- 2026-06-16 “Thank you, thank you. And thank you to the to the presidency. From the very start of these negotiations, we have been crystal clear about one fact, and that is that the overall volume of the Commission's proposal is not acceptable and needs to be significantly reduced. We are working for a restrained budget of around 1% of GNI. With the Commission's proposal, Sweden's contribution would rise considerably by 80% in real terms. That is not acceptable. All member states are investing heavily in security and defence. Sweden is also among the largest bilateral donors to Ukraine in absolute terms. We have called a long time for increased burden sharing, but clearly we and a few other member states are doing the heavy lifting. So when I say there's no room for increased contributions, I mean exactly that. Since the publication of the proposal, there has been a flood of concessions from our side on structure, flexibility and And modernization constantly moving in the wrong direction. And this continues in the latest negotiation box with the handout of billions in additional collections allocations to certain member states being the most recent example. We're at a point where we need to balance both the originally proposed volume and the concessions made during the last year by major reductions in volume.”
Size of EU budget
- 2026-06-16 “This box, I'm sorry to say, is not even close to delivering on this. We will need much more than barely 2%. No heading can be excluded when the overall volume is brought down. The effort must be shared across the budget, and we need to see a lot more cuts in heading one. Moreover, we need to get the framing of the discussion right. We remain convinced that innovations on the revenue side will not be able to solve these problems. We see no need for new own resources. It's also clear that the existing corrections must be renewed. At this point, we're not even close to a landing zone on the volume. The possibility of reaching a timely agreement is therefore put under severe pressure, and I believe the discussion at the Euco on Friday will give important input to the continued work by the incoming Irish presidency. As a final point, let me also echo my Finnish colleague on the need to recognise the special treatment of the northern, sparsely populated areas, as specified in the protocol of our Accession Treaty. Thank you chair.”
Size of EU budget
- 2026-06-16 “Dear Marielena, first of all, thanks for your efforts to reach this partial general approaches. It's been a major. It's a major achievement by the presidency. And congratulations on that. And to all of us for actually reaching this partial general approach. I would be quite brief. Um, as for many others, to be clear, this has this has not been easy and we have had to make some difficult compromises. But Sweden supports the general approaches and the establishment of the new modernized structure, where a stronger rule of law and charter conditionality, as well as a continued excellence based approach in directly managed funds, will be two key components. But let's remember this is not the end of the process, and we will monitor these aspects closely in negotiations with the European Parliament and in the box. Thank you.”
EU Supervision of the Rule of Law
- “Thank you dear Alan. And thank you also for your team and all your efforts in finding a balanced text. I will keep it quite brief as Sweden is happy with and can support these council conclusions. We think they constitute a strong signal from the council that the green transition must remain at the centre of EU cooperation and that the EU and its member states now need to be determined and effective in implementing the legislation and commitments resulting from the green deal. I especially welcome that circular economy is a key part of these council conclusions. The transition to a circular economy is an instrumental tool in tackling the triple planetary crisis as well as in by resource efficiency contributing to European competitiveness and I would like to in particularly also stress the importance of fully implementing the chemical strategy for sustainability. Thank you.”
Chemicals regulation
- “Thank you very much. Um, as my minister said earlier today, we think it's very positive that an agreement in principle has been reached with Ukraine. We would like to underline how important it is that Ukraine can continue to trade freely with the EU, without restrictions or barriers. The agreement is a step in the right direction, although it could have been more ambitious. At the same time, we understand that certain member states are more exposed to the effects of increased trade liberalization, and we find that it's important that their concerns are addressed in a constructive and balanced manner. And as for Estonia, I would like to underline the importance of that. The agreement is not further weakened. Thank you very much.”
Agricultural trade: Ukraine imports
- “Thank you. Chair Sweden highly values the high animal health status of the European Union, despite the increase of serious animal disease outbreaks in recent years. Sweden maintains that biosecurity is the fundamental cornerstone of prevention and control of infectious animal diseases. This said, vaccination can serve as an important complementary measure, and in this matter, I support the initiative from Hungary. Vaccination and the necessary follow up surveillance come with significant costs and their financial sustainability must be ensured. The vaccines used must also be both safe and effective, something that vary from case by case and must be subject to thorough evaluation. The European Food Safety Authority must be actively involved and provide the scientific basis necessary to support vaccination related decision making, also for animals. Lastly, continued dialogue with third countries in collaboration with the European Commission is essential to minimise trade related consequences of animal disease outbreaks. Thank you.”
Animal diseases prevention and management in the EU
- “Thank you very much, Minister. And thank you. And and thank you also to your team for all the efforts on this important file. And we are very pleased that the Council will reach agreement on a general approach. Today, Sweden supports the proposal by the presidency for today's meeting. We are in particular supportive of the inclusion of nuclear on the list for strategic technologies. It is a complex and broad yet important file, and we fully understand fully understand the reasons for the high pace during the negotiations. In the upcoming trialogues, we must continue our efforts to reach a regulation with textural clarity and coherence that will not create uncertainties for our businesses and authorities. We will continue our support for the presidency and the incoming Belgian presidency in reaching an agreement with the European Parliament regarding financing. The Net Zero Industry Act is not about changing the conditions or award criteria for allocation of union funding, or to steer the EIB s activities. We are thus in agreement with the president's Sentences. Proposed wording in article three be. Thank you very much.”
Nuclear energy
- “Moreover, we need to counteract the harms caused by the use of alcohol, tobacco, and nicotine. In these efforts. The protection of children and young people must be a priority. The EU's tobacco regulation is a vital tool for safeguarding public health in Europe. Measures concerning tobacco policy should be proportionate and aimed at protecting vulnerable groups, such as children and young people. To conclude, EU level initiatives should provide clear added value and the division of competences between the EU and the Member States, as well as national health care systems, must be respected. Sweden welcomes the EU level initiatives that foster increased knowledge, dialogue and the exchange of experiences among member States. A good example of this is the Expert Meeting on Digital Media and Health, which we co-hosted with Finland on June 3rd in Brussels. Another important tool in our efforts is the EU funding that supports research and joint projects that enhance our understanding of health, cancer and other non-communicable diseases As well as alcohol and tobacco consumption through programs such as EU for Health and Horizon Europe. Thank you.”
EU measures on lifestyle-related behaviours (smoking, drinking, eating, etc.)
- “Thank you, Mr. Chair. Madam Commissioner, dear colleagues. Sweden welcomes the progress made so far and wishes to highlight that pillar one on scientific excellence is sufficiently mature, but we still need to safeguard its independence. The ERC and the Msca are established, internationally respected instruments that deliver high quality results. They require stability and autonomy and an excellence based, bottom up driven approach. Also, the EU has reached a high level of maturity. Adjustments may be needed, but they should remain limited. However, issues relating to dual use within the EU require further analysis and a common conceptualized definition of dual use in the context of R&D support. Question number two. Several questions need to be resolved. Sweden three issues that particularly are particularly important. First, we share the ambition of strengthening the EU's competitiveness. But excellence must remain the primary selection criterion. An excellent and useful results must be the outcome of all parts of the Framework programme. It is essential to avoid overlaps and to clearly define the role of each instrument. Second, we need a governance structure that ensures transparency, predictability and maintains the balance between political objectives and scientific quality. Flexibility is valuable, but it must not come at the expense of member states influence and the programme's long term predictability. Thirdly. Fp10 must continue to cover the full chain from fundamental research to application. We cannot allow shifts that eliminate pre-commercial research collaborations. This is particularly important in pillar two. We endorse a strong synergy between Horizon Europe and the ECF that channels the results of Horizon Europe's fundamental research into innovation and commercialization phases. Question number three we see a need for clearer rules on international cooperation and association of third countries to avoid risking the EU's research collaborations. I am thinking in particular about maintaining collaboration with important countries such as the UK. This collaboration strengthened our collective capacity without increasing our Vulnerability. And finally, the dual use questions, as mentioned earlier, require a common conceptualized definition of dual use in the context of R&D support so that researchers and other actors understand the conditions under which they are expected to operate. Thank you.”
EU research funding
- “Thank you, Hector. And thank you for having this discussion today on the Euro seven proposal. The overall aim of the Euro seven proposal is to improve air quality in the European Union. And as you all know, road transport is still a major contributor to air pollution, especially in our cities. Sweden [00:37:30] agrees that the current European emission standards for pollutants needs to be revised to further contribute to improving air quality and to be in line with the development of electric vehicles. We therefore welcome that. The Euro seven proposal also specifies new standards for particulate emissions from brakes and tires and new durability standards for batteries installed in the vehicles. However, for the legislation to be as effective as [00:38:00] possible, it is also important to ensure that there is a coherence between the new Euro seven requirements and the new CO2 requirements for light and heavy duty vehicles which have recently been adopted or are under negotiation. Stricter Co two requirements and the transition to zero emission vehicles primarily through electrification reduces emissions of both Co two and air pollution. It is therefore important that Euro seven does [00:38:30] not disproportionately slow down the transition to electrification. Sweden appreciates the efforts of the Spanish presidency to find a compromise proposal between member states. We believe that the amendments introduced by the Spanish presidency significantly improves the coherence between the new Euro seven requirements and the new CO2 requirements compared to the original proposal. In particular, the postponement [00:39:00] of the entry into force, simplifications of test methods and more clearly defined test conditions, as well as easing of the limit values. So to sum up, Sweden believes that the compromise proposal provides a good balance between the need for emission reduction of air pollution from road transport and the costs of investments to achieve this. We can therefore support the proposal from the Spanish presidency for a general approach. Thank you.”
Road transport environmental policy
- “Thank you very much. First, let me extend our support to Romania. This morning's events highlights the importance of a strong research in Europe that can combat future military aggression, as well as the wide range of tools used in the Twilight Zone between war and Peace. That being said, turning today to today's agenda, the shift from a planned, partial general approach to today's policy debate is a welcome one, as it underlines the importance of solving important issues in response to the key issues identified in the policy debate paper. Sweden's position is guided by one main fundamental principle the programme must continue to rest firmly on excellence. This is the foundation of Europe's research and innovation, strength and must underpin all elements of the future programme. Regarding recent formulation on strategic prioritisation, we welcome the more structured process introduced in the latest compromise where Member States contribute through Iraq. This is the step in the right direction. However, for Sweden, it is crucial that member states are giving meaningful influence over both the work programmes and the long term strategic priorities. This also relates to the need for effective coordination between Horizon Europe and European Competitiveness Fund. We must avoid overlap and ensure a coherent implementation that strengthens the overall impact of EU investments. A second key issue is concern, partnerships and implementation. We note that further clarification has been necessary regarding the selection process and implementation of partnerships.”
EU-level coordination of research agendas · Research priorities within the EU
- “Thank you chair, and many thanks also to our Italian friends for raising this important point. Sweden. Located in a rather remote part of the union with long distances within and out of our country, fully agrees on the need for a level playing field within the EU. European farmers have faced tough challenges in recent years with high costs and great market uncertainty. Requirements must be appropriate, proportionate and cost effective. But we're convinced that ambitious animal welfare legislation, coupled with good animal health and reduced need for antibiotics, is the very basis of a sustainable food system with high quality and globally competitive European products. We look forward to continued negotiations to find an appropriate pathway forward that contributes to enhanced protection for animals, increased competitiveness for our producers and that will earn and maintain the trust of our consumers and citizens. Thank you.”
EU requirements on animal welfare for farmers
- “If we look specifically to the steel sector, of course, Sweden has a large steel producing and iron ore exporting country. The overcapacity of steel is a real problem. At the same time, it is important that the proposals for steel safeguard measures do not negatively affect the competitiveness of user industries such as the automotive industry to an excessive stent. If I then turn to chemical industry, the Swedish government is positive about the action plan objectives with the increased focus on resilience, competitiveness of course, and the need to ensure continued EU production of essential chemicals. And I think we need to further analyze what measures can be taken nationally and on EU level in terms of increasing demand of these products. Last but not least, the automotive industry increasingly tough global competition, as you all know, just want to highlight we stand firm with the targets and adjustments that have been discussed right before Christmas. We've also put forward additional simplification proposals in the automotive omnibus, which strengthens electrification and competitiveness also in this sector. And last but not least, in this regards, battery supply for the automotive industry is crucial. The conditions for the development of the EU battery industry have deteriorated, have deteriorated and distortive state subsidies in third countries. Trade barriers, export restrictions and global overcapacity have skewed competitive competition in this market and that remains one of our main issues to solve. If we put money on the table, then it's better we make sure that it actually does the trick, or else it's better not to put any money on the table at all. Thank you chair.”
Chinese clean tech competition: trade barriers and investment caps vs. open market
- “Thank you chair. We will also follow on where the Danish, Dutch and Finnish ministers spoke on the new benchmarks. We need predictability and long term stability of the regulatory framework. Keeping in mind that surgical interventions directly undermine the provisions of the ETS directive, create unpredictability, and are harmful to the ETS system as a whole in the long run. We need to adhere to the methodologies as agreed, and any changes in the scope or methodologies should be revised in the context of the ETS revision. As the Dutch minister just said, and the necessary adjustments can be made for the post 2030 benchmark period for sectors where emissions are often processed, related and difficult to eliminate. We need a balanced approach. Strong climate ambition combined with industrial industrial competitiveness, affordable energy and predictable investment conditions. Thank you.”
Extension of the EU Emissions Trading Scheme
- “Thank you, Maria. And thank you, Kostas. The EU's fisheries and agriculture sectors are dependent on making the energy transition both to complete, to compete and deliver a stable food production across the EU. This is part of strengthening the sector's overall resilience and critical priority and is a critical priority. Healthy marine ecosystems and sustainable management of fish stocks, ensuring long term productivity and stability for the sector are vital to ensure the profits needed to make the transition. In addition, measures to strengthen the entire value chain are necessary to improve overall profits. Economic incentives, including support for innovation, knowledge sharing, accessible charging infrastructure and investment support where needed, are necessary. Economic policy instruments that promote the use of renewable energy, such as ETS two, can also be an important tool. When it comes to public support, it is important that available instruments are targeted to reduce emissions as much as possible. Stronger links within a wider maritime sector can also speed up technology transfer. We must reduce the gap between innovation and practical practical application. New technologies must be translated into real world use on vessels in ports as soon as they become available. Lastly, to ensure that a transition strengthens the long term sustainability of the sector, we need to reduce the sector's dependency on fossil fuels, while at the same time maintaining the balance between fishing opportunities and the capacity of the fleet. The ETP and the and its support groups have provided important insights in both the challenges and opportunities ahead. I would like to thank the Commission for its efforts in this area, and I look forward to the climate roadmap later this year. Thank you.”
Environmental regulation of fisheries
- “Thank you very much, chair. We thank the presidency for this timely initiative to discuss the upcoming EU work plan for culture. The work plans are a good way to structure our joint efforts within the field of culture. They combine strategic long term action and flexibility. This combination is important to safeguard.
In parallel with the drafting of the new work plan, we have the negotiations on the joint declaration, Europe for Culture, Culture for Europe as part of the Culture Compass. It is meant as an EU strategic framework for culture. It could inspire also the future work plans, which therefore could focus more on the actual tools.
Under the current work plan, Sweden was the first member state to have the Council Presidency, and we had a strong focus on artistic freedom. And it's good to see the effects that this has had on our joint work over the last couple of years. We were, for example, happy to see that the commission placed special focus on artistic freedom in its proposal to the joint declaration, and we look forward to seeing such commitments translated into actions in the upcoming work plan.
Together with the topics where we can be inspired by the current work plan, the upcoming work plan could, of course, also take up new ones. As also proposed in the joint declaration, the issue of innovative and alternative modes of funding could be of of particular interest.
As for actions to address the different topics, it's clear that many of the tools provided in the work plan so far have been useful for policy input, such as studies or the open method of coordination groups that have let the member states' experts' networks learn from each other and come up with useful recommendations. With this in mind, we look forward to good cooperation on outlining the upcoming EU work plan for culture. Thank you very much. Thank you very much. When I have Ireland, Charlie, the floor is yours.”
EU and national cultural identities
- “Thank you, Maria. And thank you, Kostas. The EU's fisheries and agriculture sectors are dependent on making the energy transition both to complete, to compete and deliver a stable food production across the EU. This is part of strengthening the sector's overall resilience and critical priority and is a critical priority. Healthy marine ecosystems and sustainable management of fish stocks, ensuring long term productivity and stability for the sector are vital to ensure the profits needed to make the transition. In addition, measures to strengthen the entire value chain are necessary to improve overall profits. Economic incentives, including support for innovation, knowledge sharing, accessible charging infrastructure and investment support where needed, are necessary. Economic policy instruments that promote the use of renewable energy, such as ETS two, can also be an important tool. When it comes to public support, it is important that available instruments are targeted to reduce emissions as much as possible. Stronger links within a wider maritime sector can also speed up technology transfer. We must reduce the gap between innovation and practical practical application. New technologies must be translated into real world use on vessels in ports as soon as they become available. Lastly, to ensure that a transition strengthens the long term sustainability of the sector, we need to reduce the sector's dependency on fossil fuels, while at the same time maintaining the balance between fishing opportunities and the capacity of the fleet. The ETP and the and its support groups have provided important insights in both the challenges and opportunities ahead. I would like to thank the Commission for its efforts in this area, and I look forward to the climate roadmap later this year. Thank you.”
Environmental regulation of fisheries
- “Thank you Maria. Sweden agrees with Germany that a current implementing a proposal on weighing is imposed. Disproportional, disproportional burden and cost for operators and competent authorities. Sweden sees a significant need to reduce the minimum levels of inspection benchmarks. The proposed levels could undermine the current risk based approach. Central to ensuring effective fisheries controls. The proposal would mean that mean a step backwards from progress made at EU level. It risks requiring member states to allocate a large share of control resources to low risk fisheries. We also agree with Germany on the urgent need to ensure essential simplification and improvements in the catch systems. Thank you.”
Environmental regulation of fisheries
- “Thank you, chair. And thank you, Latvia and Lithuania, for highlighting the issues and undesired practical effects on fisheries related to the new provisions on tolerance margins. Sweden welcomes the revised control regulation, but provisions developed in delegated acts or implementing implementing acts must be purposeful, proportionate and cost effective. We must not also forget that simplification should be a guiding star when we when implementing the new fisheries control framework. We need to find ways to improve and make fisheries control more efficient, without disproportionately increasing the overall administrative burden in the sector, without assessing the detailed proposals from Latvia and Lithuania. Sweden welcomes the initiative to ask the Commission to assess the situation and strive to find a swift and workable solution to different aspects of the question of margin of tolerance. The provisions should be designed to be practically implementable for the stakeholders in the fishery industry, and to further enhance fisheries control. Thank you.”
Environmental regulation of fisheries
- “Thank you Marie, and many thanks to the Commission for all your work and the presentation of your priorities of the legislative agenda for 2026. Regarding the letter of intent, I would particularly like to emphasize the following three areas a strengthened and continued support to Ukraine, a call for a more united European Union, and a goal to strengthen the competitiveness of the European Union. It's of great importance that the Commission continues to provide its unwavering support to Ukraine, and continues to put pressure on Russia. Ukraine is fighting not only for its own peace and freedom, but for the whole of Europe. Moreover, only by staying united, The EU can shape its future and its role in the world. Boosting our own security, preparedness and resilience is essential in these uncertain times. This forms the basis for a more independent, stronger and united Europe. Linked to this, we must also boost the EU competitiveness and growth agenda. The way forward is to improve the single market, scale up innovation and simplify the rules for our companies and businesses. We welcome that the Commission continues to work on this important agenda, and let us all work together to see how we can speed up this work even further, because I believe that is very important. Lastly, in the context of the upcoming F'f, we want to make it clear that EU fundings are for those who care about the rule of law, respect rule of law and fundamental democratic principles. Thank you.”
Russia-Ukraine conflict (10th term)
- “Thank you chair. And thank you for having this discussion on the action plans. Sweden finds the plans generally address the important issues for strengthening competitiveness in these sectors. While it is important to also strengthen competitiveness through simplification, as we just discussed deepening of the internal market and the removal of trade barriers. However, I'd like to maybe add a bit of nuance to the report that we heard of this morning's meeting with the Ministerial Alliance of the Energy Intensive Industries. As concerns for Sweden. If you look at the EU ETS, it is the cornerstone of the EU climate policy framework. It gives us long term predictability and stable carbon pricing and are essential components for the EU industrial transformation and competitiveness. This is I mean, it is one thing to ask for fine tuning of the Cbam or the ETS, but to call out for basically an open heart surgery of one of the most successful economic instruments that the union has risks cutting the blood flow altogether. I mean, it really, truly risks undermining the support also from the private sector for larger measurements moving forward. If the EU decides on one thing and then a few years in, then rolls back the whole economic infrastructure just because. And let's be frank, a few member states did not do their homework on time. There are competitive companies that are selling at a competitive price on the European market because they did their homework on time. I will not be punished because others did not read the timetable. Having said that, the issues raised in the Steel and Metals Action Plan are in many ways good, and we are asking to see how some of these measures can be analysed further.”
Extension of the EU Emissions Trading Scheme
- “Thank you Stephanie, and congratulations on getting to lead us all. It's mostly, uh, mostly joy and privilege. I hope Sweden is ready to work to find an agreement during your presidency. Uh, just one thing. Uh, one issue. There is no thing that is not. There is one thing that is not mentioned in the in the note. And that is the requirement for euro land bank, like Sweden and other banks to handle digital euro for euro area citizens. And I think I think we need a balanced solution that doesn't burden our banks too much. I just want to raise that issue. Thanks.”
Digital euro
- “Thank you. Chair. Dear colleagues, dear Commissioner. I would like to also welcome you to the council. I'm looking forward to constructive cooperation. And you can count on Sweden's support in all measures, but not at least on road safety. And we are proud of the work done in Sweden with Vision Zero for decades. And we are happy that this important step will be taken today. So I would like to thank the presidency for the work done and its effort to create a comprehensive directive. Sweden is supportive for further attempts aimed to improving road safety in the Union. We therefore support the general approach and in the upcoming negotiations. We believe that it is important to uphold a good balance between enhancing the effect of driving disqualifications and ensuring that the administrative burden for Member States remain proportionate. So we welcome this and support it. Thank you very much.”
Road transport environmental policy
- “Thank you, Minister Bodnar. Uh, when it comes to the proposed pre-pack proceedings, we support the objective to facilitate for the business of an insolvent debtor to be sold as an ongoing concern at the highest available market price. But that said, our overriding approach is that the harmonised rules on Pre-pack proceedings must be flexible enough to make it possible for member states to integrate the Pre-pack procedure into the national system in an efficient way. This had been said by many before. We deal with very complex issues in this file, and whether there should be an automatic transfer of executory contracts, or whether the objective of Pre-pack proceedings is best achieved otherwise. It's a complex and delicate issue, so there are several different interests to take into account here. How auditors contracts are handled in an insolvency proceeding is also closely linked to other parts of national law, for instance, contract law. So in our view, member States therefore need full flexibility. So to make it very clear, we suggest that the potential transfer of the debtor's contracts in Pre-pack proceedings is not included in the directive, but regulated by national law instead. And let me also finish on a broader note, taking into account the further discussions on this file, and just as has been said by others, Germany, Finland, Slovenia, for instance, in order to really make progress on this file, we should focus our efforts on the parts of the proposals that actually could have a positive impact on the capital markets union, such as the Pre-pack proceedings discussed here today. The proposed simplified, winding up proceedings for micro-enterprises has very little to contribute in that regard, in our view, and should be deleted from the directive. Thank you.”
EU Single Market harmonisation
- “Thank you. Theresa. Let me first express our gratitude for your words of sympathy regarding the terror attacks last night in Brussels, directed at Swedish citizens. And by the way, European citizens. Let me also express our appreciation for the [00:18:00] professionalism of the Belgian authorities and express my our full confidence in their ability to investigate last night's heinous events. Regarding today's matter, we would like to first like to thank the Spanish Presidency for all your efforts made during the negotiations of electricity market revision. The revision as a whole contains many important aspects that can improve the functioning of electricity market. [00:18:30] European households and businesses, however, should not be expected to wait any longer for these reforms to take come into action. It is therefore important that we can find a compromise here today on the remaining issue. On the one remaining issue, so that we can start negotiations with the European Parliament as soon as possible. With this said, we need to keep in mind that one of the critical objectives of the reform is to allow for support for more fossil free electricity production. The rules outlined [00:19:00] in the regulation for support schemes should promote and not prohibit new production and lifetime extensions in a consistent, fair and non distortive manner.
[00:19:10] Particularly important for Sweden is the need for flexibility around how contract values are determined. When state aid rules are already firmly in place to ensure auctions are preferred where appropriate. It would be distortive disruptive and would risk very high costs for consumers to force competitive bidding in every [00:19:30] case, given specific cases where contract negotiations are economically preferable. To be clear, an auction is no guarantee against undesirable contract values when there is only one feasible bidder. Nor should a competitive auction lead to a higher strike price and a lower so-called revenues from a two way contract for difference. This applies both to inefficiency, high or low values inefficiently high or low values. It is state aid rules that must play the role of policing optimising [00:20:00] in such cases. We also see the fair sharing of risks between consumers and producers to be important in supporting the legitimacy of today's market model. General rules, such as the proportion of kilowatt hour based redistributions to undertakings, are therefore to be preferred to arbitrary limits or permitting disproportionate payments that could risk the integrity of our internal market and compromise that fulfils this concern [00:20:30] and the concern of other member States does, however, seem to be enriched today. Thank you.”
EU approach to electricity market and prices
- “Thank you madam. We had high hopes for this last cap reform and thought that we actually would be able to simplify this time. This hasn't been the case. Instead of a result oriented policy with more flexibility for member states, we feel we have the bigger administrative burden than ever. The current demands from the Commission do not fully reflect what we agreed on, and do not permit us to simplify our national control systems to the benefit of our farmers situation. Instead of changing small errors, we should focus on what is important for achieving the objectives of the policy. Thank you.”
Agriculture (green)
- “Thank you. Jacob. A competitive and diversified protein supply chain is essential part of a resilient food system. In 2017, the Swedish parliament adopted a national food strategy aimed at increasing food production in a sustainable manner. As part of this strategy, we have launched a national research programme for food where we allocated funded funding for research and innovation, including on how plant based proteins can be used. We have also established a competence Centre for Plant Breeding, which has received dedicated funding to focus specifically, specifically on protein. Through plant breeding and innovation, we can enhance both competitiveness and sustainability in the long term. It is important that new knowledge and innovations are widely shared. Therefore, I see great value in strengthening research collaboration at EU level. I believe that our joint research and innovation efforts must be open to a broad range of innovative solutions suitable for different farming systems across the European Union. When it comes to EU level measures, I would like to emphasize the importance of legislation that enables innovation and development. In this context, it's crucial that new regulation on new genomic techniques for plants is adopted as soon as possible, as it will allow new plant varieties to reach the market. Furthermore, we need rules that enable small companies to bring new varieties to the market. This is important for all our farmers. We welcome the Commission's focus on these issues and the renewed attention to preparedness in the light of the current geopolitical situation. Finally, sustainability must be addressed in all its dimensions environmental, economic and social. In order to ensure truly resilient and future proof food system. Thank you.”
New Genomic Techniques
- “Thank you. Chair, I would start to thank you and your team in the presidency for all your efforts to find a compromise text. Combating child sexual abuse and sexual exploitation of children are very important issues for Sweden, and we therefore welcome the revision of this directive, even if we acknowledge the need for a balanced approach. Sweden cannot accept the text that has been put forward today. The most critical issue for Sweden in the negotiations has been to ensure that children who have reached the age of sexual consent are provided with a comprehensive and robust legal protection against unwanted sexual activities. However, the text on consent is now not ambitious enough for us. Essential parts of the text have been deleted or moved from the operative part into recital. For example, we are seriously troubled by the inability to agree among us on the fact that sleeping or drugged children cannot give consent, or that past sexual behavior is irrelevant to the assessment of whether consent has been given or not. In our mind, it should be self-evident in a modern society that sexual acts must be voluntary to be legal. Consent must always be given to engage in sexual activity. So because of this, we will not be able to support the text and will therefore abstain from voting. Finally, I would like to refer to the statement made by Sweden and six other member States in which we all regret the position that the majority of the Member States has taken on the critical issue of consent. Thank you.”
- “Thank you. Dear colleagues, EU must set a credible path towards climate neutrality by 2050 with strengthened competitiveness. Sweden supports a 2040 target that enables such a pathway in a socioeconomically efficient way based on the best available science and in line with 1.5 degrees. Sweden has a national 2045 net zero target and the EU climate policy framework supporting a 2040 target will be an instrumental also for our national targets. We will therefore analyse the commission's recommendation in this light. I note that the commission's recommendation seems to improve the conditions to implement our long-term national target in a socioeconomically efficient way, and we intend to analyse this further in the process of forming our position on the specific target level. Climate transition must be combined with economic growth underpinned by public support. This is only possible if the standard of living for households and companies does not stagnate the framework. After 2030 needs to have a strong focus on cost efficiency, competitiveness, and reduced level of regulatory detail. EU emissions trading systems should continue to be at the heart of eus climate policy and be broadened to include more fossil activities. If the ESR regulation is to remain up to 2030, we need to see a significantly increased convergence between member states. A sustainable bioeconomy and a circular economy are also key elements in an efficient climate policy. Forests contribute with significant climate benefits, both through substitution and as a carbon sink. An active forestry with a high growth and an increased use of renewable materials provides the highest long-term climate benefits. It is crucial that the Post 2030 framework promotes a sustainable and growing economy. The lulu Sea of Regulations role post 2030 needs to be analysed carefully, especially the substantial uncertainties that surround the sector.
We must avoid distorted competition in the food production market and emissions leaking. Challenges in achieving emission reductions within agriculture must be given particular attention and it must not inhibit food production within the eu. Lastly, technological development and increased production of fossil free electricity is a precondition for climate transition. And increased focus on competitiveness means that the climate targets must be combined with a technologically neutral energy policy where all fossil free alternatives are treated equally and the regulatory detail is reduced. Technologies for negative emissions, such as Bio CCS, and DAX are important to reach the climate targets and should be incentivized. Finally, I want to emphasise that EU 2040 target and the NDCs in light with an ambitious climate policy can enable others to follow suit in a time where more global ambition on climate change is much needed. Thank you.”
Climate efforts
- “Our preliminary, very conservative estimates indicate an increase of at least 60% and possibly even a doubling. This is not possible for us. That's why we believe that the MFF volume must remain around 1% of GNP. And as we have said many times before, renewed NI corrections will also be necessary in a final agreement and we welcome that they are now mentioned in the negotiation box. We reject the argument that the modernised MFF makes NI corrections Is redundant, our net position remains severely unbalanced and deteriorates further due to the increased volume. We do not question our role as net contributor, but this is about fair burden sharing and making sure that excessive imbalances are compensated. The revenue side and the expenditure side must be seen together in this respect. Let me therefore take also a moment to address some of the concerns raised by other Member States regarding the inclusion of the rebates in the negotiation box. Corrections represent the crucial element in the broader conversation about volume structure and modernisation. It is therefore only natural that they have now been included as an option in the box. This enables us to have a comprehensive discussion covering all aspects. Number three, we oppose all forms of new common borrowing, including loan for loan arrangements.”
Size of EU budget
- “Thank you Max. So these comments will be in addition to the ones I made when we had this discussion last. Um, first of all, uh, we clearly welcome work to remove barriers in order to ensure that that our capital markets become more integrated at the same time. It is important to maintain well-functioning national markets that exist today. And a key part for that, for us, is to keep the national influence, both in supervision and governance. And I have three proposals, concrete proposals to achieve this. The first one is to remove the group criteria for companies that would fall under my supervision. And let me elaborate a little bit on this. So in my country, we have three SME growth markets, one of which fall under the main market. Um these SME growth markets do IPO. So primary listings for for SMEs. And these companies very often graduate to the main market once they grow, which is a good sort of journey for them. Uh, and also to be concrete on this, uh, looking at the EU growth prospectuses. So, so the, the, the sort of A little bit lighter regime for SMEs to do prospectuses. Sweden actually accounts for 57% of those in the EU.”
EU Single Market harmonisation
- “Thank you. Sweden welcomes France's initiative. We believe that preserving the functioning and the internal market, and increasing the level playing field in the EU is very important. An expanded EU wide mandatory labeling is therefore preferable to national mandatory measures. Our consumers should have access to appropriate and relevant food information so that they can make conscious decisions on what to buy. We in Sweden have recently implemented rules on mandatory origin labelling for meat in restaurants to increase this consumer possibility. But we'd like to also support a more developed system on the EU level. Thank you.”
Food labelling harmonisation at EU level
- “Thank you. Colleagues the effect of climate change such as floods, heatwaves, forest fires and droughts are [00:26:30] already now having a serious impact on the health and well-being of people, as well on ecosystems and economics. The EU climate risk assessment gives us a better understanding of the risks that EU is facing, and of the actions that need to be taken at EU and national level to address those risks. In this regard, the Swedish government decided on a new National Strategy and Action Plan on Climate Adaptation on March the 14th. The strategy [00:27:00] defines Sweden's work on climate adaptation for the next five years. We will be happy to engage with the Commission and other member States to share insights and knowledge on this important topic on the 2040 climate target. Let me first say that I'm glad to see that the process for adopting a target is now underway. Uh, 20 uh, and EU 2040 target and NDC, in line with an ambitious climate policy, can enable others [00:27:30] to follow suit. The EU is and should continue to be a central actor for both addressing emissions within the union, as well as influencing other large emitters. International collaboration, exchange of knowledge, free trade are all central elements for a successful transition globally. We must ensure that the EU sets out a credible path towards climate neutrality 2050. Therefore, we want to see a 2040 target and enables such [00:28:00] a pathway in a socio economic efficient way based on the best available science and in line with one and a half degrees. We are still analysing the Commission's communication, and we look forward to adopt and present a position to the specific target level in due time.
Further, we think it's important that the regulatory framework is designed in a way that entails public support and acceptable consequences for households and companies. The new target should constitute a driving force for new jobs, growth [00:28:30] and strengthened competitiveness within the EU and its member states. The climate transition can only succeed if it takes place within a growing economy where prosperity increases. Also, it's the only way to show the lead for other regions and large emitters around the world. The EU has to show that the climate transition is compatible with the growing economy and increasing prosperity. Colleagues, let me conclude with [00:29:00] a few words on the transition post 2030. Access to increased amounts of fossil free energy will be key, not least as an enabling condition for the industry's transition. In this regard, we welcome that the Commission points also at nuclear energy as a technology that will play an important role. Negative emissions such as biochar, a sustainable bio economy and measures for circular economy are important elements in realising the target. The framework post 2030 should be designed to both enable [00:29:30] an active and sustainable forest management, and allow for member states to account for negative emissions, both from bio X and direct air capture. Finally, the climate transition must take place throughout the entire Union. We want to see a post 2030 framework with increased convergence between member states towards 2040. Focus should be on cost efficient policy instruments such as emissions trading. We look forward to taking these discussions further to enable a transition [00:30:00] to climate neutrality by 2050 that reinforces growth and competitiveness. Thank you.”
Climate efforts
- “Thank you chair. And thank you for having this discussion on the action plans. Sweden finds the plans generally address the important issues for strengthening competitiveness in these sectors. While it is important to also strengthen competitiveness through simplification, as we just discussed deepening of the internal market and the removal of trade barriers. However, I'd like to maybe add a bit of nuance to the report that we heard of this morning's meeting with the Ministerial Alliance of the Energy Intensive Industries. As concerns for Sweden. If you look at the EU ETS, it is the cornerstone of the EU climate policy framework. It gives us long term predictability and stable carbon pricing and are essential components for the EU industrial transformation and competitiveness. This is I mean, it is one thing to ask for fine tuning of the Cbam or the ETS, but to call out for basically an open heart surgery of one of the most successful economic instruments that the union has risks cutting the blood flow altogether. I mean, it really, truly risks undermining the support also from the private sector for larger measurements moving forward. If the EU decides on one thing and then a few years in, then rolls back the whole economic infrastructure just because. And let's be frank, a few member states did not do their homework on time. There are competitive companies that are selling at a competitive price on the European market because they did their homework on time. I will not be punished because others did not read the timetable. Having said that, the issues raised in the Steel and Metals Action Plan are in many ways good, and we are asking to see how some of these measures can be analysed further.”
Extension of the EU Emissions Trading Scheme
- “Thank you Istvan. Sweden would like to thank the Hungarian presidency for the update on the progress regarding the on the protection of animals Is during transport. An update on the to the current transport regulation is essential to ensure good, good animal welfare during transport, while also achieving greater harmonisation and fairer competitive conditions within the union. We look forward to the continued work on the regulation during the Polish Presidency. Finally, I would like to briefly mention our additional item on animal welfare, which will be addressed later today. Unfortunately, I have to leave the meeting before then, but I would like to emphasize the importance of strengthening animal welfare in the European Union, and I hope we'll soon see the promised proposals.”
EU requirements on animal welfare for farmers
- “Thank you, chairman, and thank you for the presentation. Thank [00:05:30] you for putting this on the agenda and for organising the conference in January. In our long term, uh, attempts to achieve a sustainable food system, ambitious animal welfare, uh, regulations are an essential part. This is something that we support in all the areas promised by the Commission. [00:06:00] We would like to encourage the Commission to fully implement the reforms and, uh, and, uh, uh, address the review as soon as possible. Thank you.”
EU requirements on animal welfare for farmers
- “Thank you president. And first of all, I would like to welcome you, Oscar, to this group of colleagues. We're happy to have you here. And I would like to thank you and the Spanish presidency for your hard work on these files. And we all recognize the road safety. And for Sweden, that is [00:28:30] a crucial part of the work of when we're discussing transport and infrastructure issues. So I'm happy to hear all the support to improve the road safety and that we need to do that across the union. I'm confident that the implementation of the CB directive, as well as the driving license directive, will help increase the safety on our roads and therefore Sweden supports the adoption of the general approaches on both these files as proposed. I would like to convey [00:29:00] my gratitude to the presidency for the work done on the revision of the driving License directive. We are pleased to see the flexibility when it comes to health requirements. Both the possibility to only require a self-assessment when you apply for a driving licence for the first time, as well as for the optionality regarding checks for elder drivers. We are also pleased that measures have been taken to ensure the mobility of youth, which is an extremely important issue, especially in the rural [00:29:30] areas of Sweden. We also appreciate the flexibility introduced for the accompanied driving schemes, such as domestic option to include C1 and C licenses. We would like to extend the thank you for the positive cooperation in this file, not least when it comes to the issues around assessment of health. We believe that this revision, with measures such as a probationary period, will increase road safety and make it easier for EU citizens to move freely around [00:30:00] the Union. And we have very good experience from Sweden when it comes to probationary periods. Sweden also appreciates the work done by the presidency. With the revision of the driving and rest time rules, we support the general approach and welcomes these more flexible rules as they are better suited for the occasional passenger transport sector. However, for the sake of ensuring road safety, Sweden would have preferred that more flexible rules on the distribution of brakes would have been limited [00:30:30] to driving during daytime, due to the risks related to night work. Being able to carry out checks and enforce the rules is important, of course, but nonetheless Sweden would have preferred less burdensome rules concerning the journey forms. But with that said, we support the adoption of this general approaches and I will thank you for your hard work to achieve this. Thank you.”
Driving licences
- “Thank you. I'd like to thank the Spanish presidency for the hard work that they've put into the proposal to try and make progress. We welcome what has been done. We want a rapid procedure to get this legislation through. We want to see a European Union, which is sustainable but also competitive with the rapid deployment of these new technologies, which will improve the level of EU's competitiveness. Our national experts and Efsa have told us that these technologies are safe for the environment, safe for our health, and we think that this is a positive [00:24:00] move forward. Are an important instrument. We want European and Swedish industries to be able to benefit from NGOs to create new plant species. We think that organic farming can decide whether they for themselves, whether they should use one plants or not. And that would resolve a lot of issues. If plants are considered to be conventional equivalent to conventional plants, then the treatment should [00:24:30] also be equivalent. Next year we will have a new parliament and so so as not to lose an entire year. We want to see this legislation implemented ASAP. We'll be as constructive as we can.”
New Genomic Techniques
- “Thank you chair. And first, thank you very much to the Commission for putting EU's bioeconomy strategy on today's agenda. I don't know about the rest of the fine, ladies and gentlemen. Well, at least a lot of gentlemen in this room. Sometimes I'm not going to say when, um, at some point in time in my career as a politician, I thought bioeconomy. That sounds like a lot of humbug. As we say in Swedish, it sounds like some sort of flower power strategy, and I've come to understand it's very much a matter of money. It's very much a matter of economic growth. It's very much a matter of our industry. It's very much a matter of job opportunities for our citizens. And of course, showing that it is possible to solve what seems for, for some, an impossible equation which we know it is not to combine a decrease in emissions with increased economic growth. So this is the reason why this has become somewhat of a new favorite topic of mine. What we're asking is to keep on pushing this. We welcome the strategy of. Of course, we have to avoid adding layers of detailed rules, administrative burdens, or new regulations on how biomass may be utilized. The industry needs long term, stable and predictable conditions, and this is the reason why we're pushing rather to go with prioritizing efficient implementation of existing legislation rather than new and continued than are our simplification efforts, of course, which there is a high support for in this room. I think we also need to highlight the need for faster market access while then maintaining quality in the permitting procedures. And just finally, we truly welcome that. The Commission builds on the successful research and innovation work already done and now aim to scale up innovation and investments, and that we start seeing this as an important part for for our for our industries and for a more job creating Europe. Thank you chair.”
EU support for bioeconomic applications
- “Thank you chair. And first, thank you very much to the Commission for putting EU's bioeconomy strategy on today's agenda. I don't know about the rest of the fine, ladies and gentlemen. Well, at least a lot of gentlemen in this room. Sometimes I'm not going to say when, um, at some point in time in my career as a politician, I thought bioeconomy. That sounds like a lot of humbug. As we say in Swedish, it sounds like some sort of flower power strategy, and I've come to understand it's very much a matter of money. It's very much a matter of economic growth. It's very much a matter of our industry. It's very much a matter of job opportunities for our citizens. And of course, showing that it is possible to solve what seems for, for some, an impossible equation which we know it is not to combine a decrease in emissions with increased economic growth. So this is the reason why this has become somewhat of a new favorite topic of mine. What we're asking is to keep on pushing this. We welcome the strategy of. Of course, we have to avoid adding layers of detailed rules, administrative burdens, or new regulations on how biomass may be utilized. The industry needs long term, stable and predictable conditions, and this is the reason why we're pushing rather to go with prioritizing efficient implementation of existing legislation rather than new and continued than are our simplification efforts, of course, which there is a high support for in this room. I think we also need to highlight the need for faster market access while then maintaining quality in the permitting procedures. And just finally, we truly welcome that. The Commission builds on the successful research and innovation work already done and now aim to scale up innovation and investments, and that we start seeing this as an important part for for our for our industries and for a more job creating Europe. Thank you chair.”
EU support for bioeconomic applications
- “Thank you. Chair. We would also like to thank France for bringing up this important topic. We agree that ultra fast fashion products, primarily from outside the EU, lead to problems for the climate, for the environment and our competitiveness. We are working hard in Sweden to ensure that ultra fast fashion platforms comply with EU rules, and we fully agree that measures in adopted EU legislation should be implemented swiftly and we support the Commission in this work. Thank you.”
"Buy European" provisions
- “Thank you chair. And thank you for having this discussion on the action plans. Sweden finds the plans generally address the important issues for strengthening competitiveness in these sectors. While it is important to also strengthen competitiveness through simplification, as we just discussed deepening of the internal market and the removal of trade barriers. However, I'd like to maybe add a bit of nuance to the report that we heard of this morning's meeting with the Ministerial Alliance of the Energy Intensive Industries. As concerns for Sweden. If you look at the EU ETS, it is the cornerstone of the EU climate policy framework. It gives us long term predictability and stable carbon pricing and are essential components for the EU industrial transformation and competitiveness. This is I mean, it is one thing to ask for fine tuning of the Cbam or the ETS, but to call out for basically an open heart surgery of one of the most successful economic instruments that the union has risks cutting the blood flow altogether. I mean, it really, truly risks undermining the support also from the private sector for larger measurements moving forward. If the EU decides on one thing and then a few years in, then rolls back the whole economic infrastructure just because. And let's be frank, a few member states did not do their homework on time. There are competitive companies that are selling at a competitive price on the European market because they did their homework on time. I will not be punished because others did not read the timetable. Having said that, the issues raised in the Steel and Metals Action Plan are in many ways good, and we are asking to see how some of these measures can be analysed further.”
Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM)
- “But thank you, Madam President. Dear chair, Commissioner, ministers, colleagues, first, I would like to thank the presidency for proposing this very important Portant topic for today's debate. Protecting children and young people on the internet is one of the great challenges of our time. And let me be clear. We are about to lose an entire generation to endless scrolling and deep rabbit holes. In addition, young people also risk being exposed to manipulation, threats, hatred, violence, and sexual violence and harassment online. Europe must come together to save our children and young people. We must show that the health and safety of our children and youth is non-negotiable. We need to target both the negative impact that the digital development has on young people in terms of effects on health and wellbeing, as well as risks of being exposed to manipulation, threats, hate or violence online. It is also important to take into account that certain groups are more exposed than others. And here I would like to emphasize the critical need for effective measures to combat the alarming issue of sexual harassment and violence and grooming against all young people, particularly girls. A balanced use of digital media needs to be promoted among young people, together with measures aiming to protect young people online and strengthen their resilience.”
Safety features & content control for child protection online
- “Thank you, Chair and Damianos and the commission there. Don, if you give me three more minutes, I'll tell you all of the things I find great about the grid package. But I hope the coffee is strong because I'm here on a mission. I have five points to make today, and the first one is we've done our homework, like really in Swedish. You have a saying that it's called the good girl. Well, good girl is about to go bad. I can tell you today because we've created internal bidding zones. We are the largest per capita net exporter of clean energy and electricity in the EU, and our electricity is almost 100% fossil free. And despite these achievements, we are now on the losing end that I mean, what signal does that send? That's simply unacceptable. Secondly, we have always been the EU's and I would say the commission's best friend, if I may say so, for decades and across all different government majorities, we have been the EU's main, both cheerleader and fan club all at once. But now I'm asking for a favor. I need you to be our friend. Um. And thirdly, and I have said this before, I'm deeply concerned with the current direction of the EU energy policy specifically. Then when it comes to the great package. And I want to emphasize this because I think our situations differ from many others.”
EU approach to electricity market and prices
- “Thank you very much, chair. And thank you also to the Commissioner for the information. Simplification is also important to us, and we support the Commission in this agenda. I would just like also to agree with Ireland and others who have pointed to the energy performance of buildings, which we also think can be simplified to support competitiveness and to reduce burdens on households without compromising on decarbonisation goals. We've also submitted proposals to the Commission as regards reducing excessive regulation on solar energy, on charging infrastructure and technical systems. Thank you.”
Energy (green transition)
- “Thank you. Marilena, let me start by giving you a few words on our most important positions on the MFF. The volume of the commission proposal is significantly too high. The EU budget as a share of GNI should continue to be approximately 1% under the current proposal. Sweden's contribution would rise significantly by around 80%. In real terms, that is simply unrealistic. We fully support a modern, streamlined budget that allows flexibility to address unforeseen challenges as well as the strengthened emphasis on security, defence and competitiveness. We oppose all forms of new common borrowing, including loan for loan arrangements, with the exception of support to Ukraine. On the revenue side, we see no need for new own resources. The NI component works well, although there will be need for a correction mechanism for fair burden sharing. But ultimately we need to focus on the expenditure side where we need to do priorities just as we do on a member state level. When it comes to governance, a more flexible EU budget requires modifications and adjustments of the governance arrangements. At the same time, it's crucial that such reforms must preserve the institutional balance and ensure that the Council and the Member States retain influence over the direction and implementation of the budget. Sweden is very positive towards the increased flexibility proposed by the Commission. Greater flexibility can help the EU respond more efficiently to emerging challenges and evolving priorities counter the pressure for a mid-term review. However, this increased flexibility must be purely horizontal. That means flexibility within the ceilings rather than instruments outside the ceilings, or to new loan financed mechanisms, which we firmly oppose. A higher degree of flexibility gives the annual budget negotiations a greater political importance and impact. It's therefore essential to find ways to safeguard the strategic role of the council and to ensure that Member States are given sufficient time to examine and discuss the commission's proposal for the annual budget, for example. Finally, strong governance also means ensuring that all member States fully respect our common values when receiving EU funding, EU funds must only be disbursed to member states that uphold the rule of law and respect the Charter of Fundamental Rights. Thank you.”
Size of EU budget
- “For this is why if the direction does not change, we're going to have to consider and reconsider Sweden's role in the energy union. I don't say this lightly. I'm a warm, dedicated friend of the European Union, but we will then have to investigate all viable national measures to protect Swedish citizens and companies. And this includes a moratorium for new interconnections to continental Europe and for renewal of existing interconnections. And we are prepared with harsher and further actions apart from that. Fifthly, we propose a different solution. The scope of how these revenues may be used must be broadened, and that decision must rest solely with the Member States and their competent authorities. It is not a matter for EU legislation to determine. Looking forward, I propose a new focus. Energy system. Planning must be close to the energy consumption as possible and focus on where the demand is. A bottom up approach must be the guiding principle. Equally important is protection and resilience and to address the need for repairs. And we've heard many of my colleagues ask for this as well. All member states must take their responsibility to phase out and replace fossil based electricity production with fossil free. The chaos in the Middle East once again is a reminder of this before our electricity markets can be further integrated. Thank you.”
EU energy infrastructure integration
- “Their colleagues, their executive vice president. Let me first warmly congratulate you, Hanna, on your appointment. You have an important task ahead of you. And Sweden is really looking forward to working with you and with the new commission in delivering on the priorities for the Union so warmly. Congratulations. I would like to thank the presidency as well for his efforts on the Council conclusions and the Member States and the Commission for Constructive Discussions. Sweden welcomes the conclusions. It is especially important that they underscore the need of simplification for businesses, strengthening innovation and research, and Europe's long term competitiveness and reducing trade barriers. Thorough analysis and impact assessment are now needed to identify how to reduce regulatory burden and develop the regulatory framework. It is, moreover, important to continue to harmonise the implementation of the framework, and Sweden is looking forward to continuing constructive discussions on these important topics. Thank you.”
Energy (green transition)
- “Speaking more specifically on European preference, Sweden would like to highlight two key aspects. Firstly, Sweden generally believes that measures concerning union origin should be exceptions and established with caution. Union origin requirements can be justified to counter strategic high risk dependencies where the diversification through trade has been assessed as insufficient. Sweden believed that the definition of union origin should include countries that the EU has a free trade agreement with as a starting point to safeguard the EU's trade relations. Second, Sweden would also like to underline that the Council must work together to produce a regulation that has the intended effect. Otherwise, the EU will be less credible as a legislator to be effective. Implementation in practice and predictability are key. New measures should avoid creating overlapping structures or disproportionate burdens. My last point here is on foreign direct investment. The EU should support foreign direct investments, but also consider EU political realities of today. Sweden's starting point is that the EU should continue to be an attractive market for investments, and requirements should be targeted to specific cases. Sweden sees that some EU harmonization in this area is beneficial. Thank you.”
EU policy on screening foreign investment in strategic sectors and critical infrastructure
- “So our SME, local SME market is very vivid. And I would argue that we need to keep the local knowledge of these markets that are truly local. Secondly, looking at at ESMA, we would like to ensure that the ESMA Board of Governance, sorry, Board of Supervisors has a stronger role in governance and also that the Executive Board members both reflect and have experience from important financial markets in the Union. This is exceptionally important to us, and the way I see it is that those of us with bigger capital markets, we have higher stakes in this. So what we're talking about that this should be reflected in the executive board. I'm talking about fair representation. That's what I'm talking about. Thirdly, on the cooperation between asthma and the national competent authorities, we would like to see that clearly defined in the legal texts. So the forms of cooperation specify what the the arrangements are and what what it should should cover. And lastly, just a reminder. So we are talking about integrating our capital markets. Let's not forget that we need to make our capital markets bigger. And for that we have other measures that we have talked about before. Thank you.”
Financial regulation
- “Older farmers still play an important role in food production, and in some areas the prospects of generational generational renewal are limited. Again, targeting active farmers is key. As regards to coupled support, this can be an important tool for specific sectors and regions. But in the light of the need for market orientation, it is still important to only pay coupled support in cases where it is strongly motivated. To conclude on targeting support. I would like to express my appreciation for the Cap toolbox as a whole. That gives us good opportunities for targeted support to meet the goals of the cap. Concerning the second question on national preparedness reserves, Sweden is working now to establish such reserves. Initially focusing on cereals and key inputs, these reserves should serve as our ultimate insurance used only in severe crisis. It is crucial to minimize market impact during the build up, as also emphasized by the Commission. Finally, in response to the Italian AOB. Sweden sees opportunities for increased flexibility and will work to preserve these elements. At the same time, we agree on the importance of safeguarding a common agricultural policy and ensuring fair competition and market orientation. Thank you.”
Direct payments to farmers (pillar 1)
- “These are important issues for ensuring efficiency, transparency and strong governance. At the same time, Sweden has concerns regarding the proposed central financial management and does not support moving towards such an approach. Third, on widening participation, we understand and support the objective of strengthening participation across the Union, including Estonia's proposal on advancing support for transition countries and call for an effective model to guide the path to excellence. However, measures must remain well targeted and clearly delimited within pillar four and must not affect the selection criteria in other parts of the programme. While existing effective tools can be acknowledged, we do not see a need for mentioning new ones in the regulations. Excellence must remain the guiding principle. Finally, let me briefly touch on bottom up collaborative research and innovation. Sweden sees several merit in furthering strengthening bottom up approaches with a focus on excellence and truly strategic thematic areas for Europe. However, at this point, Sweden prefers to make full use of existing instruments before creating new ones. To conclude, Dear Chair, Sweden stands ready to engage constructively to reach an agreement under your guidance. For us, the key is clear a programme firmly based on excellence, with effective governance and broad participation without compromising quality. Thank you.”
EU-level coordination of research agendas
- “Yes. Thank you, chair, and thank you, commissioner. Sweden continues to support the ambition of the proposal to strengthen children's rights and provide legal certainty for families in the EU. At the same time, the proposal gives rise to important issues that need careful deliberations. The re regulation needs to respond to actual needs and lay down rules that are clear and fit for purpose. While we appreciate the progress that has been made in the negotiations, there is more work to be done. Several issues remain to resolve. Among these are the concerns regarding parenthood following surrogacy, which Sweden and other member states raised in the policy debate held in the council in 2024. At this point, we're unwilling to accentuate certain elements of the proposals as being more important than others that would necessarily entail other important aspects being downplayed. Rather, the ambition should be a regulation that is set satisfactory in a as a whole. The way to reach such result is to continue work on the technical level in a focused effort to reach a stable text. Sweden intends to do its part to achieve this goal and is open to considering solutions that address the concerns which we have raised. Thank you.”
Regulation of surrogate pregnancy
- “Thank you Chair. Thank you to Denmark for raising this very important issue on simplification of regulation. Sweden has welcomed the legislation on new genomic techniques for plants, and we think it can contribute to a competitive and sustainable eu. We had hoped to have reached further than we have in the negotiations, but we will continue to work for a proportionate legislation with legal certainties that can result in new plant species of the market. Thank you.”
New Genomic Techniques
- “Thank you chairman. Thank you Luis. First of all, I would like to thank the Spanish [00:42:30] presidency for all the hard work that has gone in to these negotiations. It's important legislation which can make a contribution to a competitive and sustainable EU with alternative solutions for food production and farming. Now we have a time window now before the parliamentary elections to get this legislation [00:43:00] up and running quite quickly. So that would help us to give our researchers and businesses a chance to. Be able to meet the challenges of a changed climate in Europe and not lose too much competitiveness. The compromise proposal, um, maintains the main parts of the commission's proposal, but it's now a clearer text. It's no surprise that we would have preferred [00:43:30] the Commission's proposal to be more ambitious, and we know that others wanted to take the proposal in the opposite direction. The Commission's proposal, as in itself, was already a compromise. So we've all made concessions with the aim of pushing these discussions forwards. Sweden has said that we can accept the so-called opt out process for NT two plants. [00:44:00] I regret that organic farmers will not be able to make use of NT one plants. I think that those plants could be a good tool for the future in environmental and organic farming. I'm hoping that we'll be able to resolve the remaining problems, and we support the proposal and hope that this compromise proposal can be adopted. Thank you.”
New Genomic Techniques
- “Thank you very much and good morning. And this regulation on CO2 standards for cars and vans has been a central instrument of the EU's climate policy since 2008 2009. From the beginning, the framework rests on same. The same of some important principles fair competition between manufacturers and a clear division of responsibility, which means that vehicle manufacturers obligations are kept separate from those of the fuel suppliers. These principles have served European industry well by providing clarity and stability. With the proposal before us, however, I see a risk that we now are undermining them. While the flexibility proposed is well intended, the proposed measures risk penalizing companies that have already invested heavily in zero emissions technology, which is more concerning. What is more concerning is that the proposal, which is flexibility, creates creates uncertainty, thereby making long term industrial planning more complicated. With that, the EU may set out on a path that weakens our Competitiveness. Perhaps not in 2 or 3 years, but over time. Global competition is fierce as our automotive industry is painfully aware of. But if the EU slows down the pace of electrification, we. We are deemed to find ourselves in an even weaker position in 2035.”
2035 ICE phase-out: strict zero-emission target vs. flexibility for carmakers · Road transport environmental policy
- “Thank you, Cher, and thank you for having this discussion today. Sweden welcomes the proposal and is very pleased that the commission has presented an important step in the work to strengthen EU's competitiveness and to create a best better business environment.
We see many positive elements in the proposal such as the possibility of an efficient registration procedure and the possibility for the EU ink companies to have a multiple vote share structure. A multiple vote share structure is something which has existed for a long time in Sweden, and it has proven to be beneficial for the companies as well as investors.
Sweden is also open to the proposal of not requiring a minimum capital for the EU Inc. Companies. However, such an arrangement needs to be combined with an adequate protection for the creditors of the company.
When it comes to the possibility for a company to grow, access to capital is crucial. It is therefore of importance that the EU ink companies can access the capital markets, which we noticed the proposal does not prevent.
While flexibility and efficiency should be a cornerstone in the regulatory framework, it is at the same time important that the EU ink company cannot be used for legal purposes or misused to circumvent legislation in other areas.
Furthermore, it is important to clarify that the regulatory framework must not prevent or alter the application of legal rules that fall outside of the scope of the proposal such as labor law.
We also have doubts when it comes to having specific rules for winding up insolvent EU ink companies as part of the proposal.
As regards the provision providing for a harmonized timing of taxation for certain employee stock options, it can be noted that the proposal here deviates from how Sweden generally taxes employee stock options.
Sweden is in principle opposed to increased harmonization of taxes at EU level, in particular in the area of direct taxation. Thank you.”
Overall simplification of regulation in the EU
- “Thank you, dear presidency. Thank you for inviting us to this. Discuss this important topic. And in addressing question number one, we believe that the highest scientific quality of research is the foundation on which enterprises and public actors want to and can valorize knowledge. But a major challenge lies in bridging the gap between research and its [00:38:30] practical application in industry. More effective methods are necessary to translate research findings into commercial products and services. Integrating knowledge and innovations across different sectors is crucial. This is includes ensuring researchers mobility, fair incentives for the exploitation of high quality data, and creating synergies between [00:39:00] academia, industry and the public sector. Current European financial instruments for research and innovation can harmonize better with each other and with the single market for capital. Knowledge intensive enterprises need a financial stability beyond venture capital to ensure their resilience over time. Digitalization and new technologies [00:39:30] offer new market opportunities and the need for economic, social and environmental sustainability as well as for societal benefit have increased. At the same time, the value chains for knowledge have become more complex and the number of channels and tools for knowledge utilization have multiplied. Aligning the European and national policies and programs within the European [00:40:00] Research Area to ensure free circulation of researchers and knowledge will increase the potential of knowledge valorization in our countries and in our union.
Moving towards the last question, the higher education institutions in Sweden are bound by law to collaborate with the surrounding community, which, for example, entails that their knowledge and expertise bring benefit [00:40:30] to society. Sweden has taken measures to ensure continuity in the national efforts to make research data as open as possible, and that they adhere to fair principles. Promoting open science and open innovation can facilitate more effective sharing, sharing of research data, accelerating knowledge utilization, and promoting societal benefit. It [00:41:00] is important to support effective knowledge valorization by, for example, ensuring mobility of researchers between the academia and the surrounding community, including the industry. The Swedish government is currently looking into measures aimed at encouraging joint posts where academics can be employed partly by universities and partly by other employees, such as in industrial enterprises. Simplifying [00:41:30] the condition for knowledge valorization, and thereby better use of high quality research help actors embrace the green transition and digital transformation. This can help strengthen the European competitiveness. Thank you.”
Research priorities within the EU
- “Thank you, President. We have been looking forward to this new legislative proposal on genomic techniques. We are still examining this. But having had a look at this, we are positive on this. And our preliminary conclusion is that this is very promising in our preliminary analysis. We think that this has potential [00:14:30] to contribute to to contribute to a more sustainable, resilient food system. And the proposal gives researchers and plant breeders a new tool in their toolbox. Now, on your question on which aspects are particularly important for us, we'd like to emphasize that this should be seen as a whole. All of this fits together. One particularly positive aspect, though, is that the proposal takes [00:15:00] particular account of products properties as opposed to the technique which has been used. This part of the proposal supports the idea of equivalent products being dealt with in the same way, regardless of the methods which have been used to produce them. So we think that this is a clever, well motivated approach and to a larger extent that this will contribute to eliminating a discriminatory [00:15:30] effect. So we look forward to our continued work on this important proposal and you have our full support in this proposed approach. Thank you.”
New Genomic Techniques
- “Thank you. President. Commissioner. Distinguished colleagues, I would, first of all, like to express our sincere appreciation to the Danish presidency for setting a strong and ambitious tone in launching the negotiation on the next horizon. Europe. Your leadership has laid an impressive foundation for the work ahead. Europe faces a decisive moment. Global competition is intensifying and a digital and green transition cannot wait. Research and innovation are not optional. They are the very foundation for the future of Europe. Sweden insists that excellence must remain the guiding principle of the Framework Programme. We are concerned that current negotiations of the Next Framework Programme risk deviating too far from this principle. Excellence cannot be compromised. Funding must be efficient, transparent and trustworthy, ensuring a balanced mix of basic research, applied research and innovation. Also, reaching the 3% R&D investment target requires strong national commitments. World class research infrastructures are strategic assets that maximize EU funding and deliver tangible impact. The European Spallation Source is a prime example in regards to question number two, Europe must lead and lead decisively in areas such as artificial intelligence, quantum technologies, advanced materials and biotechnology. Leadership and coordination are essential. They are the key to attracting private investments and accelerating innovation. Large scale public private partnerships must drive this effort at the same time. The green and digital transitions demand bold EU action in climate neutral industry, circular economy and secure digital infrastructures area where EU funding can set the pace and mobilise industry. However, the current framework text must ensure the horizon Europe links with the Competitiveness Fund are fit for purpose. The next Framework programme will stand on the shoulders of 40 years of EU R&D and must ensure improved opportunities for scale. Finally, Member States must have a real and meaningful influence in the development of work programmes. This is not a technical detail. It is a strategic necessity. Alignment between European and national priorities ensure coherence, prevent duplication and strengthen synergies. Without this, we risk losing both efficiency and trust in the process. Only through a program that combines excellence, openness and long term vision, we can ensure that Europe remains leading knowledge region in the world. Thank you.”
Research priorities within the EU
- “Thank you. Marie. As we approach the end of the Danish presidency, you have successfully indeed delivered on your ambitious goal. First draft negotiation box is now on the table and an initial discussion will take place at the UCO later this week. Let me give you our Swedish priorities. In view of that discussion, I will make three points. Number one, we fully support the modernised architecture. A modern, streamlined budget that allows flexibility to address unforeseen challenges is essential. However, this simplification must lead to more efficient use of resources and ultimately real savings. Colleagues, we often say Europe has to be strong and that we need to be equipped to tackle our greatest challenges. As such, we must shift our focus to modern priorities. We fully support the strengthened emphasis on security, defence, competitiveness and the simplified structure. We welcome the establishment of the Competitiveness Fund and the focus on research in heading two. It is of essence that the allocation of funds is based on criteria that focus on quality And impact to ensure that only the best projects receive funding. Number two. Our main concern continues to be the overall size of the budgets. We see increases across all headings and a lack of genuine reprioritisation. Under the current proposal, Sweden's contribution would rise significantly.”
Size of EU budget
- “Commission will identify additional indicators and thresholds or ranges for sustainable forest management on forest ecosystem conditions such as health, biodiversity and climate objectives. We want to underline the substantial work of Forest Europe in the area. We also stressed that European forests are highly diverse, and indicators and potential thresholds are best set at national or subnational level. These are core elements of national forest policy and therefore fall under member states competence. For this reason, the added value and appropriateness of the Commission developing such indicators and thresholds or ranges at the EU level must be clearly demonstrated. Therefore, we call on the Commission to outline the planned work on indicators and thresholds or ranges for sustainable forest management. This includes how Member States feedback has been taken into account in the review and further implementation of the EU for strategy for 2030. We also call on the Commission to jointly assess with Member states the added value of establishing indicators and thresholds or ranges for sustainable forest management at EU level. Finally, we welcome the Commission's engagement for the work on sustainable forest management in Forest Europe and encourage continued prioritisation of that process. Thank you.”
Management of EU forests
- “Thank you, Louise, and thank you for the update from the presidency. We [00:33:00] have a positive view of the update of the legislation, and we would like to thank the Commission for its assistance in bringing about new legislation. The new legislation needs to be proportionate. We need to find ways that do not lead to more red tape for authorities or businesses. For Sweden, it's important to have access to plant reproductive material that can [00:33:30] help us to adapt to a changed climate and make sure that we prevent a reduction in biodiversity. We need a balanced proposal for PRM and FRM. The sector is responsible for its own supply. In Sweden, we've had storms, we've had fires and we the sector has been able [00:34:00] to manage supply of plant material. After that, we thank the presidency for the compromise proposal and we believe that this proposal is on the right track. I also agree with France and Austria on forest surveillance. Thank you.”
Sustainable use of seeds in EU policy
- “And this is the reason why, although we're alone with our situations, don't leave us alone in this. And thank you for a part of that. Support Czechia. Since we are best in class, we also collect massive amounts of congestion revenues and this is my assignment today. And this is. These revenues arise for three principal reasons. One, we export the most per capita in the EU. This creates huge flows of electricity. Two, when we export fossil free electricity increases power prices in southern Sweden primarily. Three we are one of only three member states that have introduced national bidding zones. We're still waiting for our dear German friends, but I know that that's Germany's decision. It's not going to be our decision. And this also, of course, amplifies the congestion revenues that we have within Sweden. So to put it into numbers, last year, the Swedish t.s.o collected €3 billion in congestion revenues. The vast majority of this 75% is all collected on internal bottlenecks, not through interconnectors. So, I mean, come on, it is simply unacceptable that countries which lead the way are ultimately now heavily penalized for it. I also want to underline that we fear that the central scenario risks being yet another administrative obstacle for TSOs to overcome. And these are hard red lines for us.”
EU approach to electricity market and prices
- “Thank you. Chair. Dear Commissioner, dear ministers. Preventive measures and the promotion of good and equitable health across the population are cornerstones of a successful public health policy. Children and young people should remain a priority in this endeavour. We must act at European level to curb entry, microbial resistance, fight cancer, promote mental health and ensure that the EU's resilience to cross-border health threats and preparedness for future crises. Crisis. It is, for example, essential to ensure the effective implementation of Europe's leading cancer plan, the comprehensive approach to mental health, and the council recommendation on stepping up EU actions to combat antimicrobial resistance. We also need to fully implement the regulation on serious cross-border threats to health, as well as establish long term solutions for here. Another major challenge of our time is the negative impact of digital media on the mental and physical health of children and young people. Strong measures are needed at European level to promote a healthy and balanced digital media use among children and young people, and to protect them from harmful content. It will, for example, be key to make sure that the Digital Services Act is implemented effectively. We strongly encourage the Commission and Member States to use the new tools that we have in place, and we welcome the adoption of the council conclusions regarding these issues earlier today.”
EU policy on mental health
- “Thank you. Chair. Dear ministers, dear commissioners, the Swedish government firmly believes that the most effective way to overcome poverty and social exclusion is through employment and self-sufficiency. The consequences for individuals trapped in long term benefit dependency are devastating for those who become firmly rooted in social exclusion, and for the children who grow up without ever seeing their parents go to work. This reality underscores the urgency of strengthening preventive, enabling, and activating measures that can interrupt negative patterns. To be successful, the measures taken need to be based on a cross-sectoral approach and focus on labour market integration. Educational pathways are vital for both individual employment opportunities and economic growth. Investments in adult education is key since it can accelerate linguistic and economic integration and thereby enabling more foreign born adults to become self-sufficient. This reduces risks for long term unemployment and social exclusion. The Swedish government has initiated work on a strengthened activity requirement for recipients of social assistance, ensuring that all individuals engaged in in meaningful, tailored activities that support their pathway towards work. The purpose is to break long term dependency, strengthen individual motivation and capabilities. In addition to this, having a high quality social service system is in place is one of the fundamental parts of a welfare society, not only for the individual, but for the stability of our societies as a whole. Last year, Sweden adopted a new social Services Act. It emphasizes the preventive work and early intervention, aiming to support families and individuals before social issues escalate. By coordinating health, education, labor and social services, the. At the local level, we are building more coherent and responsive support systems. We believe that this preventive and coordinated approach is crucial for breaking cycles of exclusion. Lastly, any new efforts on the EU level should promote knowledge exchange, evidence based methods, and mutual learning, while allowing member states the flexibility needed to tailor measures to their own systems. Thank you.”
EU competences on social policies · Minimum income harmonisation at EU level
- “The large scale borrowing of Nju was agreed as a one off measure in an extreme situation. We were not enthusiastic at the time, and now we see that it is that it severely limits the EU budgets fiscal room for manoeuvre. It is costly and simply unsustainable to finance expenditure through loans that burden future generations. We see significant financial risks with the proposed loan to loan instruments in the next MFF. On the revenue side, we are open to discussing adjustments to the current system. However, we see no new need for new own resources. The NHI based share works well. The problem lies on the expenditure side. We must focus on reducing the volume. Ensure every euro delivers maximum impact and avoid further complicating the revenue side. Finally, the union's values are fundamental and non-negotiable. We must use this MFF as an opportunity to once and for all codify the principle that the rule of law and the charter is a must for EU funds. Such a mechanism is an indispensable element in the final agreement on the budget. In my view, the seriousness of this issue is not sufficiently reflected in the box we have on the table. Thank you.”
EU Supervision of the Rule of Law
- “Thank you, chair, for putting this important and very timely topic on the agenda. Equal representation has a democratic value in itself, but it is also smart. Diversity amongst policymakers lead to better decisions that better responds to the needs of all citizens. Women's political representation in Sweden is currently 46% of the members of Parliament, [00:13:30] 49% of politicians at regional level, and 43% of the politicians at municipal level. The 40% threshold has reached has been reached in the 90s, and in my government, 11 out of 24 ministers are women. The first party to introduce a recommendation was in fact my own party, the liberals, when it decided to recommend party districts to place women and men on alternate seats [00:14:00] on the party list. In 1984, which is 40 years ago, gender gradually became a legitimate candidate selection criteria among parties. It eventually attained a position of central importance. However, progress concerning women's political representation in Sweden did not come by easily. It is the result of active work by women's sections in the political parties and by other women's organizations, [00:14:30] which put pressure on. The political parties. When the number of women in parliament suddenly decreased in 1991, some women even threatened to form a women's party unless the political parties nominated more women on safe seats on party lists. The most significant event was the adoption of voluntary party quotas by one of the major political parties in 1993. However, this occurred after women had already [00:15:00] acquired more than 30% of the seats in the parliamentary group of the party. Importantly, an almost equal representation of women and men in the Swedish parliament has been achieved without legislation. At EU level, I must emphasize the importance of having a gender balanced colleague of commissioners. This is a major step forward, and it can be expected to generate more political interest among women, both in terms [00:15:30] of electoral turnout and in terms of representation. Thank you.”
Gender roles, equality and inclusion
- “Sweden shares the concern raised by the Czech Republic regarding the need to have access to effective plant protection products. The EU agriculture need a plant protection that will guarantee our food security and ensure high level of protection of health and environment. We want to keep our competitive edge. I look forward to simplification of the framework and hope that they can lead to effective products without compromising the level of protection. Thank you.”
EU policy on pesticides
- “Thank you, chair and dear colleagues, good to see you again this fall. And the Draghi report? Well it addresses that we face as a union. Challenges that we face as a union to stay competitive, innovative and at the forefront of the green transition. And of course, as we have stated many times before in this circuit, it is clear that energy plays an absolutely central role for several sectors, sectors of our economy. I therefore welcome the opportunity to to discuss this report today, of course. And and also what we perhaps should not do to improve our common EU energy policy. And my remarks will mainly focus on electricity, since electrification will be key to phase out remaining fossil fuels, mainly in the transport sector, but also when it comes to the pollution from our heavy industries. And as you all know, Sweden has a clear planning target to enable a doubling of electricity use by 2040 and that also is in line with our goal of reaching net zero by 2045. First, Sweden fully supports the technology neutral approach in this report, and I would like to underline that. I see that my dear minister, colleagues from France and Germany has left the room now, but we come back to the discussion of should it be only renewables, should it be mainly nuclear? We will make different decisions on this. My my dear friends, but we need to respect the different decisions that are made and make sure that we welcome and pave way for each other's decisions. That I believe will be the only way forward. But that is the the way forward. To be able to phase out our dependency of fossil fuels and make sure that we can pave way for a competitive green transition, or else you cannot have both. Both renewables and nuclear will be needed. And I think it would be healthy if we could, maybe in the years to come, move away from that discussion. Second, Sweden shares the view on the importance of well-functioning electricity market, where we first need to implement what we have already agreed on in the reform of the electricity market design. On potential new steps, we particularly welcome proposals that can contribute to good and long term conditions for investing in large volumes of fossil free electricity production. In Sweden, we now see that it is very tough for new investments in wind power, and we have pushed massive amounts of new wind power into the Swedish system. And it is a very difficult investment case because the prices have become such volatile because of a lot of new wind power. And here we need to see how can we add wind power together with storage and make a lucrative investment case. Third, in addition to competitive electricity prices, security of electricity supply is also essential. If we are to electrify the heavy transport sector, the heavy industries, we cannot only depend on a lot of electricity. It is not the same thing as having enough power and enough electricity where it is needed, when it is needed at every given second 24 over seven, 365 days a year. Security of supply must be top fourth on grids. Know that if we push mainly intermittent power production into the system, the cost for grids will explode. And we are seeing that our citizens are seeing that on their electricity bill now, that will plummet the public support. So we need to make the best possible use of the grid system that we already have, and make sure that we push both baseload and intermittent power production into the system. And fifth, on governments. Sweden is skeptical to several of the proposals for increased decision making power on EU level for the electricity market. Let's make sure to deliver on the promises already made. And finally on financing. Chair and I will end there. The report rightly highlights the great investments needed. Let's cut red tape. Let's speed up permitting processes. But we believe we should not discuss proposals for financing models and investment support that precede the negotiations of the next MFF, or otherwise involved joint financing by Member States at this stage. Thank you.”
Energy (green transition)
- “To sum it all up, we believe that this plan is too much focused on more interconnectors and new intermittent renewable generation. Instead of addressing total system costs for electrification, we need all of that. Sweden is doing all of that, but it is way too one sided. So my first remark is we lack sufficient emphasis on technology neutrality in the action plan. Such a plan should provide equal opportunities for nuclear power and renewable energy. And I'm saying this as a leader of a country that has the most amount of renewables and a lot of nuclear at the same time, this is the only way to achieve climate neutrality and increase competitiveness as a union as a whole, no matter what decisions we make as member states. And I think on this point, it's not enough to act in a walking pace. The commission needs to start running. I saw on the news this morning that Dublin maybe Ireland can speak on this later on. In Dublin, 50% of all power is of all electricity generated is now going to server halls, data halls because it's driven by the need for electricity to artificial intelligence. And that is something that all of us will face. Secondly, we need to use existing infrastructure much more efficient. And speaking of the the simile with the roads, renewables requires an autobahn, but on average only delivers the equivalent of a dirty countryside road like the one I use where I live back home in in Sweden.”
Energy (green transition)
- “Thank you and good to see you once again. Dear colleagues. It feels like I was just here yesterday. It wasn't. It was last Monday. Um, but first of all, thank you to the Danish presidency. Um, hard and and constructive negotiations on this regulation. Um, start off by a few comments on transport. We welcome the Commission's proposal. The increased focus on military mobility is very welcomed, as is allowing the programme to be open for participation by third countries, such as candidate countries and other neighbouring states. Sweden is a beautiful country, but it is a very long country. And to give you the perspective, if you want to go from the very northern part of Sweden to the very southern part of Sweden, it is the same distance as going from Copenhagen to Rome. There we have Italy that is the same distance within one single country. So we believe that a well-balanced compromise has been reached on the transport sound side, and our message is basically don't touch it. No major changes because then we'll we'll have issues again. On energy, we are not as optimistic. We believe in order to build a genuine and technology neutral energy Union that ensures secure supply, affordability and competitiveness.”
Energy (green transition)
- “Thank you. Chair. Let me start by underlining that the climate transition and competitiveness go hand in hand. The 2030 climate target is a strategic piece towards both climate neutrality in 2050 and for the future of European competitiveness, our industry. European industry actors are making investments and they need clarity. Any deviation from our path towards and commitments to the 2050 target will have immediate repercussions on lost investments and lost competitiveness. A swift agreement on the European climate law, including a 2040 target, is therefore of importance not only for our climate efforts, but also to be able to plan ahead. Thank you.”
Energy (green transition)
- “Thank you Marquis. I have one comment on timeline and then on substance as requested by by the presidency. Um, this is clearly an important package. We do want to move it forward. Uh, so therefore it is good that we discuss it among ourselves. It is good that we have intense discussions on technical level, but we also need to get it right. We don't want to end up with, um, a situation where we have more complexity or more administrative burden for our capital market participants. So we need to consider the simplification agenda when we work with this. So moving to substance, what is needed to get it right. Some parts of the proposal are very welcome and good indeed. So that would be removing cross-border obstacles, having more links in our financial infrastructure. On supervision, we agree that today's setup for cross-border firms creates challenges. That is clear. However, this part of the proposal also gives rise to. To some questions that we need to discuss and to clarify and make adjustments. I will mention two. One is the division of responsibilities between the national and the EU level, particularly in times of crisis. The second is we need to have accountability in the system. So that was on substance. And just finally, and we have said this before, let's be honest, that this package is not the most important thing to make capital markets in the EU bigger. There we know that national reforms are key. And I will again mention more funded pension systems and more retail participation in the capital markets. Thank you.”
Financial regulation
- “Thank you, Chair. This is a key issue for both the competitiveness of agriculture and the EU's food security. In an increasingly uncertain world, we need a food production system that is robust and resilient. Sweden therefore welcomes both the Commission's fertilizer action plan and today's discussion.
Sweden appreciates that the Commission has acted swiftly and introduced measures to address the short term effects. Sweden supports the EU's decision on the temporary state aid framework and we also welcome the temporary tariff suspension for nitrogen fertilizer. It is also important to take measures that facilitate imports from a broad range of markets. Open, well functioning and diversified trade is essential.
In the longer term, we need better conditions for fertilizer production within the EU. This requires stable and predictable legislation that promotes investment while also supporting innovation and new technologies. Profitability is a key factor in enabling companies to invest in fertilizer production.
Sweden welcomes the value chain partnerships to identify simplification needs and opportunities to strengthen and expand production capacity, address constraints and improve competitiveness. To ensure long term resilience and competitiveness, policy instruments and measures must be designed from a farmer's perspective so that it works well in practice for the farmer.
Sweden welcomes that the action plan includes actions to promote bio based and circular fertilizers. There is potential in greater efficiency of plant nutrition utilization. However, it is important to avoid as far as possible the recirculation of hazardous substances while striving for resource efficient cycles.
Therefore, it is positive that the commission intends to identify and review legislation and other bottlenecks that are holding back development. At the same time, we must not overlook the importance of mineral fertilizers, which account for approximately 80% of Sweden's nitrogen fertilizer use. It is therefore positive to incentivize the transition to fossil free production of fertilizers.
As regards to stockpiling and other preparedness options for key fertilizers and inputs, Sweden emphasizes that stockpiling decisions should remain a national competence and that subsidiarity must be respected. At the same time, Sweden sees potential for EU wide measures on production inputs, particularly where there are shared import dependencies provided such measures complement member states' ongoing efforts.
The EU must also continue to monitor market developments closely. High prices for inputs, especially fertilizers remain a major challenge. Therefore, we welcome that the commission will continue working on and improve access to transparent and up to date market information. Market observation is also important to ensure that the trade with Russia and Belarus is limited.
Sweden welcomes the tariff measures on imports of all nitrogen based fertilizers from the Russian Federation and Belarus. This is key to reducing our dependencies and diversify our supply chains while limiting Russia's financing of its war against Ukraine. Thank you.”
Use of fertilisers
- “Thank you chair. I would like to thank the Czech Republic for raising the urgent issue of cormorants and its detrimental impact on fish stocks. Several fish stocks in the Baltic Sea are struggling and do not recover, despite restrictive fishing opportunities and measures to protect protect spawning. There are several factors having an impact on the stocks and their recovery, in addition to the pressure from fisheries. A holistic approach and a range of measures are thus needed. Measures to improve the Baltic Sea environment are key. In addition, facilitating the hunting of fish eating predators such as seals and cormorants would be a directly effective measure. We agree with the need for a management plan at the EU level. However, such management plan would only be effective if cormorants are moved to annex two and made huntable in the birds directive. On this subject, I would like to refer to the letter just sent to Commissioner Roswall and Commissioner Caddis by a large number of environmental as well as fisheries ministers on the need for action during this time. When necessary action is lacking, important fish populations failed to recover. Thank you.”
Environmental regulation of fisheries
- “We welcome that the work programme recognises this link. On migration return and cooperation with third countries is high on the Swedish government's agenda. It is essential for the EU to implement the pact on migration and asylum, but we need other solutions too. Innovative solutions to curb irregular migration and to improve the effectiveness of returns. We therefore welcome the common proposal on the reformed return legislation. Finally, organised crime remains a security threat in Sweden and a systemic systemic threat to our democracies all over the EU. We welcome the Commission's upcoming EU initiatives on this matter and in particular the internal security strategy. It's important that the approach will be horizontal, multidisciplinary and whole of society. One last point. Like I said, Sweden fully supports the ambitious simplification agenda. Sweden will be very constructive in all this. An important element is indeed to withdraw proposals that add to the administrative and regulatory burden for industries and companies, and we welcome the action taken by the Commission. However, Sweden regrets the intention to withdraw the Equal Treatment Directive and I was surprised to see it as it's an important piece of legislation to ensure the protection from discrimination for all EU citizens. We have a lot of work ahead of us. My colleagues and I look forward to working together on delivering real change on the basis of the coming proposals. Thank you.”
Asylum & border control
- “Thank you very much. Chair. Sweden would also like to thank Ireland for raising this pressing issue. We share the great concern about the continuous actions by third countries in setting unsustainable quotas for mackerel in the Northeast Atlantic. We also urge the Commission to take the necessary steps to secure a successful outcome for the EU fisheries sector in the coming weeks. Thank you.”
Environmental regulation of fisheries
- “Thank you. Chair. Dear ministers, dear commissioners, the Swedish government firmly believes that the most effective way to overcome poverty and social exclusion is through employment and self-sufficiency. The consequences for individuals trapped in long term benefit dependency are devastating for those who become firmly rooted in social exclusion, and for the children who grow up without ever seeing their parents go to work. This reality underscores the urgency of strengthening preventive, enabling, and activating measures that can interrupt negative patterns. To be successful, the measures taken need to be based on a cross-sectoral approach and focus on labour market integration. Educational pathways are vital for both individual employment opportunities and economic growth. Investments in adult education is key since it can accelerate linguistic and economic integration and thereby enabling more foreign born adults to become self-sufficient. This reduces risks for long term unemployment and social exclusion. The Swedish government has initiated work on a strengthened activity requirement for recipients of social assistance, ensuring that all individuals engaged in in meaningful, tailored activities that support their pathway towards work. The purpose is to break long term dependency, strengthen individual motivation and capabilities. In addition to this, having a high quality social service system is in place is one of the fundamental parts of a welfare society, not only for the individual, but for the stability of our societies as a whole. Last year, Sweden adopted a new social Services Act. It emphasizes the preventive work and early intervention, aiming to support families and individuals before social issues escalate. By coordinating health, education, labor and social services, the. At the local level, we are building more coherent and responsive support systems. We believe that this preventive and coordinated approach is crucial for breaking cycles of exclusion. Lastly, any new efforts on the EU level should promote knowledge exchange, evidence based methods, and mutual learning, while allowing member states the flexibility needed to tailor measures to their own systems. Thank you.”
Youth employment & training
- “Thank you. And thank you for the update. Sweden has welcomed the Commission's proposal and its underlying principles. We support a solid, high quality regulation that really facilitates the introduction of new plant varieties varieties onto the market. Sweden envisions competitive and sustainable European Union, and we believe that the early adoption of new techniques is essential to strengthening our competitiveness across the Union. We want Swedish and European companies to be able to use new genomic techniques to develop and grow these new plant varieties in in Europe. Therefore, plants that have been found to be equivalent to conventional plants must be treated the same, that is, without requiring additional risk assessments, labeling or traceability. Thank you. Peter. Anton.”
New Genomic Techniques