Nikolas FARANTOURIS

Policy topics Nikolas FARANTOURIS is active on

What Nikolas FARANTOURIS has said (44)

• 2026-06-17 “(10:05:08 – 10:06:18): President, commissioner, ladies and gentlemen, many of the social problems in Europe are worsening social cohesion, and these social problems are accentuating social disparities, and many of these problems stem from international crises. I'm thinking of energy poverty, the cost of living crisis, high food prices, the housing crisis. All these problems are compounded by international crises in the Middle East, Africa, Eastern borders, and other parts. Where is Europe? We need strong diplomacy, and we all have to fight hard for a strong diplomatic and geostrategic mark on international institutions to fight for peace and stability. And, unfortunately, this is lacking. Thank you.”
  EU foreign policy approach
• 2026-03-10 “Answer given by Ms Kos on behalf of the European Commission 8.5.2026 Written question The EU has a strategic interest in a secure and stable environment in the Eastern Mediterranean. The Commission has repeatedly underlined, most recently in the 2025 Enlargement report [1] , that Türkiye is expected to make an unequivocal commitment to good neighbourly relations, international agreements and the peaceful settlement of disputes. A comprehensive settlement of the Cyprus issue would significantly contribute to sustainable stability and security in the region. The EU has welcomed the support provided by Member States through the deployment of military assets in the Eastern Mediterranean and in support of Cyprus and remains determined to defend its interests and those of its Member States. The Joint Communication on EU-Türkiye relations [2] of 2023 recommends resuming Council discussions on the modernisation of the Customs Union if Türkiye keeps addressing trade irritants and circumvention of EU sanctions. It further indicates that a broader environment conducive to the resumption of Cyprus settlement talks is needed to open negotiations for the modernisation of the Customs Union. [1] https://enlargement.ec.europa.eu/document/download/4bb4ddd1-4f20-4ee0-92db-926996ec8dd1_en?filename=t. [2] JOIN (2023) 50 final: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=JOIN:2023:0050:FIN.”
  EU competences on foreign affairs · EU-Turkey relations
• 2026-03-05 “E-000926/2026 Answer given by Executive Vice-President Séjourné on behalf of the European Commission The Industrial Accelerator Act 1 (IAA) proposal does not amend the EU-Türkiye customs union, that remains governed by the existing legal framework agreed between the two parties, or any other international agreement. The IAA establishes internal rules governing certain public procurement procedures and public support schemes within the EU. In Article 7, ‘Union origin’ refers to content originating in the Union in accordance with the non-preferential rules of origin as laid down in Article 59 of the Union Customs Code 2 . Articles 8, 9 and 10 provide that, for the purposes of applying the Union-origin requirements referred to in Articles 11 and 12, content originating in countries with which the Union has concluded an agreement establishing a customs union, such as Türkiye, is deemed equivalent to Union origin. However, this equivalence applies by default and is in compliance with the EU’s international commitments. The proposal also empowers the Commission to adopt delegated acts to exclude, in whole or in part, a third country from this equivalence following set criteria such as lack of reciprocity or avoidance of dependencies. In addition, EU contracting authorities and entities shall exclude from procurement procedures tenders submitted by economic operators owned or controlled by an entity established in third countries that have not concluded an international agreement with the EU guaranteeing such access. The proposal strengthens the resilience and competitiveness of European industrial value chains while remaining consistent with the EU’s international obligations. The EU will continue to ensure healthy and fair competition within the framework of its strategic autonomy. Where necessary, the Commission will rely on the full range of instruments in the EU toolbox. 1 https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52026PC0100. 2 https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:02013R0952-20221212.”
  Trade relations with Turkey · EU policy on screening foreign investment in strategic sectors and critical infrastructure · "Buy European" provisions
• 2026-02-24 “E-000767/2026 Answer given by Executive Vice-President Fitto on behalf of the European Commission The Communication on the EU`s eastern regions bordering Russia, Belarus and Ukraine 1 addresses the needs of the regions most affected by Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine. These border regions face the greatest immediate pressures from the conflict, including hybrid threats such as cyber-attacks, sabotage, violation of airspace, disruptions to transport and energy systems, and challenges related to migration. The Commission recognises the diverse challenges present in many regions along the EU’s borders and has put in place funding tools and comprehensive strategies to address those challenges. Greece and Cyprus work together in Interreg cooperation programmes on a range of resilience actions. Moreover, the Pact for the Mediterranean 2 sets out a new ambitious strategy to strengthen EU relations with its Southern Mediterranean partners across its three pillars. This approach ensures policy coherence and allows for support tailored to the specific challenges in each region. Security and stability in the Eastern Mediterranean are in the EU’s strategic interest 3 . The EU remains determined to uphold regional stability and defend its interests and those of its Member States. Türkiye is a candidate country and an EU partner. In line with the EU’s Strategic Compass 4 , the EU remains committed to continue cooperation in areas of common interest and develop a mutually beneficial partnership, based on an equal commitment on Türkiye’s side to advance on a path of cooperation and de-escalation. A comprehensive settlement of the Cyprus issue would significantly contribute to stability and security in the Eastern Mediterranean. The EU remains fully committed to a settlement within the UNagreed framework 5 . 1 https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=COM%3A2026%3A82%3AFIN. 2 https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52025JC0026&qid=1774450795971. 3 https://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/m5jlwe0p/euco-conclusions-20240417-18-en.pdf. 4 https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-7371-2022-INIT/en/pdf. 5 https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-16933-2025-INIT/en/pdf.”
  Asylum & border control · EU-Turkey relations · EU relations with Eastern Neighbourhood
• 2026-01-29 “E-000379/2026 Answer given by High Representative/Vice-President Kallas on behalf of the European Commission Despite the positive atmosphere and the ongoing dialogue between Greece and Türkiye, the unresolved dispute over the continental shelf and the exclusive economic zones continues to strain bilateral relations. As pointed out in the Commission’s annual report, Türkiye continued to systematically issue general navigational warnings challenging Greek sovereignty, sovereign rights and jurisdiction 1 . The Commission has repeatedly underlined, most recently in the Enlargement Package 2 , that Türkiye is expected to make an unequivocal commitment to good neighbourly relations, international agreements and the peaceful settlement of disputes having recourse, if necessary, and among others, to the International Court of Justice. Türkiye must avoid threats and actions that damage good neighbourly relations and respect the sovereignty of all Member States over their territorial sea and airspace as well as all their sovereign rights, including the right to explore and exploit natural resources in accordance with EU and international law, particularly the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea. The EU remains committed to defending its interests and those of its Member States as well as to upholding regional stability. Unequivocal commitment to international agreements and the UN Charter, as well as abstaining from unilateral actions which violate international law and the sovereign rights of Member States, remains an essential requirement to ensure a stable and secure environment in the Eastern Mediterranean and the development of a cooperative and mutually beneficial relationship between the EU and Türkiye. 1 https://enlargement.ec.europa.eu/document/download/4bb4ddd1-4f20-4ee0-92db926996ec8dd1_en?filename=t. 2 Ibidem.”
  EU-Turkey relations
• 2025-11-21 “E-004656/2025 Answer given by Executive Vice-President Fitto on behalf of the European Commission According to information received from the national authorities, ‘Hellenic Cadastre’ (HC) has a government-to-government programme agreement with the National Documentation Centre (NDC) for developing a platform for collecting real estate transactions and producing marketability reports. NDC cooperated with private company Prosperity to implement the platform. The company in question is neither an HC contractor, nor received EU structural funds financing. The cost of the agreement between NDC and HC is covered by HC own resources. The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) 1 provides for the conditions for lawful processing of personal data, including collection, storage and generation of statistics, including the obligation to take appropriate data security measures. Member States have a primary responsibility to monitor the application of the relevant legal provisions and to take the necessary steps for enforcement. Enforcement of the GDPR lies with the national data protection authorities and courts. Any natural and legal persons acting as a controller or processor of personal data, including public authorities are subject to the GDPR. The supervision and enforcement of the GDPR falls within the competence of the national supervisory authorities and courts, without prejudice to the competences of the Commission as guardian of the Treaties. Then, it will be for these national authorities to notably control that no personal data within the meaning of GDPR were provided by HC to NDC as only aggregated statistical form are claimed to have been sent. 1 Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation), OJ L 119, 4.5.2016, p. 1–88.”
  Accounting and auditing of EU budget · Privacy & digital economy
• 2025-11-11 “E-004459/2025 Answer given by Ms Roswall on behalf of the European Commission The European Green Deal 1 provides an ambitious framework for tackling climate, environmental and biodiversity challenges. It is now being implemented. Over the last year, the Commission has presented several initiatives aimed at lowering emissions, phasing out fossil fuels and materials, and reducing the Union’s environmental footprint while strengthening economic resilience 2 . The European Environment Agency's (EEA) report gives an overview of the situation and tracks progress to support decision-making. In 2026 the Commission will continue to update key climate legislation to prepare for climate targets and obligations after 2030 and will, for example, present a Circular Economy Act to transform the EU’s economy. The Commission will also prepare a new European integrated framework for climate resilience 3 . Several funding programmes and initiatives support investments in flood protection, drought management, resilient infrastructure, and nature-based solutions. A relevant example is the EU initiative on wildfire prevention 4 . Several instruments support this work, including the European Forest Fire Information System, the Expert Group on Forest Fires, and the Emergency Response Coordination Centre. EU funds such as the Cohesion Fund 5 , the Social Climate Fund 6 , and the Recovery and Resilience Facility 7 prioritise resilience-building and support for vulnerable groups. Vulnerability and risk assessments 8 help target investments where climate impacts, environmental pressures, and social inequalities intersect. The EU Adaptation Strategy 9 and the upcoming European Integrated Framework for Climate Resilience further reinforce the focus on vulnerable groups and regions. 1 https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-policy/priorities-2019-2024/european-green-deal_en. 2 https://commission.europa.eu/topics/competitiveness/clean-industrial-deal_en, https://environment.ec.europa.eu/strategy/bioeconomy-strategy_en. 3 The framework will include a legislative proposal and several supporting and enabling elements. More details can be found in the Open Public Consultation on the Commission’s ‘Have your say’ portal, https://have-yoursay.ec.europa.eu/index_en. 4 https://environment.ec.europa.eu/topics/forests/forestfires_en#:~:text=The%20Expert%20Group%20on%20Forest%20Fires%20helps%20the,Mechanism%20coordin ates%20pan-European%20assistance%20in%20times%20of%20crises. 5 https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/funding/cohesion-fund_en. 6 https://employment-social-affairs.ec.europa.eu/policies-and-activities/funding/social-climate-fund_en. 7 https://commission.europa.eu/business-economy-euro/economic-recovery/recovery-and-resilience-facility_en. 8 including those from the EEA. 9 https://climate.ec.europa.eu/eu-action/adaptation-and-resilience-climate-change/eu-adaptation-strategy_en.”
  Climate efforts · Nature protection and restoration in the EU
• 2025-11-11 “E-004461/2025 Answer given by Ms Roswall on behalf of the European Commission The Commission supports the implementation of environmental legislation through a range of measures. These include dedicated funding, the mainstreaming of environmental action in the EU Semester and the EU budget, structured dialogues with Member States, technical assistance and infringement packages. The Technical Support Instrument (TSI) 1 provides tailor-made technical expertise to Member States to design and implement reforms, offering strategic and legal advice, studies, training and expert visits. The Technical Assistance and Information Exchange (TAIEX) Peer 2 Peer 2 also supports this, allowing national experts to exchange through expert missions, study visits and workshops. So far, over 1800 reform projects have been supported in 27 Member States, to support environmental policy implementation and the green transition capacity needs. The Commission proposal on the next Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) 3 aims to maintain the activities of the EU programme for the environment and climate action 4 by integrating its activities into the European Competitiveness Fund 5 with further support under the National and Regional Partnership Plans 6 and specifically within the EU Facility 7 . Environment and climate action is an overarching objective of the MFF and thereby its contribution is not limited to a single programme or fund. This is further reflected in the proposal for an ambitious budget of almost EUR 2 trillion between 2028 and 2034, including a 35% green spending target for climate and environment in the 2028-2034 MFF. Projects receiving EU funding will also have to comply with the Do No Significant Harm principle. 1 https://commission.europa.eu/funding-tenders/find-funding/eu-funding-programmes/technical-supportinstrument/technical-support-instrument-tsi_en. 2 https://environment.ec.europa.eu/law-and-governance/environmental-implementation-review/peer-2-peer_en. 3 https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-policy/eu-budget/long-term-eu-budget/eu-budget-2028-2034_en. 4 https://cinea.ec.europa.eu/programmes/life_en. 5 https://commission.europa.eu/publications/european-competitiveness-fund_en. 6 https://commission.europa.eu/publications/european-competitiveness-fund_en. 7 https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/speech_25_2748.”
  Water pollution · Circular economy · Nature protection and restoration in the EU
• 2025-10-25 “E-004204/2025 Answer given by Mr Tzitzikostas on behalf of the European Commission 1. Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) Transport projects, including 21-EL-TCKARTOXRAIL ‘Construction of the new single railway line, section Nea Karvali – Toxotes’, granted under the 1 st CEF2 call CEF-T-2021-CORECOEN, have been awarded funds in compliance with the EU acquis 1 and, particularly, with the environmental legislation in force. The project was retained for funding based on approved national environmental conditions, which were in force at the time of the selection decision. These environmental conditions are currently under review by the national Council of State (Administrative Supreme Court), following an appeal procedure initiated by a locally established company after the signature of the respective Grant Agreement. 2. The management of the project’s identified risks falls under the responsibility of the beneficiary implementing the project. Any potential update of the risk register of the project, as a result of the revision of the national environmental conditions, will be assessed accordingly by the European Climate, Infrastructure and Environment Executive Agency (CINEA). 3. Based on the decision of the national Council of State, with regard to the national environmental conditions, the Commission will determine its position concerning the cofinancing of the project. 1 Regulation (EU) 2021/1153 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 July 2021 establishing the Connecting Europe Facility, OJ L 249, 14.7.2021, p. 38, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2021/1153/oj; Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 July 2018 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union, amending Regulations (EU) No 1296/2013, (EU) No 1301/2013, (EU) No 1303/2013, (EU) No 1304/2013, (EU) No 1309/2013, (EU) No 1316/2013, (EU) No 223/2014, (EU) No 283/2014, and Decision No 541/2014/EU and repealing Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012, OJ L 193, 30.7.2018, p. 1. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2018/1046/oj/eng.”
  EU support of rail transport · EU funding for transportation
• 2025-09-04 “E-003419/2025 Answer given by Mr Jørgensen on behalf of the European Commission The Great Sea Interconnector (GSI) is a project of strategic importance that will end Cyprus’ energy isolation, the importance of which has just been highlighted by the electricity cuts that Cyprus experienced in August 2025. It is also expected to considerably reduce energy costs for consumers. The Commission strongly supports the GSI, which is a Project of Common Interest (PCI) and to which a EUR 657 million grant under the Connecting Europe Facility has been allocated. The Cypriot Recovery and Resilience Plan also includes a loan of EUR 100 million for the project, for which no payment request has been received from Cyprus to date. The Commission is in regular contact with the parties involved to facilitate timely implementation of the project. The Commission attaches the greatest importance to safeguarding the sovereign rights of all Member States, in full respect of international law, including the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. Unequivocal commitment to good neighbourly relations, to international agreements and to the principle of peaceful settlement of disputes in accordance with the United Nations Charter, as well as abstaining from unilateral actions which run counter to EU interests, violate international law and the sovereign rights of Member States, remains an essential requirement to ensure a stable and secure environment in the Eastern Mediterranean and the development of a cooperative and mutually beneficial relationship between the EU and Türkiye.”
  EU approach to energy security (home-made vs import sources) · EU energy infrastructure integration
• 2025-07-16 “P-002939/2025 Answer given by Mr Hoekstra on behalf of the European Commission The Commission attaches great importance to the timely and correct transposition of EU directives. Due to the fact that Greece had not transposed by 31 December 2024 the provisions of: (i) Council Directive (EU) 2020/285 of 18 February 2020 1 and (ii) Council Directive (EU) 2022/542 of 5 April 2022 2 , the Commission decided to open infringement procedures 3 against Greece. The Commission sent its letters of formal notice on 31 January 2025. As Greece did not reply to these letters of formal notice, the Commission decided on 17 July 2025 to send its reasoned opinions to Greece for failing to transpose the two directives. 4 Greece now has two months to respond to the reasoned opinions and to take the necessary measures. In the event of failure to do so, the Commission may decide to refer the cases to the Court of Justice of the European Union with a request to impose financial sanctions. 1 Council Directive (EU) 2020/285 of 18 February 2020 amending Directive 2006/112/EC on the common system of value added tax as regards the special scheme for small enterprises. 2 Council Directive (EU) 2022/542 of 5 April 2022 amending Directives 2006/112/EC and 2020/285 as regards rates of value added tax. 3 https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/el/inf_25_273. 4 https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/inf_25_1628.”
  VAT harmonisation
• 2025-07-16 “E-002930/2025 Answer given by Mr Jørgensen on behalf of the European Commission The issue of energy prices is of crucial importance for the competitiveness of European companies and for the wellbeing of citizens. The Commission has been assessing the root causes for the high electricity prices in Southeastern Europe and has engaged bilaterally with the respective Member States and the EU Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators. The Commission is in continuous talks with Member States to support the implementation of adequate tools to respond to price spikes, without interfering with the proper functioning of the wholesale markets and the necessary investment incentives. These tools could for example mobilise non-fossil flexibility, reduce demand during critical hours, increase cross-border capacities, or protect consumers. The existing internal market rules allow Member States to introduce such measures, and the Commission is committed to support the Member States in designing such measures. The Commission also underlines the importance of using efficiently existing interconnections between Southeastern Europe and the rest of Europe and strongly supports the maximisation of use of existing interconnections. As regards derogations under Article 16(9) of Regulation 2019/943 1 , the Commission underlines that these have an exceptional character and may be granted only under strict conditions. They must be limited to what is necessary to ensure operational security and avoid discrimination between internal and cross-zonal zones. Furthermore, they shall be granted for one year to allow for a re-assessment of the identified security concerns. It is for the national regulatory authority to decide on such derogations. 1 https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2019/943/oj/eng.”
  EU approach to electricity market and prices · EU energy infrastructure integration
• 2025-07-15 “E-002880/2025 Answer given by Ms Kos on behalf of the European Commission The implementation of the pre-accession assistance in Türkiye follows the EU Financial Regulation 1 . The Commission ensures follow-up with the applicable rules and ensures funds have an impact on the ground. Reporting requirements, which may include expenditure verification and audits, are agreed depending on the specific projects, implementing partners and modalities. A monitoring framework is in place and includes bi-annual Sectoral Monitoring Committees, for each sector receiving EU support, and an annual Joint Monitoring Committee covering all contracts under implementation across all sectors. If there is evidence that a beneficiary violated the applicable legislation during the implementation of a project and did not comply with EU rules, the Commission and the national agency shall make use of all available means, including terminating the cooperation and recovering the EU funds. In addition, the Commission has put in place a comprehensive set of preventive and investigative mechanisms, including stringent internal controls, regular audits, transparency rules, and cooperation with bodies such as the European Anti-Fraud Office and the European Public Prosecutor’s Office. As to the protection of biometric data, Council Regulation (EC) No 2252/2004 2 establishes standards for security features and biometrics in passports and travel documents issued by Member States. Each Member State is responsible for ensuring compliance with the rules on procurement, production and personalisation of passports and travel documents they issue. Regulation (EU) 2016/679 3 also applies to the personal data to be processed in this context, and its enforcement lies primarily with the competent national supervisory authorities and courts. 1 https://commission.europa.eu/publications/eu-financial-regulation_en. 2 Council Regulation (EC) No 2252/2004 of 13 December 2004 on standards for security features and biometrics in passports and travel documents issued by Member States, OJ L 385, 29.12.2004, p. 1. 3 Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation), OJ L 119, 4.5.2016, pp. 1–88.”
  EU-Turkey relations · Foreign interference in Europe
• 2025-06-23 “P-002501/2025 Answer given by High Representative/Vice-President Kallas on behalf of the European Commission The EU strongly condemned the terrorist attack perpetrated against Mar Elias church in Damascus, which claimed a large number of victims 1 . This is a grave reminder to intensify efforts to ensure the enduring defeat of Daesh and other terrorist groups, which continue to pose a threat to Syria, the region and Europe. State institutions have the responsibility to maintain order and ensure the security of all Syrians without distinction. The EU consistently raises this matter in contacts at political level and through the EU Delegation in Damascus. The EU has been a staunch supporter of accountability mechanisms in Syria and calls on the transitional authorities to hold all perpetrators accountable in line with international norms and standards. In May 2025, the EU lifted economic sanctions on Syria, while maintaining sanctions related to the Assad regime and those based on security grounds – reaffirming its commitment to support socio-economic recovery and an inclusive peaceful transition. The EU also introduced individual listings against human rights violators and those fuelling instability in Syria, both under the Assad and post-Assad era. The holding of a National Dialogue Conference, the adoption of a Constitutional Declaration, the appointment of a transitional government and the establishment of a Supreme Committee for People’s Assembly Elections are first encouraging steps taken by the transitional authorities in this long process. The EU calls again for genuine elections to be held within three to five years in line with international standards, allowing for the full political participation of all Syrians 2 . The EU stands ready to support Syria in these endeavours. 1 https://www.eeas.europa.eu/eeas/syria-statement-spokesperson-terrorist-attack-mar-elias-church-damascus_en. 2 https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2025/06/23/syria-council-approves-conclusions/.”
  EU engagement with Christian communities inside and outside the EU · EU-Syria relations
• 2025-06-11 “E-002367/2025 Answer given by Executive Vice-President Virkkunen on behalf of the European Commission The Commission monitors closely the cybersecurity situation in relation to critical infrastructure. Under the Directive on measures for a high common level of cybersecurity across the Union (NIS2 Directive) 1 , essential and important entities must report any significant cyber incidents to their national Computer Security Incident Response Team (CSIRT) or competent authority without undue delay and within 24 hours of becoming aware. The EU has strengthened the legislative framework regarding the cybersecurity of critical infrastructure. The NIS2 Directive increases the overall level of cybersecurity across 18 critical sectors, by requiring critical entities to implement cybersecurity risk-management measures, such as incident handling and business continuity. Among these critical sectors are the public administration and water transport sector, including managing bodies of ports and entities operating works and equipment contained within ports or operators of vessel traffic services. Finally, the Commission has started preparations for an EU Ports Strategy 2 , which includes cybersecurity as an area of focus, and is inviting stakeholders to participate in the process. 1 Directive (EU) 2022/2555 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 December 2022 on measures for a high common level of cybersecurity across the Union, amending Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 and Directive (EU) 2018/1972, and repealing Directive (EU) 2016/1148 (NIS2 Directive). 2 See: https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/better-regulation/have-your-say/initiatives/14659-EU-Ports-Strategy_en.”
  Asylum & border control · Surveillance equipment & spyware
• 2025-06-05 “E-002269/2025 Answer given by Mr Hoekstra On behalf of the European Commission The Commission has adopted the proposal to amend the European Climate Law to include the net 90% 2040 climate target on 2 July 2025, following substantial engagement with Member States, European Parliament Groups, stakeholders, civil society and citizens, launched with the Commission’s recommendation on the target in February 2024. The proposal provides for a limited number of flexibilities and supports the creation of the right enabling environment to implement the target. The flexibilities include a possible limited contribution towards the 2040 target of high-quality international credits starting from 2036, the use of domestic permanent removals in the EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS), and enhanced flexibility across sectors to help achieve targets in a cost-effective way. It provides for the Commission to ensure that these flexibilities are appropriately reflected in designing the post-2030 legislation needed to achieve the 2040 target, and the future architecture should be based on robust impact assessments. In February 2024, the Commission presented a recommended target for 2040, based on a detailed impact assessment 1 . The proposal is based on that impact assessment, which provided a detailed analysis of different levels of net greenhouse gas emissions in 2040 and the associated sectoral pathways bridging 2030 to climate neutrality by 2050. Following the setting of the target for 2040, and in line with the foreseen reviews and based on impact assessments, the Commission will prepare a policy architecture beyond 2030. 1 COM(2024) 63 final, SWD/2024/63 final.”
  Extension of the EU Emissions Trading Scheme · Climate efforts
• 2025-06-04 “E-002248/2025 Answer given by High Representative/Vice-President Kallas on behalf of the European Commission The EU is closely monitoring developments following the Ismailia Court of Appeals’ ruling linked to the legal status of the Saint Catherine’s Monastery in Sinai. In parallel, this matter is also subject to ongoing direct negotiations between the Greek and Egyptian governments. The Egyptian authorities have provided reassurances that they remain fully committed to preserving the monastery’s religious, historical, and spiritual status and reaffirmed that the monks' access to the site will not be affected by the court ruling. The EU and its Member States will continue to follow this matter and the commitments made by the government of Egypt. In addition, the EU engages regularly with Egyptian authorities on the implementation of Egypt’s national and international commitments in the area of human rights, the rule of law and freedom of religion or belief. On 18 June 2025, the European Parliament approved a provisional agreement reached with Council on a Macro-Financial Assistance (MFA) package for Egypt worth EUR 4 billion. The draft Decision, adopted on 23 June 2025, requires in its Article 2.1 that Egypt ‘continues to make concrete and credible steps towards respecting effective democratic mechanisms – including a multi-party parliamentary system – and the rule of law, and guaranteeing respect for human rights’ 1 . The fulfilment of these parameters shall be continuously monitored by the Commission services throughout the lifecycle of the MFA (2.5 years). The EU closely monitors human rights developments in Egypt, both through engagement with a wide range of interlocutors as well as through institutional consultations held regularly under the Association Agreement, and in international fora, including the United Nations Human Rights Council. 1 https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-10-2025-0125_EN.html.”
  EU engagement with Christian communities inside and outside the EU · EU-Egypt relations
• 2025-05-05 “E-001806/2025 Answer given by Ms Roswall on behalf of the European Commission 1. The Commission is not aware of the complaints mentioned by the Honourable Member, which may call into question Greece's compliance with environmental obligations and point to a possible misuse of EU funds. 2. According to information received by the Greek Authorities, the project in question is not co-funded by Cohesion Policy programmes 1 or any other EU programme. 1 https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/policy/what/investment-policy_en.”
  Environmental crimes and justice · Accounting and auditing of EU budget
• 2025-05-02 “E-001784/2025 Answer given by Mr McGrath on behalf of the European Commission The Authority for European Political Parties and Foundations is the independent body responsible for monitoring the compliance of European Political Parties and Foundations with Regulation No 1141/2014. Not national parties. The Commission is aware of media reports concerning the allegations referred to in this question. However, under the EU Treaties, the Commission has no general powers to examine how individual cases are investigated by the authorities of a Member State, as specific cases fall under the responsibility of the competent authorities of each Member State. The Commission monitors significant developments concerning the rule of law in Member States, including the anti-corruption framework, in the context of the annual Rule of Law Report. In December 2023, the Commission published a Recommendation on inclusive and resilient elections 1 addressed to Member States, political parties, political foundations and campaign organisations. That Recommendation promotes high democratic standards for elections in the EU, including measures regarding funding of political parties and encouraging election integrity and fair campaigning. The Commission is preparing the European Democracy Shield, which will provide a strategic approach to safeguard and strengthen democracy in the EU. In this context the Commission will also continue to support Member States to strengthen the fairness and integrity of electoral processes, including through the European Cooperation Network on Elections. 1 C/2023/8626.”
  Rule of law and democracy in the EU (political compass) · Transparency requirements for interest groups
• 2025-05-02 “E-001783/2025 Answer given by Mr Várhelyi on behalf of the European Commission 1. The current epidemiological evidence regarding the potential for insect species to provoke primary sensitisation is limited and equivocal. Consequently, due to insufficient evidence on primary sensitisation that could lead to allergic reactions when authorised insects are consumed, Member States have supported the position not to impose additional labelling requirements regarding this potential risk for foods containing insects. 2. All foods placed on the EU market have to comply with the labelling requirements of Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011 on the provision of food information to consumers 1 (the FIC Regulation). The FIC Regulation requires the mandatory indication of all ingredients on prepacked food and provides that mandatory food information shall be marked in a conspicuous place in such a way as to be easily visible, clearly legible and, where appropriate, indelible. In the case of novel food containing insects, the name of the insect to be indicated, as specified in the relevant Commission Implementing Regulations authorising their placing on the market, is the scientific name followed by the common name in brackets. This name must be included in the list of ingredients. In addition, a statement, in close proximity to the list of ingredients, shall indicate that this ingredient may cause allergic reactions. The Commission considers that this existing legal framework ensures that consumers are well informed about novel foods containing insects. 1 Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2011 on the provision of food information to consumers.”
  EU policy on novel foods
• 2025-04-24 “E-001666/2025 Answer given by High Representative/Vice-President Kallas on behalf of the European Commission The High Representative/Vice-President (HR/VP) visited Baku on 25 April 2025 for meetings with the President of the Republic of Azerbaijan, the Foreign Minister of Azerbaijan and members of civil society 1 . The discussions touched upon EU-Azerbaijan relations, human rights, regional cooperation and the Armenia-Azerbaijan normalisation process. The HR/VP will travel to Yerevan in the early summer. During the exchanges in Baku, the HR/VP emphasised that EU-Azerbaijan relations have the potential to grow based on mutual respect, including respect for Member States, and fundamental principles, including the respect for the rule of law and human rights 2 . The HR/VP reiterated the EU’s strong support for the normalisation process between Azerbaijan and Armenia. The HR/VP welcomed the recent agreement on the text of a draft peace treaty and called for keeping this momentum and ensuring smooth completion of this process. All issues related to the past conflict are best addressed as part of the normalisation process between Armenia and Azerbaijan. EU stands ready to provide additional support and expertise, should the sides request, in order to achieve lasting peace in the region. 1 https://www.eeas.europa.eu/eeas/media-advisory-high-representative-kaja-kallas-travels-azerbaijan_en. 2 https://audiovisual.ec.europa.eu/en/video/I-271027.”
  EU-Armenia relations · EU-Azerbaijan relations
• 2025-04-07 “E-001399/2025 Answer given by High Representative/Vice-President Kallas on behalf of the European Commission The EU continues to call for an end to violence across Syria and urges all parties to protect all Syrians without discrimination. In its regular contacts with the transitional authorities and local actors, the EU continues to advocate for a peaceful inclusive transition, guided by respect for international law, pluralism and non-discrimination. The EU particularly supports human rights and the principle of equality among all components of society and remains attentive to the actions of the transitional authorities and the way the transition develops. The EU was alarmed by the violent events in the coastal areas and strongly condemned the horrific sectarian crimes committed against civilians 1 . Accountability and transitional justice are key to lasting peace. The EU welcomed the establishment of an investigative committee and calls for all perpetrators of violence to be brought to justice in line with international law norms and standards. The EU has been and continues to be a staunch supporter of accountability mechanisms working on Syria, including the International, Impartial and Independent Mechanism, the United Nations Commission of Inquiry, and the Independent Institution on Missing Persons. The EU provides humanitarian assistance to all Syrian people in need, through pre-certified humanitarian partners in all parts of Syria, without discrimination. EU-funded humanitarian operations are based on people’s needs, humanitarian principles, and accountability to affected populations, emphasising transparency, efficiency and effectiveness. In response to the events on the coast, the Directorate-General for European Civil Protection and Humanitarian Aid Operations delivered critical emergency assistance to affected populations through its humanitarian partners. 1 https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2025/03/11/syria-statement-by-the-highrepresentative-on-behalf-of-the-european-union-on-the-recent-wave-of-violence/.”
  EU-Syria relations · EU engagement with Christian communities inside and outside the EU
• 2025-03-31 “E-001319/2025 Answer given by Mr Šefčovič on behalf of the European Commission The Commission regrets the decisions of the United States (US) to impose tariffs on exports of EU goods, notably steel and aluminium, cars and car parts, and other products subject to a universal tariff of 10%, which hurt businesses and consumers. The universal tariffs regrettably also target EU exports of wine and spirits. The priority remains to avoid disruptions to EU-US trade and to seek negotiated solutions with the US. The Commission stated its readiness to negotiate a zero for zero tariff agreement on industrial products with the goal of achieving frictionless and mutually beneficial trade. In light of the decision by the US to delay by 90 days and partially suspend its universal tariffs, the EU has decided to put its countermeasures on hold for the same length of time. This gesture of goodwill will give time for negotiations to proceed. If, however, the talks are not satisfactory, the EU countermeasures will come into force on 14 July 2025. In addition, on 8 May 2025, the Commission launched a stakeholder consultation on further EU rebalancing measures 1 against the US, including possible rebalancing measures on imports of wine and spirits from the US. At the same time, the Commission continues to focus on diversifying its trade partnerships, engaging with other countries that share the commitment to a free and open exchange of goods, services, and ideas. The Commission is also stepping up its effort to lift barriers in the EU single market. 1 https://policy.trade.ec.europa.eu/consultations/information-gathering-notice-under-regulation-eu-no-6542014new-us-tariffs-imports-originating-or-eu_en.”
  EU-US trade relations · Export of EU agri-food products
• 2025-01-23 “E-000295/2025 Answer given by High Representative/Vice-President Kallas on behalf of the European Commission The EU stands with all Syrians, both in the country and in the diaspora, in their efforts to reunite and rebuild their country, restore justice and ensure accountability. The High Representative/Vice-President and other members of the Commission have engaged with Syria’s interim authorities discussing restoring stability, supporting an inclusive political transition as well as Syria’s recovery and future reconstruction. The EU is also stepping up its presence in Damascus and aims to fully reopen its Delegation, security conditions allowing. Whether in public statements or diplomatic engagements, including in coordination with international partners, the EU has called on transitional authorities to ensure that all Syrians, from all components of society, are protected and included in the transition process. The EU systematically and consistently calls for all actors in Syria to uphold the human rights and fundamental freedoms of all Syrians in their diversity, based on their equal rights as citizens. All external actors must respect the sovereignty, unity and territorial integrity of Syria. The EU is attentive to the reassuring statements of the new transitional authorities but most important to their actions which it follows closely. It will adjust its approach, if needed, with the overarching aim of supporting the Syrian people, and an inclusive, Syrian-led and Syrianowned transition, guided by the respect for international law, human rights, fundamental freedoms, pluralism and tolerance among all components of society.”
  EU engagement with Christian communities inside and outside the EU · EU-Syria relations · EU relations with Kurdish people
• 2025-01-22 “P-000285/2025 Answer given by High Representative/Vice-President Kallas on behalf of the European Commission The High Representative/Vice-President regularly emphasises these aspects in her exchanges with her Turkish counterpart. Delimitation of the continental shelf and exclusive economic zones should be addressed through dialogue and negotiations in good faith, in accordance with international law, including the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea 1 , having recourse, if necessary, to the International Court of Justice. The European Council conclusions of 12 December 2019 2 clearly stated that the Türkiye-Libya Memorandum of Understanding on the delimitation of maritime jurisdictions in the Mediterranean Sea infringes upon the sovereign rights of third states, does not comply with the Law of the Sea and cannot produce any legal consequences for third states. The EU has a strategic interest in a stable and secure environment in the Eastern Mediterranean and in the development of a cooperative and mutually beneficial relationship with Türkiye. In this context, the EU continues to expect Türkiye to respect the sovereignty and the sovereign rights of all Member States and to unequivocally commit to and promote good neighbourly relations and the peaceful settlement of disputes. 1 https://www.un.org/depts/los/convention_agreements/texts/unclos/unclos_e.pdf 2 https://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/41768/12-euco-final-conclusions-en.pdf”
  EU-Turkey relations · Trade relations with Turkey
• 2025-01-06 “E-000017/2025 Answer given by Mr Kadis on behalf of the European Commission 1. The Maritime Spatial Planning (MSP) Directive 1 does not provide exemptions to the obligation to submit a maritime spatial plan by 31 March 2021. Therefore, under the MSP Directive the obligation to establish maritime spatial plans remains applicable irrespective of the existence of challenges regarding the delimitation of maritime zones with a third State. As guardian of the Treaties, the Commission ensures that all EU law obligations are complied with. An infringement procedure 2 against Greece for failure to adopt and submit maritime spatial plans has been referred to the Court of Justice and is now pending judgment. 2. As guardian of the Treaties, the Commission may take enforcement action in any case of non-compliance by a Member State with its obligations under EU law, including by pursuing infringement procedures. The Commission is committed to supporting Member States in completing their maritime spatial planning obligations. The Commission also engages in dialogue with Member States to address any challenges they may face in implementing the Directive. 3. The Commission remains available to provide technical and financial support to facilitate the implementation of the maritime spatial planning acquis. 1 Directive 2014/89/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 July 2014 establishing a framework for maritime spatial planning. 2 https://ec.europa.eu/atwork/applying-eu-law/infringementsproceedings/infringement_decisions/?langCode=EN&version=v1&typeOfSearch=byDecision&refId=INFR(202 1)2226&page=1&size=10&order=desc&sortColumns=decisionDate”
  EU-Turkey relations
• 2025-01-06 “E-000015/2025 Answer given by Mr Kadis on behalf of the European Commission 1. The Maritime Spatial Planning (MSP) Directive (2014/89/EU) 1 requires coastal Member States to adopt their maritime spatial plans by 31 March 2021. The Commission is committed to fostering enhanced coordination among Member States to ensure the sustainable management of maritime areas. This includes working towards coherent MSP across the EU, as required by the Directive. Article 52 of the Treaty on European Union (TEU) and 355 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) define the territorial scope of the EU Treaties by reference to the territories of Member States. In accordance with the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), it is for each coastal State to establish and delimitate its maritime zones (including with other States in case of adjacent waters). The EU has no competence regarding the establishment/proclamation and delimitation of maritime zones. 2. The Seville Charter is a regional map created by an external party, which holds no legal significance. The adoption of a ‘European Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ)’ by the EU is neither planned nor possible. While the delimitation of the EEZ is a matter falling under the competence of the Member States, in case of unilateral actions or provocations in breach of international law by a third country or countries, the EU will use all the instruments and the options at its disposal, including in accordance with Article 29 TEU and Article 215 TFEU, in order to defend its interests and those of the Member States 2 . 1 https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2014/89/oj/eng 2 European Council conclusions on external relations, 1 October 2020: https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2020/10/01/european-council-conclusions-on-externalrelations-1-october-2020/”
  EU competences on foreign affairs · EU-Turkey relations
• 2024-12-16 “E-002961/2024 Answer given by Mr Serafin on behalf of the European Commission The ceilings of the Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) for 2021-2027 are expressed in 2018 prices and the adjustment to current prices is done based on a fixed annual deflator of 2% (article 4(2) of the MFF Regulation 1 ). This long-standing adjustment mechanism, in use since 2007, has the advantage of providing predictability for the EU programme resources over the duration of the MFF. The Commission has assessed the impact of the high inflation on the real value of MFF expenditure in the context of the Mid-term revision of the MFF proposed in June 2023 2 based on the forecast at that time, as discussed in the Staff Working Document accompanying the MFF revision (SWD(2023) 336 final 3 ). The impact of inflation is being assessed together with all the other features of the MFF. The current MFF has instruments over and above the MFF expenditure ceilings that provide flexibility to address unexpected needs, including inflationary pressures. These instruments were reinforced in the MFF revision, with an increase in the flexibility instrument and the Solidarity and Emergency Aid Reserve and the introduction of the EU recovery instrument. The design of any future flexibility tool remains to be decided in the context of the next MFF. 1 https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32020R2093 2 https://commission.europa.eu/system/files/2023-06/COM_2023_336_1_EN_ACT_part1_v4.pdf 3 https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-policy/eu-budget/long-term-eu-budget/2021-2027/documents_en”
  Size of EU budget · Accounting and auditing of EU budget
• 2024-12-13 “E-002946/2024 Answer given by Mr Hansen on behalf of the European Commission 1. The new agricultural reserve has proven to be a more flexible instrument, effectively addressing various crisis situations across different Member States in recent years, unlike the previous crisis reserve that was only used once, in its final year 2022. However, several successive crises of different nature, from extreme weather events, animal diseases to market disturbances, have shown that the scale of crises is growing in the EU. Therefore, in addition to supporting farmers who are affected by crises, it is also essential to enhance risk management measures to prevent crises, bolster resilience of farmers and increase the use of insurance tools. 2. While the specifics of the new Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) are yet to be decided, the Commission’s communication on ‘The road to the next multiannual financial framework’ underlines the continuous support to farmers and food security. Building on the recommendations from the Strategic Dialogue on the Future of Agriculture 1 and the Vision for Agriculture and Food 2 , a Common Agricultural Policy that is fit for purpose must provide targeted support to farmers who need it most, promote positive environmental and social outcomes through rewards and incentives for ecosystem services and support the right enabling conditions for thriving rural areas. It must become simpler, targeted and find the right balance between incentives, investment and regulation, and ensure that farmers have a fair and sufficient income. 1 https://commission.europa.eu/topics/agriculture-and-rural-development/strategic-dialogue-future-euagriculture_en 2 https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52025DC0075”
  Agricultural funding · Direct payments to farmers (pillar 1)
• 2024-12-05 “E-002796/2024 Answer given by Executive Vice-President Fitto on behalf of the European Commission 1. The EU Solidarity Fund (EUSF) is a post-disaster instrument which provides financial assistance to EU countries facing severe natural disasters according to the specific rules set out in Regulation (EC) No 2012/2002 1 . The EUSF financial assistance is intended to supplement the country’s public expenditure to finance essential emergency and recovery operations. It is not a rapid response instrument. The disbursement of financial assistance requires per application the prior mobilisation of the fund by the European Parliament and the Council, which can take several months. 2. Recognising the challenge, the Commission proposed a substantial financial reinforcement of the EUSF in the mid-term revision of the Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) 2 . The budgetary authority decided to increase the Solidarity and Emergency Aid Reserve by EUR 1.5 billion for the years 2024-2027. The EUSF now has an annual budget of EUR 1 016 million 3 (in 2018 prices). The EUSF aid calculation methodology was established in 2003 and accepted by the European Parliament and the Council. Changes to the methodology would need to be aligned to the available budgetary resources of the Fund. In the preparation of the next MFF, the Commission will carefully assess the operation of the EUSF and reflect how to best deliver on the EUSF’s objectives in the future. 1 Council Regulation (EC) No 2012/2002 of 11 November 2002 establishing the European Union Solidarity Fund (OJ L 311, 14.11.2002, p. 3) as amended by Regulation (EU) No 661/2014 of the European Parliament and the Council of 15 May 2014 (OJ L 189, 27.6.2014, p. 143) and by Regulation (EU) 2020/461 of the European Parliament and the Council of 30 March 2020 (OJ L 99, 31.3.2020, p. 9). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legalcontent/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:32002R2012 2 Council Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/765 of 29 February 2024 amending Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2093 laying down the multiannual financial framework for the years 2021 to 2027. 3 EUR 1 144.1 million in 2024 prices.”
  Cohesion and rural funding
• 2024-10-17 “E-002155/2024 Answer given by Ms Roswall on behalf of the European Commission 1. The Commission had identified the failure of Greece to adequately protect Natura 2000 sites and had referred Greece to the Court of Justice of the EU 1 . In particular, this failure concerns the lack of site-specific conservation objectives as well as conservation measures which are implemented in Greece through management plans or presidential decrees defining permitted and forbidden activities in the sites 2 . 2. To date, Greece has still not established adequate conservation objectives and measures for all 239 Natura 2000 sites covered by the Court ruling in case C-849/19 and has thus not yet complied with that ruling. 3. The Commission has repeatedly drawn the attention of the Greek authorities, including through bilateral dialogues, to the need to establish the conservation objectives and measures for all sites. The Commission will continue to assist Greece so that compliance can be achieved as soon as possible. If necessary, the Commission may decide to issue a letter of formal notice under Article 260 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. 1 C-849/19 https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A62019CJ0849 2 Environmental implementation review https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legalcontent/EN/TXT/?uri=comnat:SWD_2022_0254_FIN”
  Energy (green transition)
• 2024-10-09 “E-001995/2024 Answer given by Mr Šefčovič on behalf of the European Commission On 6 December 2024, in the margins of the Mercosur Summit in Montevideo, the EU and Mercosur countries reached a political agreement concluding the negotiations of the EUMercosur agreement. The Commission conducted the negotiations based on a mandate from the Council. The EU focus in the negotiations has been to ensure that the agreement delivers on the EU’s sustainability goals, while respecting the EU’s sensitivities in the agricultural sector. A study published in 2024 assessing the potential impact of the free-trade agreements on EU agriculture confirms that the EU trade approach opens new commercial opportunities for EU agri-food exporters 1 . More specifically, on Mercosur, the Commission commissioned a Sustainable Impact Assessment 2 confirming that the agreement will have a positive impact on the economies of both the EU and the Mercosur countries, raising wages and contributing to a reduction in inequalities. Imported agricultural products from Mercosur must comply with sanitary and phytosanitary standards protecting consumers health. These are the same standards that apply to EU domestically produced agricultural products. In addition, the EU has established autonomous legislation requiring that imports adhere to certain standards aimed at achieving global environmental objectives and addressing ethical concerns. For example, the European Union Deforestation Regulation (EUDR) 3 will ensure that trade in relevant products from Mercosur partners is not associated with deforestation and forest degradation. Products such as beef, soy or wood produced outside the EU and inside the EU will be subject to the same requirements under EUDR – guaranteeing a high standard of environmental protection. 1 JRC Publications Repository - Cumulative economic impact of upcoming trade agreements on EU agriculture, https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC135540 2 https://circabc.europa.eu/ui/group/09242a36-a438-40fd-a7af-fe32e36cbd0e/library/abfa1190-59d1-4f59-93a59b9810d2b744/details 3 Regulation (EU) 2023/1115 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 May 2023 on the making available on the Union market and the export from the Union of certain commodities and products associated with deforestation and forest degradation, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legalcontent/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32023R1115”
  GMOs
• 2024-09-12 “E-001699/2024 Answer given by Executive Vice-President Vestager on behalf of the European Commission 1. Member States have an obligation to ensure that the national procedural rules which they establish or apply do not jeopardise the effective application of the EU competition rules in all sectors of the economy. While each Member States decides on its institutional set up for the enforcement of EU competition rules (Articles 101 and 102 Treaty on the Functioning of the EU), their procedural autonomy should ensure effective enforcement of EU competition rules and allow the national competition authorities to have minimum independence guarantees and powers to investigate and take decisions, in line with Regulation 1/2003 1 and Directive 2019/1 2 . 2. The Commission is closely monitoring the telecom sector in all Member States, including Greece. To ensure effectiveness and coherence in the enforcement of the EU competition rules, the Commission and the national competition authorities (including the Hellenic Telecommunications and Post Commission ‘EETT’) are in close and constant cooperation through the European Competition Network and inform each other of relevant cases and investigations. 1 Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 of 16 December 2002 on the implementation of the rules on competition laid down in Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty, OJ 4.1.2003, L1/1 (‘Regulation 1/2003’). See Article 35 on the designation of competition authorities. 2 Directive (EU) 2019/1 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 to empower the competition authorities of the Member States to be more effective enforcers and to ensure the proper functioning of the internal market, OJ 14.1.2019, L11/3.”
  EU Competition policy · EU competences on consumer protection and product standards
• “Ladies and gentlemen, friends. Commissioner. In how many international sectors can the EU be a trailblazer? Where can we really spearhead this? The climate crisis is actually one of the areas where we can be trailblazers. I would say that it is the key one, the most important area, both for climate reasons but also for geopolitical reasons. This is important for the next generations, but also because we're fully aware of this on this continent. We don't have enough, uh, uh, fossil fuels. And we cannot shift from one dependence to another from because energy dependence means political and economic dependence. So let us be leaders. Who is going to pay for this? Who is going to shoulder the burden? We have to make sure that we make sure that the green transition is supported by those who have benefited the most from fossil fuels, big oil companies and those countries that host these activities. That should be our goal and we have to persevere. Thank you. **Nicolae ȘTEFĂNUȚĂ @Co-Chair: Mark. Mr. Mark is next.”
  Energy (green transition)
• “The health of 500 million European citizens, and their nutritional and food safety is extremely important. It's too important to leave it up to you to make decisions against the political will of the representatives of these 500 million European citizens. This is something that has been happening systematically in recent years. The European Parliament condemns the use of GMOs, and the recent trend of producing proteins from insects, and the European Commission turns a blind eye. So. We must state that the only democratic legitimacy based on food safety is the one that lies within the European Parliament. So you must listen to it.”
  EU policy on novel foods
• “Now I am from a country in the Mediterranean, from a people whose very existence depends on the sea. But that's not the case for the whole of Europe, colleagues. The open seas gave birth to our democracy, gave birth to creation, gave birth to solidarity and understanding and world culture. We need to protect the seas. And that's why, for this pact on the seas, I am calling for a mandatory nature of this on protection of biodiversity, also for those, um, provisions, and that people who are involved in the seas have support mechanisms because there is a huge problem of overheating and pollution, particularly in the South. So I'm calling for action and action now.”
  Nature protection and restoration in the EU
• “The RF. Is the first serious large scale attempt. With common commitments from the European. European Union. The first attempt to deal with our common problems. And it must end up in a clear direction on this continent, in this family. It must succeed, and it must succeed by using the very last euro. Paid for by European taxpayers in our Commission. The budget Commission and a social affairs. There was a wide majority for our in favour of our proposal to extend the funding window by 18 months under the Recovery and Resilience Facility, and that's absolutely correct. In order all the projects that have reached maturity to be implemented fully. This facility represents all of us. So in the plenary, I would like you to all vote in favour. We want a wide majority for the extension of this facility, and I would like to ask the Commissioner to really take into account the will of the 500 million European citizens who are asking for this funding to be unblocked on time and with the 18 month extension. Thank you very much.”
  Conditions to access EU budget
• “In Greek, please. Welcome, dear Vice President, to our committee. And thank you for your presence here today for your presentation as well. We say very clearly a big yes to the circular economy. We believe that the circular economy must lie at the core of the European Union's initiatives, because it can provide new and high quality jobs. It can lead to decarbonisation, and it can secure critical prime materials that will allow us to have enough resources. So we say a big yes to the circular economy. And I want to restate that competitiveness and sustainability. Do not lie against each other. They are complementary notions and absolutely go hand in hand with each other. They are fully compatible with each other. I would like to welcome the new initiative to curtail by 90% new greenhouse gas emissions until 2040. But dear Mr. Vice President, we would like to see the means, the instruments that are going to be instated and adopted, the binding measures that we are going to adopt on a European level in order to achieve these targets. And I would like to see some commitment on your part. Thank you.”
  Climate efforts
• “Thank you so much. To. The vast majority of the member states governments seems to be below our expectations at the council. They have decided on a grossly cut budget, which does not correspond to the real needs of our European family. And we are all trying here to find funds and increase the expenditure for. Farmers, for young people, for regions, for social cohesion, for housing. I have submitted an amendment to promote the housing of to protect the housing of young people. I ask you all to vote in favour. This budget is not to our satisfaction. We require more. Thank you.”
  Size of EU budget
• “A year ago today we saw two reports the letter report and the Draghi report despite our different ideologies or which political group we belong to we all agreed on the fact that Europe has economic geopolitical and existential problems that it has to face up to. One year later the commission who is supposed to have adopted three hundred recommendations based on these two reports has only taken measures on ten percent of those recommendations. Mister Draghi himself thinks that the EU is on the edge of the abyss because of the untargeted spending we have to pay very close attention to this. We want to ensure our own security but we are endangering the architecture of the whole EU.”
  EU political integration
• “Good morning. All. In Greek, please. After welcoming you, Commissioner, I'd like to ask you about plastics. After the international failure of the Busan summit in Korea. We have a number of different calls for a intergovernmental meeting in Geneva on this. And I'd like for you to confirm that the priorities of the European Union on the reduction of polymers in production for a reduction of polymers in consumption. For the banning of plastics, single use plastics, and for the strengthening of greater circularity of polymers and plastics overall, that this is the same, that this is a priority. And I'd like for you to tell us that the European Union will adhere to the worldwide effort, which is ongoing for the reduction of plastics with regional alliances, with an effort in order to finally achieve some sort of agreement on this front. That's number one. Number two, water resilience, water resilience in the management with sufficiency of waters taken into consideration. I'm from a region from a country where more than any other country. Perhaps we're suffering from terrible drought and lack of water. We need some sort of reassurance that we will not allow for water to turn into a kind of stock market item, that it become a product, a good bought and sold. We have to protect water as a public good. And the committee, the Commission and the European Parliament all have to work in that direction in a concerted fashion. Thank you.”
  EU policy on water management
• “Prime minister of Denmark. Welcome to the European Parliament. And together with you. I also welcome the Danish presidency. You are head of a country which over the last decades has made huge efforts towards social Cohesion to reducing inequalities and for welfare. So I would call on you to not let what you've achieved be lost and through your presidency to stress not only competitiveness, but also the climate crisis and also social cohesion. Please stress housing, health. European citizens need to know that Europe is concerned about families and is addressing the serious problems that affect us, all of us. So please lead that effort rather than trailing behind it. Thank you.”
  Climate efforts
• “Dear colleagues, I speak today also on behalf of our colleague Anthony Smith, who unfortunately had to leave after the vote. I wish, first of all, to thank the rapporteur for his work. We strongly support this report and the progressive approach of the rapporteur. It rightly treats the charter as a binding constitutional text that must shape EU law funding and policies, not as a decorative declaration. Our first message is simple no rights, no funds. Access to EU money must depend on respect for the charter and article two values. When rule of law recommendations are ignored, there must be consequences in the MFF and across all funding programmes. This cannot be limited to a narrow rule of law reading. We also need social conditionality. Public money must be linked to trade union rights, collective bargaining, health and safety at work, equal pay and decent housing, and must never support social dumping that undermine fundamental rights. Secondly, the chapter must become real for those whose rights are structurally violated migrants tenants at risk of eviction. Workers they need. Infringement. Infringement procedures. Independent monitoring and concrete access to justice and compensation. Finally, we defend a genuinely social and structural reading of the charter. People do not lack rights because they have never heard of the chapter. They lack rights because of poverty, discrimination, Insecure housing and precarious work. The European Union and the member states must remove these structural barriers and use the charter as a social shield, not a brochure. Thank you.”
  EU Supervision of the Rule of Law
• “Dear friends. Weapons are not the only things that give us security. We need the resilience and resistance of our infrastructure also to give us security. We need to be able to respond quickly and restore what has been damaged. So in response to the proposal made by the commission, uh. Um, I would say that the resources to provide answers are very scarce. So I think we need to get out of the budgetary corset that we impose on ourselves so that the countries of the South Spain, Cyprus, Italy, France, Spain, Portugal can make the necessary investments in their protection so that they can provide necessary human resources and equipment to invest in their security, in prevention and in restoration. So we need a safeguard clause for the internal security of all of our countries.”
  Cybersecurity investments for critical infrastructure