The Council of the European Union has published a cover note containing the European Economic and Social Committee's (EESC) opinion on the proposed Erasmus+ programme for 2028-2034. The opinion, issued on 2 September 2026, calls for a dedicated budget of at least 15% for youth actions and 26.2% for vocational education and training (VET), and warns against diluting the identity of the European Solidarity Corps within the merged programme.
Document details and context
The cover note, published by the General Secretariat of the Council, transmits the EESC opinion on the Commission's proposal for a regulation establishing Erasmus+ for 2028-2034. The proposal would repeal the current Regulations (EU) 2021/817 and (EU) 2021/888, which govern the programme for 2021-2027. The new programme aims to support learning mobility and cooperation in education, training, youth, and sport. The EESC opinion is advisory, but it provides a key stakeholder perspective as the legislative process moves forward.
Policy orientations and trade-offs
The EESC opinion makes several concrete proposals. It calls for a dedicated budget of at least 15% for youth actions and 26.2% for VET, arguing that these areas require ring-fenced funding to maintain their impact. The Committee also expresses concern that restructuring the programme risks reducing visibility for youth participation and policy development. It stresses the need to safeguard the identity of the European Solidarity Corps, which is to be integrated into the new Erasmus+ regulation. The opinion reflects a tension between streamlining programme management and preserving the distinctiveness of specific actions. The EESC also emphasises the importance of inclusivity, policy development support, and maintaining socio-economic impact.
Impact on stakeholders
- Youth organisations and participants: The call for a 15% youth budget could secure dedicated funding for youth exchanges and participation projects, but the merger with the Solidarity Corps may reduce the visibility of volunteering opportunities.
- VET providers and learners: A 26.2% VET budget would reinforce vocational mobility, but could divert resources from other education sectors if not carefully balanced.
- National agencies and managing authorities: The restructuring may simplify administration but could increase complexity in tracking distinct programme lines.
- EU institutions and taxpayers: The programme's overall budget will be negotiated in the next Multiannual Financial Framework; the EESC's proposals aim to ensure value for money through targeted spending.
Expected institutional follow-up
The Council will now consider the EESC opinion alongside the Commission's proposal. The European Parliament will also adopt its position. The final regulation is expected to be adopted by the Council and Parliament before the end of 2027 to ensure a seamless transition from the current programme.