups, but also the need to developing the to develop the local prospect. Also talking about, increasing cross border cooperation, particularly with Romania, Romania being a member of the European Union and a neighbor of Moldova. So cooperation is very important also in the area of energy and transport. My question is, how far are these more social aspects being included, and how are those stakeholders being built into the reform agenda? I'd also like to ask you if these cross border projects are going to become something real on the ground. Are these reforms moving forward according to the plan, the timetable? Because they would actually increase the resilience of the Republic Of Moldova. So I'd like to ask the European Commission to present its position with regard to all of these matters so that we here at the European Parliament can work to support the implementation of those concrete areas within the reform agenda and within the funding, side of the project.”
  EU-Moldova relations
• 2026-06-17 “@CHAIR (14:39:22 – 14:39:32): Thank you, commissioner. And we start with the 1st round of intervention on behalf of the political group and on behalf of VPP colleague Raul de la Jost Quintano for 2 minutes. Colleague, you have the floor.”
  EU political integration
• 2026-06-17 “We conclude with the interventions coming from the members of the European parliament. And then for the last intervention in this debate, I kindly invite deputy minister Marilena Raouna to take the floor.”
  EU public communication strategy
• 2026-06-17 “We are not going to transform in a debate. We move to the next item on the agenda. The next item on the agenda is topical debate requested by a political group in New Rule 169 protecting EU citizens. Data from hybrid threats. The Lithuanian case. I would like to inform members that this debate. There is no catch the eye procedure and that no blue cards will be accepted. You have been informed regarding the new procedures. I would also like to remind speakers that given the test measures currently in place and the fixed end times of the debate, strict observance of speaking time will be required. So I will be cutting the mic at the end of the minutes allocated to each speakers. So this being said again, we start with the debate and I kindly invite the author, Mr. Petras Austrevicius for four minutes. Colleague, you have the floor.”
  EU policy on criminal justice
• 2026-06-17 “Thank you Commissioner. We start with the first round of intervention on behalf of the political groups and on behalf of the EPP colleague, Ludus Masiulis, for two minutes. Colleague, you have the floor.”
  EU political integration
• 2026-06-17 “Thank you colleague. Now we will move to the council and we have Deputy Minister for European Affairs, Madam Marilena Rauna. I would like also to thank the Cypriot presidency for the work. This is your last plenary. So thank you so much. Minister. You have the floor.”
  EU political integration
• 2026-06-17 “Debate. We move to the next item on the agenda. The next item on the agenda is topical debate requested by a political group. The new rule 169, protecting US citizens' data from hybrid threats, the Lithuanian case. I would like to inform members that for this debate, there is no CATCI procedure and that no blue cards will be accepted. You know, we have been informed regarding the new procedures. I would also like to remind speakers that giving the test measures currently in place and the fixed end times of the debate, strict observance of speaking time will be required. So I will be cutting the mic at the end of the minutes allocated to each speakers. So this being said, again, we start with the debate, and I kindly invite the author, mister Petras Aostevicius, for 4 minutes. Colleague, you have the floor.”
  EU-US data transfers
• 2026-06-17 “@CHAIR (14:33:43 – 14:34:13): So if there aren't any comments, the minutes are approved. So we move directly to the next item on the agenda, which is commission statement electrification action plan. Again, I would like to remind speaker that given the test measures currently in place and the fixed end times of the debate, 6 observance of speaking time will be required, and this, of course, also refers to colleagues from the commission. So this being said, I kindly invite, again, commissioner McGrath to take the floor. Thank you. Commissioner.”
  Energy (green transition)
• 2026-06-17 “Thank you, colleague. Now we'll move to the council, and we have deputy minister for European affairs, Ada Marilena Rawuna. I would like also to thank the CPO presidency for their work. This is your last plenary, so thank you so much. Minister, you have the floor.”
  EU political integration
• 2026-03-02 “P-000845/2026 Answer given by High Representative/Vice-President Kallas on behalf of the European Commission The European External Action Service (EEAS) and EU Delegations are closely coordinating with Member States, the Commission and partners to support and, where necessary, facilitate the repatriation of EU citizens affected by the crisis in the Middle East. Information and needs assessments are shared in real time via the Consular Working Party, the secure Consular Online platform and local consular cooperation networks. Since 2 March 2026, 23 Member States and Participating States have activated the Union Civil Protection Mechanism, requesting repatriation support. Nearly 90 flights were completed through the Mechanism (including the first-ever planned use of rescEU capacities), bringing close to 11 000 European citizens back to Europe. The EU institutions are closely monitoring security developments in the Middle East and their impact on the EU’s internal security, notably on the basis of threat assessments produced by the EU Intelligence and Situation Centre and Europol. While the security and terrorist threat was already high, the Commission adopted on 26 February 2026 the ProtectEU Agenda to prevent and combat terrorism 1 . It sets out a comprehensive framework, fully taking into account the external dimension, and proposes measures to address spillover effects of geopolitical developments on the EU’s terrorism threat landscape. The EU is also stepping up diplomacy to safeguard Member States’ interests and regional stability. On 5 March 2026, EU and Gulf Cooperation Council Foreign Ministers 2 agreed to work jointly to prevent Iran acquiring a nuclear weapon and to curb missile and unmanned aerial vehicle proliferation. The EU and its Member States support de-escalation at the UN and prioritise maritime security. 1 Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee of the Regions ProtectEU: Agenda to prevent and counter terrorism; COM/2026/101 final. 2 https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2026/03/05/joint-statement-by-gcc-eu-ministersmeeting-on-recent-developments-in-the-middle-east-iran-s-attacks-against-gcc-states/.”
  EU competences on foreign affairs · Foreign interference in Europe
• 2026-02-18 “E-000692/2026 Answer given by Executive Vice-President Fitto on behalf of the European Commission Ensuring appropriate national co-financing for projects contracted under the 2014-2020 Regional Operational Programme falls within the remit of the Romanian authorities. Commission notice 2021/C 417/01 1 establishes guidelines to facilitate the timely closure of the 2014-2020 operational programmes, and where necessary to enable beneficiaries to secure continuing funding for phased operations. To these ends, the Government of Romania adopted Emergency Ordinance 36/2023 2 to establish a uniform national legal framework for programme closure and the phasing of operations, on which the Commission was consulted. Article 7 of the Ordinance allows for adjustments to the assessed financial needs of phased operations to reflect the significant increases in prices that have been observed in recent years. Updated cost estimates may thus be applied to the second phase of selected projects to be financed from 2021-2027 EU funding programmes. This framework is intended to alleviate the financial pressures faced by local authorities to complete projects and reduce the risk of losing EU funds. The Commission remains in regular contact with the Romanian authorities regarding implementation of the partnership principle and of the Government Emergency Ordinance 36/2023. The Commission will continue to monitor the closure process to ensure sound financial management in line with Commission notice 2021/C 417/01. 1 Commission notice Guidelines on the closure of operational programmes adopted for assistance from the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund, the Cohesion Fund and the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund (2014-2020) 2021/C 417/01 (OJ C, C/417, 14.10.2021. CELEX: https://eurlex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52021XC1014(01). 2 Government Emergency Order No. 33 (2023) laying down the general framework for the closure of operational programmes financed under the 2014-2020 programming period: http://legislatie.just.ro/Public/DetaliiDocument/270564.”
  Cohesion and rural funding
• 2026-02-05 “E-000473/2026 Answer given by Mr Várhelyi on behalf of the European Commission The Commission is working closely with the World Health Organization (WHO) to implement the global HIV 1 strategy. The Commission supports the WHO in monitoring surveillance data and progress towards international targets including the Sustainable Development Goals. Projects funded under the EU4Health Programme 2 focus on supporting outreach and care for HIV patients with comorbidities, along with funding for research activities in this domain through Horizon Europe 3 . The Commission intends to contribute to a planned UN General Assembly declaration on HIV in 2026. The Cohesion Policy (2021–2027) supports the modernisation of screening and diagnostic infrastructure, deployment of e-health and community-based care models, and strengthening of the health workforce to improve prevention, early detection and equitable access to quality treatment, including in high-incidence Member States. The EU Facility, a component of the National and Regional Partnership Fund under the 20282034 Multiannual Financial Framework 4 , offers flexible implementation and funding, allowing quick responses, including support for health and safety policy. National and Regional Partnership Plans can focus on investments to reduce health disparities, ensuring equal access to quality healthcare. The Commission discusses communicable diseases regularly in the Health Security Committee 5 , which includes discussions on the challenges and prioritisation for response with the support of the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control 6 . 1 Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). 2 https://health.ec.europa.eu/funding/eu4health-programme-2021-2027-vision-healthier-european-union_en. 3 https://research-and-innovation.ec.europa.eu/funding/funding-opportunities/funding-programmes-and-opencalls/horizon-europe_en. 4 COM (2025) 565. 5 https://health.ec.europa.eu/health-security-and-infectious-diseases/crisis-management_en#health-securitycommittee. 6 https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/hiv-infection-and-aids.”
  Vaccination · EU competences on health
• 2026-01-13 “P-000095/2026 Answer given by Mr Šefčovič on behalf of the European Commission The Commission acknowledges concerns about the EU-Mercosur Agreement and has taken steps to address them, including tariff quotas for sensitive agricultural sectors and robust safeguards. The EU co-legislators are working on a regulation to allow a prompt start and end of investigations, allowing a reduction or suspension of trade preferences in case of harm to domestic producers. It includes a quasi-automatic threshold to trigger investigations set at a 5% increase in volumes or reduction in import prices, enabling a quick response to a serious injury or threat to EU’s industry. Provisional measures can be imposed in three weeks. All food products placed on the EU market must comply with EU sanitary and phytosanitary requirements. These are enforced through rigorous border controls and audits of third countries. If a shortcoming is identified, the third country must put in place the necessary corrective measures. If insufficient, and there is a serious risk to human or animal health, the third country may be delisted and export authorisation to the EU may be suspended. The existence of a trade agreement as such does not alter this. The Commission will also pursue a stronger alignment of production standards for imports, establishing a principle that the most hazardous pesticides banned in the EU for health or environmental reasons are not allowed in via imported products. Besides, the Commission started an impact assessment for the modernisation of farm animal welfare rules, including introducing equivalent animal welfare standards for imports. Finally, the Commission announced a task force to further strengthen controls on imports and a 50% increase of audits in third countries over the next two years.”
  Pesticides & trade · Import of agri-food products in the EU · Trade relations with Mercosur
• 2025-08-31 “P-003337/2025 Answer given by High Representative/Vice-President Kallas on behalf of the European Commission European External Action Service (EEAS) recruitments and selections are based on merit whilst ensuring adequate geographical and gender balance. The selection procedure for Ambassador posts in EU Delegations is a thorough and inclusive one: candidates need to have a thorough knowledge and understanding of the country they apply for as well as EU policies and instruments, solid diplomatic experience and proven management skills in order to be able to manage a multinational and multicultural team. The above are extensively tested through interviews by panels consisting of representatives of the EEAS, the Commission, the Council and two Member States, as well as by independent external consultants with regards to leadership skills. The final decision rests with the High Representative/Vice-President (HR/VP) who is institutionally empowered to nominate the Ambassadors of the EU to third countries. The HR/VP is committed to achieving better gender and geographical balance. In this context, the EEAS, in its contacts with Member States at all levels (Romania included), encourages them to send a sufficient number of well-prepared candidates, including women applicants, who should apply for a wide selection of posts. In 2024 unfortunately there was a small number of Romanian candidates, the majority of whom were interviewed but none was selected. The EEAS strives for an inclusive service that is as geographically and gender-balanced as possible, and we are always ready to offer advice to Member States on the expected qualifications for positions but also on the recruitment process and how candidates can best prepare themselves.”
  Recruitment policies in the EU
• 2025-07-14 “P-002855/2025 Answer given by Mr Dombrovskis on behalf of the European Commission 1. The Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF) 1 is a performance‑based instrument, and funds are disbursed upon the completion of agreed milestones and targets. In the context of estimating the cost of an investment or reform, value-added tax (VAT) should not be included as part of the cost, unless it can be demonstrated that the VAT would ultimately lead to a cost for the Member State, which is a circumstance to be considered on a case-by-case basis. Consequently, Romania’s VAT increase should not affect the eligibility of RRF investments. Focus should rather be on the implementation of projects included in Romania’s Recovery and Resilience Plan (RRP) by 31 August 2026. For cohesion policy projects with total cost below EUR 5 million, additional VAT‑related costs could be potentially eligible under Article 64(1)(c) of the Common Provisions Regulation subject to national authorities’ decision and budget availability. 2. The decision to adjust wages or reorganise staff pay remains firmly within the competence of the Romanian government. The Commission shares the government’s objective of maintaining a motivated, well‑qualified administration to maximise access to cohesion policy funds and RRF funds. For cohesion policy, EU resources from the technical assistance remain available to help achieve this objective. 3. In recent weeks and months, the Commission has worked closely with the Romanian authorities to conduct a detailed evaluation of progress on investments contained in Romania’s RRP. The common goal is to help Romania maximise access to RRF grants, while also preserving viable projects in the loan component. There is a limited time window to deliver on all reforms and investments. The Commission has engaged intensively with the Romanian partners to ensure that the revised RRP focuses on sufficiently mature, achievable investments. 1 https://commission.europa.eu/business-economy-euro/economic-recovery/recovery-and-resilience-facility_en.”
  Conditions to access EU budget · Cohesion and rural funding
• 2025-07-09 “E-002783/2025 Answer given by Executive Vice-President Mînzatu on behalf of the European Commission The Commission is acting on affordable student housing in various ways: the firstever European Affordable Housing Plan will support countries, regions & cities in increasing the supply of affordable and sustainable housing, including for students. Through InvestEU’s Advisory Hub 1 and Fund, the EU has been helping higher education institutions design, implement and fund the construction and renovation of student accommodation. Under Cohesion Policy 2 , EUR 7.5 billion of EU budget support is planned for housing (2021– 2027). Member States can allocate funding for social housing, including student housing. In April 2025, the Commission has encouraged and enabled Member States to double the amounts currently planned, offering a 100% co-financing rate and 30% pre-financing, if allocating in 2025. The Recovery and Resilience Facility 3 is supporting investments and reforms with over EUR 22 billion allocated to social housing and other social infrastructure. The Commission adopted a Communication on a comprehensive approach to mental health 4 , with 20 flagships and financing opportunities worth EUR 1.23 billion to support Member States. In particular for youth, European programmes already provide targeted support to help overcome the barriers to participation, including mental health-related challenges. Erasmus+ fosters inclusive approaches to higher education, mobility, and cooperation activities including through promoting support for the mental health. Both of these issues will remain central in shaping EU recommendations and funding programmes. The Commission is committed to continue its work on student welfare, addressing especially equal access to higher education, student housing and living conditions, and health. 1 https://investeu.europa.eu/investeu-programme_en. 2 https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/whats-new/panorama/2025/03/03-12-2025-how-cohesion-policy-helpssolve-europe-s-housing-crisis_en. 3 https://commission.europa.eu/business-economy-euro/economic-recovery_en. 4 https://health.ec.europa.eu/publications/comprehensive-approach-mental-health_en?prefLang=ro.”
  EU housing policy · EU policy on mental health
• 2025-06-18 “E-002471/2025 Answer given by High Representative/Vice-President Kallas on behalf of the European Commission The EU diplomat in question has been provided with all essential support and smoothly evacuated from the Russian Federation and will not return to Moscow. To ensure a proper duty of care of its staff, evacuation level 1 has been applied in the EU Delegation in the Russian Federation since the start of the Russian full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022. It allows voluntary withdrawal of non-essential staff and dependants from the place of assignment. The remaining staff is provided with tailor-made security instructions and training. The European External Action Service (EEAS) maintains a network of regional security officers in the EU delegations to assess security risks and to propose appropriate preventing and mitigating measures to ensure security of the staff. Where necessary, in the high-risk areas, the staff is provided with special means and equipment (e.g., armoured vehicles, radio communication equipment, personal protective equipment etc.) and has to follow strict travel clearance procedure for missions. The EU has summoned the representative of Russia to the EU and has carried out a demarche in Moscow, in which it demands from the Russian authorities a thorough investigation and to bring the perpetrators to justice. Up to now, no official feedback has been received from the Russian authorities. The EEAS will monitor the progress and the outcome of the investigation launched by the Russian law-enforcement agencies. Since Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine, the EU maintains a very limited engagement with Russia. Currently, the EEAS is reflecting upon the measures to take towards the Russian Federation. Restrictive measures are taken by the Council at unanimity.”
  EU-Russia relations (from March 2022) · EU diplomatic representation
• 2025-06-11 “P-002361/2025 Answer given by Mr Várhelyi on behalf of the European Commission Member States are responsible for the definition of their health policy and for the organisation and delivery of health services and medical care (Article 168(5) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union). Through the comprehensive approach to mental health 1 , the Commission supports Member States and stakeholders with 20 flagship initiatives and almost EUR 1.3 billion in funding opportunities. Those flagships include support from the World Health Organization to Member States to build mental health service capacity and to integrate mental health across policies. Other examples are a multi-disciplinary training and exchange programme for mental health professionals (EU-PROMENS 2 ) and EU support on stigma and discrimination that surrounds mental health. Special focus is placed on boosting the mental health of children and young people through four dedicated flagship initiatives, including the development of a prevention toolkit in cooperation with the United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) 3 . In addition, the Commission supports collaborative work on mental health between Member States through joint actions, such as ImpleMENTAL 4 and MENTOR 5 , funded with more than EUR 10 million. A new joint action on the mental health of vulnerable groups is currently being prepared (EUR 6 million in funding). The Commission is also providing support in the collection and transfer of best and promising practices via the EU Best Practice Portal for Public Health 6 . In 2023, a dedicated call for practices on mental health 7 resulted in 29 new proven practices that can inspire Member States. The Commission regularly discusses the Member States’ challenges and progress of mental health policies at the subgroup on mental health 8 of the Expert Group on Public Health 9 . 1 https://health.ec.europa.eu/document/download/cef45b6d-a871-44d5-9d623cecc47eda89_en?filename=com_2023_298_1_act_en.pdf. 2 https://eu-promens.eu/eu-promens. 3 https://www.unicef.org/eca/press-releases/european-commission-and-unicef-announce-new-partnershipimprove-health-outcomes. 4 https://ja-implemental.eu/. 5 https://ja-mentor.eu/. 6 https://webgate.ec.europa.eu/dyna/bp-portal/. 7 https://health.ec.europa.eu/latest-updates/call-best-and-promising-practices-mental-health-2023-07-12_en. 8 https://health.ec.europa.eu/non-communicable-diseases/events_en?f%5B0%5D=topic_topic%3A203. 9 https://health.ec.europa.eu/non-communicable-diseases/expert-group-public-health_en.”
  EU policy on mental health
• 2025-06-10 “E-002325/2025 Answer given by Mr Šefčovič on behalf of the European Commission 1. The customs legislation applicable to free zones is found in Articles 243 to 249 of the Union Customs Code (Regulation (EU) 952/2013, ‘UCC’). These Articles enable customs administrations in the EU Member States to designate part of the Union customs territory as a free zone and set out the conditions to be followed in compliance with the provisions of the UCC. EU Member States have a duty to inform the Commission about free zones in their territories (Article 243(2) UCC). 2. A study on free zones in the EU provides comprehensive information on their operation and proposes guidelines and good practices for their implementation in line with the European Green Deal 1 . Additional guidance on international best practice is contained in the World Customs Organisation's ‘Practical Guidance on Free Zones’, developed with EU input 2 . 3. Although not specifically linked to free zones, the EU's regional policy has various financial instruments for the promotion of border regions, including programmes like Interreg 3 . Recent Commission proposals include a new Pact for Eastern Border Regions and reforms to Cohesion Policy 4 , offering higher EU co-financing and pre-financing for specific regional projects. The Connecting Europe Facility 5 instrument supports growth and competitiveness through infrastructure investment, enhancing cross-border interactions. For Ukraine only, the Ukraine Facility 6 is the primary tool, complemented by the Neighbourhood, Development and International Cooperation Instrument – Global Europe 7 . Cross-border trade is facilitated by collaboration mechanisms such as Common Transit Procedure 8 for customs, joint border controls at shared Border Crossing Points, cooperation between Romanian and Ukrainian customs (potentially, with use of the Customs Programme 9 ) and the EU-Ukraine Solidarity Lanes initiative 10 . 1 Study of the impact of free zones and proposals for guidelines on their future modernisation in light of the European Green Deal, https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/a40ce9b8-68d0-11ee-922001aa75ed71a1/languageen#:~:text=The%20underlying%20objective%20of%20the%20study%20is%20to,a%20comparison%20of%20E U%20and%20non-EU%20free%20 zones In addition, Annex VII of this study 1 contains the proposal for guidelines with good practices on how free zones can contribute to the European Green Deal. 2 https://www.wcoomd.org/-/media/wco/public/global/pdf/topics/facilitation/activities-and-programmes/freezone/wco-fz-guidance_en.pdf?la=en. 3 Programme Interreg VI-A-NEXT Hungary-Slovakia-Romania-Ukraine (https://cohesiondata.ec.europa.eu/programmes/2021TC16NXCB010) and Programme: Interreg VI-A- NEXT Romania-Ukraine (https://cohesiondata.ec.europa.eu/programmes/2021TC16NXCB012). 4 https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/communication/mid-term-review-2025/communication-mid-termreview-2025_en.pdf. 5 https://commission.europa.eu/funding-tenders/find-funding/eu-funding-programmes/connecting-europefacility_en. 6 https://enlargement.ec.europa.eu/funding-technical-assistance/ukraine-facility_en. 7 https://enlargement.ec.europa.eu/funding-technical-assistance/neighbourhood-development-and-internationalcooperation-instrument-global-europe-ndici-global-europe_en. 8 https://taxation-customs.ec.europa.eu/customs/customs-procedures-import-and-export/what-customstransit/union-and-common-transit_en. 9 https://taxation-customs.ec.europa.eu/about-us/eu-funding-customs-and-tax/customs-programme_en.”
  EU policy on custom fee on non-EU imports
• 2025-05-27 “E-002125/2025 Answer given by Mr Várhelyi on behalf of the European Commission The Commission acknowledges the importance of access to healthcare across the EU. The Commission’s political guidelines for 2024-2029 1 recognise the importance of the health sector in making our economy more resilient. The Commission calls for completing the European Health Union with diversified supply chains, more resilient health systems and stepping up work on preventive health. The Commission presented its proposal for the future Multiannual Financial Framework 2028-2034 on 16 July 2025, including these priorities among its objectives for Health. The Europe’s Beating Cancer Plan 2 works in synergy with the EU Cancer Mission. Cancer in children, adolescents and young adults (CAYA) has been systematically prioritised in all research topics supported under the EU Cancer Mission work programmes. As a result, around 20% of funding committed by the EU Cancer Mission over the period 2021-2024 targets this specific population. Addressing cancer in CAYAs is expected to remain an area of focus in future calls for proposals. 1 https://commission.europa.eu/document/download/e6cd4328-673c-4e7a-8683f63ffb2cf648_en?filename=Political%20Guidelines%202024-2029_EN.pdf. 2 https://health.ec.europa.eu/publications/europes-beating-cancer-plan_en.”
  EU competences on health
• 2025-05-15 “E-001954/2025 Answer given by Ms Lahbib on behalf of the European Commission 1. The initiatives planned under the Strategy for the Rights of Persons with Disabilities 2021-2030 1 address the rights and needs of persons with disabilities in all their diversity, including people with Down syndrome. Promoting independent living and inclusion in the community are among the key objectives of the Strategy, as well as inclusive and accessible education of all children with disabilities, including Down syndrome. While specific standards for social, educational or support services for persons with Down syndrome have not been issued, the Commission has provided guidance in various areas of life concerning them, such as independent living or employment, highlighting the importance of considering the diversity of disabilities 2 . 2. The Commission supports the participation in decision-making processes of persons with disabilities, including people with intellectual disabilities such as people with Down syndrome. For instance, the Guide of good electoral practices for citizens with disabilities 3 , adopted as part of the Commission’s EU Citizenship Package, presents an overview of practices aiming to further improve participation of citizens with disabilities in the electoral process. The Commission involves organisations representing persons with intellectual disabilities such as people with Down syndrome through the Disability Platform 4 , as well as on the occasion of the European Day of Persons with Disabilities 5 . In addition, to enhance the involvement of people with intellectual disabilities such as people with Down syndrome, the Commission is upscaling the use of easy-to-read formats across its information and consultation documents. 1 https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A52021DC0101. 2 Commission Notice – Guidance on independent living and inclusion in the community of persons with disabilities in the context of EU funding, C/2024/7897 https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/7188/oj/eng. 3 Guide of good electoral practices in Member States addressing the participation of citizens with disabilities in the electoral process https://commission.europa.eu/publications/guide-good-electoral-practices-member-statesaddressing-participation-citizens-disabilities_en. 4 Register of Commission expert groups and other similar entities https://ec.europa.eu/transparency/expertgroups-register/screen/expert-groups/consult?lang=en&groupId=3820&newsTypeId=2. 5 European Day of Persons with Disabilities 2024 - https://employment-social-affairs.ec.europa.eu/european-daypersons-disabilities-2024-2024-11-28_en.”
  EU policy on disability inclusion & accessibility
• 2025-01-26 “P-000330/2025 Answer given by Mr Brunner on behalf of the European Commission In line with the EU action plan against trafficking in cultural goods 1 the Commissions supports Member States in tackling cultural goods theft. 1. The EU Agency for Criminal Justice Cooperation 2 supports the setup of joint investigation teams for cross-border investigations into cultural goods trafficking. Romania and the Netherlands have set up a joint investigation team regarding the theft from the Drents Museum 3 . The EU Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation 4 has a special point of contact for cultural goods trafficking. Under the EU-funded European Multidisciplinary Platform Against Criminal Threats 5 , there are dedicated operational actions against cultural goods trafficking. 2. Beyond these operational actions, the Commission continues implementing the EU action plan. The EU is funding projects 6 that address the challenging issue of cultural goods trafficking. Measures include law enforcement capacity building, tools to detect trafficked items and monitor online marketplaces, protection of cultural heritage sites by drones or satellite imagery, supporting practitioners’ networks and awareness raising. The Commission has also launched a project with the International Council of Museums 7 , including support to a selected number of museums. The Commission furthermore is conducting a study on improving traceability of cultural goods in the EU, to provide recommendations to Member States on setting up stolen cultural goods databases. 1 https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:52022DC0800 2 https://www.eurojust.europa.eu/ 3 https://www.eurojust.europa.eu/news/romania-and-netherlands-set-joint-investigation-team-theft-precioushistoric-art-dutch-museum 4 https://www.europol.europa.eu/ 5 https://home-affairs.ec.europa.eu/policies/law-enforcement-cooperation/empact-fighting-crime-together_en 6 For examples of projects see https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/2cbbe3d2-a55c-11ef-85f001aa75ed71a1/language-en 7 https://icom.museum/en/”
  EU and national cultural identities
• 2025-01-12 “E-000084/2025 Answer given by Ms Roswall on behalf of the European Commission The Commission acknowledges the increased difficulties for Romania and Bulgaria to protect their marine environment, exacerbated by Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine and the absence of well-functioning regional cooperation. Under the Marine Strategy Framework Directive 1 (MSFD), Romania and Bulgaria have been assisted in developing their marine strategies to protect their marine waters. The EU Research and Innovation Framework Programme Horizon Europe 2 supports environmental protection in the Black Sea 3 . The Interreg Black Sea programme 4 provides EUR 95 million of EU funds 5 . The Cohesion Policy 6 provides support for a total estimated value of EUR 70 million, focused on the Natura 2000 sites in the Black Sea and Danube Delta. A project 7 promoted monitoring and assessment activities, in line with MSFD requirements. Under the Common Maritime Agenda 8 for the Black Sea, projects against marine pollution due to the ongoing conflict started 9 . The Commission alerts the authorities in Bulgaria and Romania daily on possible pollution incidents, including from oil spills, detected by satellite surveillance 10 . National authorities can request assistance from the Union Civil Protection Mechanism 11 . Furthermore, the Ukraine Investment Framework 12 could support investments related to 1 Directive 2008/56/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 June 2008 establishing a framework for community action in the field of marine environmental policy, OJ L 164, 25.6.2008, p. 19–40. 2 https://research-and-innovation.ec.europa.eu/funding/funding-opportunities/funding-programmes-and-opencalls/horizon-europe_en 3 Notably through the EU Mission Restore our Ocean and Waters: https://research-andinnovation.ec.europa.eu/funding/funding-opportunities/funding-programmes-and-open-calls/horizon-europe/eumissions-horizon-europe/restore-our-ocean-and-waters_en and more particularly its Danube and Black Sea Lighthouse: https://restore4life.eu/eu-missions-restore-our-ocean-waters/ or through specific projects such as https://www.doorsblacksea.eu, https://bridgeblacksea.org/ 4 Involving eight countries https://blacksea-cbc.net/ 5 Much of it for risk prevention and biodiversity. 6 https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/policy/what/investment-policy_en 7 https://emblasproject.org/ 8 The EU sea basin strategy promoting maritime regional cooperation among the coastal countries in the Black Sea region, except for Russia. 9 Building Response Frameworks under existing and new Marine Pollution Challenges in the Black Sea (RESPONSE): https://ec.europa.eu/info/funding-tenders/opportunities/portal/screen/how-to-participate/orgdetails/999999999/project/101124661/program/43392145/details and Harnessing complementary curricular preparedness via sustainable management in response to civil and military pollution on the coastline, tributaries and lagoons in Black Sea’s North, West, South zone (Black Sea SIERRA): https://ec.europa.eu/info/fundingtenders/opportunities/portal/screen/how-to-participate/orgdetails/999999999/project/101124670/program/43392145/details 10 CleanSeaNet hosted by the European Maritime Safety Agency: https://www.emsa.europa.eu/csn-menu.html 11 https://civil-protection-humanitarian-aid.ec.europa.eu/what/civil-protection/eu-civil-protection-mechanism_en via the Emergency Response Coordination Centre. 12 https://enlargement.ec.europa.eu/european-neighbourhood-policy/countries-region/ukraine/ukraineinvestment-framework_en”
  Energy (green transition)
• 2024-10-25 “E-002264/2024 Answer given by Executive Vice-President Virkkunen on behalf of the European Commission As stated in its reply to written question P-001987/2024, the EU firmly condemns Russia’s ongoing intimidation, harassment and killing of European journalists and other media workers who report from its war of aggression against Ukraine. This also includes the use of politically motivated arrest warrants issued by Russia against international journalists reporting from war zones and frontlines 1 . The EU has consistently condemned Russia’s attempts to obstruct the work of European and other journalists and has regularly addressed these issues in multilateral fora like the United Nations and the Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe where Russia is present. The EU will remain steadfast in its commitment to protect media freedom and the safety of journalists around the world and in war zones. The Commission will ensure the effective application of the European Media Freedom Act 2 and the anti-SLAPP Directive 3 . It will also monitor Member States’ actions to put in practice the Recommendation 4 on the protection, safety and empowerment of journalists and the Recommendation 5 on protecting journalists and human rights defenders who engage in public participation from manifestly unfounded or abusive court proceedings to safeguard the independence of media and journalists and will continue assessing all relevant developments related to media freedom and pluralism in all Member States, including Romania, under the annual Rule of Law Report 6 . 1 Further detailed guidance on extradition to third states and a summary of the relevant case law of the Court of Justice in this respect can be found in the Guidelines on Extradition to Third States of June 2022, see Commission Notice - Guidelines on Extradition to Third States, Official Journal of the European Union, (2022/C 223/01). 2 https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L_202401083 3 Directive - EU - 2024/1069 - EN - EUR-Lex. 4 https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/recommendation-protection-safety-and-empowerment-journalists 5 https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ%3AL%3A2022%3A138%3ATOC 6 https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-policy/policies/justice-and-fundamental-rights/upholding-rulelaw/rule-law/annual-rule-law-cycle_en”
  Disinformation & online freedoms · EU-Russia relations (from March 2022)
• 2024-09-26 “E-001832/2024 Reply On 30 December 2023, the Council adopted Decision (EU) 2024/210 on the full application of the Schengen acquis in Bulgaria and Romania and checks have been lifted at the internal air and sea borders with these two Member States from 31 March 2024. A further unanimous Council Decision is necessary to set the date for the lifting of checks at the internal land borders. At the meeting of the Justice and Home Affairs Council on 10 October 2024, the ministers were informed of the state of play in relation to the full application of the Schengen acquis in Bulgaria and Romania. The Council will continue to work with a view to gathering the unanimous support necessary for the adoption of the Council Decision setting the date for the lifting of checks at the internal land borders of Bulgaria and Romania.”
  Enlargement of Schengen area
• 2024-09-15 “E-001718/2024 Answer given by Mr Hoekstra on behalf of the European Commission The Commission acknowledges the concern for the increasing intensity and frequency of climate-related disasters in the EU and confirms its intent to strengthen EU-level action. The Commission refers the Honourable Member to its earlier responses to related questions, such as P-002209/2023 1 , E-002181/2023 2 and E-000001/2024 3 . The Commission set out the main aspects for improving climate resilience in the EU in its Communication on managing climate risks 4 . It recognises that both at national and EU level capacities are already stretched while risk pressures will continue to increase. Therefore, the Commission seeks to ensure resilience by design across all its policies, while also noting that the risk ownership lies mostly with national competence. The European Climate Law sets out the responsibility to ensure continuous progress in enhancing adaptive capacity, strengthening resilience and reducing vulnerability to climate change. As EU response and recovery capacities can be exhausted with increasing risks, the Commission will consider how the solidarity mechanisms can better incentivise adequate anticipatory actions on key risks by the Member States, also in the interest of fiscal sustainability. As part of strengthening the overall readiness of the EU to a range of challenges, the Commission has also announced its intention to further step up its support to climate resilience with a European Climate Adaptation Plan. All relevant policy proposals will take the evidence of increasing climate risks into account. 1 https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/P-9-2023-002209_EN.html 2 https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/E-9-2023-002181_EN.html 3 https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/-ASW_EN.html 4 https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=COM%3A2024%3A91%3AFIN&qid=1710403105471”
  Energy (green transition)
• “There are many references that might go against the treaties, in particular when it comes to the cohesion policy and agricultural policy that are mentioned as such in the treaties. Also, the issue of conditionalities and reforms. I think we should not wait for the Council or the Commission to define what those conditionalities means. I think I think it's important, of course, to also, uh, try to be explicit. My humble opinion is not to condition resources based on those points. Not to do the RF once more. But of course, again, I think it's an issue to be discussed. Last but not least, I also heard, uh, the colleagues in charge of resources. Own resources. I think we have here a big problem. This budget is drafting based on resources that do not exist yet. I will, together with, uh, the Romanian delegation from the S&D Group, come up with some proposals on the own resources. And one of the proposals that we are going to make is on taxing online gambling. Thank you.”
  Conditions to access EU budget · Own EU resources
• “Thank you. President. Commissioner. The EU budget for 2026 isn't just about figures, it is about our way forward. We proposed concrete measures for a Europe that's safer, fairer and more prepared for the future. First, a European hub for maritime security to the Black Sea, the protection of commercial routes, but also the protection of Europe in strategically important areas. In my amendments, I also included over €250 million for fields like research, energy, education, agriculture, youth and SMEs. I said no to austerity, and I ask additional resources for pilot projects like tourist routes like via Transylvania and Romania, for instance. Europe needs a brave budget that invests in people, provides stability and protection to its citizens, and leaves no region and no person behind. Thank you.”
  Size of EU budget
• “But the potential revenues are significant if betting, like digital platforms are also included, and if the market continues to grow as expected, the revenues could realistically reach between 2 and €4 billion per year during the next few long term budget. This means potentially between 14 and €28 billion between 2028 and 2034. This is equal to the Erasmus+ budget in the current MFF. And let us also be honest when we refer to this topic according to recent estimates published by the industry, illegal online gambling alone already represents around 71% of the market in Europe. This means billions lost in public revenues, weaker protection for consumers and minors, growing addiction risks and major vulnerabilities linked to money laundering and criminal networks operating across borders. This means that even the countries with a big online industry like Malta, Cyprus and Estonia are losing money for their national budgets. So Europe cannot pretend this problem does not exist. We have to interfere. We have to fight illegal operators. But at the same time, we are going to protect citizens. So Europe must show that it is capable not only of deciding together about how we spend the money, but also how we can build common resources that will be available as soon as possible. Thank you again to everyone supporting this initiative.”
  Anti-money laundering regulation
• “We move to the catch the eye procedures. We have three requests for speeches, and we start with Mr. Lopez Aguilar.”
  EU public communication strategy
• “This helps us save billions, but helps us show Europe is understanding the context, but also reacting and offering solutions to the current challenges. I want to emphasize what we also mentioned in the report the need to involve more social partners, civil society, local authorities and SMEs in the process by listening more to their perspective and improving their access to the funding, but also their participation in the implementation of the different reforms. I want to underline that we have a clear language also on on social goals, in particular on education and health. Lastly, the report is underlining the fact that our financial interests will be protected and that we will support all the relevant institutions in fighting against corruption and combating fraud. So thank you again for your support for your constructive approach. I hope this will be reflected in the votes. Again, I want to thank my Co-rapporteur and all the shadows for the good work that we managed to conduct on this file. And this shows that econ and budget can really work together in a constructive way. Thank you so much.”
  Conditions to access EU budget
• “Commissioner. Colleagues. Europe is facing an issue. Our networks cannot keep up with our economic ambitions. We have fragmented rules, not enough investments and discrepancies between member states. Digital Networks Act can solve this. This is not a technical regulation. It's a regulation about security and cohesion. We have high capacity networks, fiber, 5G preparation for six G. Without them, we can have a modern industry or real innovation. The act suggests more predictable rules and reduces the fragmentation of our European market. But we need to be clear investments cannot come without responsibility. Networks have to be safe, affordable, accessible and fair for citizens and for SMEs. Digitalisation is not a purpose in itself. It's a way of getting better jobs, more efficient public services and stronger Europe. And this is what this act must deliver upon. We need a European and safe, modern digital future.”
  EU policy on accessibility of digital infrastructure
• “Commissioner, colleagues. Cohesion policy is one of the most powerful. Eu instruments. It's a concrete expression of solidarity between member states and regions of the European Union. Otherwise we would have two speed Europe, a developed Europe and a left behind Europe. We need to speed up implementation and demonstrate the real impact of EU funding. We have to defend this policy. What will happen to cohesion beyond 2027? We don't want these changes. This is a vital policy and it must not remain under-financed or marginalised. This is a guarantee of a prosperous, united Europe and we should make it more efficient now so that it would be more powerful in future.”
  Cohesion and rural funding
• “Thank you, chair, and I would like to thank the rapporteur for the extensive presentation of what she tries to point out in this report. Indeed, Erasmus+ is one of the most visible and most successful EU programmes, and we always noticed the fact that many EU leaders like to take pictures with young people that are part of these mobilities. But when it comes to funding, they forget about Erasmus. They forget about the pictures. They forget about the young people. They forget about the universities. They forget about schools. If we look in the report we are supposed to allocate to Erasmus+ and educational programmes almost €150 billion. For it to be successful and generate the added value expected in our economies, and of course, also to reinforce our competitiveness and we are not there. €40 billion is simply not enough. It simply does not cover the inflation or does not cover the new expectations and goals of the Erasmus+ programme. So of course we cannot be happy with it. In the same time, we have to make sure that with the money that is available, we have the impact expected by citizens, by young people, by youth organizations, by universities, by schools. So we are coming up with new ideas. And this is great. I'm supportive of. This specific scheme related to scholarship. But in the same time we should not forget.”
  Public funding for education
• “Thank you. Chair. I was also paying attention to the statements of president Van der Leyen, and she spoke about an ambitious budget that is supposed to deal with today's realities, but it doesn't seem to be so. So I also underline what colleague said. We don't consider this MFF as being fitted for the future, and we don't believe this matches the expectation that citizens have today. Indeed, they want simplification, but they also want predictability and clarity when it comes to the funding. And this is why farmers were today in the streets in front of the European Commission. Local authorities want indeed to have integrated access to resources, but they don't want the centralization of the funds in the hands of government that might do bad reforms. Indeed, we want conditionalities, but the conditionalities should be transparent and of course, reforms that are fitted for people. Indeed, we support the increase for Erasmus, but we want to make sure education and skills it deals with in a coherent way. Indeed, we want the competitiveness of Europe, but we want to make sure that the vulnerable regions and smaller companies have access to those respective funds. So details are important, Commissioner. And this is what we want. We want information one. Clarity clarity predictability. We want simple tools. But at the same time we want a European budget. Thank you.”
  Size of EU budget
• “Commissioner. Dear colleagues. Europe is entering a decisive debate about its future budget and its capacity to act. Every day in this house we call for more investments, but also citizens expect us to answer another key question how do we finance everything fairly and responsibly? This is why I initiated this proposal for a new European own resource designed to finance, in particular education, youth mental health, addiction prevention, and the protection of minors by taxing online gambling, online betting and betting like digital activities. Together with the S&D Group, we requested that this issue be placed on the plenary agenda after formally introducing a question for oral answer in order to ensure that the European Parliament starts a serious political debate on this topic. The idea is simple a fast growing, highly digitalized and increasingly cross-border industry, using the added value of the single market, should make a fair contribution to support Europe's social priorities and protect vulnerable people. This is not a tax on citizens, it is a targeted contribution. Technically, the proposal is similar to national tax in format. We can discuss a limited European levy, for example, around 1% applied on the revenues or the turnover generated by major online gambling and betting operators active across the European market. This would not replace the national taxation systems, it would not interfere with the national licensing mechanisms, and it would fully respect member states competences in regulating gambling activities.”
  Own EU resources
• “Ai isn't any longer simply technologically. It's about competitiveness, economy in general, influence in the world, the U.S. are investing in digital infrastructure and advanced AI technology. China also has focused on it as a state priority. So Europe cannot just be about regulating this. We have to show global leadership here. We've shown that innovation can also go hand in hand in fundamental rights and democracy. But this isn't enough. If we don't have real capacities, we need investment in all the components of the ecosystem the digital world's data centers in Europe, education, skills and assistance for businesses in Europe. We need high quality standards for AI systems. We need transparent governance systems, and we need to strengthen the ethical side of AI So that we can ensure that technology is there to serve human beings. Social cohesion and democracy are important. We mustn't fragment our societies. We need. We mustn't worsen inequality, which is why we need European AI ecosystems. We need to consolidate our technological capacities in Central and Eastern Europe and at the same time support the AI factory initiative in Romania in order to encourage the industry. But there's another important challenge to bear in mind access. It mustn't be a privilege reserved for some businesses or member states. We need a European model where it is accessible to all. We all, all of us need to invest in strategic autonomy with joint investments and global leadership. Let's do this together. Thank you.”
  Artificial Intelligence
• “To be clear, no one wants to have an impact on the companies in Malta. But companies in Malta make their revenues on the Romanian market, on the German market, on the French market. So the single market is important. Do you support the single market for the betting industry? If you do that then you support also European responsibility.”
  EU Single Market harmonisation
• “Will take place on Thursday. We move to the next item on our agenda. Next item is the Commission statement. European solidarity key to securing medicine access and shifting geopolitical era. Commissioner, I hope you are ready. Commissioner Varhelyi. Please. You have the floor.”
  Government stockpiling of critical medicines
• “Today, across member States, we have different VAT levels, different profit taxes, different taxes on the betting wins and we don't have a EU regulations currently, despite the fact that this industry uses and takes advantage of the common market. So if we would apply, for instance, 1% tax on that turnover, we can easily raise between 1 to €3 billion every year. So across the MFF this would mean between €7 billion to almost €21 billion. So I also believe that we can use that specific sum to tackle some issues that are related to this industry, which also has a social impact, in particular, to tackle the issues related to education and prevention policies or supporting young people. So my question to you is whether these kind of ideas could be ideas that should be introduced in the debate and whether or not, of course, we should try to identify, as it is this case specific own resources that are related to the Common market. So we actually show why we need a common approach and own resources at your level. Thank you.”
  Own EU resources
• “The same thing is valid also when it comes to education and Erasmus all the time we have this debate and this ping pong with the council, but I hope the Parliament will maintain the line. Thirdly, the issue of front line countries, uh, it's an important issue. Uh, president von der Leyen recently made visits to all the frontline countries. It's important, I think. Of course, knowing the concern that we have in the region and the menace represented by by Russia today to continue to give priority, especially to military mobility programmes designed for those respective countries. I would like to see that reflected. And the last point is the issue of cyber security. Uh, I know security is an important issue, but we also maybe need to translate in that in doing more for this important matter. Uh, there is a cybersecurity competence centre that has managed to really support member states. And I have to say, in particular my country, Romania, when it comes to cyber threats and cyber attacks coming again from from Russia. So I think it would be good for the European Parliament to show support for those institutions that actually do something help, and that have a proven record in supporting the resilience of Europe. Thank you so much.”
  Cybersecurity investments for critical infrastructure
• “Thank you. The EU 2026 budget is not a technical document alone. It is a pledge to millions of European citizens that look for stability and protection. They want a safe community, decent work, quality services and a way forward. This budget was concluded with those priorities in mind. I was a member of the Parliament's negotiating team and wanted to secure financing for citizens day to day concerns, farmers, hospitals, schools, investment in cyber security. And we bolstered the European Centre for Cyber Security in Bucharest. I was proud to launch a pilot project for Transylvania, focusing on cultural heritage. The next MF must be more robust, more flexible and more people focused. We need to focus on the needs of citizens.”
  Size of EU budget
• “Dear Commissioner, the EU needs the friendship and democratic influence of the US as much as the United States needs a powerful and united Europe. The recent summit of authoritarian leaders has shown us that we have countries seeking to change the current global status quo, to strengthen our way of life, and to challenge our democratic model. Divided, we are clearly weaker, united. But united we can protect our citizens. And in order to do so, we need to be fair partners and respect our democratic rules. I support the need for a deal and the work done by EU Commissioner. I can even accept the request for Europe to invest more in defence, but I have difficulties in accepting some of the imbalances in the agreement, in particular related to agriculture and our industry, but also the lack of consultation of Parliament and of the business sector. This is Europe. We are not perfect, but we love our democratic imperfections and stand strong for our values. It is normal for Parliament to scrutinise the agreement, but we stand strong and firm in supporting anything that can help us improve the text without jeopardising the deal. Thank you.”
  EU-US relations
• “Mr. president Commissioner, colleagues the next MFF is not just an accountancy exercise. It's about what we want. We speak about priorities in a union that invests and doesn't leave anyone behind. That's why we have concrete proposals at the EPP. We want more money for education so that the youth can have a future. We want healthcare to be a real priority in order to have funding for prevention, for mental health, for access to essential treatments. We want more money for AI technology, but also for professional training. And when it comes to the cohesion policy, we support farmers and rural areas. That's very important. We want simpler rules for access to funding and more transparency of public monitoring system to see how money is spent. And this proposal is a clear signal that the EPP wants a budget that takes into account the citizens real needs. The answer must come now, and we should not leave behind Europe's social dimension. And we should not leave behind vulnerable families and children. Thank you.”
  Size of EU budget
• “Colleagues, today we come forward with a new framework for European innovative companies, an optional flexible instrument which was designed for the single market. Europe loses too many great ideas because of its legislative fragmentation. We have too much red tape, too many different rules. This framework allows startups and companies that want to grow rapidly to expand across the EU without obstacles. This is a real chance for EU and local prosperity entrepreneurs, creators and innovators need clear rules and access to the single market. I wish to state very clearly that European standards on labour, workers rights and social dialogue have to be observed, which is why I wish to thank local partners, including Romanian ones, for their active participation in the consultations. Europe can be competitive, can innovate and can play fair by the social rules, and we will continue to fight for this Europe. Thank you.”
  EU Single Market harmonisation
• “About the final beneficiaries, those people that are part of the mobilities, and the fact that they need to be able to afford those mobilities with the money that they receive. We should not forget about the youth NGOs that are applying for grants. We should not forget about the EU diplomas that we just created. We should not forget about those schools that are lagging behind, and that count on the Erasmus funding to simply catch up, or at least make sure the kids that are going to those schools have more opportunities. So indeed, there are a lot of things that need to be done. Synergies is one of the solutions. But in the same time, we have to make sure that we are consistent in our approach, that we are coordinating our approaches. And at the same time that we still push for additional funding for skills and education in those other different programs. I also believe that we should have a proper allocation for sports, and I'm going to ask for a 5% allocation for sport in Erasmus+. This is also very important for the goals of this program. So thank you again. I'm confident we will be working together and provide a good input to our colleagues in the specific committee working on the Erasmus programme. Thank you.”
  Public funding for education
• “Colleague. You forgot something really important. The data presented by the industry. 71% of the market is composed of illegal platforms. That means your citizens are going online right now, spending their money on illegal platforms, and those platforms are not taxed, not taxed at the national level. Not at all. So we need to approach this issue at European level. Do you agree in us fighting against those illegal platforms? Do you agree that together we can fight better against illegal platforms? The in the MFF report of the European Parliament, together with the Co-rapporteurs on own resources, we are coming with this proposal. So what is your opinion about illegal platforms?”
  Digital platforms liability for harmful and illegal content
• “Dear colleagues, simplification is necessary. I've said this times and times again when the Commission kept introducing new rules. But let's not create new inequalities or hurt those companies that have observed EU standards. There are useful measures in this omnibus, like reducing red tape or facilitating public procurement. But there are also drawbacks. If we do away with reporting, what about the companies that have already invested in these standards? If we change The, um, the the rules in mid-game. Who was wrong? The commission now? A previous commission. And who will bear the cost? We need a balanced position that supports SMEs. Europe needs to be a model of predictive predictability. And we don't change the goalposts in the middle of the game. Yes, simplification, but not with new solutions that could harm our economy. We need our social values and help companies grow. And at the same time, let's not go backwards in terms of responsibility.”
  Overall simplification of regulation in the EU
• “Thank you chair. Welcome to this new edition of the dialogue. And I want to underline from the beginning that you mentioned in your intervention the flexibilities in adjusting the plans. And it was actually the Parliament that called for those flexibilities. So I'm happy that the Commission is happy with the outcome. But we should not forget that the Parliament played a key role, and we would like to continue to play this key role in the implementation of the RF. So first of all, to the executive Vice president. So two To issues. We speak about the added efforts being a model for cohesion. And there are many questions regarding the participation of local authorities and social partners in the RAAF. I'm wondering how you are going to correct that in, in, in the future and how you are going to correct that before August 2026. Second issue also to you if you allow me. Uh, the Parliament called at the beginning of the discussion on RAAF to give stronger support for education. And we see in Brussels a lot of billboards. The commission is the next generation new finance education. Again, it was the parliament asking for that. Can we have can you add to the report that you are presenting additional information about the support given to education across Member states to Mr. Dombrowski, Commissioner Dombrowski? The question relates to what do we do beyond the deadline? What do we do with the mature projects that have a certain level of implementation, and what do we do with the rest? Do we stop the construction of a school? Do we stop the construction of a hospital because we reach August 2026, or we find a solution? Can we prolong especially if we are already borrowing the sum of the projects? Can we transfer some of the projects to other financing tools? Do we need a new regulation for that? Or you already have everything set up. And again the solution is already being integrated. And last and not least on the delays in the answers of the commission. If you can give us more info on that. Thank you.”
  EU cohesion/structural-fund architecture: consolidation vs ring-fenced separate funds
• “Have a blue card from Madam Konecna. Would you like to take the blue card? Madam Konecna, please do respect the timing. I will cut the speakers after the time. Yeah.”
  EU public communication strategy
• “Chair. Dear colleagues, it is clear and we all saw in the previous intervention that the proposal that was made by the Commission is unacceptable and therefore we need to see from the Commission the willingness to make changes. Make changes on conditionalities, make changes when it comes to the allocation of financial support for education and health, make changes in the way the local authorities are are being involved in the process. Make changes in the allocation for rural areas and for farmers. That is why I also want to inform you that just today, the Legal Affairs Committee approved an opinion in which we are asking the Parliament to ask for legal clarification when it comes to this proposal for national plans, if those plans correspond to the framework given by the treaties, if the conditionalities also are respecting the current legal framework. So, dear colleagues, if you stand by what you said, please support the position of the Legal Affairs Committee. Let's go further and be certain that there is legal guarantees behind this proposal, because it seems, based on Eca's report, that there are no legal certainties when it comes to the national plans as they were proposed by the Commission.”
  Conditions to access EU budget
• “We also noticed that in the last couple of months, many changes have been brought forward by member States one at the same time, we noticed that the Commission had difficulties in catching up and also providing rapid response to those changes. So we need to find solutions to make sure that by August 2026, we will implement the projects. We also try to strengthen some specific points that have been part of the calls that the Parliament has made, which some of them are mentioned in the Recovery and Resilience Scoreboard. Some are not explicitly referred to. We want to emphasize the need, maybe to give more information, for instance, when it comes to educational targets. We also try to come up with solutions. You know very well that when it comes to the evaluation of the recovery and resilience plans, we have a system that validates or refuses the proposals made by member states. So we believe that we should better integrate the financial regulation that will allow us more flexibility and at the same time will allow us to disperse more funds to the Member States. Strengthening transparency is a key element. This has been requested also by social partners. We have to see where the money goes.”
  Conditions to access EU budget
• “So this is a procedure. When the question is addressed, the person can come and reply. We move to the next speaker, the vice president. Antonella, vice president, you have the floor.”
  EU public communication strategy
• “Mr. Tenkanen, I would remind you that you are part of this house as well. I will refer to the president based on rule number ten due to the the words being used in our intervention. We move to the next speaker.”
  Transparency requirements of EU institutions
• “Commissioner. Cohesion policy is irreplaceable. We cannot merge it or dilute it, or make it conditional on several types of reforms that are antisocial. It should be as stated in the treaties. Our municipalities, our regions have developed due to this funding. And I think we should stop turning the European structural Funds into, uh, into RF, RF funds. I think we need to use European money in a more efficient manner. We need more flexibility, and we need the possibility to transfer some of the unspent funds to new funding needs, particularly to infrastructure areas affected by disasters or innovative projects. We have to protect this European policy, and I would like to commend the rapporteurs for having accepted my amendments, and I send out a strong message to support the cohesion policy. Thank you”
  EU cohesion/structural-fund architecture: consolidation vs ring-fenced separate funds
• “Dear colleagues. The recovery and Resilience Facility was a huge step for Europe. Investments, unprecedented important reforms and fast reaction to a crisis. Three years after its launching, all member states are confronted with huge challenges in its implementation. At European level, we have a low degree of implementation and few milestones have been reached. Hundreds of billions of euros still have to be paid, and the European Court of Audit warns us that there are problems with transparency and implementation. My country, Romania, is in a similar situation also because of a national plan which was wrongly drafted. Now we see that euros no consultancy with the local authorities, with local partners and nonrealistic. Objectives. Therefore, the Social Democrats have required faster control and. Easier to modify plans because we have to act now in order not to lose essential projects such as hospitals, schools, infrastructure projects, energy or digitalisation projects. Once again, I call upon you prolonging aid with 18 months to projects and to transfer not finalized projects to other ones. Simplified access to financing for authorities and an involvement of social partners. These solutions are in the report of the European Parliament, and they have also been taken over by the European Commission, although they were rejected at the first start. But this is not enough. We need a complete decisions decision. This report is not a technical document. It's a strong political message and a fight for our countries not to lose vital investments. It is warranted that European money is correctly spent where it is most needed. It is time for Europe to show that it does not leave behind essential projects, that it supports local communities, and that it understands the huge challenges represented by investments. Where there is a political will, there is always also a way. Thank you.”
  Conditions to access EU budget
• “Thank you, Commissioner colleagues, we really do have to focus on prevention. These extreme temperatures are becoming more and more frequent in various sites and hotspots, and the farmers have seen their land drying out. Villages. Were caught fire. And the figures are absolutely astounding. We need more resources at local level for these vulnerable communities, and we need a proper response, uh, an anticipatory response from Europe. But we can't just abandon people. We are. If we're going to be prepared. We're going to have to not just intervene, but we have to focus on prevention as an essential part of our budget.”
  Cohesion and rural funding
• “Thank you, chair. And thank you to the rapporteurs for their presentations. I also want to underline some key points. Uh, first of all, uh, I think it is key for the Parliament to call for an N+ three period of implementation of the next MFF. Currently the proposal is N+ ten months. Is it enough? Is clearly not enough due to the fact that in the implementation of the MFF. The commission already started late or late? Started late. So therefore, I think we have to take that into consideration. The second element is the role of the European Parliament in the process of budgetary scrutiny. I'm also drafting the opinion of the jury committee, and we looked at that. Of course, it doesn't stand. We have to keep the role of the Parliament also in the implementation report, in the amending budget and all of those key procedures that allows the Parliament to get informed in the same time, together with the colleagues. We are evaluating whether there is a legal basis for the national and regional plans. There is also a lack of legal certainty around those plans. And here again, is something that I think it's important to consult the legal team of the European Parliament on that specific point.”
  Conditions to access EU budget
• “So first of all, I would like to thank the rapporteur and the shadows for the different point of views expressed. And I want to take the floor also, because I have been part of the negotiations for the 2025 EU budget. Therefore, again, I want to stress out the fact that, again, the Council is very rigid in its perspective and despite the fact that we still have some margins available, they are still pushing us in order not to spend those Resources for the programs that are again requested by people and citizens with whom we often discuss. And I want, of course, also take this opportunity to emphasize that there are different, strong and very consistent opinions that come from different committees. I want to firstly to underline the the opinion coming from the Health committee, where we strongly emphasize again, the impact that those respective cuts will have on the health program. And this is very much concerning for us knowing that in the next MFF also the health program will likely disappear. So therefore, it's important to show during the 2026 procedures that health is a priority for the European Parliament. We had many achievements during the pandemic, and we have to keep those achievements and continue in in offering support for health.”
  Size of EU budget
• “Thank you president. So I think it's clear we need to help the Republic of Moldova. And the Parliament seems to share a common position in wanting to help the Republic of Moldova. So the shadow rapporteur in the Budget Committee, I fully support the need to adopt this regulation as fast as possible and to be able to implement the facility also as soon as possible, knowing the needs on the ground. In the same time, I want to express our full support to increase the grants, but also to increase the pre-financing for Republic of Moldova. In the same time, we have to be very clear that the funds should be accessible, so we have to see how we can do that. We have also to simplify the methods of accessing those funds. So it's very important how we are going to work with Republic of Moldova in defining the plan, but also enhancing the cross-border cooperation that can improve the impact of the facility itself. We need to work on the transparency, building a platform, but also seeing actually also the final beneficiaries, in particular young people, rural areas, civil society, universities, all of that needs to be underlined in at the same time, I want to underline the fact, and this was expressed also by the president of the Republic of Moldova being here in Brussels these days, that Republic of Moldova still needs support, especially on the energy side. And they would also require maybe additional support beyond the facility itself. And I hope there will be support for that. In the same time as Vice President of European Parliament, also dealing with the relation of with the Republic of Moldova. I hope that the Parliament can contribute even further in the implementation of the facility, and I hope soon we will open an office there in Chisinau, as we did in the Western Balkans. I'm actively supporting that. So the Parliament and myself as the shadow rapporteur on behalf of the S&D, we fully support the facility and we are working closely with the rapporteurs to make sure this will happen in due time. Thank you so much.”
  EU-Moldova relations
• “Thank you Commissioner. I also need to inform the plenary that we have received seven proposals for a resolution based on the declaration. The debate is now closed. The vote will take place tomorrow. And we move to the next point of order on the agenda. I will read it in Romanian. Declaration. The Council's declaration. Online piracy of live sports. The need to tackle unresolved issues. The next debate. And again, I will invite Commissioner Micallef to take the floor on behalf of the Commission. Commissioner, please.”
  Broadcasting of sports events
• “Mr. Commissioner president Europe cannot Art. Uh. Hold still. Uh, this, uh, compass, uh, shouldn't be just words. We need an action plan for investment, for education, and so on. Support for SMEs and solutions for innovation and for bridging the technological gap. We all need access to resources. The Court of Auditors says that Eastern European countries have only received 7%, 7.2% out of horizon Europe. Romania, one of the fastest growing economies in the EU, managed to attract only 0.46 of funds. We need to correct this imbalance if we want a strong Europe, we need intelligent investment and we need to make sure that no country is left behind. Europe's competitiveness is built together through courageous decisions and common actions.”
  EU cohesion/structural-fund architecture: consolidation vs ring-fenced separate funds
• “Thank you Commissioner. It's always good to have this exchange of views when it comes to the annual budgetary procedure. So, uh, after a successful negotiation for the this year's European budget, it's important to do the same for the 2026 EU budget. And I will emphasize five things shortly. One, the issue of implementation. I would like to see the measures that the Commission is seeking to do in order to make sure that we are actually spending the money wisely. And we would like to get more information about the degree of implementation of the different programmes in order to make a better evaluation of what is happening right now. Second issue, the issue of civil protection. It was underlined earlier as well. Europe is confronted with floods in the 2025 budgetary procedure. We allowed member states to allocate some of the funds that they have available in the cohesion programs, but again, more is needed or better use of those funds is needed. So so so therefore we also need to make sure this is happening. And we would like to see the measures. Eppo transparency is key. Supporting the prosecutor's office is something that the Parliament has requested and would like this to happen. In the conversation with the Council, we would like to see the Commission being strong on on this position. Cybersecurity has been a big issue, especially in the electoral context. Europe has a competence center. Maybe we should reflect about the possibility of allocating more resources to that competence center that we currently have. And last but not least, indeed we we are strongly supporting the increase for the funds. For Erasmus. My emphasis is on education. Let's see those funds being used wisely. Thank you so much.”
  Accounting and auditing of EU budget
• “Vice President, dear colleagues, I am speaking speaking to you on behalf of millions of Romanians who are experiencing an increase in energy prices, and they are worried that they won't be able to pay their bills. The conflict in the Middle East is already present in Europeans lives, and they expect the EU to protect them. Energy is not just an economic sector. When it becomes too expensive and industry loses its competitiveness, it impacts farmers. Our security and our resilience suffers. I would ask the council and commission to come with a coordinated proposal to stabilize the energy market and to protect our buying power. We need to use our reserves. We need to use support mechanisms, alternative mechanisms. We need to tackle speculation. These are all different options that could be rapidly adopted. Accessible energy means protecting our citizens and the European economy. Thank you.”
  EU approach to electricity market and prices
• “Honourable members, we talk about competitiveness at global level and in Europe. But now we're being asked to reduce financing that allows us to do that. So we're really jeopardizing our own future. It would be better to consolidate our capacities in the EU. Um, in rather than just eroding them. The budget must have own resources and priorities are clear. Cohesion policy must be the basis for solidarity in Europe and not the target for these cuts. At least 20% of the European budget must be earmarked for education and skills. We need to focus on vulnerable groups. People can't survive on just hot air and statements. We need to focus on crises, whether we're talking about floods or whatever. And flexibility is also essential. It's not just about accounting and figures. It's about the future for Europe, and we want to be prepared for the future.”
  Size of EU budget
• “So, dear colleagues. First of all, again, Malta is losing money because of the illegal platforms. This is the first element. And what's your opinion on this point? The second element, which I think is relevant, Malta will remain competitive because we are not affecting the national regulations. Not at all. It's not about national regulations. And thirdly, at least I think is crucial. This initiative was co-signed by EPP members as well three new members, green members from all political sides. And it was voted because it is included in the MFF report approved by this House. So it's a common initiative of Parliament.”
  Digital platforms liability for harmful and illegal content
• “Commissioner. Dear colleagues, the housing crisis is one of the highest social challenges in Europe today for millions of Europeans, including many Romanians. Access to a decent house has become more difficult. Prices have gone up about 50% from 2010 to now. Many young people and many families pay rent or pay mortgages that eat up a huge amount of their salaries. That is why we've come up with a European plan for affordable housing. Europe should look at this problem in all seriousness, just as it treats large challenges. That is why mobilising European funds to renovate and construct accessible lodgings is a priority. We need more transparency and rules to curb speculation with real estate. We have included in the next European MFF a budget for um to to allow a real right to housing.”
  EU housing policy
• “Thank you. Chair. Thank you, commissioners, for the participation at this dialogue. This is an important mechanism for us members of the European Parliament. My question will refer to conditionalities. And we all know you mentioned it, that they were linked to the country specific recommendations. But we also need to focus on this point because most probably this is the perspective that the Commission has shared with us. You might introduce conditionality in the next MFF. So my question and I will give you an example. What do you do if your recommendations or conditionalities are wrong? And I'm going to give you an example from Romania of two recommendations that were in international report published by the Commission. And I attended the meetings with the Commission, and the Commission insisted on these two recommendations increased taxes for micro-enterprises and increased taxes on the ICT employees. Again, it refers to Romania. Both led to unemployment, the closure of thousands of micro-enterprises and heavily affected ICT companies in Romania, which led to a decline. This is statistically correct in the collection of taxes. We already had a deficit. The deficit increased and now the commission sent a letter to the Parliament to discuss about the possibility to cut EU funds because of the deficit deficit that grew. Also based on those two recommendations. So I will not focus on the recommendation because probably you are not aware of it. My advice is to have a look at them. What do you do at the commission level to fix this kind of situation? If you find out, maybe it was a mistake that your recommendations were wrong or had a social impact that was above what was expected or evaluated initially. By the way, the recommendations were not based on a on any previous evaluation done by an impartial evaluator. But what do you do to correct in order to make sure that we do not continue on a path that is not socially viable? Thank you.”
  EU fiscal rules and oversight of national budgets
• “Chair. Dear colleagues, it is clear and we all saw in the previous intervention that the proposal that was made by the Commission is unacceptable and therefore we need to see from the Commission the willingness to make changes. Make changes on conditionalities, make changes when it comes to the allocation of financial support for education and health, make changes in the way the local authorities are are being involved in the process. Make changes in the allocation for rural areas and for farmers. That is why I also want to inform you that just today, the Legal Affairs Committee approved an opinion in which we are asking the Parliament to ask for legal clarification when it comes to this proposal for national plans, if those plans correspond to the framework given by the treaties, if the conditionalities also are respecting the current legal framework. So, dear colleagues, if you stand by what you said, please support the position of the Legal Affairs Committee. Let's go further and be certain that there is legal guarantees behind this proposal, because it seems, based on Eca's report, that there are no legal certainties when it comes to the national plans as they were proposed by the Commission.”
  EU cohesion/structural-fund architecture: consolidation vs ring-fenced separate funds
• “These concerns are backed by the European Court of Auditors, which highlighted in its special reports the need for more transparency, better planning and stronger ownership at national and local level. All of those points are referred to with solutions in our report. I am proud that the European Commission has already taken on board several of these ideas in its recent communication. Next generation EU the road to 2026. The funny fact is that initially the Commission said no. When we underline those specific calls. But we need today to do more than partial progress. We need the full package because it is not enough to spend. We must ensure that every euro is used correctly and transparently and where it matters most. This is about public trust and it is our responsibility to safeguard it. A hospital cannot function with only the walls built. A digital training cannot happen without connectivity. A reform is useless if no one can implement it. Tomorrow, through our vote, this Parliament will send a clear message that we stand by the citizens, that we fight for the finalization of essential projects, that we want every cent to count, and that Europe can and will deliver if it dares to adjust when reality demands it. I would like to thank my Co-rapporteur and the shadows for the good work. When the Parliament is united, we are stronger. Thank you for your support.”
  Accounting and auditing of EU budget
• “Thank you, Vice president. Commissioner. Dear colleagues. I had initially prepared a different type of speech, but I've listened carefully to this debate, and the only thing I could do was think of my own experience. I come from a family that frequently had to go look for medicines that were not available in our country. And I can tell you, this is a very hard to describe thing as an experience. And we continue to have tens of thousands of Europeans that do not have access to simple medicine. Essential medicine for their day to day life. So, dear friends, we must move from theory to practice. Indeed, we are dependent. What do we do about it? Yes, we need to develop a European industry. What do we do about it? Yes, we need to do more things and to allocate proper financing. Where do we get the money for that? What do we do about it? So yes, we need to take action. This is an initial step, but we need to take it further, because I can tell you from my own personal experience that patients cannot wait for as long as we can wait. Thank you.”
  EU pharmaceutical strategic autonomy and industrial policy
• “I will follow, please, the time of the EP. So thank you. Thank you chair. And thank you, Commissioner, for being here. Of course everyone says yes for simplification reducing administrative burden. But in the same time, of course, we need predictability and clarity and maintaining our standards high. So what we would not like to see is a Elon Musk effect here. When it comes to EU Your regulations like it happened in the case of the yes, yes on the nuclear stockpile. So four easy questions were very direct. If there are side effects, negative effects. Do you foresee to introduce compensations. You mentioned financial impact how you calculated the financial impact. Because when you propose regulation, you said the regulation will help bring more money to SMEs. Now you say the regulation will help bring more money to SMEs. So but in the same time, we want to see that money coming in. Many, uh, many of the rules are linked to funding. We funded companies and beneficiaries to apply regulations. So how we are going to deal with that? Because some of the projects are ongoing and last and not least, the calendar of implementation. How do you foresee this? Try to offer us more predictability because of course we want simplification, but we want to be certain that this can be applied. Thank you. ** Ilhan KYUCHYUK @Chair: Thank you for all the exact time of EP. Daniel Tsaloumas, please.”
  Conditions to access EU budget
• “Thank you chair. Thank you, Commissioner, for being here and we appreciate this dialogue, but I have been in this Parliament for many years, and my age still allows me to remember that the Commission said no to many things before you said no when we asked to for the possibility to modify the plans due to unforeseen circumstances, you said no. Also here for transfer to other EU programs. Now you say some of those things were mentioned. I was looking at the regulation. Those things were not mentioned explicitly. So when you say no to extension, this does not mean this cannot happen. So I have two precise questions. One, what is based on your estimate of the number of projects or the amount of the project that will be transferred to other EU programs? Because this is an important question. And the second question is you say extension is not possible. When and how many times did you ask member states to do an extension? And who said no to an extension of the implementation period?”
  Conditions to access EU budget
• “We also try to come up with solutions with regards to mature projects. We call upon the automatic prolongation by 12 months of projects that have a certain level of implementation beyond the deadline of August 2026. You mentioned the numbers. We still have a lot of funds available, a lot of funds have not been disbursed. But at the same time, we have to reckon that in terms of amount, many, uh, sums have reached beneficiaries. We speak about close to €200 billion in grants and €100 billion in loans. Were also based on previous experiences. Call upon the Commission to establish a mechanism to transfer ongoing projects to other funding schemes, including the funding schemes of the European Investment Fund. But also, why not to the new funds that the Commission might create, like, for instance, the European Competitiveness Fund. We also underline the need to introduce more flexibility, but also offer the possibility to member States to amend their plans, of course, based on explicit considerations based on the report and data that was provided to us. It seems that the majority of the changes being done by member states were linked to the fact that the original plans do not correspond to the current targets, and also many of the changes were linked to the administrative burden.”
  Conditions to access EU budget
• “Thank you. Chair. I would like to thank the Commission for presenting this Dec eight. So concerning the Luxembourg Housing Allowance, as it has already explained this was an important issue for for the staff, especially with lower grades in Luxembourg. We need to attract talent and we need to, you know, keep talent within our institutions in order to make our institutions more effective and more efficient. I can confirm that this was part of the agreement that was reached in the annual procedure. So this is very important when we agree upon something for those things to happen in the same time. I want to underline that, of course, housing and cost of living are really serious issues. Of course, now it concerns our staff, but this is a general issue for citizens across the EU. So therefore we need to identify proper solutions. So again the Parliament supports this TEC and we will be voting for it. Thank you.”
  Budget for EU politicians
• “This was also emphasised by the European Court of Auditors, and we try within the report to underline this aspect as much as possible. We also speak about the role of the European Parliament, the need to consult stakeholders like local authorities, social partners. We also defend the key role that the European Public Prosecutor's Office plays in protecting US financial interests. Last but not least, we refer to what we achieved and this is the European Parliament that has achieved this. How to deal with overruns in borrowing costs. We have a new agreement that was reached in the negotiations for the 2025 EU You budget. We emphasize that solution. So for us, it is key for the RF to succeed and to make sure that we avoid additional problems or administrative burdens. We try to push for simplification while at the same time keeping and protecting the targets that were fixed at the beginning. So we speak about the 12 pages report, and at the same time we have a clear deadline. I have to mention the deadline. So the deadline for tabling amendments in budget econ was today the 24th of February, 2025 at 12:00. And together with my rapporteur again, we have already engaged in a conversation and discussion with the shadow rapporteurs and the different committees in charge of the file. Thank you so much.”
  Accounting and auditing of EU budget