- 2026-06-16 “Thank you, Marigelena. 1st of all, I would like to sincerely thank my colleagues from Ireland and Lithuania, Thomas and Sigitas, as well as their teams for their excellent cooperative spirit throughout the process of preparing our 18 month program.
I'm happy that this exercise ran very smoothly and that we've, we jointly succeeded in reaching a very good result, which has been presented by Thomas.
I would like to also extend my appreciation secretariat for their support and assistance.
Ireland, Lithuania, and Greece espouse the same values. We share similar value systems, and we all 3 strive to achieve peace, stability, and security, and progress for our union.
Our trio program, which is based on the 3 pillars that Thomas mentioned, reflect our steadfast support towards a rules based global order in respect of international law and safeguarding key principles, including the availability of borders and the respect for the territorial integrity and sovereignty of all nations in line with the UN Charter.
Before I close, I would like to take a moment to say goodbye to the general affairs council. Thank you for your nice words, Thomas.
As I move into a different spectrum of duties within the minister of foreign affairs, another colleague of mine, a younger a politician of the younger generation is going to take over, the day to day running of the Greek presidency.
He will be responsible about the Greek presidency. And although I will still be involved in certain files that have to do with our common worker, he will represent Greece in Gaka.
He's a close friend of mine. He's a very efficient and nice person, and I hope you extend to him all the love and support you have extended to me in the last 3 years.
Thank you all. I think I have created close bonds of friendship with most of you. I will always remember my participation here, and good luck to Ireland and Lithuania in the next 1 year. Thank you.”
EU political integration
- 2026-06-16 “This would better support competitiveness, cohesion, agriculture and external action while facilitating discussions with the European Parliament. Greece can support the presidency's efforts towards partial general approaches on the three regulations. That being said, when it comes to the next steps for the end piece, it is essential to implement additional safeguards to ensure predictability and balanced conditionality on pillar two and the European Competitiveness Fund. Excellence must remain the guiding principle, while geographical inclusiveness and SME participation should be strengthened. The crucial role of the Connecting Europe facility should be reflected in the relevant allocations. We also support broadening implementing partners under investigation while preserving the special role of the EIB group regarding global Europe. We favor dedicated allocations for enlargement, stronger safeguards for the geographical pillars, particularly the southern neighbourhood and Western Balkans, and a balanced approach between the eastern and southern dimensions. We welcome the indicative migration target and support close council involvement in the governance of support to Ukraine. Finally, we remain open to common financing instruments where clear European added value exists. Reiterate the importance of a genuine 360 degree approach to external borders, and underline the need for serious discussions on new own resources to ensure that the union's ambitions are matched by adequate and fair financing. Thank you.”
EU industrial funding (mechanism level: EU-pooled vs nationally-financed) · Own EU resources
- 2026-06-16 “Thank you Marilena. First of all, I would like to thank the Cypriot presidency for its tireless efforts in navigating this difficult exercise. We appreciate the good faith attempt to reconcile divergent positions and identify a possible landing zone. Tangible, tangible progress has been made and the whole discussion can move in the in the forward based on what the Cypriot presidency proposed. Nevertheless, more work has to be done, and in this regard, Greece would like to make the following points. Our primary concern relates to the overall size of the budget. While we understand the effort to accommodate those seeking deeper deductions, the union requires a financial framework commensurate with the challenges it faces. We welcome the additional support for sin for member states below 90% of the EU average GNI per capita. However, greater transparency regarding the allocation methodology remains essential. We also support the increased flexibility of the EU facility, but regret the proposed reductions in its size. Regarding the link between financing reforms and the European Semester, Greece supports a performance based approach. However, this connection must be carefully calibrated to preserve funding predictability and ensure effective implementation. We remain concerned by the reductions under chapters two and three. A more sustainable solution would be to revisit the Commission's original proposal on the overall size of the MFF.”
Size of EU budget
- 2026-06-16 “Thank you, Marilyn. And again, many thanks to the Cypriot presidency, yourself and your team for all the efforts to come to a platform on which we can all work. Uh, of course, um, as I said before in my statement, a lot of work needs to be done. But Greece stands ready to support the presidency's efforts towards partial general approach on the three regulations. Um, in my previous statement, as well as in corporate, we have spoken about specific improvements that we consider necessary in its regulations, including, for example, the visibility of the Western Balkans in global Europe, inclusiveness and SME participation in ESF and safeguards to ensure predictability under the peace. Um, I'll stop here and we'll I'm looking forward to further discussion on these issues. Thank you.”
EU relations with Western Balkans
- “Thank you. President. First of all, let me thank the presidency for the work done on this file, this sensitive file, despite the fact that the current compromise text moves to the right direction as it preserves the maximum height and axle load. There is space for improvements. Were particularly conscious about the requirements for introducing new EMS systems under article four, and the time frame for introducing the one stop shop in the same context, the permit system introduced under article four A needs more elaboration for reasons of clarity. Finally, this file has interlinkages with the proposal for a revision of the Combined Transport Directive. Thus, we should examine them in parallel. Thank you.”
EU transport infrastructure integration
- “Chairman Colleagues, recent geopolitical developments bring further into focus the need to ensure the resilience of food systems, the maintenance [00:36:00] of agricultural holdings through their economic and financial viability, the renewal of generations and therefore of agricultural productivity. Undoubtedly, the restoration of agricultural ecosystems has a positive impact on productivity, and the restoration of nature contributes to ensuring long term sustainability and resilience of the European Union. However, in order to achieve these objectives, massive investments will be required [00:36:30] and support for the agricultural sector, including financial support. Therefore, in order to achieve this ambitious proposed indicators, sufficient new funding must be ensured beyond the CAP funds that are already committed. Moreover, some provisions of the proposed regulation overlap with other European regulations that have just entered into force, for example, the National Strategic Plans of the CAP. And they may also clash with [00:37:00] regulations currently under discussion such as the Regulation on Carbon certification. As regards the plan for the restoration and rewetting of peatlands located in agricultural, forestry and peat extraction zones. We believe that this plan is extremely ambitious and does not take into account the possible impact the rewetting and restoration of peat extraction zones as activity will have serious consequences for crop production, more specifically in the fruit and vegetables sector. For example, [00:37:30] the use of peat in vegetable growing accounts for 70% of the growing media currently used in the European Union. We believe that these objectives and approaches must be close to reality and must be feasible. Climate change is already having a significant impact on ecosystems and these changes must be taken into account both when setting the targets but also when preparing and implementing the future national recovery plans. Thank you.”
Nature protection and restoration in the EU
- “Thank you, thank you Magnus Greece is a maritime and island nation with 20,000km of coastline. That depends on the scale that you use. But okay, pretty much 20,000km. So whatever has to do with seas is extremely important for us. We have recently declared two very large marine parks. We are very proud of them. But we there see all the challenges that, uh, We have to face in order to have a proper measures to improve good environmental status and implement those measures. So there are elements in the common EU policy that are missing. Sometimes common fisheries policy does not add up with marine protection. Um, also policies that have to do with Common Agricultural policy, uh, because of all the nutrients, uh, sometimes malfunctions of wastewater treatment plants again create nutrients. We have the challenge of plastic pollution coming from, uh, from the land. And we have also tourism and yachting, uh, regulations that sometimes do not contribute to the preservation of Posidonia, for example, or, uh, even to, to avoid having excess nutrients into, To into the sea. So these are big challenges. But a key instrument in that is to engage local societies in developing and participating in these marine protection endeavors and make them agents of of the improvement that this is needed. As regards Marine Strategy Framework Directive, we have a very specific suggestion to make. Uh, I've been around for many years in the in the Environment Council, and I recall that the problem with the Marine Strategy Directive since its inception was that the scale, the geographical scale is very large. So we need to explain to the Greek citizens that the Aegean Sea needs to be saved. But, you know, in the common understanding, it's already in a in a fine state. So not much is needed. But if you take it at a smaller geographical Scale, then it becomes more tangible and the average citizen, the average politician, can understand what you are aiming at. So I think the issue of geographical scale is very important in order to have meaningful measures and meaningful results. Thank you very much.”
Nature protection and restoration in the EU
- “Thank you. Chair. Greece fully supports the green transition agenda and for that matter, we have adopted two years ago a very ambitious, uh, national climate law. We also support nature restoration law. But right now there is a growing gap between the policies for climate neutrality and the public perception about [00:51:30] the transition to climate neutrality. We need to bridge this gap. Some people feel that the that climate transition is something for the rich, for the upper class, a luxury or another way for the rich get richer. Or the other part believe that we undermine the competitiveness of our industry, and in some cases, we do. And we better face the facts. And, you know, European citizens [00:52:00] are not interested to be safe in the afterlife, in the afterlife. They want to have a good life now, now, and in the immediate future. We need to explain better and simpler the benefits of the transition for each and every different sector. If there are, if there aren't any benefits for a specific sector, we must, uh, have appropriate compensation measures so that no one is left behind. There [00:52:30] are important social impacts, and these should be addressed. Widespread social acceptance is a prerequisite for a successful transition. Renewables and not so much energy efficiency, is the sector that has the greatest potential to contribute to the transition to climate neutrality in the foreseeable future, together with electrification of transport and heating of buildings. To be able to fully exploit the renewables potential, we should tackle the bottleneck [00:53:00] of the electricity networks. We should remove any barriers now. Prevent the development of innovative financing mechanism for the funding of electricity network projects in order to to attract the necessary capital that is there but cannot be exploited. We also need to intensify our efforts to convince the other big emitters to follow similar policies. There is no point in continuously increasing our climate ambition if the others don't follow. [00:53:30] We just keep undermining the competitiveness of our economies. And the best argument? To convince the others to follow is to have a growing economy. So a growing economy and and climate policies should go hand in hand. However, what is even more important is to focus much more on climate change adaptation. Climate crisis is here to stay. They. Later, we realize [00:54:00] that and delay the necessary shift to our focus in our climate policies from mitigation to adaptation. The higher the cost for our societies is. Mitigation policies have already created a self-sustainable business model without the need for a strong state intervention. But adaptation policies still remain quite vague and need substantial economic support, much higher than what is foreseen today to make a meaningful impact. Thank you.”
Energy (green transition)
- “Thank you, Madam Chairman. Ladies and gentlemen, 16 years ago, on the 2nd of July 2008, the Commission proposed the Equality Directive. But [00:20:30] 16 years on, although a compromise text is now available in order to address the opposition, it hasn't yet been adopted by the Council. The principles in it are founding parts of the principles of the European Union. Overcoming discrimination is a part of human rights. [00:21:00] It's already recognised by regional and national bodies as one of the most important principles there are. But still people are complaining about discrimination due to religion, sexual orientation, race and so on. And this is a violation of human rights and they are calling for support and justice. As long as this directive has not been adopted, [00:21:30] the legislative um body of legislation of the EU is still incomplete. As far as as long as this has not been adopted, the EU will be restricted to supporting the victims of discrimination. Greece is therefore pushing for its final adoption as soon as possible. We are all convinced that this is an extremely important piece of legislation [00:22:00] in the area of fighting discrimination, because this will be applied throughout Europe and it will ensure people are protected from discrimination because of sexual orientation, religion, race or gender, etc. and it should be implemented in education and in all services and in all public bodies.”
EU policy on integration and ethnic, racial and religious discrimination
- “Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Ladies and gentlemen, we'd like to thank Portugal for having raised this question. We agree that. Intelligent agriculture is the future, and it's the future of our productive purpose, because it leads to quality products that are more environmentally friendly. We agree with the fact that the use of drones is important, but the main problem is the absence of data for assessing risks, even though what we need is a proper legislative framework. We'd like the Commission to provide a reliable framework for plant health products and the Authorities in my country are willing to participate in this exercise. There has to be flexibility with regard to the adoption of new technologies, which will improve the competitiveness of our agriculture.”
Digital and precision farming
- “Yes. Thank you chair. Thank you very much for putting this item on the agenda. Let me say that income support is very important. Of course in this on this issue. But breaking the cycle of poverty requires more than income support. It requires systems that empower people to regain stability, autonomy, and access to opportunity. In Greece, our approach combines three pillars. First of all, targeted income support, access to essential services, and strong activation pathways towards employment. The minimum guaranteed income remains the backbone of our safety net. But income alone is not enough to break the cycle. This is why we increasingly focus on person centered services, so beneficiaries are not treated as passive recipients. They receive counsel, skills Assessment, access to training and support in reconnecting with the labour market. Social services, employment services and local actors work together so that support is coordinated and tailored to each other, to each person's needs. So we also place strong emphasis on child poverty through our national school meal programme. We support nearly half of all primary schools, pupils in 153 municipalities, reducing material deprivation and supporting families in vulnerable situations. At the same time, we recognise that poverty today is closely linked to rising housing costs across Europe. Housing affordability has become a major driver of financial insecurity for many households.”
Minimum income harmonisation at EU level
- “Thank you very much. President, Commissioner and colleagues. Consumer protection and transparency in the food sector is a very important need for the European Union. But those principles are endangered today because there are more and more vegetable origin products on the market. Which are which seem to be and are often advertised as being meat products. That's not just deceptive, but it is deliberately deceptive. It under minds the right of consumers to know what they're buying and to know what they're eating in a clear way and not with impressions. There's a clear solution. We need a clear, binding European protection of traditional names for products of animal origin, not only for accuracy of information, but also for the institutional cohesion of the European market, is a question of transparency and respect for consumers. Thank you.”
Food labelling harmonisation at EU level
- “Mrs. chairperson, Mr. Commissioner. Uh, the debate of the 7th of January confirmed something that for Greece is crystal clear. Uh, the food safety is not just a policy objective. It is a pillar for European cohesion and safety within an increasingly unsafe and uncertain environment. This is the reason why Europe needs to move on, a principle that is not to undermine the productive basis of the Union, which requires a very robust, truly common cap past 2027, uh, upon two pillars a clear cut budget that provides producers stability, perspective, and the possibility to continue producing a reinforcing competitiveness of our farmers within the level playing field and through reciprocity, operational safety clauses and substantial control of imports, reducing the production cost and priority on fertilizers. Initiatives like the capacity of temporary suspension of sebum. Uh, move to right direction. We need to continue working towards a European policy that is more than words, providing solutions to and perspective to farmers and giving Europe safety and predictability. Thank you.”
Agricultural funding
- “The data from Eurostat shows that an increase in the value of agricultural production by 19% in 2022, in gross added value by 26% and business income by 25% do not really reflect the real situation because inflation is different according to the type and the size of the holdings. Energy and fertilisers have increased the input costs by 23% for large crops and 33% for permanent crops like treat crops. Also, according to the data and forecasts of the European Central Bank on inflation, the real total value of the CFP budget for the period 2021 2027 is going to decrease by 21.95% compared to 2020 and by 34.12% for the last year 2027 compared to 2020. The forecasts of the European Commission as it was presented in the beginning of December 2022, stresses that it is a real danger that agricultural production might be reduced and this would mean an increase of imports. It is very important to find the structural solutions that will allow the increase of available funds in agriculture with specific intense incentives and immediate short term but also long term measures. Thank you very much.”
Agricultural funding
- “Finally, for our country, the Blue Dimension and agriculture are very important, combining foods of high nutritional value with a low environmental footprint and prospects for the production of animal feed and bioproducts. While it's important to have an adequate and effectively available funding in order to move forward. Now on the second question, we believe that a balance is needed in five areas using the cap for collaborative investments and new high added value value chains. Meeting biomass needs without compromising food security, with priority given to secondary biomass and a hierarchy of uses so that biomass is directed first to food and high value materials. Circularity, with priority given to soil health and coordination with policies such as renewal, strengthening local processing so that value and employment remain in rural and coastal communities and financial instruments reach the local level. And finally, effective support for the blue Economy. At the same time, it would be useful to have a European forum of regulatory authorities and economy innovators in order to strengthen the exchange of best practices and accelerate the implementation in practice. Additionally, we need to ensure harmonised sustainability criteria at the union level so that the development of bioeconomy enhances rather than degrades ecosystems. In conclusion, we support the ambition for a competitive and nature based bioeconomy. Our priority is to translate the strategy into practical solutions for producers with fair rules, adequate implementation tools and sustainable use of biomass. Thank you.”
Agricultural funding
- “Thank [00:06:00] you, Madam Chairman. Uh, Commissioner colleagues, I'd like to thank the Belgian presidency for organizing this, uh, Council on Gender Equality. We have to take it further and organize a better cooperation between the member states, so that we can incorporate the gender dimension into EU policy. That's why this debate [00:06:30] is so topical in having more women in positions of power. And it is a part of a women's political and human rights. And it's also strengthens a state government's governance, uh. Including women in positions of leadership. It's a high on the agenda of the Greek government, with measures such [00:07:00] as a quotas in public, uh, policy debates, uh, and in inclusion of women through equality committees in a local authorities, including the convention on the Prevention of Harassment at Work in all our policies and also fighting against stereotypes. So these [00:07:30] are basic pillars of our steps towards more gender equality. We've made a lot of steps already, but the the road is long and we shall be focusing on building an equal society with equal conditions and opportunities for all. And the fact that Greece has joined the Network on Gender Equality shows that we are committed [00:08:00] to making progress. The European Union is also committed to achieve, uh, equality and promoting women's leadership roles in political decisions. So it shows that progress has been made, but we should continue to focus on making even more progress. And the we will be moving towards a new gender equality policy in the EU and as part [00:08:30] of the Beijing platform. We need to raise awareness in society of how important it is for women to be involved in all decision making positions, and all these measures are can be used as an incentive to promote gender equality and to promote women in all areas of society.”
Gender roles, equality and inclusion
- “Thank you, President. Dear colleagues, there is no doubt that the union's farmers are currently facing many different adversities. This happens in Greece as well. We have forest fires that great adversity for many of our citizens [00:21:00] throughout Greece. Extreme weather conditions, prolonged drought, high input and energy costs, but also serious disruptions in trade, in agri food products and in the supply of raw materials due to the war in Ukraine. Consequently, we agree with the concerns of the joint documents initiated by Romania. Providing flexibility to farmers at this time is a key factor in their survival. We believe that the proposal to derogate from the applications of Standard seven and eight of garlic [00:21:30] for 2024 as well can help, while at the same time it will not significantly affect the environmental objective of conditionality. The European family must further react to the. What nature sets in store for us. Many aggressive events. So we really need to speed up our reaction. Thank you.”
Agriculture (green)
- “Thanks very much. President. Commissioner. Colleagues. Today's discussion concerns two very essential legislative proposals which aim to respond to a common demand, which is the need to strengthen farmers position in the agri food chain. Greece firmly supports that step towards a fairer, more balanced European market, which will not leave farmers exposed to unfair trade practices and asymmetrical relations of power. Strengthening cross-border cooperation in enforcement will be a critical tool. In order to effectively protect and producers, the particularly for transactions which go beyond national borders. These are not just technical steps, they're political ones which will help to support Parliament's position throughout Europe. Thank you.”
EU policy on farmer–buyer relations in the agri-food supply chain
- “First of all, thank you very much, chairman. We too welcome the text, these council conclusions on rural development and would like to thank the presidency for this initiative as it highlights the contribution, the needs and the specificities of the agricultural sector [00:31:30] as a factor that will contribute substantially to the support and development of rural areas. We fully agree with a thorough analysis of these issues in the text. I would only stress the importance of de-population of rural areas and poverty phenomena that particularly affect mountainous, insular and disadvantaged areas. There special attention must be paid, ensuring housing and access to basic services, and [00:32:00] promoting the establishment of small and medium sized enterprises by providing incentives and opportunities must be a matter of concern for us in the near future in order to maintain the existing population and attract new people there in those areas. I conclude by noting that the current geopolitical context makes rural areas a priority for ensuring our food security and reducing external dependencies [00:32:30] in key sectors. In this sense, the long term vision for rural areas up to 2040 and the Rural Pact. Our flagship initiatives of the union, which, following a holistic assessment of the available studies, data and indicators, will feed into the discussions on the adoption of a comprehensive union strategy for rural areas. Thank you. [00:33:00”
Cohesion and rural funding
- “Dear Chair, Dear colleagues, let me wish best of luck to the Swedish presidency for this semester. The regulation on animal transport welfare should be improved and we must take into account new technologies and scientific data and good practices and the experience acquired during the implementation of the current legislation. I would also like to stress that the revision should take into account the geographical specificities mostly of islands, remote regions and the different production models. For example, the Greek islands have livestock farming and transport is long distance. Therefore, we should take into account these conditions during the animal transport. The revision should be lead to a simpler and easier to implement regulation and improvement of such some definitions. Finally, I would like to stress that animal welfare is very important to our farmers, consumers and our society because it is important for the high quality of our products. Thank you.”
EU requirements on animal welfare for farmers
- “Thank you very much, president. Well, first of all, I would like to agree with my Italian colleague who has said that we really have delayed considerably in dealing with the competitiveness issue at this point in time. The major European economies are facing very serious problems. We have social inequality within the member states on the increase. And of course, we do have matters of strategy in terms of the security of EU member states and the EU overall. So we need to move very quickly in terms of stepping up competitiveness, because without that, we're not going to be able to maintain the level of and the living standards of European citizens and cohesion, which is important for stability and political stability in each individual country within the EU. So our proposals would be as following. First of all, we believe that we need to have full use of all the financial instruments to be able to reinforce industrial base innovation as well as applied research, and also to have those industries which are using energy to a great extent and to slimline them. And then of course, in terms of the governance mechanism, we need to have the cohesion between all member states, as well as it being necessary to have a just redistribution in terms of geographical balance.”
Energy (green transition)
- “Thank you very much, Lars. Dear Commissioner, I really want to thank you for this document. Uh, Greece feels that this is a major breakthrough. I think this is one of the most important documents we have received from the commission in recent years. I note five key elements that stand out for Greece. One is the inclusion of a central EU scenario. Uh, we've been advocating for this for a long time. The need to look at resource endowments across the EU to connect hydro in one place, nuclear in another, solar, offshore wind, whatever resources countries have and see how they can all be brought together. Uh, the second is the gap filling process. We know where the bottlenecks are. But sometimes the bottlenecks shift as our systems shift. So it's really important to be able to identify them and also to leverage all the resources we have, economic but also political, in order to resolve these bottlenecks. The third thing that is really important is emphasizing the better use of the existing system. This is also a topic that Greece has been very passionate about. I think it's very important to to build more, but it is equally important to use what we have better. And I think there the work that Acer has done, looking at both the technological fixes like dynamic light rating and other things, but also the regulatory approach that we have to enforce the rules that we have agreed on to ensure the free flow of electrons across the EU.”
Energy (green transition)
- “Chairman. Dear chairman, thank you very much for all the information and all and all the update you provided about the outbreak of foot and mouth disease in Germany. I am certain that competent authorities took all necessary action and followed the relevant protocols and legislation, and that all required measures are being taken for this serious animal disease. Coordinated action and scientific know how has have contributed successfully to limiting the spread, and will help identify the point of entry of this disease. Let me point out that we agree with the choice made by Germany to not vaccinate animals, so we fully share the concerns raised in the final paragraph of the document about additional complications and the impact on trade. Thank you very.”
Animal diseases prevention and management in the EU
- “Dear, dear president, dear Commissioner, I'd like to also welcome on my side the colleagues from Bulgaria and the Netherlands. The energy transition in fisheries and aquaculture is an important step for achieving the goals for competitiveness and sustainability in the sector. However, we are at a very demanding point where the depletion of fossil fuels and an ageing fleet is posing many challenges, especially for coastal fisheries. That's why transition needs to be realistic, taking into account the differences between member states and also between different parts of the fleet. We can support the alignment with the policy on the environmental goals of the EU and the condition that it's going to be accompanied with various social support measures for fisheries communities, like special funding programs for upgrading fleets and coastal Uh, areas, uh, on a regulatory level, it's important to keep the right flexibility as part of the CFP in order to update the fleet, but also have adopt, uh, vessels of low emissions. Uh, at the same time, we need to guarantee that the relevant regulation does not impose further burdens on investments. It is also important to clarify that the adoption of such investments do not reduce to a further reduction in capacity when it comes to funding.”
Environmental regulation of fisheries
- “Mr. chairman, dear colleagues, I would like to thank Latvia and Lithuania for the presentation of the serious problems in the implementation of the permitted margin of tolerance. According to the Revised control regulation based on data, it's clear that there is a risk for fishers to to be in serious infringement for tiny amounts of bycatches of Non-controlled species. We fully understand their concerns, and we want to emphasize that any solution should effectively protect protected stocks without posing a risk for legitimate pelagic fisheries. So we want to encourage the Commission to urgently look for a realistic approach. If necessary, amend the relevant provisions. This would ensure the continuation of fishing activities and a fair treatment for the fishers. Thank you.”
Environmental regulation of fisheries
- “This directly affects producers income, especially given environmental and climate ambitions can equally be served through pillar two interventions. Alternatively, it's important to allow for the transfer of resources between environmental interventions under the two pillars without limiting the rates foreseen, given that both have the same strategic focus. This ensures maximum use of resources without any loss. We also need more flexibility with regard to changes, notably with regard to strategic plans, we should exhaust all scope for examining changes to environmental interventions without requiring prior amendment of strategic plans and time consuming approval processes by the Commission services. So, based on the principle of subsidiarity and given the specificities of each member State, this will ensure that producers will receive aid in the most realistic and feasible way. Accordingly, strategic plans should be limited in their scope and their detail, the description and analysis of their interventions. Another area where we need to focus is the overlap between the Common Agricultural Policy and other policies, particularly those arising from the Green Deal. The debate should begin immediately, given that it will influence Member States legislative initiatives on sectoral regulation in view to the to the upcoming strategies for soil and biodiversity, we believe that there's still a lot of scope, uh, in spite of the, uh, changes. Uh, so that, uh, with the spirit, with a constructive spirit, we can work together to further improve proposals in order to strengthen agricultural production in a sustainable manner and in balance with our environmental obligations. Thank you very much for France.”
Agricultural funding
- “Thank you. It is time to catch up on the attacks of the Russian embassy. We have thousands of vessels, thousands of kilometers of coastline, hundreds of inhabited islands and hundreds of landing points. So it's very important for the new system to be applied and to monitored quite systematically as far as catch is concerned. We think that the. Participation of third countries in the system as quickly as possible is very important. We've already started an electronic application in Greece, which will be operational at the beginning of 2026. Thank you.”
Environmental regulation of fisheries
- “Establish fair commercial conditions so that they do not have to sell below cost financing, public investment and leveraging private capital. To this end, we need clear commitments from the union. A clear framework and a timetable to support farmers income from new resources, in addition to Cap funding, which should itself remain strong. Now, in response to your third question, a strong framework promoting innovation in the agri food sector is important. This can be done through a new model for agri food, enhanced funding, simplified access to new technologies, simplifying regulation for introducing new solutions, education and training. Developing skills. Knowledge transfer by using the ArcGIS framework, which should be a central pillar of the overall effort, and through international cooperation on the competitiveness of the European agri food sector. The Commission's vision is a good basis, But if we want it to be truly effective, we need to ensure funding and more targeted, dynamic policies to address the structural weaknesses of the European agricultural sector. And any success will depend on the Union's willingness to effectively support the primary sector by strengthening its productivity and resilience to challenges. Thank you very much.”
Agricultural funding
- “Thank you, Max, and the dilemmas behind this discussion of the Savings and Investment union seem to be recurring. So if I am to to codify them in popular terms, I would say that the question is, do we talk the talk or do we walk the walk? Uh, will we be repeating that we agree with the Savings and investment union and then advance our national consideration, the bat. Or will we move on with the agreement? And two stories come to mind very vividly when we're having such discussions, because all of them, in a sense, have similarities, be they cross border consolidation in banks, be they the digital euro or be they elements of the Capital Markets Union. I'll share the stories in the end. But first on the technical aspects, we support the proposal of the Commission. We need to capacity build ESMA because frankly, we cannot do the same thing 27 times. And especially as technological advancements accelerate, this feat will become even more difficult to replicate. Can we keep capacities at the national level? Yes we can. We have already done it through the ECB single supervisory mechanism. It's a very useful reference. We have done it in the past. Centralized oversight can combine with decentralized implementation and execution, and overall, the supervisory intensity can differentiate on the basis of operational need. There are objective criteria that we can have cross border activity, market relevance, the need to preserve a level playing field. Those can help focus the supervisory efforts. And I think that Bertrand offered before a very interesting perimeter in order to be able to find a landing zone. Now, going to the two stories and concluding the first one that comes to mind is the 1846 repeal of the Corn Laws. The UK is not at the table anymore, but I think that when we learn that school Ireland knows this very well, it was a quite vivid example that the UK shows systemic efficiency over national protection.”
Financial regulation
- “Thank you. Chairman. We support what's in the document and would like to thank Germany for the initiative. For the initiative? The rules for the organic producers. Well, that's a sector that's certainly deserving of our support. They certainly do contribute to the green transition and more sustainable agriculture. They also contribute to bringing about environmental and climate targets. So we need to have a workable, simple system. This is a priority for our policy. It certainly should be. We need to lighten the burden so that producers can focus more on their main activity. And then hopefully we will have more organic farmers too. Thank you.”
Agriculture (green)
- “Thank you. Chairman. Commissioner. Colleagues, in the midst of geopolitical turmoil and a climate crisis, the cap being a fundamental tool for agriculture, must maintain its role in preserving the single market, contributing to food security, environmental sustainability, protection of rural areas, and supporting farmers income. The proposals to merge the agricultural and fisheries funds into one single fund per member state entail the risk of reducing the efficiency, the coherence and the adaptability of the policies to the particularities of each sector. It is of critical importance to ensure adequate funding for farming and rural areas, by maintaining the Cap as an independent and autonomous financing tool, relying on two strong pillars. Thank you.”
Agricultural funding
- “Thank you, Stephanie, and thank you to the Danish presidency for including this pertinent issue in the agenda. I wish you the best of luck for the next six months. It's an issue that we have been supporting, supportive of from the outset, from the beginning, since especially in this current geopolitical environment, we need to further boost our monetary sovereignty. And in this regard, we see that in front of us we have one threat and five opportunities vis a vis the digital euro. Because at the end of the day, it's not solely a technological discussion, it's a strategic discussion. The threat, bluntly put, is not to do it fast enough. There is an opportunity cost of time here because the digitalization of payments, the digitalization of our monetary system will happen. It needs to happen fast enough. And this is why we're fully supportive of setting an objective for reaching an agreement on the package by the end of this year. We believe that the technical discussions can be completed by then. Now, the five Opportunities, in my view, are self-evident. The first one is the further digitization of payments. I agree with many colleagues who spoke before that digital payments should not completely act as an alternative. They should be a they should complement a cash. They should not fully replace it. But at the same time, the benefits of the digitization of payments are self-evident in many countries that are certainly evident in mind. Because if you looked at the status of tax evasion, for instance, in Greece ten years ago, and you look at it today, it's because of digital payments that we managed to have a primary budget surplus of 4.8% and of capturing two thirds of the VAT gap.”
Digital euro
- “Thank you. It is necessary to strengthen the union's competitiveness. A prerequisite for that is to convince the international community to raise their ambition to. Similar to the EU levels raising unilaterally, our ambition is counterproductive and undermines our competitiveness. For the EU to have a leading position in clean technology development, we need the development of strong industrial sectors, the deployment of low carbon technologies, the European production of critical raw materials, and 11 playing field with international partners. It is also necessary to have a greater focus on just at least no one behind. That means that we have to explain to our citizens both the benefits but also the challenges. For some sectors, it is necessary to focus on employment, including availability of jobs, job quality, and investments in reskilling and upskilling. In this context, the development of artificial intelligence digitalization will create enabling conditions for the green transition. A simplified regulatory environment for businesses is needed to reduce the administrative burdens. Circularity is also an essential part of a wider transformation of industry towards climate neutrality and long-term competitiveness. It can deliver substantial material savings throughout value chain and production process, generate extra value and unlock economic opportunities. However, in order to be effective, it has to rely on sustainable business models and stop relying on state support via regulation or subsidies. Thank you.”
Circular economy
- “Thank you very much. President. Greece shares the concerns on the need to harmonise production standards between the European market and third country markets, particularly with respect to pesticides on imported food. It is necessary now to for us to reform European legislation to close the gaps which allow products to come into Europe, which include substances which are banned here. This asymmetry endangers health as well as the environment and creates unfair competition. Therefore, we think that we should have a legal framework which will discourage the use of substances in the European market, which is dangerous for human health. We must not reward lower production standards from other countries. Thank you.”
Pesticides & trade
- “Dear president, Greece considers organic farming to be a key pillar of European agricultural policy, both for the sustainability of production and for strengthening consumer confidence. Regulation 2018 848 was an important step towards modernization and is now in its third year of implementation. This experience shows that the current framework is robust, but it also appears that some targeted adjustments are necessary in order to avoid unnecessary administrative burden and increased costs, especially for smaller businesses, without compromising the high standards of organic production. Well. Thus Greece welcomes the proposal to amend the regulation. The proposed changes are aimed at strengthening and facilitating implementation in practice while maintaining the objectives, principles and credibility of the system. We consider the provisions that reduce the administrative burden on processing and storage facilities to be particularly important, as well as the adjustments concerning small businesses and their participation in producer groups. These are interventions that strengthens the functionality of the regulation and support the development of the sector in practice. With regard to trade with third countries, Greece has no objection to the proposed provision and recognizes the importance of legal certainty and the smooth continuity of trade in organic products in this context. The relevant provisions of the proposals are moving in a direction that ensures market stability during the transition period. At the same time, adjustments to the labelling rules the conjunction with the relevant case law enhance clarity for consumers and this is a political priority for us. In conclusion, ladies and gentlemen, Greece has no objection in principle to the proposed framework of amendments, and is participating constructively in the discussion. We consider it important to proceed with realism and consistency, so that the necessary adjustments can enter into force in 2026 for the benefit of producers, businesses and consumers in the European Union. Thank you very much for your attention.”
Agriculture (green)
- “Thank you very much, chair. And also many thanks to Austria for its initiative and our collaboration, as well as the other countries on this very, very serious issue which is of interest to all European citizens. Now, we do have grave concerns as concerns the unjustified which basically fragment the single market and increase prices for our consumers and certainly do water down competition. So we do agree with the intention of the commission to tackle this issue. But we do think that our time programme to 2026 doesn't really correspond to the crucial nature of the problem. We would like to ask the Commission, therefore, to work faster and to apply just competition rules and to work closely with national authorities, we need to have also legislative intervention. This is the whole point of the Prime Minister's letter to Commission Ursula von der Leyen last year, because that would mean that we were going to be able to, as a European Union, tackle decisively this issue to make sure that our, our citizens and our businesses also do have the full advantages of a single market. Thank you.”
"Buy European" provisions
- “Thank you very much, chairman. Greece fully agrees with this document. Of course we do, because we signed it. I'm sure you're acquainted with our position, but I would like to spell a few things out. Grace supports policies to reduce emissions in the transport sector, and there is a need to harmonise legislation to adapt it to the. At international level, in terms of maritime transport, that is the way to guarantee competitiveness of European maritime transport. And we support the procedure which has been set up by the International Maritime Organisation, which is to take mid-term and long term measures looking to 2030, in order to reduce greenhouse gases emitted by ships. Of course, there is a need to comply with the with the Green Deal and to take measures. Under directive 959. 2003. So we do hope that measures can be adopted to.”
Energy (green transition)
- “Thank you very much, madam chair. Dear colleagues, Greece fully shares the concerns expressed and supports the need for flexibility in the implementation of the decommitment rule under the strategic plan of the cap. Our long standing position is that a transition to an n plus 3 rule is needed for the entire 20 23, 20 27 period in order to ensure effective implementation of interventions and avoid a loss of resources. In the absence of an agreement, we can support, as a temporary solution, we believe, the targeted derogation proposed for the year 2024.”
Agriculture (green)
- “In order to have, um, financial security and strategic autonomy, for example, the shipbuilding sector is one of those or the wire manufacturing sector. When it comes to licensing, we need to ensure the important progress that we have seen in the member states in their national licensing system. And we should give technical aid in order to have interoperability by having alternative solutions in order to, um, make the licensing systems, um, connected in a union level. Regarding the union origin, we need to have a specific geographical scope as a. France correctly said. And we need to have all the necessary measures in order to avoid circumventing and make what is a proposed effective way. It is on low carbon. It is important to give incentives and for the foreign investments, we have to strike the right balance for the scope. As for the threshold, so that we don't reduce the attractiveness of the EU as an investment destination and have make the most of this for the EU. Now, we have heard Italy and other member states say that it is important to accelerate. But that should happen alongside the collaboration of the industry in order to have positive results and not catch them off guard.”
EU policy on screening foreign investment in strategic sectors and critical infrastructure
- “Thank you. Chair. Dear ministers, the European Commission did not set a specific target for the reduction of greenhouse gases [00:10:30] for the farming sector for 2040, which is in the right direction. But European farmers are hit by the harsh financial reality. Increasing prices, energy, fertilisers and interest rates. We have to take into account financial and social consequences of ambitious targets. Yes, we do support the green transition in the farming but with specific proposals. No red tape, uh, [00:11:00] proposals that will not reduce food production and will not lead to conflict with farmers in the EU and the European targets for climate. We can achieve our climate goals with farmers on our side and not against us if we want to continue to produce affordable, high quality products. Thank you.”
Agriculture (green)
- “Thank you very much. Chairman, Commissioner. Colleagues, the multifactor crisis in agriculture Quickly reveal the weaknesses of policy and sped up the implementation of structural interventions, with many of them being included in the first simplification Simplification package in the spring of 2024. One year later, we welcome the Commission proposals to simplify the cap and its implementation, cutting red tape for farmers and the competent authorities and making rules more flexible are a sign that we're moving towards a more functional, versatile agricultural policy that, at the end of the day, is more efficient and farmer friendly. The changes in how the strategic plans are amended constitute a pragmatic approach that makes the whole procedure more rational, without undermining the objectives of transparency and control. As regards the proposed changes to the good agricultural and environmental conditions. The gags. It is encouraging to see that we're moving towards a more balanced path. Sustainability is maintained as a goal. Making things easier for farmers in practice without the burden of excessive requirements. In addition, provisions relevant to organic farmers and small farmers are equally positive. For us, it is particularly important to introduce a new measure to tackle crisis under the current cap. Such a tool would allow member states to respond immediately to crisis and to meet urgent needs. This is a proposal on flexibility submitted by Croatia and Slovenia, which we have supported repeatedly as we recognise its potential. However, the consequences of climate change are dire and permanent and require a new, strong financing tool beyond 2027 with stable funds and long term prospects. Reducing administrative burden, boosting flexibility and simplifying procedures are a fundamental reform breakthrough. This direction is not only desirable but also indispensable. If we want the cap to truly serve the interests of farmers and the agricultural community. Thank you.”
Agriculture (green)
- “Thank you chair, and we would like to thank Austria for this very interesting document. Some observations on my part. First of all, Greece supports the the enhancement of the solidarity lines with Ukraine. And we have already offered possibilities for the use of the ports of Thessaloniki [00:20:30] and Alexandroupolis. And yes, the Green Deal creates a competitive disadvantage for farmers, and there is a danger of the import of huge quantities of very cheap products from third countries. This could increase also sbb's dangers and the introduction of dangerous substances in safe areas. We agree with Austria that we need to use [00:21:00] the structural dialogue in order to have a fair environment to develop agricultural activity. Thank you very much.”
Agricultural trade: Ukraine imports
- “Chairman. Commissioner. Colleagues, allow me, first of all, to congratulate the new Commissioner of Health, Mr. Varhelyi, for assuming this, uh, very difficult portfolio. Undoubtedly, the protection of public health, and more specifically, uh, young people, is a priority in Greece. A large part of the points covered by the recommendation have been implemented since 2019, more specifically when it comes to protection, public health from secondary smoke. Young people and adults and we have limited. We have included bans in outdoor spaces. But public health suggestion must rely on scientific data and proportionality rules. We need feasible and workable solutions, taking into account the large extent and the large scale of these suggestions to ban out smoking in outdoor spaces without an impact assessment, we would like to point out that the very specific features of our country, in terms of climate and geographical location, will take will have a particular weight. In terms of implementing these suggestions, the Hungarian presidency has indeed done an excellent job in order to find a very delicate balance. But Greece would like to abstain from this vote. I would like to remind to recall that, uh, as regards the directive on smoke products, we would like to first have a full impact assessment, take into account scientific Developments. Unless this takes place, any decision would be hasty and would not help us fully protect public health for EU citizens. Thank you.”
Smoking regulation
- “Thank you, dear passenger. Dear, dear president. Dear Commissioner, uh, the debate on national recommendation is inextricably linked to the strategic orientation of the future Common Agricultural Policy and ultimately to the type of European agriculture that we want to build for Greece. These recommendations can be a useful tool for strategic guidance under clear conditions. First of all, the character must remain non-binding in nature. They should not become an indirect mechanism for imposing policy choices or a tool for excessive standardisation of strategic plans, the flexibility of member states and the ability to adapt to national and regional specificities are fundamental elements of the Cap and must be preserved. Secondly, the scope of the recommendations must remain clearly focused on the specific objectives of the Cap um, such as agricultural income and competitiveness, generational renewal, the resilience of farms in rural areas, as well as climate and environmental performance. At the same time, we recognise that some areas covered by the draft regulations, such as the resilience of rural areas or access to knowledge, innovation and digitalisation, are inherently cross sectoral in nature. So it is therefore reasonable for the these recommendations to take this dimension into account. However, this should not lead to a weakening of the autonomy of the cap and must remain the main pillar of support for agriculture and rural areas.”
Agriculture (green)
- “Thank you, President. First of all, allow me to congratulate and wish the new commissioner a success in his duties. Apostolos. All the best on your new adventure. My country supports all efforts towards the improvement of road safety. While Greece has made strides in reducing fatalities, there is still work to be done. Although the number of fatalities in Greece has decreased more than the EU average by more than 50% over the last decade. Yet Greece still ranks seventh out of 27 EU countries in terms of the highest number of fatalities per million inhabitants. The current legislative proposal is moving in the right direction. In our case, successful implementation involves strong cooperation and enforcement by regional authorities. Therefore, it is crucial that Member States and the European Commission cooperate closely to ensure its effective application. Digital tools such as the EU Driving Licence Network should be further improved and utilised extensively. Enhancing these tools will not only streamline processes, but also ensure better coordination and enforcement across all Member States, together with a unified approach and the right technological support. We can significantly enhance road safety and protect our citizens. But is it enough? The answer is definitely no. I will not focus on investments in road infrastructure as this has been discussed many times before. If the European Commission wants to be the game changer for EU countries, then it needs to focus more on prevention via changing the driver behaviour and using as tools a lifelong education and training on road safety matters, as well as awareness campaigns. Thank you.”
Road transport environmental policy
- “Dear chairman, dear colleagues, we share. We share the reasons given and we believe it's very important to support this sector as described in great detail in the Romanian document. So we support this request and we are in favour of amending the basic regulation in connection with the eligibility for the purchase of breeding animals. This will give access to funding for improving the animal capital, and it will be an important incentive in providing further support to developing farming in the EU with better productivity and profitability. It will contribute towards food security and in achieving our environmental objectives. Thank you very much.”
Agricultural funding
- “Chairman Colleagues, pollinators are [00:16:30] an integral part of healthy ecosystems. Without them, many plant species will decline and eventually disappear with serious environmental, social and economic consequences. In the European Union, 84% of cultivated plants depend partly on pollinators. While around €15 billion for the EU's annual agricultural production are directly attributable to pollinators. The wider [00:17:00] adoption of pollinator friendly agronomic techniques, in particular agroecology, is essential to reverse this trend. The Greek cap strategic plan is a key instrument to support such a transition through measures such as organic farming, conservation and development of landscape features, agroforestry and reduced use of pesticides. In addition, the proposed nature restoration law includes a legally binding target to reverse the [00:17:30] decline in pollinator populations by 2030 and then maintain an upward trend. Thank you.”
Nature protection and restoration in the EU
- “Thank you very much. Madam president, Commissioner, thank you for the very good draft conclusions we have prepared. Life sciences are crucial for promoting RNAi in a plethora of areas such as health. Medical technology, pharmaceuticals, agriculture, bio economy and environment, among others. They can act as a lever to growth for the European economy and strategic autonomy in these critical areas, but also to maintaining and attracting well-educated staff. Innovation in life sciences can respond to the emerging needs of diagnostic and therapeutic methods, ensuring thereby equal access to health services and retaining scientists within Europe. Now, we believe that the DSPs for Research and Innovation and Infrastructures and Partnerships provide a strong basis, therefore, for further progress. So we feel that coordinated action is needed in the EU. All stakeholders must increase and improve access to funding in the private sector, SMEs and start ups. It is crucial for complex legal and administrative barriers being simplified in this intersectoral in the field of medical care. Rather, the improvement of the regulatory framework and facilitation of cross-border clinical trials will accelerate the adoption of new medicines and treatments, thus improving access for patients. So we will support, um, uh, the role of national regulatory authorities in this effort. And as well as investing in them, we support the European health data space with respecting, of course, personal data. Europe can become the largest. And from a scientific point of view, the most important health data hub. Finally, um, we would like to welcome the strategic research and innovation agenda for food systems. Agriculture is facing many challenges, such as climate change and energy, just to mention a few. In addition, it faces the ever increasing problem of young persons reluctance to work as farmers. And of course, we strongly believe that problems do require special attention here too. Thank you.”
Processing of health data
- “Thank you. This is the pillar for the construction of a cohesive and well linked European Education Space thereby creating an extroverted network of a new generation of innovative Europeans capable of liaising beyond any linguistic or scientific constraints.
The high number of actors participating in European alliances and a very high quality targets all of them render definitely necessary the reassurance by way of a profit financing. We need to ensure the viability of alliances if we are to continue operating as catalysts for a transformation thereby essentially contributing to the academic excellence and European integration. Thank you very much.”
Public funding for education
- “Madam president, we. To support the issue raised by Germany as we face similar problems in certain areas of the provisions implementation and we in turn urge the Commission to make every possible effort to resolve them. Thank you very much.”
EU Supervision of the Rule of Law
- “Good morning. Thank you very much for the Cyprus presidency for their excellent work. Congratulations. Dear colleagues, Europe has been always, always been something more than just financial union. It's a common place, a common cultural place of value and creativity and freedom.
The new European program, AGRA EU, is a particularly important initiative that enhances this cultural identity of the European Union as a whole. The Agra EU program is not only a financial instrument. It is an important political investment to own in the European idea, the enhancement of European cooperation and the support of cultural and linguistic diversity and the strengthening of civic engagement and the protection of social cohesion are important parts of Europe without any discriminations.
Particularly important is also the support for the challenges that come from the digital and AI transformation, the protection of human rights and the ethical use of new technologies. These are all important issues that are going to play an important role in the future landscape. We would like to congratulate the Cyprus presidency for the negotiations up to now, and we'll continue the discussion for a program that continues to be ambitious and important for all European creators and citizens.
We believe that Agora EU can play an important role as a cultural contract between Europe and its citizens, and its citizens, based on values such as freedom and democracy for humans. Thank you very much.”
EU and national cultural identities
- “Thank you very much, dear commissioner, dear colleagues. The debate on this new work program is taking place at the time when Europe is called upon to redefine its position, explicitly stating that culture is not merely a specific area for public policy, but a crucial factor for resilience and Europe's presence in the world.
So we consider that the council must focus on the following issues. First of all, the strengthening of Europe's cultural resilience, the protection of cultural heritage from natural disasters, environmental threats, armed conflicts and the illicit trafficking of cultural goods is now becoming a key priority for the European Union.
Second, the European Union must invest in the sustainable and people centered digital transition of the cultural and creative sectors. We need to find a balanced environment that will ensure technological innovation without undermining intellectual property, autonomy and the professional rights of artists. The artificial intelligence already changing culture. But crucial question is who's going to determine those changes. Culture is created by humans for humans. So this people centered value needs to be central even at the time of artificial intelligence. So the responsibility of how this is going to be done is still human.
Third, the strengthening participation in culture and social cohesion must be a key priority. We need to support cultural institutions and at the same time international corporations promoting mobility and cultural exchange. We need to promote the active participation of citizens and culture and creative organizations in policymaking so that it functions as an area of shared European responsibility reflecting the real needs of the cultural ecosystem.
The European Union strengthened the geopolitical dimension of culture and its international relations. In an environment of increasing competition between values and narratives, culture constitutes a soft but substantial form of European power. Cultural diplomacy can help promote democracy, pluralism and intercultural dialogue, while at the same time strengthening Europe's presence in neighboring and third countries.
In any case, the institutional flexibility of the new work program will determine its success. The council must therefore establish mechanisms that will allow for rapid adaptation to emerging challenges without however undermining the program's coherence. Operational flexibility, the ability to update individual actions during this four year period and a stronger link between policy planning and the European Union's funding instruments are essential prerequisites for a truly dynamic program. Thank you.”
EU and national cultural identities
- “Thank you, sir. I was. I was speaking Greek. I would like to thank the Swedish presidency and the Czech presidency for their efforts and for the cooperation. And we also thank the European Commission for its support. The pace of negotiations has been too speedy. We believe we could have dedicated more time to discuss this proposal at council level. In any case, we are expecting that council will be more involved in tourism issues and nonetheless, we support this Presidency proposal for a general approach as this is an effort to find a balance, given that at Member State level we have different procedures and mechanisms to monitor these activities where applicable. We it is important that we ensure a level playing field between the Member states that will opt in and those that will opt out of the procedures included in this regulation for the collection and sharing of data. We are pleased with the fact that our proposal was taken on board and now in Article five we have a safeguard allowing for this proposal to be compatible with existing procedures in many Member States, national procedures. And we also agree with the proposal of the Commission to simplify the procedures when it comes to the automatic determination that an authorisation requirement applies where applicable for hosts. We are also happy with the amendment you made to Article nine, paragraph one, taking into account technical errors that may arise during the data transmission from the host from the platforms to the public authorities. All the best for the negotiations with the European Parliament for that.”
Digital platforms liability for harmful and illegal content
- “Dear colleagues. Given the geopolitical [00:21:30] uncertainties and given the two wars near Europe, we all agree that we want a strong, democratic Europe, but a strong, democratic Europe, without strong culture and without a strong cultural policy, cannot exist. It is obvious that Greece supports Germany. We agree that we need more funding, both from structural funds and from all different programmes. And what's really important [00:22:00] is what Ruth just said. Given that culture is a horizontal policy, and given that a lot of different sectors impacted, we need to find a way that in European legislation, uh, we will be updated. The ministers in charge of culture will be informed and updated because a lot of things change without us really becoming aware of the changes. Thank you.”
EU and national cultural identities
- “Thank you very much. We must, of course, respect consumer rights and the precautionary principle. However, new adapted legislation is necessary to make full use of new scientific and technical progress in biotechnology, especially for the AgriFood sector. The European Union must not be left behind in terms of both competitiveness and scientific and technological research. This, of course, would negatively affect food safety in Europe as well as the resilience of European food production. Thank you.”
New Genomic Techniques
- “Greece welcomes this Franco-German initiative. And we think this is a way of helping young people to become familiar with and have access to cultural events. So we can also provide financial support to the cultural sector in this way. We have the same kind of initiative in Greece. The pass culture and the young people that benefit from this system can obtain a digital card during the year in which they make their requests, and they receive €150 in the subsequent year.”
EU and national cultural identities
- “Thank you very much indeed, chair, and I'm grateful to the Polish presidency for the excellent work that they've done. On your first question, we believe that all of the results from the mid-term evaluation for the framework program are of great use, and fundamentally, we'd like to recall the increase in high quality proposals and also the difficulties we encounter with funding. Often there is a lack of funding available that only underscores the fact that we need an ambitious budget for the 10th FP in order to ensure that we can tackle international challenges and maintain the EU's competitiveness worldwide. Turning to the next aspect, it's certainly a good idea to continue our cooperation on R and I. That's very important for the future of Europe. But in parallel to that, we need to ensure that all technology readiness levels can come into play. We do think it's a good idea that the percentage of SMEs, so 78% of funding going to SMEs is something that we'd welcome. Then on the widening measures, in order to close the innovation gap to these member states. Well, we need to do more on that front. We believe that the merriest Kokoschka Curie grants are useful, particularly with an eye to sustainability of research institutes and then on the Air Innovation Council. We'd ask for further participation to ensure that those member states that don't have the requisite experience can get the air resources and financing that they require.”
EU research funding
- “hank you. Unfortunately, numerous studies continue to show that there are differences in both the composition and price of products distributed and sold in the single market under the same brand and the same identical packaging. So-called [00:05:00] unfair practices of local logistical constraints, as they're called, are abused by multinational companies because of their asymmetric power vis a vis individual member states, but also individual wholesalers and retailers. I agree with Slovakia that any distinction concerning quality or price is unacceptable. There are no second class consumers, second class consumers in Europe. All union citizens must have [00:05:30] access to products of the same quality and price. The Greek government, the Prime Minister Mitsotakis, has recently taken a specific practical initiative and called for more effective use of the collective power of the EU jointly to tackle cross-border, unfair practices that a country cannot tackle on its own. And we could actually be even bolder than we are being in the single market to protect competitiveness and make sure this doesn't [00:06:00] happen on our markets. Thank you.”
EU restrictions on unfair commercial practices
- “Thank you. President. I would like to congratulate the Spanish presidency for choosing this topic. Creating a safe environment is a condition for society to [00:44:30] operate, and also to achieve the ideal of sport, which was created in Greece. Of course, sport is subject to a number of threats, particularly in terms of sporting integrity and because of acts of violence and hate speech. When a sporting environment is a safe gives the green light for aggressive behaviour, we have to counter that as quickly as possible. [00:45:00] With that in mind, in Greece we ratified the convention of the Council of Europe, and we are currently setting up a coordinating committee to come up with a national strategy in the area of security, of sporting infrastructure. Within the Parliament, we set up a monitoring committee of the Santorini Convention, and in 2023 [00:45:30] decided that there could be no sporting clubs or sporting installations operating without having been given a certificate showing that they protect against fires.
Now, in terms of supporter violence, we have focused. On applying the Synteny convention, and we have set up a National Coordination Committee, which involves [00:46:00] various sectors involved in sport, along with the Minister for Protecting citizens in the same setting. We are trying to combat harassment, abuse and mistreatment and abuse of power we involved in the Council of Europe. Startalk. Project, we're setting up a strategic framework to help preserve integrity and to combat corruption in sport. We are currently [00:46:30] nominating somebody responsible for safety and welfare, and that would apply in all the various sporting federations, starting with the national ones. At the moment, we are defining the characteristics which would be appropriate for that function and also the content of the required training for this. At the same time, we are putting the finishing touch to the legislative and regulatory framework to deal with this phenomenon. To my mind, and by way of conclusion, we need a collective, [00:47:00] coordinated approach by all Member States to tackle these problems. We need to implement a good practice and exchange of know how, whilst respecting the cultural specificities of each association. We need to pool our strength on this.”
Broadcasting of sports events
- “Thank you very much, Stephanie. Thank you too, to the Commissioner to the Danish Presidency for the intensive efforts that you have made. Uh, let me start by stressing two points before I raise certain concerns. The first one is that we fully share the objectives of energy transition. We as Greece started the forefront of the green transition with the fastest growth in renewable energy in Europe, with significant investments in grids, storage, clean technologies. That's my first point. The second one is that we all have to acknowledge that substantial progress has been made in the discussions and has been achieved on the Energy Taxation Directive after long negotiations, and we welcome both the presidencies and the Commission's efforts to promote landing zones, compromise solutions. However, overall, as we advance on energy transition, we should focus on a broader strategic narrative and mindset because we're trying to tackle many things at once. We have many goals at once. We look at sustainability, we look at competitiveness, we look at social cohesion, we look at territorial cohesion and our job. Our work is to balance all of those things and find optimal solutions to every social problem that we have in front of us. And in this regard, we need to focus a lot on cost effectiveness, because there are certain member states, for instance, that still rely on coal for power generation and even for heating oil for their homes and businesses. So if you had to imply if you had to implement exactly the same solution in a one size fits all approach simultaneously at all 27 member states, that would not be a recipe for success.”
Energy (green transition)
- “Thank you. Chairman. Colleagues. Humanist values are very much at the heart of Europe. Our cultural heritage is at the heart of our policies, of our identity and of our nation states. The widespread destruction of Ukraine's cultural heritage requires a firm response from the European Union. And that means that we will be sending a strong message. We will be saying that Europe stands side by side with Ukraine and is doing all it can to preserve cultural heritage. Greece has close historical ties with Edessa, and we support the inclusion of protection of Ukraine's heritage in the EU's objectives, and I'd like to thank Italy for its suggestion.”
Russia-Ukraine conflict (10th term)
- “Thank you. First of all, we want to thank the Swedish presidency for all this effort. But like Italy, we are not ready to give the green light of the proposal because we entertain serious doubts about the effective operational implementation. [00:14:30] And it's still better than the dysfunctional system that we have today. Even if we are not convinced that the right balance has been struck between responsibility and solidarity, and we are disappointed that our concerns on the concept of the concept of safe third countries were not take into account. This will not only hamper our ability to apply the proper border procedures, but as experience my experience has taught us, will end up hurting those same that did not wish to take the concerns [00:15:00] into account. We welcome that we will have a rendezvous clause on the matter a year after the entry into force of the regulation, which is really hope that when we do revisit the issue, our discussions will be sober and based on solid operational truths and facts rather than ideological pipe dreams. But but this is not meant to take anything away from the Swedish presidency, presidency and the very hard work that has done. Thank [00:15:30] you.”
Asylum & border control
- “The relationship of the FP with the ECF will be key to the effectiveness of the overall architecture. Now, coming to your second question, we agree with the key challenges identified in the presidency document. Addressing them requires inclusive decision making. So with the full participation of of of all of all of us, of all Member States. The rationalisation of partnerships, the development of world class infrastructures and the relationship between the Framework Programme and the ECF, the Competitiveness Fund are issues of common European interest, and tackling them in a balanced way is crucial in order to reduce disparities among member states. Very important goal for us. Third question. I mean, looking ahead flexibility, interdisciplinarity, simplification and effectiveness also at national level. By the way, are essential. It would be very interesting to have national priorities closely aligned with the Framework Programme, in close cooperation with the Commission in this and practical ways to achieve this to align the EU and national priorities. Could be a multiplier for our research effort. And so, in conclusion, we strongly believe that EU research policy under the FPT has all the potential of being an engine for our competitiveness and sovereignty. Thank you.”
EU-level coordination of research agendas
- “In this, we can propose. Firstly, unsurprisingly, perhaps, AI has already transformed scientific practice. Ai factories, gigafactories and advances in quantum research and innovation will further strengthen Europe. Secondly, biosciences research and development in biosciences are essential for health, medical technology, agri environmental protection and other strategic sectors. Thirdly, advanced materials. They are a foundation of industrial prosperity and a key driver of our current transformation. They are also included in the list of critical tech sectors for the EU's technological independence and economic security. They are essential for improving our competitiveness and for our green and digital transitions. They can also help us with the objectives of the Critical Raw Materials Act and the chip? The chips act. Now, on your second question. Consortia, particularly between public and private sectors, are a key instrument of Horizon Europe. They enable cutting edge research, help addressing global challenges and leverage private sector investment. However, however, we believe that Europe, the European partnership landscape, should be rationalised prior to the creation of new partnerships under the Next Framework Programme and overall. Of course, Greece supports a limited number of public private partnerships, with more flexible central governance and the participation of a wide range of member States. Thank you.”
Research priorities within the EU
- “The relationship of the FP with the ECF will be key to the effectiveness of the overall architecture. Now, coming to your second question, we agree with the key challenges identified in the presidency document. Addressing them requires inclusive decision making. So with the full participation of of of all of all of us, of all Member States. The rationalisation of partnerships, the development of world class infrastructures and the relationship between the Framework Programme and the ECF, the Competitiveness Fund are issues of common European interest, and tackling them in a balanced way is crucial in order to reduce disparities among member states. Very important goal for us. Third question. I mean, looking ahead flexibility, interdisciplinarity, simplification and effectiveness also at national level. By the way, are essential. It would be very interesting to have national priorities closely aligned with the Framework Programme, in close cooperation with the Commission in this and practical ways to achieve this to align the EU and national priorities. Could be a multiplier for our research effort. And so, in conclusion, we strongly believe that EU research policy under the FPT has all the potential of being an engine for our competitiveness and sovereignty. Thank you.”
Research priorities within the EU · EU-level coordination of research agendas
- “Yes, thank you Chair. I would also like to thank the Netherlands and other partners for raising this issue. We were very much happy to add our voice of support further paper. This is really an issue of great importance for public, which will discriminate against by the practise territorial supply constraints. It's pretty easy to find out that the same product or something very similar. I mean it's cheaper just across the board some borders. It is also simply our view crucial to the integrity of the single market. So we shouldn't allow ing converting practise converting the single market. And on this issue, the prime minister of Greece, Kos Miot Taki sent a letter on the 18th of May to the president from the Landan raising the issue of territorial supply constraints. So allow me to say that we are aware and welcome the actions actually taken already by the commission in some relevant competition cases.
You have a very spectacular one just yesterday. And same goes for the dialogue pursuit on this issue. It's also clear that the EU competition law has specific scopes, has limitation. Vice president mentioned this already and doesn't cover all harmful cases of territorial supply constraints and restrictions in this context. Through this letter, we propose to address firstly, the further strengthening of EU competition law by providing the competent national authorities and the commission with new tools and powers to tackle unjustified territorial supply constraints. Secondly, raised the issue of unfair commercial practises in supplier retailer relations such as those practises that impede parallel trade and cross border passive sales. Thirdly, the issue of further reduction of language restrictions sometimes on the labelling of essential consumer goods, which when they're not strictly necessary. And finally, the issue of differentiated pricing, IE, the prevention of the policy of some multinational companies to sell identical or similar consumer products under different brands and prices in different member states. We would very much like to see this as a priority on our agenda on the agenda of the European Commission as well in the coming months. Thank you.”
EU Competition policy
- “Madam president, we. To support the issue raised by Germany as we face similar problems in certain areas of the provisions implementation and we in turn urge the Commission to make every possible effort to resolve them. Thank you very much.”
EU Supervision of the Rule of Law
- “38:31 – 11:41:53): you, chair. Thank you, Alexis. Greece, the support of Austria, Czechia, Hungary, Italy, Luxembourg, Portugal, and Romania, whose delegations we thank very much, wishes to draw attention to what has become 1 of the most significant practical challenges for the future of European rail. The complexity, fragmentation, and unpredictability of testing certification, authorization, and system integration procedures, particularly for ERTMS. Looking at today's agenda with several AOBs touching on railway matters, it is evident that this is not a natural isolated concern, but a systemic issue across the union. Let me remind all colleagues, the data as presented by Era, in our last meeting in Cyprus. Less than 18 of, our 10 t network has deployed, ERTMS protocol successfully. And this is precisely why Greece raised the matter with the Cyprus presidency from the very 1st moment. We appreciate that the presidency immediately acknowledged its significance and reflected reflected it in the informal meeting, enabling a broader political discussion on the operational realities of ERTMS deployment. We all share the same strategic objective, a more interoperable, digital, safe, and competitive European railway system. ERTMS is indispensable for safety, capacity, cross border traffic, 10 t implementation, and for the resilience and military mobility of our network. Yet across member states, the practical steps required to bring systems into operation often take longer than the physical works themselves. Procurement, construction, and installation may be completed on time, but commissioning, validation, and authorization can still require years. This challenge is even more acute for ERTMS, a system that depends on the interaction of infrastructure, rolling stock software, operational rules, and human factors. When technical specifications evolve during implementation, major projects face uncertainty and additional cost. Our message is very clear. If a solution is safe, interoperable, and already proven in another member state on a 10 t, network part, it should not face repetitive checks and prolonged uncertainty in another member state. Ahead of the revision of the error regulation, Greece calls for a stronger error role, more practical mutual recognition, and clearer management on specification changes. Only with a fast, predictable, and proportionate authorization framework will Europe move from plans to real ERTMS operation. Finally, allow me to stress that Greece also recognizes the strategic importance of rail for freight transport and the decisive role that the European rail supply industry will play in this transition. For this reason, we support the related initiatives presented today in Encourage member states to bring forward AOBs that highlight these operational and industrial priorities. Thank you.”
EU support of rail transport
- “Thank you very much, Maria. Ladies and gentlemen, dear colleagues, Greece understands the concerns expressed by member states about the impact of the increase in human population, particularly on vulnerable fish stocks and in areas where the problem is particularly acute. In Greece, the phenomenon is milder until now at least. However, we are also facing similar pressures at local level, especially in coastal and lagoon ecosystems. We therefore believe that a balanced European approach is needed, taking into account both the need to protect biodiversity and the implementation of the Birds directive, together with the sustainability of fisheries and the local communities that depend on it. Therefore, in this context, we support the continuation of the dialogue with the European Commission and the search for solutions that are practical and science based. Thank you very much.”
Environmental regulation of fisheries
- “Thank you Teresa. On September 4th, three years after the extreme storm, Cyclone Daniel hit Greece, especially specifically [00:31:00] the area of Thessaly, and over a period of four days, unprecedented precipitation levels caused extensive flooding which led to human deaths. It also led to big destruction in animal deaths and extensive damages in public and private property. The flooding reached an extent similar to that depicted in the flood maps for 1000 years return period event, but failed [00:31:30] to accurately predict the water depth. We had water depth of five six meters in places where even in that extreme event, we were supposed to have 1 or 2m, and then another extreme storm hit in the 27th of September led to even worse situations because the the floods happened on an already flooded area. The above highlight [00:32:00] the vital importance importance of the flood directive as a tool in strategic planning for flood hazard mitigation, but also its constraints. We must consider how to improve the usefulness of the flood maps under the flood directive to better support the management authorities and the civil protection in a more dynamic way, to become more of an operational rather than a strategic tool. The process of developing the flood maps must be adapted to the new climate reality. We have a new climate. [00:32:30] The return period of 50 or 100 years, as this is currently estimated by using data that refers to longer time periods, seems to be irrelevant as a planning tool, since since the climate in our mind in Greece at least has changed and flooding probabilities cannot be predicted accurately, the climate models cannot help us there as much as we would want. Finally, more emphasis needs to be given to [00:33:00] increasing the resilience of critical infrastructure and adapting all human activities to the inevitable increased frequency of extreme weather events. To sum up, we had tools looking created by the models based on the climate that we used to have. Now we have a new climate and looking at the past, climate is not the way to handle these events. [00:33:30] Now on a more. Well, sorry. Maybe I should stop here. And the next item. You will give me the floor.”
Water pollution
- “Thank you very much. And warm thanks again to the to the Commissioner. I will focus on those points that are of more specific interest to us because of course, the, um, the work programme covers so much ground. So first, the annual programming on security and defence is more urgent than ever to strengthen European defence capabilities through a fit for purpose transformation of the European defence industry, while taking into account fully the security and defence interests of all Member States. Regarding funding of our defence expenditure, we must explore new ways both from public and private sources. We need to prove our determination to move from work to deeds with concrete steps, clear timelines and tangible deliverables. On migration, we look forward to the Commission's proposals on returns and the review of the safe third country concept. A well-functioning EU return system should effectively complement the objectives set out in the Pact on Migration and Asylum. On sustainable prosperity and competitiveness, there is an urgent need to improve the governance of the regulatory framework of the European electricity market and intensify our efforts to reduce energy prices. In view of the post 2027, MFF Greece focuses on the sustainability and competitiveness of a renewed cap, including food security and support for small farmers, and addressing the challenges and needs of rural and low density regions in terms of income, infrastructure, energy self-sufficiency, sufficiency, connectivity and welfare services. In the same vein, special attention should be paid to fragmented insular territories and mountain areas. As natural disasters greatly affect agricultural production, there is a need for special support for climate change adaptation and mitigation measures.”
Defence spending
- “The presidency has prepared a balanced compromise text that we can support. Deadlines have been extended. The risk based approach is better reflected in the text and additional flexibilities have been included. Of course, the new requirements are still very challenging and not only high achievements will be high investments will be necessary, but also much stronger operators of Wastewater management treatment services will be required. However, we should look at the overall picture and the overall picture is positive. The benefits, the environmental benefits are very important and outweigh the costs. The directive, if adopted, is going to have a pivotal role in ensuring a healthy environment for our citizens. Expansion to smaller agglomerations. Stricter quality requirements. Quaternary treatment, the inclusion of new parameters, the treatment of urban runoff, improved monitoring and the pathway towards carbon neutrality by 2045 are all necessary to protect the environment and public health. We also support the introduction of the extended producer responsibility to cover the cost of the tertiary treatment, where there is room for further improvement is an issue, such as flexibilities for insular areas like islands and population fluctuation due to tourism. We look forward for the next steps of the negotiations with a view to an ambitious final agreement with the Parliament. [00:10:30] Thank you.”
Water pollution
- “Thank you, President. Greece fully supports all the EU ambitious goals to create a viable and robust system for the protection of human health and the supply chain. The Member States authorities need to be able to combat phytosanitary risks quickly and effectively. This needs to remain our priority. At the same time, we need to ensure a level playing field between our agricultural products and products from third countries and also ensure that we will be in a position to export them. We share the concerns expressed in the Latvian document and we hope that this will be debated during the procedure on legislation on our side, we will participate in this debate constructively so that we reach a conclusion that will be based on scientific data. It will be fair and will also be based on the principles of proportionality and subsidiarity. Thank you.”
Import of agri-food products in the EU
- “Dear president, dear Commissioner, we thank Portugal for this initiative and its contribution to the debate on managing the increasing climate risks in agriculture, it is clear that the current model, which is based mainly on ex-post emergency compensation, creates serious, unpredictable and time concentrated pressures on national budgets. So in this light, we are in principle in favour of a European re-insurance mechanism, which at um ex-ante cost can cover catastrophic risks and enhance stability and predictability for the agricultural sector and public finances. At the same time, we consider it crucial to further clarify key technical parameters the mechanism for the flow of funding, clear criteria and thresholds for activation, as well as safeguards in the event of limited private participation. So we therefore support the Commission's continued technical work so that we can, uh, examine credible and workable European solution for managing, catastrophic agricultural risks at the later stage. Thank you.”
Agricultural funding
- “As for the second question, the abolition of green exclusive allocation and the horizontal target of 43% for the environment and the climate that do offer flexibility, but that may lead to to a divergence of ambitions and a shift of resources away from from primary production. So therefore Greece calls for a common minimum European support levels for interventions with high environmental value, with explicit reference to the conversion and the maintenance of organic farming, as well as a transparent mechanism for the monitoring of commitments. The Commission must be able to request minimum allocations where necessary in order to ensure balanced implementation. On the issue of co-financing the equalization of rates in the abolition of full EU funding, they weaken the incentive for large scale green interventions. So therefore, we call for the 30 national 30% national rate not to be applied for UN climate action support for small farmers. We need clear European guidelines for the differentiation of Co-financing, so that less developed regions and small organic farms are not put at a disadvantage. So I'd like to conclude with a technical but important observation. The requirements for intensification and nitrate pollution zones must be precisely defined, and those producers who already operate at low intensities must be fairly rewarded. Only that way we can avoid fragmentation of the rules, and we can prevent an informal renationalisation of the cap. Thank you.”
Agricultural funding
- “The relationship of the FP with the ECF will be key to the effectiveness of the overall architecture. Now, coming to your second question, we agree with the key challenges identified in the presidency document. Addressing them requires inclusive decision making. So with the full participation of of of all of all of us, of all Member States. The rationalisation of partnerships, the development of world class infrastructures and the relationship between the Framework Programme and the ECF, the Competitiveness Fund are issues of common European interest, and tackling them in a balanced way is crucial in order to reduce disparities among member states. Very important goal for us. Third question. I mean, looking ahead flexibility, interdisciplinarity, simplification and effectiveness also at national level. By the way, are essential. It would be very interesting to have national priorities closely aligned with the Framework Programme, in close cooperation with the Commission in this and practical ways to achieve this to align the EU and national priorities. Could be a multiplier for our research effort. And so, in conclusion, we strongly believe that EU research policy under the FPT has all the potential of being an engine for our competitiveness and sovereignty. Thank you.”
EU-level coordination of research agendas
- “Thank you Max. So we were discussing the savings and Investment union at the previous Ecofin in a similar public forum as well. And we were discussing a different element of the portfolio. The terminology I attempted to use back then when we were speaking about this, was that this is the most consequential policy agenda in Europe. And I also lauded the efforts of Maria Luis, which I will repeat today because this is a great effort and she's spearheading this process with leadership. There are certain issues which, when we're discussing them publicly, citizens grasp them. We discussed energy yesterday at the inclusive Eurogroup format. It's the number one topic discussed internationally. It's fully grasped. When we're discussing the saw, this is quite more technical. So it's a policy challenge, but it is also a communications challenge on our end to convey to citizens why this is important and why we call it the most consequential policy agenda in Europe. But it is. And in this regard, it has many elements. I wouldn't qualify some as less important than others. I would say it's like American football. We're trying to get inches in the field, and this is exactly what the commission is trying to do. In one phrase, you have our full support in this endeavour, and the discussion on market integration and supervision is a central part of that effort.”
European Banking Union
- “Thank you very much to the Cyprus presidency for the discussions in the Council regarding the I. A we would like to thank the European Commission for the comprehensive proposal as well as for the impact assessment. On the whole. We support the goal of the proposal and we support improving the functioning of the internal market in order to strengthen the strategic autonomy and the economic security of the EU through a framework that will boost growth, resilience and competitiveness in the EU, focusing on strategic industrial sectors, energy intensive industries and the whole of the industrial base in Europe are, as we know, and many member states have said, face many crises that jeopardise their survival and their activity in the EU. We need coordinated initiatives on a union level and what is proposed in the IAA. If we couple what is proposed in the IAA with financial resources to boost investments in the industry sector, then we will see a positive impact in the growth and competitiveness in the EU, as well as in achieving a climate targets, including the target for sufficient and affordable energy. It is important to set out the scope in the proposal and include strategic sectors more than the ones that we are looking into.”
EU industrial funding (mechanism level: EU-pooled vs nationally-financed)
- “Thank you Chair. Greece supports the adoption of the restoration law. We have a similar provision already in our national legislation, so it goes without saying that we support it. The issue of following the rules with institutions, of course it's an important issue, but of course I have to remind you that this anomaly has happened before in the past when we were discussing about vehicles, if I'm not mistaken, a few years ago. So it's not without president unfortunately, but of course that does not mean that we should repeat it. Thank you.”
Nature protection and restoration in the EU
- “Madam chair, dear Commissioner, we took note of the comments made by Poland and other Member States regarding the protection of sensitive agricultural sectors. We would like to emphasize that we have always supported the Union's trade agreements and recognize their importance both economically and geopolitically. At the same time, we considered it important that these agreements are implemented on the basis of reciprocity, ensuring a level playing field for European producers, particularly with regard to imported products. Compliance with EU standards is not only a matter of fair competition, but also an essential prerequisite for protecting public health and consumer safety. We have confidence in the work of the Commission and look forward to its continuing efforts, contributing Constructively to the search for balanced solutions. Thank you very much.”
Import of agri-food products in the EU