- 2026-06-18 “I also want to join those who congratulate Ukraine for opening the first cluster. This is a big step forward. Congratulations, and you deserve it because you have been working so hard to move forward, to do the necessary reforms. We hope that during the summer we can open more clusters. This is very important because when Ukraine delivers, we also have to deliver.
And indeed, there is a special momentum right now. I have the impression the tide is turning for Ukraine. We see that Ukraine is holding the line, even partially regaining territory. Ukraine is strong on air defence, also together with our Member States working on a drone wall for our frontline countries. This shows how much Ukraine is already integrated in the work of the European Union and moving forward.
And this at a time where we send a very strong message also to Russia that we provide Ukraine with EUR 90 billion loan for the next two years, so also to give a very strong message to say we are going to be by your side for as long as it takes. In Russia, on the other hand, the economy is suffering. The fact that Russia has shut down the internet, closed telegram for example, speaks for itself because Russia is again rising an iron curtain, but now it is a digital iron curtain on their people.
And so far, this is a very special moment. We are very glad to have Volodymyr Zelenskyy here with the European Council, and I am very much looking forward to the discussions that we will have.”
EU-Ukraine relations
- 2026-06-15 “Thank you very much. I am looking forward to this G7 in Évian under the French Presidency. We meet against the backdrop of geopolitical fragmentation, economic reconfiguration and a rapid technological change. Our main goal here is, on the one hand, to address the structural challenges of the global economy, specifically global imbalances and overcapacities. And on the other hand, we want to focus on crises that are affecting all of us – the war in Ukraine, the conflict in the Middle East, and indeed Ebola. So we will have a packed agenda, and I am very much looking forward to the discussion with the G7 leaders and the guest countries that you all named.
Let me start with the structural topic. A key topic for this year's G7 is global economic imbalances. This means that some countries produce too much and do not consume enough, and vice versa. And these dynamics are increasingly dangerous for the stability of the global economy. That is why I very much welcome President Macron's focus on this topic – not at least because it is increasingly becoming relevant for the European Union. If you look at the year 2025, this will be remembered as the year where, for the first time ever, all Member States had a trade deficit with China. The European Union recorded its largest ever trade deficit of EUR 360 billion. This is of course not sustainable. As you know: in Europe, our strategy is very clear – de-risk, not decouple. And concretely, this means we really have to step up and accelerate building domestic capacity on the one hand. And on the other hand, we have to weave our worldwide net of free trade agreements because this is the means to diversify our supply chains. At the same time, we also need to protect our market from unfair practices. Over the last years, we have developed and deployed our toolbox from safeguards to anti-subsidy measures to address unfair competition and even cases of coercion. In the G7, there is a general understanding that unity and coordination among G7 is paramount in this topic. We all experience the same patterns in our economies. Take for example the topic of critical raw materials. We need to come together to achieve the adequate scale for these critical raw materials. And this is why we are working with the G7 and other partner countries on a critical raw material agreement. Unity is the precondition for G7 to achieve a level playing field globally.
Now, moving from structural challenges to the ongoing crises, we will discuss the situation in the Middle East. And let me also start by welcoming the agreement reached between the United States and Iran. The priority now is implementation. The Strait of Hormuz must reopen, and freedom of navigation must be restored – toll-free. This is essential for the regional stability and of course also for the global economy. The agreement should open the door to wider talks and lead to the end of Iran's nuclear and ballistic programmes. And let me also underline that there can be no lasting peace while Lebanon remains in flames. We call for a genuine ceasefire and the full respect for Lebanon's sovereignty. This crisis also carries a clear lesson. Once again, we have seen our energy dependency being weaponised. So in this framework, we will discuss how to reduce our dependence on transit through the Strait. For example, alternative export routes have been created that are more resilient and offer choices. And other routes will be built – for example, a typical one is IMEC.
Turning now to Ukraine. We look forward to welcoming President Zelenskyy tomorrow. Russia's brutal war of aggression has now lasted indeed longer than World War I. And in the face of escalating attacks, Europe keeps up its unwavering support to Ukraine. Our EUR 90 billion loan package covers two-thirds of Ukraine's financing needs for this year and for the next year. The first disbursements will come still this month. And for the remaining third, we need Ukraine's partners to step up. This will be a topic at this Summit. We are also preparing for the next winter together with Ukraine. Together with Canada, we are leading the preparedness work. We are also joining the pledging efforts of President Macron. And I can announce a contribution of EUR 75 million in grant funding for the New Safe Confinement.
Now you will all recall, at our last G7 in Kananaskis, the situation for Ukraine was much more challenging. Today, Ukraine is in a different position. Let me recall: Ukraine is holding the frontline and even partially regaining territory. Ukraine has developed the capability to strike strategic targets deep inside Russia. And Ukraine has become a world-leading producer of cutting-edge military equipment. On the other hand, Russia is feeling the strain and pressure. Our sanctions are biting and cutting deep. Putin's war economy has never been as weak. And at the same time, we are anchoring Ukraine in Europe. Today, we opened the first cluster of the EU accession negotiations. This is a huge step forward. Ukraine has made remarkable reform progress. They have delivered, so now we have to deliver too.
Finally, turning to AI. We have seen impressive advances in frontier models that will drive progress in science and technology. At the same time, these models also multiply the risks. The key question of today is how to introduce new models safely. Now, testing before entry into service – that is not new. It is very much what we are used to, for example, for airplanes and medical devices. Here, cooperation of G7 countries is paramount. We should exchange information and ensure cooperation of independent entities that are evaluating models before their market release. The other important dimension is how to reap the benefits of the AI revolution. And here, adoption is key. Europe and the United States are at par in terms of AI adoption, but we all know that much more needs to be done in terms of industrial AI and transforming our manufacturing. Here, AI adoption is key. The G7 countries have to win the battle of adoption. And it is all about application. We – as you know – as European Union have recently presented the Tech Sovereignty package to drive AI innovation in Europe. We want our own AI future, not in isolation – that is very important – but together with our trusted partners.
My final point, we are protecting children online. I want to thank President Macron for tabling this crucial topic. Because the opportunities of the digital world are clear, but so are the risks. The debate is not whether young people should have access to social media, the debate is whether social media should have access to our children and teenagers, and when. And here the case for social media delays, because of the risks, is getting stronger. We all know that childhood and early adolescence are formative years, for the brain functioning but, most importantly, also for the development of a personality. Children need to develop their skills to act with autonomy offline but, of course, also online. And we need to give them the protection, the time to mature and, of course, the means to do so. There is also a vast responsibility of the tech companies. In Europe, platforms must prove that they are safe by design, and this principle is especially important for our children and teenagers.
So you see we have a lot to work about ahead of us. And the results of this Summit will feed into our discussion that we will then have at the end of the week at the European Council back in Brussels.
Thank you very much.”
Trade relations with China
- 2026-06-15 “I welcome the agreement reached between the US and Iran, following sustained diplomatic efforts by several partners.
The priority now is its swift and full implementation by all parties.
This agreement should allow for the immediate reopening of the Strait of Hormuz.
Freedom of navigation must be restored toll-free.
This is essential for regional stability and the global economy.
It opens the door to broader negotiations on peace and security in the Middle East.
And should end Iran's nuclear and ballistic programmes and its destabilising activities in the region.
And of course there can be no peace in the Middle East while Lebanon is in flames.
Once again Europe calls on all parties to respect Lebanon's sovereignty and territorial integrity and implement a genuine ceasefire.
In Evian, G7 leaders will meet partners from the Gulf and the wider Middle East. Europe is ready to play its part.
This crisis also carries a clear lesson.
Once again, energy dependencies have been weaponised.
We must diversify our supply routes and develop alternative export corridors to diversify away from the bottleneck of Hormuz. We will discuss this, and more, in Evian.”
EU-Iran relations
- 2026-06-11 “Answer given by President von der Leyen on behalf of the European Commission 11.6.2026 Written question In line with Regulation No 1 from 1958 [1] , EU legislation is published in all EU official and working languages and natural and legal persons can write to the Commission in all of them, including Croatian, and will receive a reply in the same language. On its main website [2] , the Commission provides information in all EU official languages, including Croatian. Practical information on citizens’ rights and administrative and legal procedures is also provided in all EU official languages [3] , including Croatian. When information is particularly relevant for speakers of a specific language, it is usually drafted and published in that language or translated into it. In such instances, other languages may be provided through machine translation. An example of this is the website of the Commission’s Representation in Croatia [4] , where the content is drafted and published in Croatian. This balanced approach ensures that the Commission’s online communication with citizens fully adheres to the principle of multilingualism. [1] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:01958R0001-20130701. [2] https://commission.europa.eu. [3] https://european-union.europa.eu, https://europa.eu/youreurope or https://e-justice.europa.eu. [4] https://croatia.representation.ec.europa.eu/.”
Multilingualism in EU institutions
- 2026-06-10 “Answer given by President von der Leyen on behalf of the European Commission 10.6.2026 Written question Members of the College are subject to strict obligations arising directly under the Treaties as well as to the ethical obligations emanating from the Code of Conduct for the Members of the Commission [1] . The Commission is aware of the allegations against Peter Mandelson, who was Member of the Commission between November 2004 and October 2008. It takes these allegations very seriously and has referred the matter for appropriate follow-up to the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF), within the latter’s independent investigative function. OLAF has confirmed it has opened a case but is not in a position to share details on individual cases or probes beyond the information and data already made public. This is in order to protect the confidentiality of investigations and of possible ensuing judicial proceedings, as well as to ensure respect for personal data and procedural rights. OLAF fully respects the presumption of innocence and the rights of defence of the persons/entities concerned. Global Counsel was removed from the Transparency Register [2] on 20 March 2026 following the cessation of its activities. Public information regarding its participation in meetings, previously available in the Transparency Register, remains accessible on the Commission’s transparency webpages concerning meetings with Members of the Commission, members of their cabinets and Commission staff holding management functions . The Commission requires registration of interest representatives in the Transparency Register prior to such meetings and publication of information and minutes for each meeting thereafter. The EEAS should be addressed for questions about members of its staff. [1] Commission Decision of 31 January 2018 on a Code of Conduct for the Members of the European Commission, C(2018) 700 final. [2] https://transparency-register.europa.eu/index_en.”
Transparency requirements of EU institutions · Transparency requirements for interest groups
- 2026-06-10 “Answer given by President von der Leyen on behalf of the European Commission 10.6.2026 Written question The question raised by the Honourable Member, received by the Commission on 24 February 2026, partly overlaps with his Written Question P-004435/2025, whose reply was given by the Commission on 5 February 2026. The Commission refers to its reply to the above-mentioned question concerning the charges brought against the former Commissioner for Justice . At this stage, and as far as the Commission is aware, the allegations regarding the former Commissioner for Justice do not concern the exercise of his duties as Member of the College and notably his performance as Member of the Commission in charge of Justice. The Commission has not conducted any internal investigations following the allegations published in the media and will not interfere in any investigations which might be carried out by the Belgian competent authorities, yet it remains ready to cooperate with the Belgian authorities where relevant . The Commission recalls that the former Commissioner for Justice, as any other citizen, benefits from the principle of the presumption of innocence until a possible conviction by the competent judicial authorities. The anti-money laundering and counter financing of terrorism (AML/CFT) package is a comprehensive legislative reform that was adopted in June 2024 [1] . The preparation of this package involved extensive and complex consultations of the various Directorates-General of the Commission, including the Directorate-General for Justice and Consumers and culminated with a collegiate decision procedure at the level of the Commission, which naturally involved all the members of the College and their cabinets. It is therefore not possible to comment on the individual role of any specific Commissioner. [1] https://finance.ec.europa.eu/financial-crime/anti-money-laundering-and-countering-financing-terrorism-eu-level_en.”
EU law enforcement cooperation in criminal matters · Transparency requirements of EU institutions
- 2026-06-10 “Answer given by President von der Leyen on behalf of the European Commission 10.6.2026 Written question Members of the College are subject to strict obligations arising directly under the Treaties as well as to the ethical obligations emanating from the Code of Conduct for the Members of the Commission [1] . The Commission is aware of the allegations against Peter Mandelson, who was Member of the Commission between November 2004 and October 2008. It takes these allegations very seriously and has referred the matter for appropriate follow-up to the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF), within the latter’s independent investigative function. OLAF has confirmed it has opened a case but is not in a position to share details on individual cases or probes beyond the information and data already made public. This is in order to protect the confidentiality of investigations and of possible ensuing judicial proceedings, as well as to ensure respect for personal data and procedural rights. OLAF fully respects the presumption of innocence and the rights of defence of the persons/entities concerned. The investigation of other criminal offences remains the competence of national authorities. [1] Commission Decision of 31 January 2018 on a Code of Conduct for the Members of the European Commission, C(2018) 700 final.”
Transparency requirements of EU institutions · EU law enforcement cooperation in criminal matters
- 2026-06-10 “Answer given by President von der Leyen on behalf of the European Commission 10.6.2026 Written question The Commission is aware of the allegations against Peter Mandelson, who was Member of the Commission between November 2004 and October 2008. It takes these allegations very seriously and has referred the matter for appropriate follow-up to the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) , within the latter’s independent investigative function. OLAF has confirmed it has opened a case but is not in a position to share details on individual cases or probes beyond the information and data already made public. This is in order to protect the confidentiality of investigations and of possible ensuing judicial proceedings, as well as to ensure respect for personal data and procedural rights. OLAF fully respects the presumption of innocence and the rights of defence of the persons/entities concerned. The EU has a strong legal and operational framework to support Member States in tackling serious crime with a cross-border dimension, including trafficking in human beings and child sexual exploitation. However, the investigation of criminal offences remains the competence of national authorities. Finally, since 2014 the Commission publishes transparent information on meetings held between Members of the Commission or Commission officials and interest representatives, and Members of the Commission publish additional information on their activities in their online public agendas. There are no registered meetings held between Jeffrey Epstein and/or his consultancy with the Commission in these publicly available sources.”
Transparency requirements of EU institutions · EU law enforcement cooperation in criminal matters
- 2026-06-10 “Answer given by President von der Leyen on behalf of the European Commission 10.6.2026 Written question Members of the College are subject to strict obligations arising directly under the Treaties as well as to the ethical obligations emanating from the Code of Conduct for the Members of the Commission [1] . The Commission is aware of the allegations against Peter Mandelson, who was Member of the Commission between November 2004 and October 2008. It takes these allegations very seriously and has referred the matter for appropriate follow-up to the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF), within the latter’s independent investigative function. OLAF has confirmed it has opened a case but is not in a position to share details on individual cases or probes beyond the information and data already made public. This is in order to protect the confidentiality of investigations and of possible ensuing judicial proceedings, as well as to ensure respect for personal data and procedural rights. OLAF fully respects the presumption of innocence and the rights of defence of the persons/entities concerned. [1] Commission Decision of 31 January 2018 on a Code of Conduct for the Members of the European Commission, C(2018) 700 final.”
EU law enforcement cooperation in criminal matters · Transparency requirements of EU institutions
- 2026-06-09 “Almost every day now, we wake up to the same kind of news. Another major Russian strike on Ukrainian cities, targeting civilians blindly. We also wake up to the news of drones violating European airspace. Over the Baltics, and along our Eastern borders. Two weeks ago, a drone crashed into an apartment building in Romania. Another one exploded in the port of Constanța just last week. Some call it Russian escalation. I see it differently. It is plain and simple: failure. Four years after the start of its full-scale invasion, Russia has clearly failed to subjugate Ukraine. The price Russia pays is heavier by the day. And it is paid primarily by the people of Russia. They are mourning sons, brothers and husbands. And at the same time, they face declining living standards at home. Inflation is close to 6%. Interest rates stand at 14.5%. Taxes are rising. This is the real cost of Putin's war for Russian citizens. And on top of this, our sanctions keep biting hard and cutting deep. They are weakening the economic foundations of Russia's war effort.
Sanctions have effectively cut Russia off from global capital markets. Russia's economy is slowing sharply. Growth is sluggish, at best. The budget is under growing pressure. More than two-thirds of the liquid assets of its sovereign wealth fund are gone. Energy revenues fell by around 40% in early 2026. Hundreds of vessels from Russia's shadow fleet have been targeted by our sanctions. Export controls are depriving Russia's defence industry of critical technologies and components. So our consistency with the sanctions packages is paying off.
Today, we are putting forward the 21st sanctions package. We focus on the sectors with the highest impact: energy, financial services and crypto, trade – including fisheries, for the first time – and we are banning the entry of former Russian combatants into the European Union.
First, on energy. The conflict in the Middle East and disruptions to global energy supply chains have eased some pressure on Russia. So, the objective of our package could not be clearer. We want to maintain the full intensity of our sanctions. And the way to do this is to ensure that Russia's profits from oil sales remain contained. Our oil price cap has a built-in adjustment mechanism to follow the market. It was not made for market shocks like the one caused by the closure of the Strait in Hormuz. So we propose to simply pause the adjustment until January next year. This will give oil markets time to stabilise while preserving pressure on Russia's revenues. At the same time, we will continue targeting the shadow fleet. Today, we propose listing 30 more vessels on top of the 632 already sanctioned. For the first time, we are also targeting vessels that assist the shadow fleet – providing bunkering and other services for example. And we propose targeting critical infrastructure, such as ports, airports, refineries trading or processing Russian oil. Finally, we propose restricting the sale of LNG tankers to Russia, just as we already did for oil tankers.
Second, on financial and crypto restrictions. We are expanding our transaction bans to 31 more Russian banks. And to 20 banks, crypto firms or platforms and oil traders in third countries, ones that have been servicing sanctioned Russian entities and individuals or circumventing our measures. For the first time, we will introduce the possibility of a full third-country ban for crypto-asset services. It will act as a strong deterrent for the countries hosting platforms that help Russia evade our sanctions.
Third, on trade. We are putting forward new export restrictions on items and technologies used by Russia's military industry. For example, we are targeting more metals and alloys used in the aerospace and defence sectors. For drones, we propose new export bans on ground support equipment, and jamming and launch systems, among others. We also propose new import bans on a number of goods worth EUR 60 million. For example, it covers certain metals, metal ores or car parts. Because we want to lock in Europe's diversification away from Russian imports. And finally, we are addressing one of the last major unsanctioned sectors: fisheries. We propose substantial restrictions on imports on some fish products, and a complete ban on others, including cod. And we will be aligning trade restrictions for Belarus. So it cannot serve as a backdoor for Russian trade.
I also want to mention one key point of this new aspect. For the first time, we propose to ban from entry into the EU anyone who has served in the Russian Armed Forces since the beginning of the war. So, Europe stays off limits for anyone who has participated in the invasion of Ukraine. As simple as that.
And finally, at the same time, we provide relentless support to our brave neighbour, partner and future member of the European Union, Ukraine. Yesterday, we delivered almost EUR 3 billion from the Ukraine Facility. And still this month, we will issue the first disbursement under our EUR 90 billion loan to Ukraine. So by the end of the month, we will provide Ukraine with EUR 6 billion for drones and more than EUR 3 billion worth of macro-financial assistance. And of course, more disbursements will follow soon.
And to conclude: One thing I admire most about our Ukrainian friends is their unbreakable determination to belong to our European Union. That is impressive. They are delivering reform after reform while their cities are under attack. While the sky above them is filled with smoke. While air raid sirens echo across the country. Despite all this, they are making extraordinary progress. Clearly, Ukraine has delivered. So it is now high time for us to deliver as well. And we now have the historic opportunity to do so. In the next days, we will open the first cluster with Ukraine and Moldova. This basically opens the door to the next phase of the accession process: The formal start of accession negotiations. And I do not need to tell you that the Commission stands fully ready to support Ukraine on its path to our European Union where it belongs.
Thank you very much for your attention.”
EU-Russia relations (from March 2022)
- 2026-06-09 “Dear António,
Dear Members of the European Parliament,
Dear Commissioners,
Ladies and gentlemen,
Dear friends of the New European Bauhaus,
It is good to be here today, surrounded by people and projects that show Europe at its best. Europe has always been a continent of builders, cathedrals that took generations to complete, railways and bridges to connect our countries and – of course – building our European Union itself. A Union that is aspiring to be the best place in the world to live, to work and to raise a family. The best place to feel safe and to grow old with dignity. The best place to be innovative and daring. The best place to sow respect and harvest community. Therefore, our buildings have always been more than stones or steel. They embody our culture, our values and our way of life.
But as the world around us is changing, we also have to change our approach. Geopolitical shocks are shaking our economies. Extreme weather events are the new normal of climate change. Extremists within and outside our Union are challenging our democracies. This does not mean we should stop building, it means we must build differently. More sustainable. More resilient. Better connected. That is what the New European Bauhaus is all about. It is a shared effort to tackle the issues that matter most to our people today. From affordable housing to the industries and infrastructure of the clean transition, to democracy itself. And we are doing so in a way that is sustainable, inclusive and beautiful. Because these are the values that have long made Europe special.
Coming to the New European Bauhaus, what started six years ago has become a real movement. Over 700 projects, more than 2,000 organisations, and millions of people from Europe to Brazil to Japan, you name it.
And our Parliament and our Member States are fully engaged on this journey. Just last month, the Council adopted our new recommendation on the New European Bauhaus. So the commitment is here, and so is creativity.
As you walk through the festival – and I can only recommend it –, you see it on display. Building materials created from agricultural waste. Civic spaces reimagined to bring communities together. Neighbourhoods that are cleaner, cooler and more accessible. We are showing that inclusiveness and competitiveness go together, that clean is cool and that people drive lasting change. Through projects like these, the New European Bauhaus is building a more sustainable, more liveable and more democratic Europe.
Ladies and gentlemen,
Sustainability is the baseline for everything we do through the New European Bauhaus. It is a big topic, but I want to start small – with an olive pit. Two thirds of the world's olive oil come from our European Union, but only 20% of the olives becomes oil. The rest – pulp, skin, pits – becomes waste. Two years ago, a group of Cypriot entrepreneurs brought their idea to a New European Bauhaus hackathon in Nicosia. They wanted to turn discarded pits into sustainable design materials – tabletops and other commercial products. Cyprus produces over 24,000 tonnes of olive pits each year. So this project both reduces waste and creates new revenues for communities across the island. And this week, the results are here at this festival: beautiful, durable tables. I think this is an amazing success story and I really want to applaud these fantastic, innovative people for that. From waste to everyday usability.
This project shows a shift in how we can build – making new out of old, turning waste into value. And we need much more of this approach, because the circular economy will help power our clean transition. Just two figures: the built environment makes up 35% of Europe's waste – and 12% of national emissions. So circular buildings can make a huge difference, for communities, nature and our climate. We also know that today, sustainability and competitiveness go hand in hand. And as global demand for clean technologies and materials grows, staying at the forefront of that curve will give our businesses a competitive edge. And this is also a matter of economic independence. The more we recycle, the less we import, the less we depend on vulnerable supply chains. For all these reasons, later this year, we will adopt the Circular Economy Act. It will create a single European market for high-quality recycled materials – to grow supply and to strengthen demand. As our Bauhaus projects show, circularity is already a present reality. But we can make it the new normal, so that we waste less, create more and develop more value here at home.
Great innovations like these start with people, people who have the vision and the skills. This is why we put the New European Bauhaus Academy at the heart of this project, and we will increase our investments. Good news: today, I can say that over the next two years, we will commit an additional EUR 50 million to the New European Bauhaus Academy. That is promised. This will go toward building skills, of course to research and experimentation – that is what we live of –, and to supporting start-ups, SMEs and creative practitioners.
Dear guests,
Several of our Member States already have New European Bauhaus Academy hubs. Now, just last month, we officially launched our first international hub in Ukraine. It is a huge step forward. We all know the destruction in this brave country is abhorrent, but we will overcome it. We are supporting new skills, new jobs and new industries. We will turn rubble into recovery. So that Ukrainians can build back their country stronger than ever. I am very much looking forward to hearing more on this soon from our friend Hanna Bondar and to learn from Ukraine's example. One thing is for sure: new European Bauhaus will be at the side of Ukraine every step of the way, you can count on that.
Ladies and gentlemen,
When we started this, we knew that the true test would be whether people can feel the difference in their daily lives. And this is also true for housing. A home is more than four walls and a roof – we all know it by experience –, it is the foundation on which people build their lives: their families, it is important for the health, for their jobs, for the sense of belonging. And when people put down roots, entire communities flourish alongside them. This is why the housing crisis is one of the most urgent facing Europeans today. And our solution is not just to build more, but to build better. Homes that are affordable, sustainable and genuinely liveable. There is a wonderful example: we can see this in Amsterdam, at the Kleiburg flat complex. This modernist icon from the 1970s fell into dereliction. But instead of demolishing it, the local community launched a project to restore it. Each future occupant helped to finish off their own apartment. By giving the residents control, the project reduced delays and costs. The result was housing made not only affordable, but fast, functioning and fit for purpose.
We need more of this. The good news is: Bauhaus funding is still available in our current budget. So I encourage our Member States to take full advantage, particularly for housing, so that we can deliver at the necessary scale. This is also why, today, we are launching a new Catalogue on New European Bauhaus blueprints. It is a tool for architects – for all of you in this crowd here who are architects –, real estate companies, local authorities. Please use it, so that we can build better and faster where it is most needed. The knowledge is out there, just seize the moment. That is important.
Ladies and gentlemen,
In 1925, 100 years ago, the legendary Bauhaus opened its doors in Dessau. It was a promising moment, and a fragile one. We all know what was lost in the years that followed, and how quickly democracy can fracture. This lesson is especially important and urgent today. As polarisation and distrust grow, and some feel disconnected, we need stronger public spaces where citizens can come together and engage. And this is why participation is the cornerstone of our Bauhaus approach. Because when people act together, they build trust, and stronger communities make stronger democracies.
Change starts always at the local level. From something as small as an olive pit, or perhaps a new tree in the square. But taken together, our projects add up to something much greater. Therefore, over the past five years, the New European Bauhaus Prizes have become a true expression of this idea. This year is very special. For the first time, we launched an EU-wide competition to design the official trophy, and we have many of the finalists with us today. Their amazing work is displayed all around the room – later on, you can have a look at it. But I would ask now each and every one of these finalists to please stand up for a moment. We asked these finalists to imagine a symbol for an entire movement, and I must say, dear finalists, you delivered beautifully. Being selected among the ten finalists is already a remarkable achievement. So, my friends, let us thank each and every one of them for their creativity and their imagination. I thank all of you who came to the opening of this Festival.
Many thanks to you and long live Europe.”
EU policy on urban development
- 2026-06-08 “Thank you so much, dear Sophie.
Dear guests,
Thank you very much for giving me the opportunity to offer a very brief introduction. It was very important for me to be here. First of all, I want to thank all of you, and especially you, Sophie, for organising this event on World Brain Tumour Day. This is deeply important to me because, with all the crises we are experiencing around us, it is essential that we remain committed to beating cancer. You are familiar with the figures: every year, around 2.7 million people in the European Union are diagnosed with cancer. Around 42,000 people annually are diagnosed with brain tumours, and 36,000 lose their lives. Behind every single figure is a human story. A person suffering and fighting. Loved ones who care for them, stand by them and hope for the best.
Dear Sophie,
You and your children experienced this first-hand. That is why it was important for me to come the moment you asked me. It was an immediate yes. But there is also a second reason why I wanted to come to this session specifically. I was just 13 years old when my little sister died of cancer. She was only 11. She had a reticulosarcoma, a very rare cancer, completely incurable at the time. I still vividly remember the helplessness of my parents, but also of the medical staff around her. Ten years later, I studied medicine myself, and after my studies I started to work as an assistant in obstetrics and gynaecology. Of course, there was also the oncology ward. But I must say that there, I also experienced cases that ended well. There was healing. There was hope. There was progress and groundbreaking research that truly made a difference. Another ten years later, one of my brothers became ill with non-Hodgkin lymphoma. He lost the battle, and it was a heartbreaking farewell. But today, the five-year relative survival rate for non-Hodgkin lymphoma is approximately 74%. That figure speaks for itself.
Ladies and Gentlemen,
What I am trying to say is that we can, and we must, beat cancer. Thanks to medical professionals and researchers like you, we are making tangible progress. I often think back to my years studying medicine. Who would have imagined at that time that we could vaccinate against certain cancers on a large scale? Or that immunotherapies could defeat cancer? At the time, this was almost unthinkable for a medical student. Today, as you all know, it has become common practice. That is why Europe has placed the fight against cancer at the heart of its agenda with Europe's Beating Cancer Plan. We are investing EUR 4 billion in the fight against cancer, including EUR 600 million dedicated to research projects. We have made HPV vaccination the standard recommendation for both girls and boys. Some Member States have already vaccinated 90% of young girls, and we are seeing a dramatic reduction in cervical cancer rates. But there is still much more to do. I want to be very brief on four points.
First, 40% of cancer cases are considered preventable, so we should focus even more on prevention. This is not only a question of lifestyle. It is also a question of screening, and of access to high-quality screening for everyone.
Second, we must act faster and more efficiently, particularly when it comes to developing treatments. This is one of the goals of the European Biotech Act. It will help accelerate and simplify approvals for clinical trials. I know that clinical trials are often the bottleneck, and it is absolutely essential that we improve in this area, and we will. We also need better data-sharing through the European Health Data Space. Better data-sharing means better understanding and better treatment, especially in the age of AI. We are sitting on a wealth of data, and with the highest standards of privacy, we can use this data for the benefit of people who are ill or recovering.
Third, we must address the inequalities that still persist in early detection and treatment. Our goal in the European Union must be that every person has equal access to high-quality care, regardless of where they live, what they earn or their level of education.
And my final point: it is wonderful that more and more people are surviving cancer, but we must strengthen support for survivors. Too often, survivors face higher insurance premiums or difficult loan conditions, for example. That is why the right to be forgotten is so important. Many Member States now provide such protections, and we will persevere until every survivor in Europe receives the same treatment and the same opportunities.
Ladies and Gentlemen,
Dear Sophie,
I started with sad stories, but I want to end with a story of hope. When I was a medical student, I worked night shifts to support the nurses, as students often do to earn a little extra money. I worked on a children's cancer ward. There was a little girl there, six years old, who had both a reticulosarcoma and an osteosarcoma. She survived both, for many years. Then the cancer returned. And she survived a second time. She went on to live a full life. She completed her education, built a career, raised a family and had two children. All her hopes became reality. And I think this must also be the motto of our work: to turn the hopes of people into reality.
Thank you again for allowing me to address you today.
This was very important for me. And I wish you all a wonderful session.”
Vaccination
- 2026-06-08 “Answer given by President von der Leyen on behalf of the European Commission 8.6.2026 Written question Members of the College are subject to strict obligations arising directly under the Treaties as well as to the ethical obligations emanating from the Code of Conduct for the Members of the European Commission [1] . The Commission is aware of the allegations against Peter Mandelson, who was Member of the Commission between November 2004 and October 2008. It takes these allegations very seriously and has referred the matter for appropriate follow-up to the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF), within the latter’s independent investigative function. OLAF has confirmed it has opened a case but is not in a position to share details on individual cases or probes beyond the information and data already made public. This is in order to protect the confidentiality of investigations and of possible ensuing judicial proceedings, as well as to ensure respect for personal data and procedural rights. OLAF fully respects the presumption of innocence and the rights of defence of the persons/entities concerned. [1] Commission Decision of 31 January 2018 on a Code of Conduct for the Members of the European Commission, C(2018) 700 final https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32018D0221(02). In 2008, the version Code of Conduct of 24 November 2004 was applicable, available at the following link: https://www.cvce.eu/obj/code_of_conduct_for_commissioners_24_november_2004-en-eb3c996a-b728-496e-b06c-49ef61f70d16.html.”
Transparency requirements for interest groups · Transparency requirements of EU institutions
- 2026-05-22 “Opening remarks
President Sheinbaum,
President Costa,
Dear business leaders from Mexico and Europe,
Thank you for joining us today. I look forward to hearing your perspectives and insights with us. But before you do that, I highlight how we – Leaders and governments – are working together to support your work, and your investment in this relationship. Later today, President Sheinbaum and I will sign a modernised Global Agreement. We are removing the remaining barriers to trade. We are facilitating investment. And we are making it easier than ever for businesses in Mexico and Europe to grow together.
Let me focus on the three main novelties. First, on investment. We have just announced 5 billion EUR in investments in Mexico, directly supported by our Global Gateway investment plan. The strength of this package lies both in its alignment with Plan México and in cooperation with the private sector. Our focus is to create the conditions for you to step up your investment – and it is encouraging to see that this momentum is already translating into substantial newly announced investments by EU companies. For instance, we are investing in clean energy and electricity lines – because this is the essential infrastructure to power up your businesses. We are supporting Mexican and European ports to decarbonise together – because this will foster clean trade between us. And when European pharma companies told us they wanted to invest here – we joined forces with Mexico to harmonise our rules. The benefits on both sides are clear. Local jobs and technology transfers for Mexicans, and stronger supply chains for both of us.
Second, on trade. Since our Global Agreement has entered into force 25 years ago, trade between Mexico and Europe has already quadrupled. For European business, Mexico is an important gateway to the entire Western Hemisphere. Now we are removing almost all barriers that still stand between us. For instance, you will be able to trade critical raw materials with no restrictions or tariffs. Mexico is one of the top global exporters of fluorite, copper and zinc. That is, essential minerals for electrification and the clean transition. This means greater integration between our industrial value chains, at no additional cost. We are building new bridges with one of our most trusted partners.
This leads to my third and final point. We are creating a level playing field for Mexican companies operating in Europe and vice-versa. For instance, Mexico's services sector is already important on the European market and is growing fast. Now we will open doors for Mexican companies in sectors such as telecom, financial services, transport, digital trade. Likewise, European companies will now be able to participate in Mexico's public procurement. Not only at the national level, but also at state (regional) level. No other partner enjoys that kind of access in Mexico. Because we trust each other. And we are turning trust into opportunity for Mexican and European companies alike. So our message to business is clear. This is the moment to invest in our partnership. If you are looking for predictability. If you are looking for a compelling business case. If you are looking for open markets in these volatile times. The modernised Global Agreement will give you just that. And with that, I look forward to hearing how we can build on that further, together.
Thank you.
Concluding remarks
Thanks to all of you for your valuable insights and suggestions.
What we have just heard proves a simple fact. The ties between Mexico and Europe already run deep. But we are ready to bring this partnership to the next level. The business case for investing in each other is clear. Listening to all of you, three messages come out clearly that I take with me.
The first: Mexico is, in your words, a land of opportunity. Our task – yours and ours together – is to keep it that way. That means predictability. It means fairness. It means clear and stable rules, not least in matters of taxation.
The second: today we will be shaping the future of our economies. From Artificial intelligence to renewables and clean technology. These are not distant horizons – they are the work in front of us.
And the third: our economies fit together. They are complementary by nature, and that is a foundation we should build on with ambition. From Critical Raw Materials to delicious food and drinks: we need each other and benefit from our cooperation.
For 25 years, Mexico and Europe have built a trusted economic relationship. But the best times of our partnership are yet to come. Let us deliver on the promises of this partnership in the years to come.
Thank you.”
Free trade agreements (FTAs)
- 2026-05-22 “Answer given by President von der Leyen on behalf of the European Commission 22.5.2026 Written question Allegations of cooperation between Marta Kos and the former Yugoslav secret service were raised during the European Parliament’s hearing with the then Commissioner-Designate, prior to the European Parliament’s vote on the appointment of the Commission. In the hearing, the Commissioner-Designate rejected these allegations, stating that she had never been an informant or worked for the Yugoslav secret service. She has confirmed her position in this matter in the context of the Honourable Member’s question [1] . The Commission has no reason to revisit the issue that was addressed in the European Parliament’s thorough vetting process of the candidates who were subsequently appointed as Members of the Commission 2024-2029. [1] Cf pages 33/34 of the verbatim of 7 November 2024 of Commissioner-Designate Marta Kos’ hearing with the European Parliament’s Committee on Foreign Affairs.”
Rule of law and democracy in the EU (political compass) · Transparency requirements of EU institutions
- 2026-05-22 “President Sheinbaum,
Dear Claudia,
Yesterday, I had the privilege of sharing a deeply enriching exchange with a group of Indigenous women at the Museum of Anthropology. Their wisdom, strength, and leadership are a powerful reminder of the richness and resilience of the Mexican Indigenous peoples. They presented me with this beautiful rebozo. And it is an honour for me to wear on this historic occasion. Their communities have preserved knowledge, culture, and dignity across generations. Our responsibility is to listen, to stand alongside them with humility, and to support them. Strengthening gender equality is one of the many values shared by the EU and Mexico. Today we adopted a Joint Declaration on Trade and Gender Equality. So that our modernized agreement benefits women and men equally. And we launched 6 new projects worth 4 million euro, this is 80 million pesos. They all aim to fight violence against women and girls in Mexico and provide them with the support they need.
Our Global Agreement, signed in 1997, was among the most ambitious Europe had ever concluded. The agreement was truly “global” from the outset, as it brought together political dialogue, cooperation, trade, and investment. And today, we upgraded this broad platform, I want to thank Commissioner Šefčovič and Minister Ebrard for their tireless work and skilful steer. We strengthened it, in line with our values. Our joint priorities. And the challenges we share as partners in this world. Our Modernised Agreement deepens our cooperation on human rights. It reaffirms our commitment to multilateralism, peace and global stability. It also anchors our common dedication to equality. Fairness. The empowerment of our people. It reflects our engagements under the Paris Climate Agreement. And for the protection of our planet. In sum, this Agreement reflects who we are as partners. Ambitious, reliable, forward-looking. And ever committed to delivering for our people.
This brings me to our trade commitments. The goal here is simple. We want to create even more jobs and value on both sides. With swift ratification, tariffs on virtually all Mexican agri-food exports to Europe will disappear. Imagine the opportunities. European companies, drawn by Mexico's talent and dynamism, already support more than five million jobs here. And there is much more to come. Mexican small and medium-sized producers will benefit greatly. Because this agreement promotes sustainable practices. And it protects iconic Mexican geographical indications, from Tabasco's cocoa to Tequila. The modernised agreement now expands into areas that the original text never anticipated. From digital trade to public procurement. For Europe, the deal will make it easier for companies to invest, provide services, and compete for public contracts in Mexico.
Of course, I also have a message for Europe's farmers. Mexico is a vast market for agri-food products. This agreement opens new opportunities for you. By removing tariffs, it can save EU agri-food exporters up to EUR 100 million per year. At the same time, Europe's health, Environment, and food standards remain fully protected. Finally, the agreement safeguards 568 EU geographical indications. From Gouda to Feta. From Prosciutto di Parma to Tiroler Speck.
Dear Claudia,
Today we give our agreement its big wings to fly by backing it with its own investment plan. An agenda that is fully aligned with your own Plan México. Global Gateway, Europe's investment strategy for the world, is mobilising 5 billion EUR (more than 100 billion pesos) in Mexico. It powers the clean energy transition, with 13 new solar and wind power generation projects. And clean mobility projects – among them, new cable cars for Mexico City. We are also investing in big strategic sectors. The pharmaceutical industry. Digital networks. And the circular economy – with our flagship project on tackling sargassum. This Global Gateway agenda is dynamic and designed to evolve. This is why we are launching today new dialogues on energy, health and digital.
Finally, I want to mention our new High-Level Dialogue on security and migration. In Europe and Latin America, these issues are both pressing and complex. This dialogue will allow us to address them comprehensively. From strengthening law enforcement cooperation, to tackling their root causes.
Let me conclude,
The EU-Mexico relationship has always been vibrant and dynamic. It is rooted not only in shared interests, but also in a shared culture. Thousands of Europeans found safe haven here, during the wars that ravaged our continent in the last century. And I am thinking of the legacy of artists such as Diego Rivera and Frida Kahlo, who drew inspiration from their European experience. Their spirit, in many ways, accompanied us throughout this visit. Of course, we share a common passion for football. That is undeniable. And European football supporters are greatly looking forward to the World Cup, which you co-host. Today, I believe we have honoured that rich heritage. By taking our partnership to a whole new level.
Thank you very much.”
Free trade agreements (FTAs)
- 2026-05-19 “Answer given by President von der Leyen on behalf of the European Commission 19.5.2026 Written question 1. and 2. The general provisions on the Union’s external action in the Treaty on European Union provide that the Union shall ensure consistency between the different areas of its external action [1] . The Council and the Commission, assisted by the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, cooperate to that effect. This is without prejudice to the fact that, with the exception of the Common Foreign and Security Policy, it is for the Commission to ensure the external representation of the Union [2] . 3. The Team Europe approach focuses on joining forces, delivering more effectively, increasing global impact and avoiding duplication of efforts, while respecting the division of competences under the Treaties. It aims at bringing together the European Union, its Member States — including their implementing agencies and public development banks — as well as the European Investment Bank and the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development. [1] Article 21(3) of the Treaty on European Union. [2] Article 17(1) of the Treaty on European Union.”
EU competences on foreign affairs
- 2026-04-23 “P-000077/2026 Reply Following the political agreement reached at the Foreign Affairs Council of 29 January 2026 to include the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) on the ‘EU terrorist list’, the Council adopted Council Decision (CFSP) 2026/421 of 19 February 2026 amending Decision (CFSP) 2025/1577 1 updating the list of persons, groups and entities covered by Common Position 2001/931/CFSP on the application of specific measures to combat terrorism. On the same day, the Council adopted Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/420 of 19 February 2026 implementing Article 2(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 on specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism. 1 https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L_202600421”
EU-Iran relations
- 2026-04-23 “E-000609/2026 Reply In its conclusions of 19 December 2024, the European Council expressed its deep concern over the consequences of the Israeli legislation adopted on 28 October 2024 on UNRWA’s capacity to operate its mandate and stressed the essential role of UNRWA, which provides crucial support to the civilian population in both Gaza and the wider region. Furthermore, it reiterated its call for the urgent improvement of access and sustained distribution of humanitarian assistance at scale throughout Gaza 1 . Moreover, in its conclusions of 18 December 2025, the European Council stressed the need for the UN and its agencies to be able to work independently and impartially and called on Israel not to implement the NGO registration law in its current form 2 . As regards the EU-Israel Association Agreement, the Council recalls its replies to written questions E-002313/2025 and E-004880/2025. In its conclusions of 23 October 2025, the European Council deplored the dire humanitarian situation in Gaza and called on Israel to allow immediate, unimpeded access and sustained distribution of humanitarian assistance at scale into and throughout Gaza and to enable the UN and its agencies, and humanitarian organisations, to work independently and impartially to save lives and reduce suffering. Israel must fully comply with its obligations under international law, including international humanitarian law 3 . The European Union will support the rapid, safe and unhindered delivery of humanitarian aid in coordination with international partners, including via the Cyprus Maritime Corridor to supplement land routes 4 . 1 https://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/jhlenhaj/euco-conclusions-19122024-en.pdf. 2 https://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/wqmknoh4/en-20251218-european-councilconclusions.pdf. 3 https://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/d2nhnqso/20251023-european-council-conclusionsen.pdf. 4 https://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/d2nhnqso/20251023-european-council-conclusionsen.pdf.”
EU Development & Humanitarian Aid · Relations with Israel - Palestine · Support for international humanitarian organisations
- 2026-04-23 “P-000015/2026 Reply On 18 December 2025, the European Council agreed to provide a loan to Ukraine of EUR 90 billion for the years 2026-2027 based on EU borrowing on the capital markets backed by the EU budget headroom. By means of enhanced cooperation (Article 20 TEU) in respect of the instrument based on Article 212 TFEU, any mobilisation of resources from the Union’s budget as a guarantee for this loan will not have an impact on the financial obligations of Czechia, Hungary or Slovakia. The text, supported by 25 Heads of State or Government, mentions that: ‘This loan would be repaid by Ukraine only once reparations are received. Until then, these assets will remain immobilised and the Union reserves its right to make use of them to repay the loan, in full accordance with EU and international law’. On 14 January 2026, following the European Council’s agreement, the Commission put forward a proposal for a EUR 90 billion limited recourse loan to Ukraine for 2026 and 2027 (‘the Commission proposal’). The proposed support would be structured in two components, with an indicative distribution of approximately two thirds (amounting to EUR 60 billion) dedicated to supporting Ukraine’s defence industrial capacities, and the remaining one third (corresponding to EUR 30 billion) provided for macro-financial assistance or for budget assistance to be implemented under the Ukraine Facility. The support will help Ukraine strengthen its defence capabilities and ensure the continued functioning of the state and basic public services, while also contributing to Ukraine’s resilience and its closer integration with Europe’s defence industrial base. According to recital 33 of the Commission proposal: ‘The implementation of the assistance to support Ukraine’s defence industrial capacities should be carried out in line with the principles of sound financial management ensuring the protection of the financial interests of the Union as set out in Article 223(4) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 of the European Parliament and the Council. Detailed requirements in this respect might be entered into an arrangement to be signed between the Commission and Ukraine. Furthermore, for the management of the financial and economic assistance received to support Ukraine’s defence industrial capacities, Ukraine should open a single account via which to manage the assistance, where the Commission should be able to monitor that account’.”
Russia-Ukraine conflict (10th term) · EU-Ukraine relations
- 2026-04-23 “P-000337/2026 Reply In its conclusions of 9 February 2023, the European Council called on the Commission and the Council to take forward the work on relevant tools, including possible measures against transport operators that engage in or facilitate trafficking in persons or smuggling of migrants. It is not for the Council to answer questions concerning ongoing consultations in other institutions or services. Moreover, the Council is not in a position to comment on a potential new EU sanctions regime addressing migrant smuggling, human trafficking or other forms of organised crime prior to the submission of a formal proposal by the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy and the European Commission. Once the legal acts have been received by the Council, negotiations will commence in the relevant Council preparatory bodies and at this stage, the Council can foresee neither the outcome nor the duration of these discussions.”
Asylum & border control
- 2026-04-23 “E-000425/2026 Reply The information requested by the Honourable Member is not available to the Council.”
EU law enforcement cooperation in criminal matters · Privacy & law enforcement
- 2026-04-10 “E-000623/2026 Answer given by President von der Leyen on behalf of the European Commission First and foremost, the Commission recalls that former Commissioner for Justice, as any other citizen, benefits from principle of the presumption of innocence until a possible conviction by the competent judicial authorities. At this stage, and as far as the Commission is aware, the allegations regarding former Commissioner for Justice do not concern the exercise of his duties as Member of the College. The Commission has not conducted any internal investigations following the allegations published in the media regarding former Commissioner for Justice and will not interfere in any investigations which might be carried out by the Belgian competent authorities, yet remaining ready to cooperate with these authorities, where relevant. The Commission is not aware of any allegation of breach of EU rules by former Commissioner for Justice.”
Rule of law and democracy in the EU (political compass) · Transparency requirements of EU institutions
- 2026-03-31 “P-000352/2026 Answer given by President von der Leyen on behalf of the European Commission The Commission is committed to transparency in its activities, applying strict rules concerning interest representation. It publishes information on, and minutes of, all meetings held between Members of the Commission and/or Members of their Cabinet and interest representatives, including companies representing the defence sector, in accordance with Commission Decision (EU) 2024/3081 1 since the start of the Commission’s mandate on 1 December 2024. The Honourable Members are invited to consult the information that is publicly available on the transparency website of, respectively, the President of the Commission 2 and Commissioner for Defence and Space 3 . In accordance with Article 5, paragraph 1, of the detailed rules for the application of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001, annexed to the Rules of Procedure of the Commission 4 (hereinafter, the ‘detailed rules’), ‘any content that constitutes important information that is not short-lived shall be registered pursuant to Article 7 of Commission Decision (EU) 2021/2121 5 ’. Article 5(2) of the detailed rules gives illustrative examples of how to apply the registration criteria of important and not-short lived documents. The detailed rules also clarify that text messaging applications on corporate mobile phones shall not be used for important information that is not short-lived, unless where this is strictly required in the interest of the service and that they shall comply with the Commission’s information technology security recommendations for the automatic disappearance of messages (Article 5 paragraph 4). The Commission has a record-keeping policy as laid down in Commission Decision (EU) 2021/2121, and in its internal guidelines, which provide for criteria for registration of documents, together with the above-mentioned provisions in the detailed rules. 1 https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L_202403081. 2 https://commission.europa.eu/about/organisation/president/transparency_en. 3 https://commission.europa.eu/about/organisation/college-commissioners/andrius-kubilius_en#transparency. 4 Commission Decision (EU) 2024/3080 of 4 December 2024 establishing the Rules of Procedure of the Commission and amending Decision C(2000) 3614 (OJ L, 2024/3080, 5.12.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dec/2024/3080/oj). 5 Commission Decision (EU) 2021/2121 of 6 July 2020 on records management and archives (J L 430, 2.12.2021, p. 30–41) (https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dec/2021/2121/oj/eng).”
Transparency requirements for interest groups · Transparency requirements of EU institutions
- 2026-03-31 “E-004250/2025 Answer given by President von der Leyen on behalf of the European Commission As regards transparency, the Commission acts in accordance with the Treaties and the applicable rules adopted on their basis. Those include in particular Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents 1 , and the Annex to the Rules of Procedures of the Commission 2 , which sets out detailed rules for access to documents of the Commission, on the basis of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 and Article 15(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU. The Commission has consistently set out, including in replies to previous written questions, how the transparency framework applies to different types of documents and forms of communication. The Commission also cooperates constructively with the European Ombudsman, in line with its institutional role. In its judgment in case T-36/23 3 , the General Court found that the Commission should have provided a more detailed explanation in its decision that it does not hold the text messages requested by the applicants but did not put in question as such the Commission’s policy on registration and retention of documents. The Commission has implemented this judgment by adopting a new decision C(2025) 5429, providing a more detailed explanation, which has not been challenged. The Commission recalls that respect for the rule of law, democracy and fundamental rights is a founding value of the EU and underpins all the Commission’s actions. In light of the above, the Commission considers itself in full compliance with the rule of law. 1 OJ L 145, 31.5.2001, pp. 43–48. 2 Commission Decision (EU) 2024/3080 of 4 December 2024 establishing the Rules of Procedure of the Commission and amending Decision C(2000) 3614. 3 Judgment of 14 May 2025, Stevi and The New York Times v Commission, T-36/23, EU:T:2025:483.”
Transparency requirements of EU institutions · Activities of EU Ombudsman
- 2026-03-19 “E-004338/2025 Reply Further to the adoption of Directive (EU) 2024/1385, the Council reaffirmed its commitment in its conclusions of 17 October 2025 on ‘violence against women and domestic violence: prevention, early detection and intervention’ 1 , explicitly noting that women and girls are disproportionately exposed to gender-based violence, including its most extreme and brutal manifestations such as femicide. Article 44 of Directive (EU) 2024/1385 provides for obligations in relation to data collection and research. In order to ensure the comparability and standardisation of administrative data across the Union, Member States must endeavour to collect administrative data on the basis of common disaggregations developed in cooperation with and in accordance with the standards developed by the European Institute for Gender Equality (EIGE). The deadline for the transposition of the Directive is 14 June 2027. In its abovementioned Council conclusions, the Council called on the European Commission and the Member States to improve the data collection, analysis, publication and use of data on violence against women and domestic violence. In the framework of the Council of Europe Convention on preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence (‘Istanbul Convention’), a thematic discussion on preventing and combating gender-related killings/femicide was held at the Committee of the Parties’ meeting on 11 December 2025. As the Union is a party to the Convention, it participated in the discussion and the Commission debriefed the Council’s competent working party on the outcome. 1 https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-13244-2025-INIT/en/pdf.”
Gender roles, equality and inclusion
- 2026-03-03 “E-003849/2025 Answer given by President von der Leyen on behalf of the European Commission The reply from the Spokesperson’s Service during the Midday briefing on 2 October 2025 was provided within the context of acknowledging the intentions of those involved, which is consistent with the values the EU upholds, such as respect for fundamental rights and support for relief efforts. The Spokesperson’s Service operates within its mandate, supporting the President and Commissioners in effectively communicating with the press. The Commission recognises the challenges in delivering aid to Gaza and remains in constant contact with the Member States and Israel regarding the humanitarian situation. It has acknowledged several times the right of the activists on board of the flotilla to raise awareness about the dire humanitarian situation in Gaza, freedom of assembly being integral part of the EU values within democratic societies. As such, they should not have been subject to attacks by drones or any other means. Nevertheless, the Commission also expressed its concerns about the risks the activists on board of the flotilla were taking and the need to comply with international law of the sea. The Commission is committed to upholding the freedom of navigation under international law of the sea and calls for establishing pathways for the delivery of aid to ensure its safe and lawful passage. The Commission promotes humanitarian efforts, in full respect of international law, and is committed to maintaining this balance in its communications.”
EU foreign policy approach · Relations with Israel - Palestine
- 2026-03-03 “E-004415/2025 Answer given by President von der Leyen on behalf of the European Commission As indicated in the answer to written parliamentary question E-001110/2025, the Commission publishes in the transparency register, information on all meetings, including minutes, held by the Head of Cabinet, The Digital Adviser and the Diplomatic Advisor of the Commission President with interest representatives, among others, arms industry representatives. In addition, Members from the Commission President’s Cabinet exchanged emails and other correspondence with representatives of the arms industry to respond to invitations, congratulatory messages, or requests for meetings with the President which were shared with the Honourable Member in access to documents request EASE/2025/5658. In addition to the documents disclosed already to the Honourable Member, the Commission identified one more letter (ARES 2024/6937003) which in the spirit of good cooperation it shared with the Honourable Member via the EASE 1 platform on 9 February 2026 with reference 2026/0474. 1 Electronic Access to European Commission Documents (EASE).”
Arms export from the EU
- 2026-03-03 “E-004159/2025 Answer given by President von der Leyen on behalf of the European Commission The Commission is committed to evidence-based policymaking. Furthermore, the Commission attaches the utmost importance to the adherence by the members of the Commission to the ethical framework applicable to them and notably to their full observance of the Code of Conduct for the Members of the European Commission 1 . Pursuant to Article 5 of the Code of Conduct, the members of the Commission must comply with the duty of loyalty towards the Commission. Without prejudice to their fundamental freedom of expression and the right of members to express their personal opinions, they are expected to abide by the restraint that their office requires. In particular, members shall not make any comments that would call into question a decision taken by the Commission or which may harm the Commission’s reputation. This being said, it is the Commission policy not to comment on hypothetical situations such as captured in the Honourable Member’s written question. The Commission does not have sufficient details to provide a relevant reply of the substance. 1 https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32018D0221(02).”
Disinformation & online freedoms · Transparency requirements of EU institutions
- 2026-02-16 “E-003804/2025 Reply The listing of a person, group or entity under Council Common Position 2001/931/CFSP (‘CP 931’) has to satisfy the conditions laid down in Article 1(2) to (4) of that Common Position, which provides a definition of persons, groups and entities ‘involved in terrorist acts’ and a definition of ‘terrorist acts’ for this purpose, and which specifies the requirements related to the adoption of a decision by a national competent authority in respect of the persons, groups and entities concerned. The ‘competent authority’ means a judicial authority, or, where judicial authorities have no competence in the area covered by this paragraph, an equivalent competent authority in that area. Currently, there are 13 individuals and 22 groups and entities on the so-called ‘EU terrorist list’, which are active both within and outside the EU. The Council reviews the list at regular intervals and at least every six months. The issue of listing Antifa raised by the Honourable Members has not been discussed in the Council.”
Disinformation & online freedoms
- 2026-02-16 “E-004133/2025 Reply The listing of a person, group or entity under the Council Common Position 2001/931/CFSP has to satisfy the conditions laid down in Article 1(2) to 1(4) of that Common Position, which provides definitions of persons, groups and entities ‘involved in terrorist acts’ and of ‘terrorist acts’ for this purpose, and specifies the requirements related to the adoption of a decision by a national competent authority in respect of the persons, groups and entities concerned. Currently, there are 13 individuals and 22 groups and entities, active within and outside the EU, on the so-called ‘EU terrorist list’. The Council reviews the list at regular intervals and, at least, every 6 months. The Council has not discussed the question of ‘Antifa’ raised by the Honourable Member.”
EU policy on criminal justice · Rule of law in Spain
- 2026-02-05 “P-004435/2025 Answer given by President von der Leyen on behalf of the European Commission The Commission reminds that, as any other citizen, the former Commissioner for Justice mentioned in the question benefits from the presumption of innocence until proven guilty according to law. This is a fundamental principle enshrined in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (Article 48) and led down in EU secondary legislation 1 . 1. The Commission has not been involved in any investigations regarding the charges brought against the former Commissioner for Justice and is not aware of any link between him and any Russian oligarch. 2. The Commission has no information on the arts foundation referred to by the Honourable Members. 3. At this stage and based on the currently available information, the Commission has no reason to perform any audit linked to the exercise by the former Commissioner for Justice of his duties as Member of the Commission. 1 Directive (EU) 2016/343 on the strengthening of certain aspects of the presumption of innocence and of the right to be present at the trial in criminal proceedings (Article 3).”
EU law enforcement cooperation in criminal matters · Transparency requirements of EU institutions
- 2026-01-30 “E-004278/2025 Reply The Council has not discussed this question, as it does not fall within its sphere of competence.”
Transparency requirements for interest groups · Transparency requirements of EU institutions
- 2026-01-30 “E-003112/2025 Reply The European Union (EU) has the power to adopt restrictive measures, which are preventive, temporary and reversible. Restrictive measures are based on Article 29 of the Treaty on European Union (TEU) for decisions under the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP), and Article 215 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) for implementing those measures through EU regulations. While the decision-making process you are referring to – where the Council can take decisions to impose restrictive measures on natural persons – rests on the above-mentioned legal bases, the rules regarding the deliberations of the Council are laid down in its Rules of Procedure, in particular Articles 6 to 10 thereof. As regards respect for the right to be heard, according to the established case-law, ‘in the case of the initial decision placing a person’s or an entity’s name on the list of persons and entities whose funds are frozen, the Council is not required to inform the person or entity concerned beforehand of the grounds on which it intends to rely in order to list that person or entity. So that its effectiveness may not be jeopardised, such a measure must, by its very nature, be able to take advantage of a surprise effect and to apply immediately’ 1 . Furthermore, in accordance with its obligations the Council consistently ensures the communication of its decisions, including the grounds for listing, to the listed persons and informs them about possible actions before the Court of Justice of the EU. This communication is done either directly, if the address is known, or through the publication of a notice, providing such persons with an opportunity to present observations, including through legal representation. In terms of judicial review, designated individuals are entitled to it under EU law, primarily under Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. That Article guarantees the right to an 1 See judgment of 27 July 2022, RT France v Council, T 125/22, EU:T:2022:483, paragraph 80 and the case-law cited”
Disinformation & online freedoms · EU competences on human rights
- 2026-01-30 “E-002889/2025 Reply In its conclusions of 23 October 2025, the European Council welcomed the agreement reached on the first phase of the Comprehensive Plan to end the Gaza Conflict. To alleviate the dire humanitarian situation in Gaza, the European Council called for immediate, unimpeded access and sustained distribution of humanitarian aid at scale into and throughout Gaza and for the UN and its agencies, and humanitarian organisations, to be able to work independently and impartially. The European Union will continue to contribute to peace efforts and to actively engage with partners on the next steps. It will support the rapid, safe and unhindered delivery of humanitarian aid in coordination with international partners, including via the Cyprus Maritime Corridor to supplement land routes. With regard to restrictive measures, to date, under the thematic EU Global Human Rights Sanctions Regime (EUGHRSR) adopted by the Council in December 2020, the EU has introduced measures targeting individuals, entities, and bodies, including both state and non-state actors responsible for, involved in or associated with serious human rights violations and abuses worldwide. In July 2024, Tsav 9, an Israeli organisation, was listed for having regularly blocked supply trucks delivering humanitarian aid, including food, water and fuel, to Gaza. Restrictive measures include travel bans for individuals, asset freezes for individuals and entities and a prohibition on making funds or economic resources available to those listed.”
Support for international humanitarian organisations · Relations with Israel - Palestine
- 2026-01-30 “E-003544/2025 Reply The Council receives data from the Commission regarding evacuations of Palestinians from the Gaza Strip for medical reasons. The data concerns the number of Palestinian patients and their companions who have been evacuated from Gaza with the support of the EU Civil Protection Mechanism (UCPM) to EU Member States and UCPM Participating States, in response to the request for support by the World Health Organisation (WHO) in April 2024. In addition, the European Union Border Assistance Mission to the Rafah Crossing Point (EUBAM Rafah), which was temporarily deployed to the Rafah Crossing Point (RCP) as part of the January 2025 ceasefire deal, facilitated the safe transit of 4 176 individuals, including 1 683 medical patients and their relatives, between 1 February and 17 March 2025, in close cooperation with the Palestinian General Authority for Borders and Crossings (GABC). Following the agreement reached on the first phase of the Comprehensive Plan to end the Gaza Conflict, the EU will contribute to peace efforts and to actively engage with partners on the next steps, including by making full use of EUBAM Rafah. In order to activate the Temporary Protection Directive, it is necessary to determine that a mass influx of displaced persons is occurring, especially if it risks overwhelming the asylum systems of Member States. In the absence of a proposal by the Commission for a Council Decision establishing the existence of a mass influx of displaced persons, the Council has not discussed this question.”
Asylum & border control · Relations with Israel - Palestine
- 2026-01-30 “E-003288/2025 Reply The listing of a person, group or entity under Common Position 2001/931/CFSP has to satisfy the conditions laid down in Article 1(2) to (4) thereof, which provides a definition of persons, groups and entities ‘involved in terrorist acts’ as well as of ‘terrorist acts’ for this purpose, and which specifies the requirements related to the adoption of a decision by a national competent authority in respect of the persons, groups and entities concerned. Currently, there are 13 individuals and 22 groups and entities on the so-called ‘EU terrorist list’, which are both active within and outside the EU. The Council reviews the list at regular intervals and at least every 12 months. The Council has not discussed the inclusion of drug cartels on the list of persons, groups and entities covered by the measures in Articles 2 and 3 of Common Position 2001/931/CFSP, nor the issue raised by the Honourable Member in question two. The EU drugs policy priorities are set out in the EU Drugs Strategy 2021-2025 1 . It takes an evidence-based, integrated, balanced and multidisciplinary approach to the drugs phenomenon at national, EU and international level. The Strategy covers three policy areas: drug supply reduction including enhancing security; drug demand reduction including prevention, treatment and care services; and addressing drug-related harm. It also incorporates a gender equality and health equity perspective, and complements national policies. The new EU strategic framework on drugs, which will replace the current EU Drugs Strategy, is currently under preparation in close cooperation between the Council and the Commission. 1 EU Drugs Strategy (2021-2025) (OJ C 102I of 24.3.2021, p. 1)”
EU-Venezuela relations · EU-Cuba relations · EU-US relations
- 2026-01-30 “E-002149/2025 Reply The EU lifted its economic sanctions on Syria to support its inclusive political transition, as well as its swift economic recovery, reconstruction, and stabilisation, in line with a gradual and reversible approach. The EU maintained sanctions related to the Assad regime in line with its call for accountability as well as sanctions based on security grounds, including arms and technology that might be used for internal repression. The Council has assessed that, despite the fall of the al-Assad regime and the establishment of the transitional authorities, the situation in Syria remains unstable and al-Assad’s network, spread inside and outside Syria, has not yet been held accountable and cannot be considered dissolved. Since listed individuals and entities linked to the al-Assad regime continue to hold powerful influential roles and pose a risk of supporting, through financing or other means, further armed conflict, and may play a part in attempts to reverse the transition and, they may continue to be sanctioned. The EU has also introduced additional sanctions against human rights violators and those fuelling instability in Syria. The Council will continue monitoring developments on the ground, including progress on accountability with regard to recent violence outbreaks, and the Council will remain seized on the matter of restrictive measures and sanctions in the context of Syria 1 . The Council approved on 23 June 2025 conclusions on Syria 2 , reaffirming the EU’s commitment to standing with the Syrian people, regardless of their ethnic or religious background and to supporting a peaceful and inclusive, Syrian-led and Syrian-owned transition. All Syrians should have the chance to finally reunify, stabilise and rebuild their country, restore justice and ensure accountability. The European Union also welcomed the commitment by Interim President Ahmed Al-Sharaa and the transitional government to build a new Syria based on national reconciliation, rule of law, separation of powers, as well as human rights and fundamental freedoms for all Syrians without distinction, fully safeguarding the diversity of the country. 1 Council statement of 20 May 2025 on the lifting of EU economic sanctions on Syria; https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-9176-2025-INIT/en/pdf. 2 Council conclusions of 23 June 2025 on Syria; https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-10688-2025-INIT/en/pdf.”
EU-Syria relations
- 2026-01-30 “P-003904/2025 Reply The Council regularly discusses threats to EU critical infrastructure, including threats posed by drones and hybrid campaigns. However, it is not for the Council to produce findings concerning incidents. The Council also supports close cooperation among Member States to strengthen the protection and resilience of EU critical infrastructure. To this end, a Council recommendation on a Union-wide coordinated approach to strengthen the resilience of critical infrastructure and a Council recommendation on a blueprint to coordinate a response at Union level to disruptions of critical infrastructure with significant cross-border relevance were adopted in December 2022 and June 2024, respectively. These acts complement the Directive on the resilience of critical entities (CER) and the Directive on measures for a high common level of cybersecurity across the Union (NIS 2), both adopted in December 2022.”
Cybersecurity investments for critical infrastructure
- 2026-01-30 “E-000984/2025 Reply The EU has welcomed the agreement reached on the first phase of the Comprehensive Plan to end the Gaza Conflict put forward by President Trump, as well as the outcome of the Sharm el-Sheikh Summit for Peace held on 13 October 2025, and has called on all parties to fully commit to implementing all phases and to refrain from any actions that jeopardise the agreement. The EU is committed to international law and to a comprehensive, just and lasting peace based on the twostate solution in accordance with relevant UN Security Council Resolutions where two democratic states, Israel and Palestine, live side-by-side in peace within secure and recognised borders. The European Union will continue to contribute to peace efforts and to actively engage with partners on the next steps. It will support the rapid, safe and unhindered delivery of humanitarian aid in coordination with international partners, including via the Cyprus Maritime Corridor to supplement land routes. It will make full use of its missions European Union Border Assistance Mission to the Rafah Crossing Point (EUBAM Rafah) and European Union Police Mission for the Palestinian Territories (EUPOL COPPS). Their mandates should be strengthened. The European Union stands also ready to contribute to Gaza’s stabilisation, transitional governance, recovery and reconstruction 1 . Concerning the EU-Israel Association Agreement, following up on the discussion of 23 June 2025 on the review of Israel’s compliance with Article 2 of the EU-Israel Association Agreement, the Foreign Affairs Council on 15 July 2025 exchanged views on an inventory of possible follow-up measures 2 . The Council also recalls its replies to Written Questions E-000431/2025 and E-001357/2024, and as regards the arms trade, the Council recalls its reply to Written Question P-003630/2023. 1 https://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/d2nhnqso/20251023-european-council-conclusionsen.pdf 2 https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/meetings/fac/2025/07/15/”
Relations with Israel - Palestine
- 2026-01-30 “E-003111/2025 Reply The European Union (EU) has the power to adopt restrictive measures, which are preventive, temporary and reversible. Restrictive measures are based on Article 29 of the Treaty on European Union (TEU) for decisions under the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP), and Article 215 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) for implementing those measures through EU regulations. Regarding compatibility with the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (the EU Charter), listed individuals and entities are entitled to judicial protection under EU law, primarily under Article 47 of the EU Charter. That Article guarantees the right to an effective remedy and a fair trial. Restrictive measures, such as asset freezes or travel bans, can be challenged before the Courts of the EU by the designated individuals and entities. The Courts ensure a review of the lawfulness of all Union acts in the light of the fundamental rights that form an integral part of the EU legal order. The listed individuals are informed about the possibility of such recourse individually or through a notice published simultaneously with the legal acts. On the other hand, Article 52(1) of the EU Charter permits limitations on EU Charter rights if such limitations are provided for by law, respect the essence of the right and are necessary and proportionate to objectives of general interest (such as peace, international security, EU foreign policy goals). The EU restrictive measures meet these criteria, since they are adopted on a clear Treaty basis, pursue objectives of general interest recognised by the Union, respect the essence of the rights and are proportionate to the objectives they pursue. The decision-making process you are referring to, where the Council can take decisions to impose restrictive measures on natural persons, is based on Article 29 TEU under the CFSP, and Article 215 TFEU for implementing those measures through EU regulations.”
Disinformation & online freedoms · EU competences on human rights
- 2026-01-30 “E-003828/2025 Reply On 29 September, the Council prolonged its restrictive measures in view of the situation in Nicaragua by another year, until 15 October 2026. The Honourable Member is invited to address the second question directly to the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy. The Council will continuously review its restrictive measures as part of a set of measures to address the situation in Nicaragua. As regards any other measures, the Honourable Member is again invited to address their question directly to the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy.”
EU relations with left-wing Latin America
- 2025-12-10 “E-003391/2025 Answer given by President von der Leyen on behalf of the European Commission The Commission is committed to upholding transparency and ensuring that all its public statements and communications are based on verified and accurate information. Regarding the specific case mentioned by the Honourable Member, the Commission can confirm that the aircraft carrying the President of the Commission to Bulgaria experienced Global Positioning System (GPS) interference. However, the plane landed safely. The incident was investigated and verified by the Bulgarian Air Traffic Services Authority. Additionally, the Bulgarian Prime Minister issued a statement 1 confirming the radio interference on the President’s flight. The Commission’s approach to addressing foreign information manipulation and interference (FIMI), including disinformation, involves collaboration with Member States, EU institutions, online platforms, and civil society. Part of this approach involves addressing systemic risks on very large online platforms, while fully respecting fundamental rights, and promoting access to accurate and reliable information, including through supporting independent journalism and media. Additionally, the European External Action Service exposes FIMI actors and operations. 1 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IUdi4z0l6D0.”
Disinformation & online freedoms · EU-Russia relations (from March 2022)
- 2025-12-09 “E-003842/2025 Answer given by President von der Leyen on behalf of the European Commission Since the reply given to the previous question made by the Honourable Member on the same issue, no new elements have been brought to the Commission’s attention. Therefore, the Commission has to reiterate that, at this stage, the amount of the legal costs connected to case T-36/23 have not been liquidated and it is not yet possible to quantify them.”
Accounting and auditing of EU budget
- 2025-12-09 “E-003605/2025 Reply Under Article 14(5) of the Agreement between the European Union and Georgia on the facilitation of the issuance of visas, each Party is entitled to suspend the Agreement in whole or in part for reasons of public order, the protection of national security or the protection of public health. The Council found that actions taken by Georgia breached the fundamental principles on which the Facilitation Agreement was concluded and went against the interests of the Union and its Member States. The Council therefore found it appropriate and proportionate, in order to protect public order in the Member States and in the Union, that Member States require a visa from Georgian citizens holding valid diplomatic passports who travel to the Union, as those persons represent interests that are contrary to those that led the Union to conclude the Facilitation Agreement in the first place.”
EU-Georgia relations
- 2025-12-09 “E-003995/2025 Reply In the European Union, the arrest and surrender of requested persons is handled through the European Arrest Warrant (EAW), which is an entirely judicial procedure. The Council does not comment on individual surrender proceedings between national judicial authorities.”
EU law enforcement cooperation in criminal matters
- 2025-12-09 “P-003504/2025 Reply The legislative proposal referred to by the Honourable Members is still being discussed within the Council, which has not yet adopted a position. Discussions between the European Parliament and the Council regarding this proposal have not yet begun, and the Council does not answer hypothetical questions.”
Privacy & detection of online child abuse · Artificial Intelligence
- 2025-12-08 “E-003687/2025 Answer given by President von der Leyen on behalf of the European Commission 1. The EU’s migration policies aim to ensure effective and sustainable management of migration and to bolster the protection of its external borders. The Pact on Migration and Asylum aims to prevent abuse, tackle illegal migration and alleviate pressure on national systems. The Commission is also planning to propose to enhance Frontex and Europol to address border security and organised crime. The Commission will also present the EU Strategy on Combating Antisemitism and Fostering Jewish Life 1 to protect communities and uphold shared values from prejudice. As announced in ProtectEU – a European Internal Security Strategy 2 , the Commission works on a new EU Agenda to prevent and counter terrorism and violent extremism. 2. NextGenerationEU has been key for Europe’s economic recovery after the COVID-19 crisis, enabling investments and reforms for fair growth and modernisation of infrastructure. The Commission takes action to foster innovation, strengthen competitiveness, support EU societies, sustain EU’s social model and quality of life. This includes initiatives, such as the roadmap set out under the Competitiveness Compass, the Affordable Housing Plan, or the Anti-Poverty Strategy. 3. The Commission focuses on safeguarding a strong democracy and upholding EU values, amid increasing attacks and attempts of anti-democratic forces. The European Democracy Shield counters foreign information manipulation and interference, enhances media literacy, while applying the Media Freedom, Digital Services and Artificial Intelligence Acts 3 fosters secure and informed societies. Actions to strengthen the rule of law ensure societies and economies work, safeguard EU fundamental rights, protect democracy and tackle corruption. 1 COM/2021/615 final. 2 https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52025DC0148. 3 https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1083/oj/eng, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/2065/oj/eng, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/oj/eng.”
EU competences on human rights · EU political integration
- 2025-12-08 “E-003469/2025 Answer given by President von der Leyen on behalf of the European Commission The Commission is concerned by the growing number and intensity of antisemitic incidents and anti-Israeli actions in the EU. Antisemitism is a threat to democracy and the Commission is determined to fight it in all its forms and manifestations, in line with its EU antisemitism strategy 1 . Ensuring the security of EU citizens as well as of tourists is essential for the Commission and all Member States. Violent attacks, intimidation and security threats on individuals have no place in the EU. The 2008 Framework Decision on combating racism and xenophobia 2 requires Member States to criminalise public incitement to violence or hatred based on ethnic origin or religion. The Commission monitors its correct transposition. However, it is for national authorities to ensure an effective investigation and prosecution of individual hate offences, including when motivated by antisemitism. The Commission has been supporting cooperation between national authorities and experts to improve knowledge and exchange practices on fighting antisemitism 3 . The European Internal Security Strategy-ProtectEU 4 places the ‘protection of people, especially those most vulnerable to attacks … including Jewish and Muslim communities, … at the heart of the EU’s work on security’. The Internal Security Fund 5 supports the protection of Jewish places of worship. The new EU Agenda for Preventing and Countering Terrorism and Violent Extremism will include actions to tackle antisemitism and protect places of worship. 1 https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-policy/policies/justice-and-fundamental-rights/combattingdiscrimination/racism-and-xenophobia/combating-antisemitism/eu-strategy-combating-antisemitism-andfostering-jewish-life-2021-2030_en. 2 https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dec_framw/2008/913/oj/eng. 3 An example is the successful collaboration preventing and countering violent extremism including antisemitism involving 14 Member States and the EU Knowledge Hub on Prevention of Radicalisation. 4 https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52025DC0148. 5 https://ec.europa.eu/info/funding-tenders/opportunities/docs/2021-2027/isf/wp-call/2023-2025/call-fiche_isf2024-tf2-ag-protect_en.pdf.”
Jewish culture and antisemitism
- 2025-12-08 “E-003525/2025 Answer given by President von der Leyen on behalf of the European Commission The Commission invited a group of 25 content creators from across the EU to attend the delivery of the 2025 State of the Union Address. They joined a group of other content creators invited by the European Parliament. The selection of the participants tried to ensure a diversity of nationalities, profiles, and topics of interest. The group represented a wide geographical spread, ranging from Portugal to Sweden, from France to Latvia, from Luxembourg to Bulgaria. It also brought together creators focusing on different thematic areas, including youth opportunities, geopolitics, and democracy. The content creators were invited as visitors, with no requirement to produce or share content. They had full editorial freedom. The Commission covered their travel expenses to and from Strasbourg, as well as accommodation costs, in accordance with standard reimbursement rates. The objective of the Commission’s engagement with content creators is to reach out to citizens from all walks of life and communicate openly and transparently.”
Budget for EU politicians · Accounting and auditing of EU budget
- 2025-12-08 “E-003528/2025 Answer given by President von der Leyen On behalf of the European Commission The Commission is deeply committed to multilingualism, which reflects the cultural and linguistic diversity of the EU, and therefore makes every effort to provide information in all 24 EU official languages. The State of the Union is a particularly important moment for the EU’s democracy during which the Commission President is ‘taking stock of the current year and looking ahead to priorities for the following years’ 1 . As in previous years, the Commission services and staff ensured timely publication of the President’s State of the Union address as well as related documentation, e.g. the letter of intent. All 24 language versions of both the State of the Union address and the letter of intent were translated and published on the dedicated webpage 2 after the President finished the speech. Said documents were sent for translation as early as possible with a view to sharing all 24 language versions with EU citizens rapidly upon publication. 1 https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2010:304:0047:0062:EN:PDF. 2 https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-policy/state-union/state-union-2025_en.”
Multilingualism in EU institutions
- 2025-11-27 “E-003234/2025 Answer given by President von der Leyen on behalf of the European Commission As laid out in Article 10(1) of the Code of Conduct 1 , members of the College of Commissioners may ‘participate in European politics as members of European political parties or organisations of the social partners at European level provided that this does not compromise their availability for service in the Commission and the priority to be given to their Commission duties over party commitment’. The post was published during the 2022 European People’s Party (EPP) Congress in Rotterdam. The President attended the meeting in her capacity as President of the Commission and congratulated a fellow European leader. The Guidelines on ethical standards for the participation of the Members of the Commission in the election campaign to the European Parliament 2 were adopted in January 2024 and implemented for the European Parliament elections in June 2024. 1 Code of Conduct for the Members of the European Commission of 31 January 2018, 2018/C 65/06, https://eurlex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32018D0221(02). 2 Guidelines on ethical standards for the participation of the Members of the European Commission in the election campaign to the European Parliament, 24.1.2024, https://commission.europa.eu/system/files/2024-01/participationof-ec-members-in-ep-election-campaign-guidelines_en_1.pdf.”
Budget for EU politicians
- 2025-11-21 “E-003493/2025 E-003421/2025 Answer given by President von der Leyen on behalf of the European Commission The Strategic Dialogue is an inclusive and collaborative process aimed at addressing critical challenges facing the sector and ensuring its continued success as a major driver of the European economy. As stated in the Industrial Action Plan for the European automotive sector 1 that was the outcome of the first two meetings of the Dialogue, the sector is undergoing a structural transformation of unprecedented speed and magnitude. To ensure the broadest possible participation in the preparation of the Action Plan, the Commission invited input from more than 100 organisations in dedicated thematic dialogues, among them also the Automotive Regions Alliance. The Strategic Dialogue has shown its value as a forum of exchange between the President of the Commission and representatives of the industry. For practical reasons, the size of the group cannot be expanded further to allow sufficient time for all participants to express themselves. This is not merely a matter of organisational efficiency but an essential requirement to ensure effective exchange. The Commission is consulting stakeholders extensively in the preparation of the proposals announced in the Action Plan. The Committee of the Regions, under whose auspices the Automotive Regions Alliance has been formed, will also be consulted on the legislative proposals. 1 COM(2025) 95 final, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:52025DC0095.”
Road transport environmental policy · EU Competition policy
- 2025-11-18 “E-002416/2025 Reply The United States continues to consider participation in the enhanced border security partnership (EBSP) an important criterion for participation in its Visa Waiver Program, as confirmed at the EU-US Justice and Home Affairs ministerial meeting in early June 2025. Given the intrinsic link to EU competence on visa policy, in 2024 the Permanent Representatives Committee (Coreper) asked the Commission to submit a recommendation for a Council Decision to negotiate, on behalf of the Union, an agreement which would address these issues. On 23 July 2025, the Commission submitted a recommendation to open negotiations on a framework agreement between the European Union and the US on the exchange of information for security screenings and identity verifications relating to border procedures and applications for visa. The Council is currently discussing it.”
Privacy & law enforcement · Asylum & border control
- 2025-11-18 “E-002407/2025 Reply The EU continued to pursue its critical engagement towards Cuba under the EU-Cuba Political Dialogue and Cooperation Agreement (PDCA). The Council follows the implementation of the PDCA and the political dialogues it establishes, including the ones in April 2024 on Unilateral Coercive Measures and on Sustainable Development and in October 2024 on the Non-Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction and on Illegal Trade of Small Arms and Light/Conventional Weapons. Any change in policy would require a unanimous decision by the Council of the EU.”
EU-Cuba relations
- 2025-11-18 “P-002725/2025 Reply Information regarding EU sanctions is publicly available and can be accessed via the EU Sanctions Map 1 , the EU Sanctions Tracker 2 and the Financial Sanctions Database 3 . The specific reasons that led the Council to list Hüseyin Doğru can be found in Annex I of Council Decision (CFSP) 2024/2643 and in Annex I of Council Regulation (EU) 2024/2642. Useful information can also be found in the Council Document Register 4 , which provides access to various meeting documents (agendas, minutes, conclusions, votes, outcomes) of the following three bodies: preparatory bodies (Coreper I and II), Council of the European Union, European Council. The Council does not disclose further information on its deliberations in relation to restrictive measures. 1 https://www.sanctionsmap.eu/#/main 2 https://data.europa.eu/apps/eusanctionstracker/ 3 https://data.europa.eu/data/datasets/consolidated-list-of-persons-groups-and-entities-subjectto-eu-financial-sanctions?locale=en 4 https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/documents/public-register/meeting-documents/”
Foreign interference in Europe · EU-Russia relations (from March 2022)
- 2025-11-18 “E-003131/2025 Reply The listing of a person, group or entity under Common Position 2001/931/CFSP (CP 931) has to satisfy the conditions laid down in Article 1(2) to (4) thereof. These paragraphs set out a definition of persons, groups and entities ‘involved in terrorist acts’ and a definition of ‘terrorist acts’ for this purpose, and specify the requirements related to the adoption of a decision by a national competent authority in respect of the persons, groups and entities concerned. The Muslim Brotherhood is not included in the list of persons, groups and entities covered by the measures in Articles 2 and 3 of CP 931. The Council has not discussed the matter raised by the Honourable Member.”
EU policy on Islam
- 2025-11-17 “E-003778/2025 Answer given by President von der Leyen on behalf of the European Commission Under Article 25a of the Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF) Regulation 1 Member States have an obligation to maintain a public portal and publish, twice a year, data on the 100 final recipients receiving the highest amounts of RRF funding. As of 20 October 2025, 19 Member States have published a second update of their list of final recipients this year. The Commission is currently following up with the Member States who have not updated their reporting yet. Spain is among the countries, who reported only once this year. These lists per Member State are available on the Recovery and Resilience Scoreboard 2 . The RRF is a result-based instrument where Member States provide data on implementation at the time of the requests for payments. Accordingly, the final implementation data will only be received by the end of the implementation period, at the end of 2026. This is applicable to all Member States, as they all follow the same procedure. At this point in time, Spain has received five disbursements amounting to EUR 71 bn (incl. EUR 10.49 bn of pre-financing), corresponding to the fulfilment of 262 milestones and targets out of a total of 602. The Commission released the fourth RRF Annual report 3 on 8 October 2025, where it lays out the estimated economic impact of the RRF. In the case of Spain, estimated GDP positive effects of EUR 142.7 billion (9.5% of current GDP) are expected in total over the period 2020-2030. 1 Regulation (EU) 2021/241 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 February 2021 establishing the Recovery and Resilience Facility, available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2021/241/oj/eng. 2 https://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/recovery-and-resiliencescoreboard/disbursements.html?table=finalRecipientByCountry. 3 https://commission.europa.eu/document/download/81dd7c71-7b75-4b2a-8323fb7b4326fa16_en?filename=COM_2025_637_1_EN_ACT_part1_v4.pdf.”
Accounting and auditing of EU budget
- 2025-11-11 “E-002151/2025 Reply The General Affairs Council discussed on 27 May and on 18 July 2025 the request by Spain to include Catalan, Basque and Galician amongst the official languages of the institutions provided for in Regulation No 1/1958, which governs the EU’s language regime. Ministers held constructive exchanges of views and decided to continue working on the Spanish request. The General Affairs Council remains seized of the matter. As for the rest, it is not for the Council to comment on statements made and positions taken by the Member States in deliberations pertaining to an ongoing decision-making process.”
Multilingualism in EU institutions
- 2025-11-11 “E-003300/2025 Reply It is not for the Council to answer questions concerning an EU agency.”
EU law enforcement cooperation in criminal matters · Privacy & law enforcement
- 2025-11-11 “E-002858/2025 Reply The G7 statement on global minimum taxes is a political statement of the G7 member countries, intended to provide a way forward on global minimum taxes within the OECD Inclusive Framework. The G7 statement represents the G7 shared understanding that an agreement on a ‘side-by-side’ system to the OECD’s Pillar Two global minimum tax regime would facilitate further progress to stabilise the international tax system, including a constructive dialogue on the taxation of the digital economy and on preserving the tax sovereignty of all countries. At this stage, it remains to be ascertained how a ‘side-by-side’ system would be structured, whether it would require revisiting OECD’s Pillar Two design and implementation, and whether it would lead to amendments to the EU Pillar Two Directive.”
EU competences on taxation · Tax Havens
- 2025-11-11 “E-003296/2025 Reply The information requested by the Honourable Member is not available to the Council. The Honourable Member is invited to put this question to the Commission.”
EU relations with the Southern Neighbourhood · Asylum & border control
- 2025-11-11 “E-002891/2025 Reply The Council does not comment on the internal situation of particular Member States. With regard to the US tariffs, on 27 July 2025, the Presidents of the European Commission and of the United States reached a political agreement aimed at preserving and stabilising the transatlantic trade and investment partnership. The Joint Statement issued on 21 August 2025 sets out concrete steps to be taken by each side and will improve the competitive position of companies in the EU compared to other US trading partners. The United States will reduce its tariffs on cars and car parts from the current 27.5% to 15%, which in turn will help alleviate the burden on European exporters of cars and car parts. The EU is developing its network of Free Trade Agreements and Investment Protection Agreements with partners around the world. These agreements strengthen our economy, create jobs and help EU businesses compete more effectively abroad and export more to countries and regions outside the EU. In line with the Strategic Agenda 2024-2029 approved by the European Council in June 2024, the Council is working to consolidate the European Union's technological and industrial strength and strengthen its competitiveness in the context of a sustainable economy. In this context, the Council is discussing proposals contained in the European Commission's 2025 Work Programme and the Competitiveness Compass.”
EU-US trade relations · Climate efforts
- 2025-11-11 “E-002360/2025 Reply It is not for the Council to comment on articles appearing in the press. The Council also has no information on the Commission having provided funding to NGOs for the purpose of taking legal action against European firms. The Council considers that the Directive provides for all safeguards to ensure full respect for fundamental rights, as set out in the Charter and the corresponding articles of the European Convention on Human Rights (‘ECHR’), as interpreted by the European Court of Human Rights (‘ECtHR’).”
Environmental crimes and justice · Regulation of NGOs in Europe
- 2025-11-11 “E-002313/2025 Reply The European Union 1 has called for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza and the unconditional release of all hostages, leading to a permanent end to hostilities. It deplores the dire humanitarian situation in Gaza, the unacceptable number of civilian casualties and the levels of starvation. The EU has called on Israel to fully lift its blockade on Gaza, to allow immediate, unimpeded access for and the sustained distribution of humanitarian assistance at scale into and throughout Gaza, and to enable the UN and its agencies, and humanitarian organisations, to work independently and impartially to save lives and reduce suffering. Israel must fully comply with its obligations under international law, including international humanitarian law. On 23 June 2025, the High Representative presented to the Council the report on Israel’s compliance with Article 2 of the EU-Israel Association Agreement 2 . On 26 June 2025, the European Council took note of that report and invited the Council to continue discussions on a follow-up, as appropriate, in July 2025, taking into account the evolution of the situation on the ground. The Foreign Affairs Council subsequently exchanged views on the situation in the Middle East, including on Israel’s compliance with Article 2, on the understanding reached between the EU and Israel for the expansion of humanitarian aid into Gaza, and on an inventory of possible followup measures 3 . The Council is currently examining the Commission proposal of 29 July for a Council Decision on the partial suspension of the Agreement between the European Union, of the one part, and Israel, of the other part, on the participation of Israel in the Union programme Horizon Europe, and the Commission proposal of 17 September for a Council Decision on the suspension of certain trade-related provisions of the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement establishing an association between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the State of Israel, of the other part. 1 https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2025/06/26/european-councilconclusions-on-the-middle-east/?utm_source=brevo&utm_campaign=AUTOMATED%20%20Alert%20-%20Newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_id=3318 2 https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/meetings/fac/2025/06/23/ 3 https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/meetings/fac/2025/07/15/”
EU competences on human rights · Relations with Israel - Palestine
- 2025-10-28 “E-002421/2025 Reply There are currently no plans to create a separate Council configuration dedicated to gender equality. The topic is addressed in the Employment, Social Policy, Health and Consumer Affairs (EPSCO) Council, as well as in other Council formations, depending on the subject or subjects on the agenda.”
Gender roles, equality and inclusion
- 2025-10-28 “E-002913/2025 Reply The Political and Security Committee (PSC) evaluates whether a CSDP action needs to be refocused, drawing on a Strategic Review developed by the European External Action Service under the responsibility of the High Representative and in accordance with established crisis management procedures. On 16 April 2025, in the context of the Strategic Review of EUBAM Libya, the PSC agreed that the mandate of that mission should be extended by two years. Ensuring full respect for international human rights standards are core aspects of the Mission’s work. EUBAM Libya has adopted a Human Rights Action Plan and Human Rights Due Diligence Policy to be implemented throughout the Mission’s activities. Benchmarking criteria are developed in the Mission’s Operation Plan. For matters concerning the Mission’s operational design, the Honourable Member is invited to address the question to the High Representative. The Council does not produce its own evaluation reports on civilian CSDP missions.”
Asylum & border control · EU relations with the Southern Neighbourhood
- 2025-10-28 “E-002399/2025 Reply It is not within the Council’s remit to answer questions concerning the President of the European Council, as the European Council is a separate institution. Nonetheless, please note that the Code of Conduct applicable to Charles Michel in his capacity as the former President of the European Council contains the following provision: ‘If the former President intends to engage in an occupation within eighteen months after ceasing to hold office, he/she will inform the incumbent President of the European Council in good time, as far as possible with minimum four weeks notice. The incumbent President of the European Council will examine the nature of the planned occupation and, if he/she deems it appropriate, inform the European Council. (…)’ 1 . In accordance with this Code of Conduct, Charles Michel informed President of the European Council Antonio Costa of his intention to take up a teaching position at the China Europe International Business School in China. In accordance with the said Code of Conduct, President Costa examined the nature of the planned occupation, and did not deem it appropriate to inform the European Council. 1 See the following on the European Council website: https://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/45515/code_of_conduct_pec_en.pdf”
EU-China relations · Trade relations with China
- 2025-10-28 “E-002788/2025 Reply As part of the joint initiative on the Conference on the Future of Europe launched on 10 March 2021 by the European Parliament, the Council and the European Commission, and concluded on 9 May 2022, the Council has been fully committed to opening new spaces for debate with citizens to address the EU’s challenges and priorities, in particular through the organisation of European Citizens’ Panels. In this context, several Member States have also organised national Citizens’ Panels. These panels have allowed citizens to deliberate and formulate a set of recommendations on which the Union can follow up. Specific initiatives organised by public authorities at local, regional or national level to promote the engagement and effective participation of citizens and civil society organisations in public policymaking processes fall under the respective authority’s competences.”
EU engagement with citizens · EU engagement with civil society
- 2025-10-27 “E-001110/2025 Answer given by President von der Leyen on behalf of the European Commission With respect to the Commission President von der Leyen’s contacts with defence contractors since the European Parliament elections in June 2024, she hosted the first-ever Strategic Dialogue with the European defence industry 1 on 12 May 2025. Fifteen defence companies were represented at the meeting 2 . On 5 June 2025, the President hosted a working dinner with industry on tech and innovation, participants included Airbus, Frankenburg Technologies OÜ (FT), Isar Aerospace SE (ISAR), and NATO Innovation Fund (NIF). President von der Leyen did receive invitations via email or correspondence to attend conferences on defence matters, which she had to decline due to prior commitments on her agenda. Additionally, she received congratulatory messages from some defence contractors on her re-election following the European Parliament elections in June 2024. The Commission publishes information on meetings, including – since 1 January 2025 – minutes, held by President von der Leyen with, among others, defence industry representatives on the President’s online public calendar 3 , the transparency register 4 and through other channels of communication, including press releases and social media. 1 https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/fr/read_25_1181. 2 https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_25_1187. 3 https://ec.europa.eu/transparencyinitiative/meetings/meeting.do?host=a2c7c963-a9ad-4c47-aa734bb46b06dd5d&page=1. 4 https://transparency-register.europa.eu/search-register-or-update/search-register_en.”
Defence spending · EU competences on defence
- 2025-10-27 “E-003340/2025 Answer given by President von der Leyen on behalf of the European Commission The Commission attaches utmost importance to press freedom and transparency and actively promotes them through its policies and actions. It believes that a free and independent press is vital for fostering informed public debate. To this end, the Commission strives to maintain the highest standards of transparency, accessibility, and openness in its interactions with the media and the public, providing timely and accurate information to facilitate informed reporting and public scrutiny. These principles underpin all press events with the participation of the President of the Commission, where journalists are free to ask any questions they consider relevant. Before press conferences abroad involving the President of the Commission, the press team seeks to identify in advance key issues of interest to the local media. To this end, press officers liaise with their national counterparts. In preparation for the press conference of the President of the Commission and Prime Minister Kristrún Frostadóttir in Reykjavík, the Commission’s press team reached out to the press office of the Icelandic Ministry of Foreign Affairs. The exchange focused on practical aspects of the event organisation such as expected media attendance and the main topical issues for the Icelandic press.”
Discharge of EU institutions and agencies
- 2025-10-27 “E-003144/2025 Answer given by President von der Leyen on behalf of the European Commission The Executive Vice-President for a Clean, Just and Competitive Transition replied to questions raised by the Members of the European Parliament during her hearing with the European Parliament which took place before the Parliament’s vote on the composition of the Commission. The issues mentioned by the Honourable Member relate to the actions of the Spanish Ministry for Ecological Transition and Demographic Challenge. Consequently, it is not for the Commission to comment on these topics.”
Transparency requirements of EU institutions
- 2025-10-24 “E-001815/2025 Answer given by President von der Leyen on behalf of the European Commission In the run-up to the formation of the College of Commissioners, the Commission Presidentelect had extensive exchanges of views with representatives of the European Parliament, including party leaders. These exchanges covered both policy priorities and organisational issues and were held with all political groups that shared the conditions outlined by the President for a stronger Union: being pro-European, pro-Ukraine and pro-rule of law. The recruitment of staff in the Commission is conducted through a transparent and meritbased process, with appointments made based on qualifications, experience and ability to contribute to the Commission's work, without regard to political group affiliations. Commission staff, including those in Cabinets of Commissioners, are selected on their professional and personal qualities, as well as their ability to adapt to the Commission's working methods. In line with the duty of loyalty, they must perform their duties solely with the interests of the Union in mind, taking no instructions from anyone external to their institution and always remaining impartial. The Appointing Authority verifies that all new staff members meet the requirements outlined in the Staff Regulations and Conditions of Employment 1 , as well as the specific rules governing Cabinet composition 2 . More specifically, at the time of recruitment, the Appointing Authority examines whether the candidate has any personal interest that could impair his/her independence or cause any conflict of interest, and if necessary, implements appropriate measures. 1 Regulation No 31 (EEC), 11 (EAEC), laying down the Staff Regulations of Officials and the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Economic Community and the European Atomic Energy Community, OJ P 045 14.6.1962, p. 1385 https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legalcontent/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A01962R0031-20250513. 2 President’s Communication to the Commission P(2024)7 https://commission.europa.eu/document/download/ef4cd545-2fa4-445c-83748dce9e10acf5_en?filename=Rules%20governing%20the%20composition%20of%20the%20Cabinets%20and%2 0SPP.PDF.”
Transparency requirements of EU institutions · Recruitment policies in the EU
- 2025-10-14 “E-002015/2025 Answer given by President von der Leyen on behalf of the European Commission Under the principle of conferral, set out in Article 5 of the Treaty on European Union, the EU shall act only within the limits of the competences conferred upon it in the Treaties, while competences not conferred on the EU remain with the Member States. The Commission strictly adheres to this rule. Secondary legislation, such as regulations and directives, is a standard mechanism for exercising the EU’s competences as set in Article 288 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. The Commission shares the view that the rigorous application of the subsidiarity principle is important to ensure that the EU acts only if and in so far as the objectives of the proposed action cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States. Therefore, the Commission has made a thorough subsidiarity assessment part of its Better Regulation agenda. Also, it reinforced its public consultations and political dialogue with national Parliaments to facilitate their input on the Commission’s initiatives allowing for better alignment with national priorities.”
EU competences on human rights · EU competences on health
- 2025-09-04 “E-002758/2025 Answer given by President von der Leyen on behalf of the European Commission In accordance with Article 226(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, in the course of its duties, the European Parliament may, at the request of a quarter of its component Members, set up a temporary Committee of Inquiry to investigate, without prejudice to the powers conferred by the Treaties on other institutions or bodies, alleged contraventions or maladministration in the implementation of EU law, except where the alleged facts are being examined before a court and while the case is still subject to legal proceedings. The exception contained in the last part of this provision requires committees of inquiry to cease investigations into facts that are subject to pending court procedures. This includes situations where such facts are subject to an appeal procedure before the Court of Justice against decisions of the General Court. Indeed, while, in accordance with Article 56 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union, appeals against rulings of the General Court are limited to points of law, it is within the jurisdiction of the Court of Justice in appeal procedures to assess facts where facts had been allegedly distorted by the General Court. In addition, in case, on appeal, the Court of Justice annuls a judgement of the General Court, it either decides the case itself or sends the case back to the General Court. In both cases, the judge might, as the case may be, have to reexamine the facts, taking into account the judgement of the Court of Justice on appeal.”
Jurisdiction conflicts between EU and national courts
- 2025-09-03 “E-002030/2025 Answer given by President von der Leyen on behalf of the European Commission The Commission ensures the respect of the principle of subsidiarity in all its proposals in the area of shared competence, including when it proposes Union interventions in times of crisis. Experience has shown that in times of crisis situations, a coordinated response at the level of the European Union is necessary to achieve the objectives pursued to adequately solve or mitigate such a situation. An uncoordinated response at the level of Member States risks leading to disruptions of the functioning of the internal market and to unequal access to products and services. This is particularly relevant when severe difficulties arise in the supply of certain products, as was the case during the COVID-19 crisis. Under these circumstances, an intervention at Union’s level is deemed the best means to ensure an efficient response to the crisis situation and a fair and equal treatment to all Member States and citizens of the Union. In practice, these interventions often take the relay of actions taken at national level, without by-passing national decision-making. It is important to note that a Union intervention in time of crisis does not necessarily lead to the use of emergency powers. Even during the COVID-19 crisis, most acts of the Union aimed at mitigating the effect of the crisis were adopted by the ordinary legislative procedure. Moreover, the Commission only proposes the use of emergency powers when the conditions for their use are considered fulfilled.”
EU political integration
- 2025-09-03 “P-002848/2025 Answer given by President von der Leyen on behalf of the European Commission Member States have the power to deal with criminal procedures according to their respective national legislative frameworks. The Honourable Member’s attention is drawn to the fact that, pursuant to Articles 11 and 19 of the Protocol (N°7) on privilege and immunities (PPI), the President and the Members of the Commission benefit of the immunity from legal proceedings in respect of acts performed by them in their official capacity, including after they have ceased to hold office. Pursuant to Articles 17 and 19 PPI, this immunity is granted in the interests of the EU and may be waived by the Commission when it considers that such a waiver is not contrary to the interests of the EU. As regards costs in possible criminal proceedings, the principles set out in Article 24 of the Staff Regulations of Officials and the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants apply.”
EU political integration
- 2025-08-12 “E-002189/2025 Answer given by President von der Leyen on behalf of the European Commission 1. On 10 June 2025, the Commission released a third payment of EUR 1.3 billion to Romania under the Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF). Romania has now received EUR 10.6 billion or 35 % of total available funds, with 27 % of all milestones and targets successfully completed so far. Romania’s recovery and resilience plan (RRP) contains major investments in energy-efficiency renovations and rooftop solar installations – especially for energy-poor and vulnerable households. While the RRP does not include reforms related to energy subsidies, these investments aim at lowering energy bills and will be assessed in Romania’s upcoming payment requests. Romania, like all Member States, has until 31 August 2026 to meet its remaining milestones. Final disbursements are to be made by 31 December 2026. The Commission continues to support Romanian authorities in ensuring successful implementation, in line with the latest guidance 1 . 2. Romania is required to uphold the independence and autonomy of its energy regulatory authority, ensuring that it operates impartially and transparently 2 . This obligation stems from Article 57 of Directive (EU) 2019/944 on the internal market for electricity 3 and Article 76 of Directive 2024/1788 on common rules for the internal markets for renewable gas, natural gas and hydrogen 4 . The Commission is closely monitoring compliance with these provisions. If any breaches occur, the Commission may take the necessary action to ensure compliance of EU law. 3. Romania has access to substantial EU funding for energy efficiency through RRF, Cohesion Policy and the Social Climate Fund 5 . Romania should prioritise renovation measures for energy-poor vulnerable households, while ensuring full absorption of available funding. 1 https://commission.europa.eu/document/download/ad5f00c9-4101-41a0-9d8fe78f06c0c7ed_en?filena%20me%20=%20COM_2025_310_1_EN_ACT_part1_v8.pdf. 2 In particular, Romania must guarantee that the staff and decision-makers of the regulatory authority act free from any market influence and do not seek or accept direct instructions from government bodies, public authorities, or private entities while performing their regulatory duties. 3 https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32019L0944. 4 https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32024L1788&qid=1751556730282. 5 Romania benefits of more than EUR 7 billion allocated to energy under RRF - a large share supporting energy efficiency renovations in buildings, including EUR 550 million via financial instruments which focus, among other things, on energy efficiency and renewable energy. Under cohesion policy, Romania receives more than EUR 1.5 billion for energy-efficiency in buildings, including EUR 376 million from European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) for financial instruments. Additionally, Romania could benefit of up to EUR 6 billion from the Social Climate Fund, which can support building renovations, reduce energy poverty, and target vulnerable households. To ensure smooth and effective implementation, it is recommended that Romanian authorities prioritise and ensure timely administrative procedures, clear decision-making, building local capacities and strong interinstitutional coordination.”
EU approach to electricity market and prices · Energy efficiency
- 2025-08-08 “E-002195/2025 Answer given by President von der Leyen on behalf of the European Commission According to Article 48(6) Treaty on European Union (TEU) any decisions taken by the European Council to amend the Treaties under the simplified revision procedure are taken by unanimity and can only enter into force if and when approved by the Member States in accordance with their respective constitutional requirements. The EU does not have any competence to launch public consultations via referenda in the Member States. It is for the Member States to decide when to hold a referendum on any given topic, in accordance with their respective constitutional requirements. Any amendment to the EU Treaties needs to follow the procedures laid down in those same Treaties. In that regard, modifications of the EU Treaties would have to follow the various steps in the ordinary or simplified revision procedure laid down in Article 48 TEU, both of which require ratification by all Member States, in accordance with their respective constitutional requirements.”
EU political integration · EU engagement with citizens
- 2025-08-08 “E-000826/2025 Answer given by President von der Leyen on behalf of the European Commission The respect of the rule of law and of ethical principles are crucial and of paramount importance for the President of the Commission, for the Commission as a College and for all individual Members of the Commission. The Executive Vice-President for a Clean, Just and Competitive Transition replied to all questions raised by the Members of the European Parliament during her hearing with the European Parliament which took place before the Parliament’s vote on the composition of the Commission. The issues mentioned by the Honourable Member in her question related to the Executive Vice-President’s responsibilities as former Spanish Minister for Ecological Transition and Demographic Challenge are not linked to the exercise of her current responsibilities as Member of the Commission. Consequently, it is not for the Commission to comment on these topics.”
Rule of law in Spain · Transparency requirements of EU institutions