Three MEPs have called on the European Commission to coordinate emergency support for the EU fisheries sector, warning that rising fuel prices linked to the Middle East conflict are forcing vessels to operate at a loss or remain in port. In a written parliamentary question submitted on 13 April 2026, Sander Smit (ECR), Bert-Jan Ruissen (ECR), and Ton Diepeveen (PfE) argue that the absence of comparable national measures risks creating an uneven playing field in the internal market, particularly highlighting the Netherlands' minority government's lack of action.
The question, filed under Rule 144, asks the Commission to encourage Member States that have not yet introduced emergency measures—such as fuel tax reductions or direct financial support—to act swiftly to ensure a level playing field. The MEPs also urge the rapid activation and flexible use of the European Maritime, Fisheries and Aquaculture Fund (EMFAF) and State aid rules to complement national efforts. Commissioner Costas Kadis has previously acknowledged the severity of the situation and indicated that emergency support may be mobilised.
Concrete asks and policy direction
The question contains three specific demands: coordinated national action on fuel cost compensation, rapid activation of EMFAF and State aid flexibility, and immediate, technologically neutral measures to reduce fuel consumption and operational costs. Notably, the MEPs call for accelerating the approval of innovations such as pulse fishing and other fuel-saving technologies, signalling a push for pragmatic, short-term solutions alongside long-term decarbonisation goals.
Expected follow-up
The Commission is required to respond within approximately six weeks. Its answer will signal whether it intends to take a more active coordinating role or leave measures to Member States, and whether it will expedite approval of fuel-saving technologies. The outcome will affect EU fisheries operators, national authorities, fuel suppliers, and the broader seafood supply chain. The question reflects a cleavage between Member States that have already introduced national support and those that have not, raising concerns about market distortion and the need for EU-level coordination.