- 2026-06-16 “Thank you very much, chair, and thank you to the presidency team for all the hard work on achieving the partial general approaches. Um, I can be very brief. Uh, we support the PGA, um, on European Competitiveness Fund, and we've submitted a joint statement with Latvia, Lithuania and Poland already referred to by my colleagues. We also support the partial general approach of the global Europe regulation on the NRP. However, we feel that the text changes don't sufficiently reflect the challenges faced by the EU's eastern border regions. Um, so sadly, we cannot support it and we will be abstaining. And we have also joined a statement together with Latvia and Lithuania on these challenges. Thank you.”
Cohesion and rural funding
- 2026-06-16 “Thank you very much, chair. And let me begin by expressing our appreciation for the work done by the Cypriot presidency. We share the aim of reaching an agreement by the end of the year, and we are ready to continue work on the basis of the box prepared by the Cypriot presidency. The modernised structure. Prioritising competitiveness, defence, climate reforms, rule of law. All of these are valid aims that should be maintained. This was also the spirit of the Friends of Cohesion joint declaration from Estonia's perspective. The proposed cuts to the overall volume of the MFF is a step in the wrong direction. We should not reduce the ambition of the MFF. We want more Europe, not less. Having said that, we do appreciate the presidency who has taken on board the views of the majority of Member States regarding the budget of heading one. However, we regret that the unique challenges and needs of the eastern border regions in defence, in competitiveness and security are still not recognised, as are the. Also hybrid threats in the Negro box. All elements should be on the table for the negotiations. We also have concerns regarding cofinancing rates. In addition, we believe that the N plus one rule should be extended to N plus three, and the compulsory flexibility amount should be reduced in order to maximise the results for the NPS on agriculture, in order to enable fair competition.”
Size of EU budget
- 2026-06-16 “We need to establish a maximum cofinancing rate for member states cap measures. Also, it is very important for us that the mandatory minimum for digressive area based income support should be significantly lower than €130 per hectare. In our view, the horizontal cut in heading two is not justified. There is a reason the commission has proposed a modernised budget. Urgent challenges in defence, military mobility and cross-border connectivity have clearly increased and should therefore be prioritized. Cuts in the ECF defense window and CF are counterproductive. We should learn from the mistakes of previous negotiations on global Europe. It's important that the 100 billion for Ukraine reserve has been preserved. In addition, we believe that the budget must be made enlargement proof. Considering all the horizontal cuts in heading two and three, we were surprised to see only very modest cuts in heading four for administrative expenditure. And finally, regarding the revenue side, we accept that all options for own resources remain on the table in the Negro box. However, we have to reiterate our objection to the ETS own resource and rebates for a modernised budget. Thank you.”
Defence spending · Agricultural funding · Size of EU budget
- “Noncommunicable and chronic diseases remain the primary reason for health loss in EU. And our main aim should be prevention. We should keep the focus on the most impactful changes. We need to continue with strengthening prevention policies, in particular addressing health concerns caused by tobacco and tobacco and alcohol consumption. Consumption Assumption. At the same time, we should support healthy nutrition and physical activity. We need to continue with strengthening prevention. I'm sorry in many areas to be more effective. We need EU regulations and closer collaboration to harmonise tobacco and alcohol policies. Urgent revision of the Tobacco Directive is needed. Estonia joined the call to request prompt action in 2025. In view of the new nicotine products that are attractive to young people, even children, we need more affection. Effective regulations at the EU level, we need to extend the scope of all tobacco and nicotine products, and we should agree on EU wide ban on flavours in e-cigarettes and on cross-border distance sales. When it comes to alcohol, we need to further restrict availability, visibility and affordability. Eu can act, for example, to harmonise labelling requirements and restrict advertising, especially in social media. Also, we should follow W.H.O. lead and put cancer warnings on alcohol labels to protect public health. Food and drink advertising contributes to unhealthy eating habits. A common approach is needed to regulate marketing to children as this is a global challenge. Eu level initiatives are also needed to require a front of package nutrition label. Finally, I would like to emphasize the importance that member States are actively involved and have a decisive role in setting the priorities and allocation of resources. Thank you.”
EU measures on lifestyle-related behaviours (smoking, drinking, eating, etc.)
- “Thank you very much, Mr. Chair. The Commissioner and the ministers. We are very grateful for the work done on the Ways and Dimensions proposal, and we take good note of the progress report. And let me just highlight that in order to continue with this file in a good spirit, we need to be technologically neutral and future proof. Therefore, the deletion of 2035 cut off date or having a review clause as a compromise is a very important to us, as the operation would still practically benefit from being as efficient as possible. It is also crucial to utilise the window of opportunity, for example, when it comes to using biogas in the transitioning phase. That means also allowing extra length for those articulated vehicles, and we hope that negotiations will continue under the Belgian presidency and we are able to find a very good compromise. Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman.”
Road transport environmental policy
- “26:50 – 11:27:55): Thank you, Estonia. Thanks to the presidency for the work on the cybersecurity package. We support strengthening cybersecurity at the EU level, and it is very important that the CSA 2 focuses on areas where EU action brings clear added value and ensures legal certainty for member states and stakeholders.
We support strengthening ENISA's role, but we should avoid overlaps with national competencies. We are also very thankful to the commission for presenting such an ambitious proposal on ICT supply chain security, but member states need to have a strong role in processes of identifying inferred countries of cybersecurity concern and managing both technical and nontechnical ICT supply chain risks.
It is important to preserve member states' flexibility in setting risk management measures. Thank you.”
Scope of EU cybersecurity obligations
- “Dear chair, dear colleagues. Dear Commissioner, I think it is quite a symbolic thing that your first meeting is also beginning with a point that takes us closer to achieving Vision Zero. And of course, we hope that this is only the first step and not the last. I would like to thank both the Hungarian and Belgian presidencies for the very good work done. And I can say that Estonia is very positive about the text. This file is an important missing piece of legislation that will no doubt prove important in increasing road safety, and I'm sure this will be a significant step in cooperation for making sure that dangerous, dangerous drivers are kept off the roads all across the European Union. For us, one of the most important aspects of the discussions was to make sure that the administrative burden is in line with the added value, and we are pleased to see that our concerns have been taken into account. And we would like to thank the presidency team for that. With this in mind, we are supportive of the general approach and wish the next presidency the best of luck with the trialogues. Moreover, I would like to say that we are eager to learn from our French colleagues and their experience with the automated scrutiny of this matter. Thank you colleagues, and good luck.”
Road transport environmental policy
- “Thank you. Chair. As to the matter at hand, then, while we note the the concerns raised by several border border countries, we think that we must also not forget that Ukraine is still in war and fighting not only for its independence, but also for our freedom, our values. So fighting also for Europe. And in order to survive, Europe needs our help, including support with its economy and Ukraine's agricultural sector has a substantial contribution to its economy. Thus, we find that it is of critical importance to support trade facilitation for Ukraine and agricultural products, as well as Ukraine's rapid integration to the EU. This is our common interest and priority. Consequently, as I already said before, we welcome the agreement reached at this point. Though the agreed solution we think is the very minimum and cannot be further diluted, as the Commission has also explained, several safeguards are in place there. And in addition, we have to continue stepping up pressure on Russia and Belarus. So I call once more for further support to impose tariffs on trade with Russia, including all types of fertilizers and fish. Thank you.”
Agricultural trade: Ukraine imports
- “First of all, I must inform you that Estonia has a parliamentary scrutiny reservation on the draft as a whole. Estonia considers it's important to ensure that the provision of the legal protection is as child friendly and victim centered as possible. But in the negotiations on the Victims Rights Directive, more proportionate solutions [00:20:30] must be achieved, which would leave member states more flexibility when ensuring the range of the appropriate support services for the victims. The Member States should have the possibility to maintain flexibility in deciding on what services would be necessary for each victim, focusing on the foremost needed assistance and services that can be provided within reasonable and proportionate financial means. Thank you.”
EU policy on victims' compensation rights
- “Thank you. You know, on the, summer, actually, in the morning, we had the same discussion because there was, like, you know, something is supposed to happen before summer. And I said, that's 2 weeks. But actually, apparently, European summer is August. So so let's see.
Now that, on the 20 first package, there's a call for the member states to, put forward the proposals. So we are targeting the military industrial complex, of, of Russia, and, of course, member states can put forward ideas, shadow fleet as well. But, as we agreed last time that we are, you know, putting the sanctions, on rolling paces. We're not gathering, you know, big package together, but just rolling basis when we see that this could actually, achieve our goal, which is to deprive Russia of the funding to finance this war. Mhmm. Augustin?”
EU-Russia relations (from March 2022)
- “Madam chairman, commissioner, colleagues, first of all, I'd like to thank, commissioner Glenn. Thank you ever so much for this honest overview that came from the bottom of your heart. Thank you very much again. The EU work plans for culture have been an important tool. They will help member states to work together and learn from each other. I'm sure that the next work plan should continue this. The new work plan must be clearly linked to both the culture compass and national priorities. Without this, its impact will be limited.
For Estonia, cultural resilience is a central horizontal topic. Well, simply put, culture must withstand change and crisis, and that's why it should be linked to crisis management and security planning. Culture is what holds the society together. It builds trust. It brings people together and provides stability in difficult times.
Second important topic, the AI and algorithms. They shape more and more what culture reaches people and what part of culture stays in the shadow. The AI doesn't only just reflect culture. It's also started to shape it. How can we ensure that European creative works are visible and easy to find? How do we protect human creations in the fast developing digital environment? This is where we need to find shared European solutions.
Estonia has a very highly developed cultural space in digital terms, but there's a specific question. Our language is widely present online. That's why the AI has learned Estonian at least at a basic level, but its cultural understanding remains shallow. There's no wider context because cultural content hasn't been systematically included in training data. The content of small languages and small cultures often stays in the background. Background. However, Europe's strength is its diversity. I think we agree on it all. Small languages and cultures are like voices in a choir. They make Europe special. We need to keep this diversity. We need to strengthen it.
And finally, cultural sustainability starts with education. Young people are not just participants. They are future creators and guardians of culture. A strong connection to culture builds a responsibility to carry on the heritage. Culture helps prevention. It supports the well-being of youngsters and offers safe channels for self expression.”
EU and national cultural identities
- “Thank you. First, on the Strait Of Hormuz, our operation has been as is already in the region. So currently operating in the Red Sea, but the operation area is much wider. But it doesn't have enough ships right now. So the member states are putting their contributions to the operation as bid as then we can also have more ships and really to escort. Also, if we need to change the mandate to also cover the demining activities, then we can also do that.
Now, on your second question, Putin can end this war immediately if he just stops bombing civilians, civilian infrastructure, and withdraws its troops, it's that easy. But what his statement really shows is that he's not in a strong position. So I think there's an opportunity for ending this war. Of course, the security guarantees that we need to see is also we need to see concessions from the Russian side because they are always the ones who are attacking their neighbors. How can we make sure that we don't only have a ceasefire or a truce that would give them possibility to regroup and get their army in a better shape than it is right now and then to go on attacking? But it would be sustainable and lasting peace that they would refrain from attacking other countries.
That's why we have the discussion with the foreign ministers coming up of what kind of concessions we need to see from the Russian side. It's coming up already in May.”
Russia-Ukraine conflict (10th term)
- “Thank you. No. Maybe you don't know because it's logical that, high representatives should also deal with trade, but it's not my portfolio. So, you know, it is commission's initiative, and, and every commissioner has their portfolio. Immediately after the last FAC, we also had the commission. I raised this issue that member states want this proposal. I asked this, but the proposal is not there, and I can't draft it. I'm sorry.”
EU competences on foreign affairs
- “Thank you. The colleagues commission presidency. As you know from our statement, we strongly support the nature restoration law and call for its swift adaptation without any delay. Biodiversity loss is an imminent threat to all aspects of our life. Science is also very clear on that. Restoration [00:27:30] of degraded ecosystems is both our moral obligation as well as pure economic calculations. We need nature and the invisible and visible services it provides. Not to mention that the nature is our strongest ally in climate change mitigation and adaptation. It is crucial that we do not fail on this critical step. Let us stay on the right side of the history and adopt a law that is so urgently needed by us and by [00:28:00] our children. That is to remind that it is responsibility to us as a union. And also a big question to the presidency. Thank you.”
Nature protection and restoration in the EU
- “Dear Commissioner, dear colleagues. We are very happy that an Estonian city has once again the honour of being a European Capital of Culture. This time it will be our second biggest city, Tartu, a city of university and students, the intellectual capital of our country and the city of good, fresh ideas. The motto Arts of survival has also become more topical than we could have thought a few years ago. Next year will show how artists and creators, both from Estonia and Europe, will interpret it. Having seen the programme, I can assure you that it will be busy and very inspiring. But the Capital of Culture project will not concern only Tartu. In fact, one quarter of Estonia will be involved. The entire southern Estonia has joined forces. This is a rich region at the crossroads of cultures, where you can hear different dialects and enjoy traditional smoke sauna that is on the Unesco Cultural Heritage list, and where you can take a moment for yourself, cleanse your mind, and recharge your creativity. So, dear friends, you are warmly welcome. Thank you.”
EU and national cultural identities
- “Dear president, dear Commissioner, esteemed colleagues, thank you for the opportunity to discuss this topic today. And I would like to acknowledge the good start by the presidency. The text is advancing, but it is not yet ready to discuss a negotiation outcomes. First, we really must start negotiating widening articles. As research ministers, we must take responsibility for our field and address difficult and sensitive issues. Time is not here on our side and without meaningful discussion on widening, it will be hard to reach a partial general approach by the May Council. Widening measures are originally were meant temporary, designed to increase participation of less performing countries, and it is now time to reduce dependence on the widening measures. All widening countries must have a clear incentive to move beyond the widening measures and strengthen their own research and innovation capacities. We should focus on exit strategy instead of further strengthening the widening part. The transition measures must serve as a bridge to progress. They should reward national efforts in R&D funding and reforms rather than punish the countries who have performed well. Second, we need clarity on the interface between Horizon Europe and the European Competitiveness Fund. Without a clear understanding of how the research dimension will be supported and implemented in the Competitiveness Fund, it will be difficult to move forward. Clear governance and strategic alignment between the programmes are essential to make the next horizon Europe effective and credible. To conclude, let's start constructive discussions on widening now and ensure all widening countries have incentives to progress and provide clarity on Horizon Europe and the European Competitiveness Fund. Thank you.”
- “So we must also notice what's happening in the video game industry. Opportunities and risks. What happened to the Ukraine game stalker two, which was used by Russia to spread false information about war and mobilization in Ukraine? We strongly support mainstreaming of culture in the EU enlargement process. Ukraine's cultural heritage needs to be protected and restored. This is key to safeguarding Ukraine's identity and thus to preserving Europe's cultural heritage. We consider it important for the future cultural strategy to take into account the role of the EU preparedness and resilience plans. There is a clear link and opportunity for joint action in cross-border preservation of digital cultural heritage. I will come to this under another agenda item. And to conclude, we find it important that European cultural policy also addresses the status of artists, secure working conditions, social protection and fair remuneration and ethical use of creative outputs. Also, copyrights must be clearly regulated. Innovation must not come at the expense of creators and artists. Large online platforms must also contribute their fair share also through taxation, to preserve Europe's cultural and linguistic diversity. Our future cultural strategy must reach all Europeans, combining timeless values and modern solutions that support the vitality of culture and dignified livelihood of creative people. Thank you.”
EU and national cultural identities
- “Madam chair. Commissioner. Colleagues. Culture is crucial for European democracy, resilience and security. It creates connection and a sense of belonging across national borders. And this all is very clear from the recently published Eurobarometer survey, where more than 80% of Europeans highlighted these aspects that I just mentioned with regard to programme Creative Europe. Estonia supports strong and accessible funding for cross-border cultural cooperation. I would like to reiterate what I already said in the joint communication professional cross-border cooperation in the cultural and creative sectors, including audiovisual. The distribution and accessibility of our works in Europe must continue to be supported as much as possible. Estonia's opinion is that specific targeted funding measures for the creative sector at EU level must continue. The Creative Europe programme must maintain visibility, inclusiveness and flexibility. Application processes must be simple. We should consider how to better implement AI tools for both beneficiaries and project evaluators. We also see that the system of advanced payments and lump sums so far has helped to simplify the work of cultural organisations in realising these projects, especially for smaller countries and artists with fewer resources. We believe that the future EU cultural strategy must stand firmly for our common European values democracy, human rights, cultural diversity, credible media and pluralism. At the same time, we need to be innovative in promoting these values. In addition to our already well-known media such as literature, audiovisual industry or news media. We should also look more closely at what happens in the world of video games, increasingly powerful tools to tell stories and create meanings, especially for younger generations.”
EU and national cultural identities
- “03:57 – 14:06:42): we are also we have joined the Friends of, Cohesion as presented by Romania. We shared these, objectives that the partnership programs are very important for our security and for our economy. For us, the connecting your facilities is essential for effectively integrating different parts of the EU to ensure integration with a single market.
Given the geographically distant location of Estonia, it is very important for Estonia. The Rail Baltica is a very important project to connect the transport networks. It helps to reduce the structural disadvantage cheese, enhance military mobility, and strengthen the resilience of regions bordering aggressive neighbors.
Electricity interconnections are also of critical importance for ensuring affordable energy prices and strength carrying energy security. The resilience of energy and digital networks must be prioritized. In this regard, the connecting Europe facility and the European Competitiveness Fund should play a pivotal role to make sure that, Europe is more secure.
Also, hybrid threats directly impact economic stability, supply chains, and trust in the single market. Therefore, preventing and responding to hybrid threats should be embedded across EU funding.
Cohesion policy has proven to be 1 of the cornerstones of the single market. Continued socioeconomic convergence across Europe, together with its positive spillover effects, is essential for strengthening our competitiveness. Cohesion policy is not just redistribution. It's a strategic investment with focus on reforms for a stronger and more integrated economy.
The EU eastern border regions neighboring Russia face adverse impacts on their economy budgets and society of having the aggressor as neighbor. This should be addressed by a top up funding for eastern border regions.
A larger, more integrated, and more secure single market will strengthen the EU's global economic and trade influence. Achieving this requires both EU enlargement and continued support for Ukraine. We support the Ukraine reserve in the amount of at least €100,000,000,000 Thank you. Thank you, Markus. Now Joakim of Finland, followed by Sweden.”
EU transport infrastructure integration · Cybersecurity investments for critical infrastructure · EU funding for transportation
- “Thank you, president. And thank you to Germany for raising the issue. We carried out a similar analysis in Estonia in 2021 21 and in and in our analysis, we found that the main problem for our businesses was the lack of guidelines on how to donate food. We have taken steps to address these shortcomings and we have developed a guide for businesses. We believe it's important to keep in mind that we need to maintain a high level of food safety, and this also includes donations. And in this context, it's important that people from a lower economic or socio economic background are also able to make conscious choices. Our German colleagues came to the conclusion that in order to improve food donations, we need to change EU food law. Our findings did not include this, but we are open to discussions. However, I'd like to point out that in order to reduce food waste, we also need to revise the requirements related to shelf life labelling in EU legislation. We therefore hope that the Commission will come forward with the planned food label package. This will contribute to making the food system more sustainable.”
Food labelling harmonisation at EU level · Food waste
- “Thank you. Chair. Um, and first of all, we would like to thank the Irish delegation for raising this important issue. I can be very brief. We are as well very concerned about this situation. And therefore, we urge the Commission to present a comprehensive action plan to address this dire situation of mackerel stocks in the North east Atlantic. Thank you.”
Environmental regulation of fisheries
- “Thank you. Chair. Colleagues, I would like to start by thanking the Spanish presidency, but also the Swedish presidency for the efforts made on moving the negotiations forward on this important [00:11:30] file. In principle, we can support the establishment of stricter emission standards for the new heavy duty vehicles and extensions of the scope to the new vehicle categories. However, in our view, the compromise text needs a final touch before we will be able to support the general approach. Our key concern is related to the fair treatment of biofuels in the heavy duty sector, particularly for urban buses. We need to consider [00:12:00] the bigger picture energy security concerns related to connectivity and competitiveness, cost effectiveness, climate contribution and as well local circumstances. Therefore, we see that biofuels such as biomethane will with neutral or negative Co two emissions can be viable locally produced alternative that helps us to move towards climate neutrality in a cost efficient way. Estonia has made significant [00:12:30] investments to support the use of biomethane in urban public transport, and it is one of the reasons that Estonia ranks ranks fifth among the EU member states in the share of renewable fuels in the transport sector, with 12%. Banning the sale of gas powered urban buses from 2030 will jeopardise the return of investments already made in Estonia, and will clearly have an adverse effect on achieving the overall ambitions in the transport sector. [00:13:00] That is both by jeopardising the return on investments already made in Estonia, as well as increasing the demand for imported fossil fuels. Therefore, we ask for an extension of the deadline for urban buses to at least 2035. It is also crucial that there remains a strong and clear review clause to take adequately into account investments already made into biomethane, without an extension of the deadline for urban [00:13:30] buses. Unfortunately, we will not be able to support the general approach on this file. A similar concern for urban buses were echoed also from other colleagues. I hope we can accommodate these worries in the text and agree on a general approach today. Thank you..”
Road transport environmental policy
- “Yes. Thank you. President. Dear colleagues. Of course, we agree with the need for targeted sectorial measures where necessary. But we must not lose sight of the most important goal that all EU industries need a streamlined, simplified and predictable regulatory framework, not only specific areas. There are many new proposals on the table, with more still coming, and all of them should follow one core principle simplifying the current regulatory landscape for our businesses. This also means considering the cumulative impact of different legal acts, for example, requirements on permitting industrial projects. Those are currently scattered across existing legislation, current proposals and upcoming ones. To actually streamline permitting procedures, we need a unified and consistent approach so companies and business owners could actually understand what is the near future legislation coming up. Another fundamental challenge for our industry is, of course, as mentioned previously, many, many times high energy prices. Here, let's be honest, it's more easy to say than be done. We need to focus on cross-border energy connections, and we have to invest heavily and fast to new energy projects that will help to stabilize energy prices and will increase our region and our union's energy security.”
Overall simplification of regulation in the EU
- “Thank you, Madam President. We too welcome the Commission's work programme. Program. But I'd like to highlight three priorities that Alstonia holds dear. First, as for the single market, we appreciate the emphasis on simplification. We support highlighting the 28th regime, which should be as simple, flexible and usable as possible for all entrepreneurs. However, we should be even more ambitious on deepening the single market on the services side in particular as the services sector remains highly fragmented. Secondly, on Ukraine, it is crucial that urgent and long term financial and military support continues and that we keep increasing the pressure on Russia through broader sanctions targeting revenue generating sectors and military use goods. And finally, third, on defence, a priority for us is to quickly start implementing the European readiness flagships, especially the eastern flank watch. We do appreciate the focus on increasing the capacity of European defence industry. We support the simplification of defence procurement but underscore that it needs to be balanced according to our own needs. Thank you.”
EU Single Market harmonisation
- “Thank you, Cher. And I would also like to thank Mr. Executive Vice President for this overview. We need ambitious implementation of the single market strategy, especially in the area of cross border services. Furthermore, we need to accelerate tackling the Terrible 10 in priority areas. Estonia remains fully committed to the single markets. We are willing to do our parts and continue to work towards removing the barriers identified in the heat maps. In addition to removing barriers, we must also make sure that our toolbox is sufficient to prevent new barriers from rising. So we'll be looking forward to the next stock taking where we can hopefully already assess tangible results that the businesses and the citizens can really feel. Thank you.”
EU Single Market harmonisation
- “Yes. Thank you very much, presidency Commissioner. Dear colleagues, I would like to thank all of you for sharing information and experience. It's important to be transparent and share the best practices in Estonia. The situation is stable. During the recent years we have not had ASF among the domestic pigs. But regarding wild boars, yes, this disease is spreading in the border areas and we are monitoring this and we do understand that this is a very dangerous disease and it takes a lot of work to contain it. And what we heard from you today shows that institutional and sector based cooperation is very important in combating ASF and other diseases. I would like to emphasize that we should remain vigilant regarding African swine fever and regarding biosecurity. We have to keep the requirements on both in pig farming and in hunting, and we have to continue working with the scientists in order to to develop a vaccine. Thank you very much.”
Animal diseases prevention and management in the EU
- “Thank you very much, Mr. Chair. And and the Commissioner, the ministers. First we would like to to sincerely thank the Commission for the first simplification proposals, as well as the Polish Presidency, for swiftly taking the work forward. As we have said before, deregulating and simplifying the EU acquis is essential, which also means reducing the amount of new legislation. We are pleased that Member States calls have been heard, heard and progress is being made with this omnibus package. And here I would just like to support our Lithuanian colleagues comments on on corporate sustainable due diligence directive. However, simplification should of course not be a once only thing, but a continuous process. And and I would like to bring a few examples which I think we will expect from the further packages. Our enterprises have expressed concerns about new labelling requirements in the classification, labelling and packaging of chemicals regulation and additionally, the Urban Wastewater Directive should be included in the in the omnibus package. And we share the concern of many other member states how disproportionate burdens would affect the price and availability of medicines. And regarding digital sector regulations, I think we really do need legislative pause for a certain period of time, followed by an ex post evaluation to assess the effectiveness and implementation of different regulations and more generally, digitalisation, data re-use and cross use are key to simplification and legislation should support this. Prohibition of reusing data like in Doc seven directive should be avoided and if possible, amended. And we also need ongoing dialogue and reality checks with businesses to ensure we meet their actual needs. Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman.”
Energy (green transition)
- “Thank you. Estonia supports the update because harmonization of minimum rates depending on energy content is a step forward anyway, and further delays will risk losing the progress made. Inclusion of new energy products like peat and hydrogen is very positive. But now I continue with my disappointment. For me, I can't recognize Europe. Actually, Europe used to be the leader of responsibility in saving energy and and environment. Now, during discussions and environmental ambition has significantly decreased. For example, opportunity to exempt fuels used in agriculture, forestry, fishing, fishing, or an opportunity to differentiate the excess rates of commercial diesel. Those are wrong stimulus, and the worst possible way to subsidize anyway is via the amount of consumption of fossils and energy. This is the worst possible way, I believe, for Europe at least. All in all in all, we support moving on with the even that limited progress, those first steps must be taken anyway, but the overall progress is still not satisfactory. Thank you.”
Energy (green transition)
- “So thank you very much, president. I'd also like to thank the Latvian and Lithuanian delegations for this subject. We understand this problem well because we are aware that there have been difficulties with applying the new margins of tolerance. Small quantities that constitute less than 5% of the catch are difficult to estimate without resulting in a serious infringement. Here the Commission has a chance to amend via delegated act. The criteria for the serious infringement sets out in annex four of the control regulation, and we see an urgent need for an amendment. It's also important that the Commission improve the application of the derogation for certain listed ports and the procedure for the designation of these boards must become quick and efficient. To sum up. We have to carry on with simplification of the rules and regulations, especially when it comes to rules on weighing procedures.”
Environmental regulation of fisheries
- “Thank you. Chair. We're facing a number of problems that can be solved only through reforming of common fisheries policy. The reform needs to take into account realities that the fisheries sector and coastal communities are facing. For instance, the problem of predators in some patients. Patients have, um, have become a major issue and needs to be tackled at EU level. We also already discussed vessel capacity question and the need to change these rules. Secondly, the multiannual management plans should support decision making instead of creating misunderstandings as is the current situation. We have to find a way to update the maps last night. But not but not least, CFP should be structured in a way that minimises administrative burden and costs. It should also avoid disproportionate proportionate control measures, for example regarding weighing and serious infringement criteria. Thank you.”
Environmental regulation of fisheries
- “Thank you chair. And we also thank the commission for this overview. Uh, regarding the control regulation. Uh, then we would like to draw your attention to a couple of problems there stemming from the implementing rules of the control regulation. Firstly, rules on weighing pose a big additional financial and administrative burden. Um, despite several sets of individual as well as joint written comments by member states, draft implementing rules have not been modified. Secondly, as was discussed also during the council meeting in March, the new margin of tolerance rules are creating difficulties. 20% margin of tolerance is allowed in the Baltic Sea pelagic fisheries, but when quantities are very small, less than 5% tolerance rule often leads to serious infringements. Therefore, we strongly call on the Commission to initiate the amendment of the criteria of the Control Regulation Annex four by delegated Act. So to conclude, the rules should be more balanced and feasible for both the competent authority and the fisheries sector. We remain open to discuss how this should be improved. Thank you.”
Environmental regulation of fisheries
- “So thank you very much. Presidency Commissioner, Ministers. First of all, we would, of course, like to wish all the best for Sweden for the council presidency. We'd also like to thank the Portuguese delegation for putting the spotlight on this important subject. We can support the elements in the joint document, as we've said before, then improving the welfare of animals in every way possible, not only during transport. It's very important. It helps to ensure the sustainability of the livestock sector. This can be achieved through the effective implementation of requirements, the training of compliance officers, promoting best practices, and also through innovative solutions and agreements within the sector. For animal transport, it's important to ensure the welfare throughout the entire journey and solutions have to be found by applying certain measures and not through prohibiting things. So to sum up, we agree that the current welfare legislation needs an update, some reasonable changes, but it's important for the sector to remain competitive and for the animal welfare standards to remain high. Thank you very much, Mr. President.”
EU requirements on animal welfare for farmers
- “Dear Marilena and full support to your presidency. Priorities and goals from Estonian side. And as Sweden underlined, we are strong together and as many colleagues have underlined, so supporting Ukraine remains our priority number one. We are interested in to see the real advancement of Ukraine, EU accession and Ukraine also needs our continuous financial and military aid to keep fighting for just and lasting peace. Due to these turbulent times we are living in, we need really an ambitious MFF. We need increased funding for defence, cross-border connectivity, sovereign AI and Ukraine. So it is the very minimum needed given the geopolitical context. And finally, boosting the EU competitiveness. Competitiveness is essential. Single market simplification, as we talked also at our breakfast is crucial. And Germany underlined as many others underlined, we are Greenland. We really support Denmark. And as already Ireland noticed, the slogan that you have chosen an autonomous union is more timely than ever. So thank you for that and good luck.”
EU enlargement
- “Thank you very much. I would like to thank the Spanish presidency for a great job done on behalf of Estonia. I can support the proposal for the council. [00:37:00] Council conclusions for the long term vision. Ensuring the development of rural areas is key for providing a level playing field for all companies and enterprises. I find that when it comes to the goals of the long term vision, then one of the important methods here is what's referred to as rural proofing, which ensures that all policy measures take into account the people and the companies in rural areas, both at the regional, at the state [00:37:30] and at the EU level. It's important to ensure that the Cap, cohesion policy and other programmes work in synergy, and that they're implemented smoothly to ensure that there's a comprehensive development of rural life. It's important to be administratively flexible and to adapt measures based on the circumstances. Support measures need to go into dealing with the boosting of the [00:38:00] competitiveness of rural companies, because this creates the preconditions for highly qualified jobs in rural areas, we think that it's important to better add value to the bio resources in rural areas, the circular bio economy and the blue economy. Actions to support renewable energy solutions are important as well. However, agricultural land should primarily be reserved for the production of food. As a result, I'm glad that the conclusions tackled the issue [00:38:30] of food security as well, especially in the current geopolitical situation. And finally, it's necessary to keep simplifying the structure of the support measures. We need a shift from a requirement based approach towards being goal oriented, and also support the simplification of combining different financing opportunities and programmes. Thank you very much.”
Cohesion and rural funding
- “Commissioner Colleagues, I would like to thank the Latvian delegation for raising this important issue. I would like to support the Latvian delegation and I agree with the problems raised when we introduced changes. It is important to take into account all relevant aspects here. I would like to mention the Council decision for additional impact assessment. Further impact assessment is needed in order to address all challenges that we face. We need to ensure that the proposed changes would not jeopardise food security or the. Also important that we take into account the specificities of member states and the progress made so far. And maintaining the competitiveness of our agricultural sector is crucial for us. Thank you.”
Agriculture (green)
- “38:01 – 10:39:14): Thank you. Thank you for bringing this important file to the attention of ministers to seek political guidance. Estonia appreciates very highly the efforts made in the negotiations so far. And Estonia fully supports the overall objective of this proposal.
We support the continuity of parenthood in cross border situations within union. And we also support clarity, and thus, we politically support proceeding with all the issues to find the balance points.
It is also important to ensure adequate safeguards to prevent conflicts with national law as many colleagues have already pointed out as well.
Also, we attach particular importance to preserving member states' competence in a substantive family law alongside ensuring that the key concepts and rules on applicable law are clear, consistent, and easily applicable in practice.
So Estonia remains open to further work, preferable in the council with all member states on this sensitive but very important issue. Thank you.”
Jurisdiction conflicts between EU and national courts
- “Thank you very much. Presidency Estonia would like to thank Germany for raising such an important topic. We agree organic farming plays a crucial role in promoting the green transition. The main task of farmers, however, is to produce food. This is why it is extremely important to avoid excessive administrative burden which disrupts that important work. Reducing the administrative burden for organic farmers helps to make the organic sector more attractive and increase its overall share. Thank you.”
Agriculture (green)
- “Thank you, Lewis. What do we have here is an important initiative for the sector. I believe that negotiations in the council's working group are on the right track. We welcome the inclusion of soil greenhouse gas emissions in this initiative, which creates realistic possibilities for climate change mitigation in agriculture. But considering high forest coverage in Estonia and concentration of private land, it is important that certification methodologies take such national specificities into account. We believe that based on the European Joint Programme on Soil, reference to composts should be added to the example of biochar. This supports our objectives of soil health, biodiversity and circular economy. Also, regenerative farming [00:20:30] practices should be included, such as sustainable grazing of livestock. In addition, we may consider including the reduction of methane emissions in the scope of the regulation as was proposed by the European Parliament's committee. Thank you.”
Soil protection policy
- “Thank you. Chair. Dear ministers colleagues, first, of course, thank you to the Commissioner for introducing the report. And I would also like to thank the presidency and [00:31:00] his team for raising important topics related to the Cap during the Spanish presidency. Now to your questions. First, I can support the presidency's assessment of the Cap strategic plans. And I agree that the first year of implementation has been full of challenges, mostly because of time pressure and the complexity of the changes that had to be made. At the same time, the Commission report included [00:31:30] very little information on amending the strategic plans. For example, the report could have described the main difficulties that emerged during the first year or the problems that member states had when amending the strategic plans. I think that it is important to distinguish between technical and substantive amendments, all changes that do not have a direct impact on the objectives set by result indicators should be considered as technical, and the procedures related [00:32:00] to them should be flexible and faster. It is also important to evaluate the results. This gives valuable feedback on the efficiency of implementation to policymakers, but also to producers and the wider public.
An important role here is played by a well-functioning agricultural knowledge and innovation system that enables our companies to have access to the latest knowhow and new solutions. Yet, we would like to thank the Commission for good cooperation [00:32:30] during the process of negotiating our strategic plan on question two. Recent crisis and extreme weather conditions have shown that there is one thing certain, and that is that nothing is certain. Thus, I agree with the presidency that farmers need stability, and I also support the conclusion in the Commission report that it is vital to ensure crisis prevention and adaptation. But in order to efficiently react to crisis, it is [00:33:00] important that the Commission and Member States could simultaneously and rapidly amend the strategic plans. Also, I would like to emphasise that other financial financing resources must also contribute to the Cap objectives. In conclusion, I can support the issue raised by Slovakia on the external convergence in order for EU farmers to efficiently meet the ambitious Cap objectives, it is important to abolish inequalities [00:33:30] between Member States as regards support levels. Levels. Thank you. Presidency.”
Agricultural funding
- “Thank you, Mr. President. And you, you have our full support in reaching agreement with Parliament close to the council position. The Council has decided to increase the funding for military mobility, borders, humanitarian aid, which are all important for our security now and in the future. We are glad to see that this increase is also are part of the draft elements in joint conclusions presented by the Commission. However, to further support the crisis resilience of the EU, we are flexible to further increase these areas but also transport and energy connectivity. And finally, it is important that payment payments reflect the needs and we support the inclusion of statement on payment appropriations. Thank you. And and thank you.”
Size of EU budget
- “Thank you. Yes. We were analyzing also, what do these messages, by Putin mean because it's different than he has said before. And I think the overall understanding is that, you know, Putin is in a weaker position than he has ever been before. We see they are not, they are losing on the battlefield, a lot of lives. There is growing discontent in the Russian society, and that's why they are also turning, off, the Internet that people couldn't access, the actual, news. That's why also the deep strikes that Ukraine has made have made, really an impact. The support for Putin's war is going down. We see also, you know, influencers expressing this, more. So I think it all shows that actually, really, Putin is not standing, that, that strong. And, and that's why but but we are not in the point where actually, they would genuinely negotiate because they are still presenting, maximum, claims. And that's why we need to continue, with our work.
On your second question, yes, it is true that many member states, want, more. There are also many member states who don't want more. So, this is, where we where we are, but I'm happy that we were able to put, sanctions on the violent settlers and agree on that today because it has been on the table for quite some time. Thank you.”
Russia-Ukraine conflict (10th term)
- “Thank you. We had very good discussions over the operation speed as today. So as I said, it's a naval operation that is already in the region, and the area of operation is also covering so that we only need to change the operational plan. But what it needs is more vessels, more ships. And of course, there were also member states today actually saying that they will contribute with more ships to this operation. So it's the fastest way to move forward.
We have the call of the coalition of the willing, and that is defense minister's level this term. It's clearly the operation of speed has caused to contribute to the coalition of the willing. So if the idea of the coalition of the willing is to have more countries also joining from outside, then we could contribute as one Europe with the operations that we already have. Because if you have a member state that only has one ship, you can't give it to different initiatives. But I think that if we operate together under operation Aspires, that could be our contribution also to the coalition of the willing as Europe.
I really think that this is the way we could do it, the fastest way we could do it, and also the way we could make Europe really strong in the region, but also stronger geopolitically because our contribution then is much bigger if we do it together. My favorite quote of Europe only having small countries and those countries who haven't realized that they are small countries yet. So doing it together, we are a force.”
EU competences on defence
- “Why? Because as we know, these national contact points can be guide appliance for on financial instruments, support consortium buildings and help to prepare projects, especially for SMEs who don't have this kind of capacity that has bigger companies and consortiums. Europe's competitiveness depends on a secure and resilient single market. Therefore, ECF must explicitly support the protection and resilience of critical infrastructure, for example. I guess all of you have heard read the what what has happened in the eastern border region. We face different hybrid threats, sabotage risks and pressure on key infrastructure, as also highlighted by the Commission's recent communication. Similar vulnerabilities and growing pressure are increasing across all member states. Resilience is a union wide challenge and should be clearly addressed. And for finally, ECF needs strong governance and multiannual work programmes. Member States must retain a clear role in both strategic and operational decisions. Thank you very much.”
EU policy on screening foreign investment in strategic sectors and critical infrastructure
- “Mhmm. Thank you. No. The 42 7 was not discussed today, because we will have a discussion in the informal meeting of defense ministers. You rightly pointed out that we had the tabletop exercise for the BSC ambassadors to really identify the gaps. But before that, we also actually mapped all what could be done on the 427. So basically, three scenarios. One scenario when article 42 7 is triggered together with article 5. So who does what really? How these two tracks complement each other? Then the other scenario is when you have a member state that is not part of NATO. So it's only Article 42 7 what could be done then. And then the third is when it is below the threshold. So it's hybrid attacks and threats like this. What could be done, what are the tools that are in the toolbox of the commission, of the external action service, of the member states, and how does it work. But we will have deeper discussions in Cyprus when we have the informal meeting of the ministers.”
Relations with NATO
- “Thank you. Not concretely, but it is clear when we go around then we are actually raising this issue, especially now with the countries who are actually benefiting from the cooperation with Ukraine that they could also help them more, even if they can't help them with the military means. Also, energy, infrastructure reconstruction needs. I know that some of those countries where we have been pushing this have also contributed. So also to share the burden, if we are providing support for the defense capabilities, then some other countries who share the views of United Nations charter and who also understand what is at stake could also contribute in other fields to take the burden away from us.”
Russia-Ukraine conflict (10th term)
- “First, on the need of participation, as I said, we were discussing that before we, talk to the Russians, we should agree and talk to, amongst ourselves what we want to talk to, the Russians about. And that's why I've presented also a list of requests, concessions that we need to see, from the Russian side already some months ago, and we will discuss this in Gimli.
On your other, question, you know, I was, half of my working life, I've been a lawyer. So a partner in a law firm, participating in a lot of, negotiations. And the difference between politics and private sector is that in private sector, if you're a good, lawyer or negotiator, you don't have to tell yourself because others are telling this. But in politics, have to, you know, how was it, like, George w Bush said that when a politician doesn't toot his own horn, the horn usually remains untooted. So I have to say, I think I I could see through the traps that Russia is presenting, but, of course, you know, we are not there in entering the negotiations in any way. Right now, we don't see that Russia is really negotiating in good faith at all. And and first, we have the discussion with the member states, what we want to see, you know, conceding Russia conceding as well.”
EU-Russia relations (from March 2022)
- “Good afternoon. Good to see you again. We just concluded a meeting of the defense ministers, which began this morning with the European Defense Agency steering board. Following from the tasking that we got from the European leaders, ministers today agreed to strengthen the EDA with the dedicated structures for innovation and experimentation. Work will continue to strengthen the agency even further also on joint procurement. Ukraine's experience shows how quickly modern warfare evolves and also the lessons learned must shape our policy decisions. Defense innovation has to become a political priority.
Then we discussed Ukraine. We had the minister Fyodorov joining with us and also NATO deputy secretary general Shekharinska. Ukraine will receive the first disbursement of the 90,000,000,000 loan already in June, and these funds will go directly to drones, which are the key capability in pushing back Russian forces at the moment. At the same time, it is clear that, although the 90,000,000,000 loan is there, the bilateral support must continue. The same goes for more sanctions, more pressure on Russia.
Ministers discussed also the €6,600,000,000 that is blocked in the EPF, and there was strong support to find solutions to mobilize these funds. We will come up with proposals in this regard because, of course, member states have different ideas how to mobilize it, and then we need to have a balanced approach to take that all into account. We are also advancing our work on the EU security guarantees to Ukraine when the truce is there. This includes strengthening the EU satellite center so it could also provide support for the ceasefire monitoring, track Russia's shadow fleet, and help prevent sanctions circumvention. But it's also clear that we need it for Europe ourselves to strengthen this capability.
Ministers also discussed the modernization of the two training centers for Ukrainian military, and I thank those member states who have already contributed with funding for this. Then turning to the Middle East. The Strait Of Hormuz is caught in a gray zone between war and peace. We support all diplomatic initiatives to have a way out and prevent further escalation. Closure of the world's most important shipping lane is untenable. EU naval operations in the region can play a vital role in restoring energy and trade flows.
Operation Aspiras already makes a crucial contribution in protecting the shipping in the Red Sea, but its activities could also be extended to the Strait. It only requires the change of the operational plan because the mandate already allows this. Of course, this is when the conditions are appropriate. This is a discussion we will continue shortly after this press conference when we have the meeting hosted by UK and France on the coalition of the willing.
In Lebanon, we discussed also what more can we do there. Europe is doing its part to mitigate the crisis. Thousands of European troops serve as part of UNIFIL. We have also supported Lebanese armed forces by €100,000,000. But it's clear that when UNIFIL mandate ends, then there needs to be also something in addition, and the ministers were discussing how that could be. We are currently looking into new EU mission to help to strengthen the state control in Lebanon. The stronger we make Lebanese army, the weaker we make Hezbollah.
And finally, we had discussion on the defense readiness. Russia is gearing up for long term confrontation with the West. Tanks and missiles are pretty much the only thing that Russia's economy is producing right now. Whether Putin dares to test European defenses is really dependent on us. Deterrence works if it is credible. Showing weakness only invites aggression. Member states have put a lot of funding on the table, but defense industry production in Europe is still not ramped up. So we need faster arms production, also cheaper and rapid delivery to close those capability gaps.
We also had the defense industry representative present, so we were able to discuss with them as well. Ministers stressed that the industry needs to deliver in time and with volume and the industry representatives were then explaining what is hindering them from ramping up. Then we had discussion of the next steps, how to speed up this effort. With that, I take your questions.”
EU-Ukraine relations
- “Yes. Thank you. President. Dear colleagues. Of course, we agree with the need for targeted sectorial measures where necessary. But we must not lose sight of the most important goal that all EU industries need a streamlined, simplified and predictable regulatory framework, not only specific areas. There are many new proposals on the table, with more still coming, and all of them should follow one core principle simplifying the current regulatory landscape for our businesses. This also means considering the cumulative impact of different legal acts, for example, requirements on permitting industrial projects. Those are currently scattered across existing legislation, current proposals and upcoming ones. To actually streamline permitting procedures, we need a unified and consistent approach so companies and business owners could actually understand what is the near future legislation coming up. Another fundamental challenge for our industry is, of course, as mentioned previously, many, many times high energy prices. Here, let's be honest, it's more easy to say than be done. We need to focus on cross-border energy connections, and we have to invest heavily and fast to new energy projects that will help to stabilize energy prices and will increase our region and our union's energy security.”
Overall simplification of regulation in the EU
- “First, the burden sharing issue comes up every time. So, of course, those member states who are really contributing more are raising this every single time. If we look at the numbers, it's clear that the burden is not equally shared. So today, again, EPF could play a role and is actually there. 6,600,000,000 has been blocked. But now there are also different views of how to proceed with this. That's why my services need to come up with options really to cater for those who say that we need to use the EPF for reimbursement, as it was initially, and those who say that it should be looking to the future, what more can we do? So I think we need to find a balance there.
On the 42.07, I still think, and hope, and wish that this is a hypothetical scenario. It would benefit our adversaries immensely if we would start to discuss something like that.”
Defence spending
- “Thank you. Chair. Um, like at the previous council meetings, we would like to emphasize again that to survive, Ukraine needs our help, including our support to effective functioning of its economy. Ukraine's agriculture sector has an important role to play there. The Eu-ukraine Dcfta agreed solution is a very minimum. The EU market is well monitored and well balanced, and the free Trade agreement with Ukraine is offering a stable and transparent trade framework for both parties, including market protection measures. We would also like to recall that Ukraine agreed to comply with higher SPS and production standards than any other trade partner of the EU. And also, I would like to recall what my minister said during a previous debate regarding stepping up pressure on Russia and Belarus in order to weaken their capacity to continue carrying on its war of aggression, for example through imposing further tariffs. Thank you.”
Agricultural trade: Ukraine imports
- “Uh, thank you chair. In our view, ETS one remains an effective tool for reducing emissions and supporting the transition, but it needs balanced and targeted improvements. We need greater price stability and predictability. Also, current benchmark reductions are outpacing technological economic realities. Therefore, we should consider maintaining current benchmark levels or showing the pace of reductions until the end of the decade. Also, we need to review the benchmark methodology. And finally, adequate funding is also needed. The Innovation Fund, Industrial Decarbonisation Fund and upcoming investment booster must reflect geographical balance and the needs of small economies. The modernisation fund works well and especially important for smaller member states, which is why its continuation is crucial. Thank you.”
Extension of the EU Emissions Trading Scheme
- “Yes. I share your frustration, because I have this same feeling. Somehow, we haven't seen the industry ramping up as we would have expected. And of course, some things have come better. I mean, the industry was also showing how much they have actually increased their production when it comes to ammunition, air defense, and critical capabilities. The problem is just that the needs have also grown by the member states. Some of the things that we already know, we are working on them, and some of the things that clearly we need to develop further.
One of the things I bring you as an example that was raised today and really needs to move faster is the procurement directive. Many were raising this, you know, the clear rules because the industry was saying also you have different rules everywhere, and it's hard to operate also the standards. Every member state is tweaking things a bit, so everybody has different orders. You can't really produce in line like this. But on the positive side, we have done a lot, and we have managed to solve some of the issues. But still, there's a lot to do. So, yeah, I share your frustration.”
"Buy European" provisions
- “Why? Because as we know, these national contact points can be guide appliance for on financial instruments, support consortium buildings and help to prepare projects, especially for SMEs who don't have this kind of capacity that has bigger companies and consortiums. Europe's competitiveness depends on a secure and resilient single market. Therefore, ECF must explicitly support the protection and resilience of critical infrastructure, for example. I guess all of you have heard read the what what has happened in the eastern border region. We face different hybrid threats, sabotage risks and pressure on key infrastructure, as also highlighted by the Commission's recent communication. Similar vulnerabilities and growing pressure are increasing across all member states. Resilience is a union wide challenge and should be clearly addressed. And for finally, ECF needs strong governance and multiannual work programmes. Member States must retain a clear role in both strategic and operational decisions. Thank you very much.”
EU policy on screening foreign investment in strategic sectors and critical infrastructure
- “Colleagues, Presidency Nature restoration is important to protect biodiversity and to mitigate climate change. But also we have to [00:50:30] strike a reasonable balance between the goals of the Green Deal and the ways in which land is used to apply The regulation. Subsidies from EU funds are necessary and funding cannot be left up to the CAP alone. For us, when it comes to restoring organic soils, it's important to be able to control the water level both ways in order to prevent floods and to preserve the use of agricultural land to produce food. The presidency proposal for the definition of Rewetting doesn't [00:51:00] give us the full confidence, and it does not take into account the specificities of the member States also a precondition for the restoration target for drained organic soils would be a detailed location Specific analysis. Estonia has large drainage systems, fragmented land ownership, a high proportion of lands that's being rented. This makes it difficult to motivate landowners to reach the Rewetting targets. Therefore, we welcome the Presidency proposal [00:51:30] to increase the percentage for flexibility for the organic soils target. It's very important for this flexibility to remain in the final text. We support a monitoring obligation for the biodiversity indicators for agro ecosystems. Based on studies in Estonia, we find that the monitoring for the organic carbon stock should be done throughout the entirety of the surface [00:52:00] soil horizon instead of just at 30cm. Then when it comes to areas with landscape features, then I think that it should be permissible to carry out extensive agriculture. Long term grasslands help with restoring and increasing biodiversity, but without some moderate mowing and without some moderate grazing, these areas cannot be preserved. Thank you very much.”
Nature protection and restoration in the EU
- “Transition to clean energy is definitely needed, no question about that. But it must be gradual and aligned with technological readiness to avoid unreasonable costs for companies and societies. Ets has been, I would say, an effective tool for cutting emissions and financing our emission reduction. Different measures in the upcoming ETS review. We, of course support changes that will reduce price volatility. That's a huge issue for companies to improve predictability and to prevent price spikes. It is important that any review continues to safeguard the strengths of the current allocation logic, which has ensured that its revenues actually support domestic green transition. Finally, on automotive, uh, unfortunately, we do not support mandatory targets in the corporate fleet proposal. Why? Companies and a lot of member states have already made long term investment decisions and plannings based on the existing regulatory framework. Introducing additional binding targets at this stage will risk undermining predictability. As I mentioned previously, what's most important for companies to have stability and predictability? Therefore, policy efforts should focus on effective implementation of existing legislation rather than creating new mandatory targets. Thank you.”
Extension of the EU Emissions Trading Scheme
- “I also congratulate the Commissioner for the nomination and the new portfolio. Estonia supports the adoption of the new recommendations. They are long awaited. And of course, as my colleague says, better evidence and impact assessments would help each and every one of us to to implement national policies as well. But we shouldn't wait for the assessments in order to strengthen our public health policies to effectively protect people, especially youngsters, from the negative effects of new nicotine products and national policies are often difficult to implement politically and practically. For example, Estonia has banned a distant sales. But but half of the member states allow it, and it's very difficult to control what goes on cross borders. So EU level policies would benefit the people and would be much more easy to to implement. So we also call for stepping up the ongoing evaluation process of EU tobacco legislation and the revision of Tobacco Directive, and redesign it into a Nicotine Products Directive. Thank you.”
Smoking regulation
- “Yes. Thank you, dear Vice President, dear colleagues, Estonia also supports the overall goal of boosting our industrial capacity and the decarbonization in key strategic sectors in the union. Achieving this by supporting local production and improving the impact of foreign investment requires predictability. It requires business friendly rules and, of course, flexibility to reflect member states specifics on union origin rules. The key point for us is definitely clarity. We need to be very clear about which sectors are covered and which partner countries are included. Sectors like steel, automotive and clean tech are central to Europe's growth, so strengthening their competitiveness is essential. At the same time, for smaller economies like Estonia, openness definitely is fundamental, fundamental, both within the European Union and with like minded partners. Union. Origin rules must be coherent, easy to apply and not create excessive burdens. Clear guidance from the Commission will be crucial to make procurement of European products products straightforward. Lastly, we need enough flexibility to avoid supply bottlenecks and ensure access to alternatives when needed. On permitting, we unfortunately have several concerns. Having provisions on permitting scattered across different legal acts with often inconsistent rules causes fragmentation, complicates implementation and may even at some point slow down the process. While we support the aims of simplification and digitalisation, they should not come at the expense of well-functioning and already existing national systems. Member States, who have already made investments to streamline and digitalized operating systems should not be penalized for that. Lastly, we note the need to actually limit the use of delegated acts. Member states need to be strongly involved in the decision making, making, for example, when excluding third countries in relation to union origin rules. Thank you.”
Overall simplification of regulation in the EU · EU Single Market harmonisation
- “Dear colleagues, I'm very glad that we have the opportunity to discuss on the chemical strategy. Bringing the topic to the political level will contribute to the implementation of the strategies, actions and effective delivery. The measures outlined in the chemical strategy ensure a broad approach to developing the sector and addressing bottlenecks. Similarly to most of us around the table, we do attach importance to the review of the Reach regulation, a more general implementation of the Reach approaches, in particular the one substance, one assessment principle and the harmonisation of terminology and assessment methods across different EU legislation is key to lessening the administrative burden in the chemical sector and at the same time helps to better protect our health and nature. We consider it important to ensure that sufficient time and capacity is provided for the implementation of the actions already identified in the strategy. The implementation of those actions itself can be challenging, and it is therefore crucial that they are well thought through and that the different initiatives go hand in hand. For example, we consider it important to support and promote the use of a framework for safe and sustainable design of chemicals and materials. Effective implementation can be facilitated by linking the objectives of the chemical strategy and the more specific actions of the measures, with the work of other areas at all levels which support these objectives at member state level. The implementation of the strategy can also be supported by guiding companies towards solutions that bring innovation and support to the environment and health. In Estonia, for example, we are planning to support companies in promoting safe material recycling through structural funds. Overall, we find that the measures set out in the strategy remain appropriate to address the problems identified. Thank you.”
Chemicals regulation
- “Thank you. Estonia is ready to support this proposal, but we also regret that the ambition in the compromise text has fallen, fallen very low, and there are too many exemptions here. As a minimum, we hope that it would not be watered down even even more. And I remind you that neither environment security has as asks us about for such compromises. And the idea of energy taxation is not making consuming fossils easier. Thank you.”
Fossil fuels
- “Thank you very much, Mr. Chair. And I would also like to start by thanking Latvia and Lithuania for raising the issue. We understand these concerns very well, and we are quite certain that implementing the new rules on margins of tolerance is going to be difficult. We [00:12:00] agree that those infringements that do not cause significant environmental or economical damage should, in principle, not be regarded as serious infringements. Luckily, the Commission has delegated powers to amend the criteria for serious infringements in annex four of the new control regulations. We believe that when necessary, a reasonable solutions can be found here. Currently, our efforts have been directed towards the Implementing Act on conditions for listed ports, where an additional derogation [00:12:30] may be applied. We would like to stress that the conditions must not be unjust or fishing for human consumption, which is regarded to be a more sustainable use of fisheries resources and must not be jeopardised. Around 70% of our small pelagic fish goes for human consumption, which sets higher standards for fish quality compared to fish for fishmeal. We have shared our views and proposals with the Commission, but unfortunately they have not been taken into account, so we remain slightly concerned about that. [00:13:00] Thank you very much.”
Environmental regulation of fisheries
- “Thank you very much, Lars. Dear colleagues, first big thank you to the Danish Presidency for the dedicated, sincere and pragmatic efforts in guiding this process. I believe discussions have been both substantial and constructive. If little more time is needed. Let's take it. But let's not lose momentum for the last 20m of 100 meter sprint, because the text before us today already represents a significant and positive step towards the agreement on how and on what preconditions we will reach to 2040 target of 90% reduction. I have four comments on on on key issues. First on review clause. We need to know where we are going, and we also need to take stock on the way whether the chosen path Remains fit for purpose. Therefore, I thank the presidency for strengthening the review clause in the compromise text. Second, on financing, the availability of funding for reaching our targets is important, and it is important to have equitable and available funding to all parts of the Union, including the small economies that are part of the text should be further strengthened. Third, on flexibilities regarding on international credits, we are open to their inclusion in a limited manner within the flexibilities part. However, it is crucial that the future system does not create imbalances within the union. The clear priority must therefore remain on the investments required for the EU's domestic transition. We have been strongly advocating for enabling flexibilities within and across the sectors and welcome the clear provisions here.”
Energy (green transition)
- “So thank you very much. Presidency colleagues. Commissioner Kyriakides First of all, I'd like to thank the Swedish colleague for the overview. In Estonia, we too, unfortunately have to admit that ESF hasn't disappeared over the past year. We can clearly see that the virus is spreading more quickly. Therefore, it's extremely important not to lose our vigilance. And in Estonia this summer, there have been at least [00:13:30] two cases in which ESF has made its way to a pig farm. So as a result, we've had to eliminate around 10,000 pigs looking for dead wild boar. Isolating them from the environment is necessary, as is keeping the number of wild boar under control. It's also necessary. And implementing biosecurity in pig farms and hunting are things where no concessions can be made. Also, public awareness raising of this issue is needed. I'd also like to stress that [00:14:00] it's very important to exchange best practices between the states, to continue cooperation with scientists and to look for options to develop an effective vaccine. Thank you.”
Animal diseases prevention and management in the EU
- “Thank you and thanks, Commissioner, for the progress report focusing on better application of existing legislative acts. Reducing administrative burden and streamlining the current framework is crucial to ensure that it delivers the intended ambition in the most efficient and practical way. Simplification is a priority for Estonia, so we see it as necessary to better reach our shared objective on energy without putting into question the overall ambition. A good example is the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive, where practical and cost effective solutions should guide implementation. Like Finland and Sweden already noted, this is particularly relevant for the provisions related to sustainable mobility, such as charging points and bicycle parking spaces. So we look forward to the Commission's next steps in simplification effort. Thank you.”
Road transport environmental policy
- “Thank you. Thank you for the commission for introducing for the revised initiative. We agree that this is an issue that has to be addressed and highlighted. [00:38:00] The decrease in the number of pollinators may be caused by changes in the environment or climate, and they see a P is equipped with the measures to protect pollinators. In Estonia, we have provided support for measures that promote natural pollinators using CAP funding here. However, I would like to say that if we talk about the causes of this decrease, then it's important to analyse the combined interplay of various risk factors. We have to support scientific studies and [00:38:30] to raise awareness. And I also understand the concerns by the Lithuanian and Polish colleagues. Thank you. Thank you.”
Nature protection and restoration in the EU
- “Thank you. A lot of questions. So first, yes, we discussed the security and defense cooperation because the Western Balkans are also worried about the hybrid attacks that they see, you know, in their societies and and, you know, exchange of views of our practices, that we have already had with Moldova, that we are now using with Armenia as well, helping them to to really be resilient, to these attacks. Foreign malign influence is 1 of the issues. Of course, you know very well that all the Western Balkan countries are are different, and and they also have a different view. And that is very much reflected in the alignment of common foreign and security policy. For some of the countries, it's 100% aligned, also sanctions, which are hard. For some others, it's much lower. Member states were also expressing that they expect, all the countries to move on, on the European track to be fully aligned with the common foreign and security policy because in these geopolitical times that we are living, it's not a box ticking exercise, but it's actually showing whether you see the world in a similar way.
And on, Christian Smith, of course, the question is, maybe a bit rhetorical question, but, can it, I mean, the, operation functioning of this country, can it, get more complicated? But I think, it actually, can. So that's why we were discussing, how, we are supporting that the new high representative is appointed by the peace implementation commission, that, is supposed to take place, I think, in June. But, but this is the format, that Europe is supporting.”
EU relations with Western Balkans
- “Thank you chair. And also thank you to the Commission. The objectives are very important and we have already found several ways to make it more flexible. Of course, Estonia supports these objectives that we have a better. Competitiveness in Estonia. But we do not support article 27 for the reasons that Finland and Germany already stated. This is in contrast with workers law in Estonia. According to our national law, work contracts can be assigned unchanged only in the case the company continues with the same economic activity. If it is not the same, the workers have better conditions compared to the situations where these contracts are automatically assigned. So we support deleting article 27 and since in Estonia most companies are micro enterprises. The current title six is not appropriate for us, so we do not support that as well. But we hope we find better agreements with greater flexibility. Thank you.”
EU regulation on worker representation in company decisions
- “Thank you very much, president. And I would very much like to thank for thank the Spanish presidency. Yes, we do agree that finding a consensus about this proposal is very [00:27:30] important for European research, and it's a time critical issue. We have stated before that the principles and the provisions governing new breeding techniques need to be renewed, and Europe needs to keep pace with technical and scientific progress, and we have to remain in global competition, and we have to ensure that we don't hamper that beneficial innovation. Innovation and these needs should be available also for small and medium sized enterprises and provide faster [00:28:00] and more precise opportunities to respond to changing market and environmental conditions. So I expect that we come to a positive agreement. Thank you.”
New Genomic Techniques
- “Thank you. Commissioner. Colleagues. Presidents. I would like to very much. Thank you for the great work done by the [00:31:30] presidency on the draft of the new genomic techniques, and that you have been trying to find a compromise between delegations. We can support the general approach proposed by the presidency. The compromise proposed will allow for a further step in facilitating the introduction of varieties obtained by new genomic techniques. The proposed approach is moving towards equating varieties obtained [00:32:00] by NTS, which can also be obtained naturally or by conventional breeding methods. It means classical breeding. I think that NTS should not be subject to legislative provisions or separate measures for their implementations, compared to varieties obtained through classical breeding methods. I have also said that that [00:32:30] we need to renew all those provisions, and when we use products produced by NTS, then the then the consumers can also and the producers can also make decisions as to what to choose and they make sound decisions. I want to repeat that. We have to be in the global compact competition, and we have to make sure that there is no hampering of this useful innovation. [00:33:00] And the new NTS, they provide quicker and more precise possibilities to be in balance with new conditions. And it's also one of the alternatives for for herbicides. And it means that we can move towards more durable and sustainable use of pesticides. And it can also offer solutions for the challenging challenges we are facing. [00:33:30] And it helps to ensure a sustainable and more resilient food system. Therefore, I consider that finding consensus on the draft is an important and time critical issue for European research and innovation. We must refrain from moving knowledge and researchers out of Europe. I hope we will reach a common position on NTS. Thank you.”
New Genomic Techniques
- “Thank you very much. Thank you to Denmark and to Spain for raising this important topic. We have high expectations when it comes to this proposed Biotechnology Act. New solutions would contribute to achieving our sustainability objectives and to addressing the challenges the agriculture and food sector is facing here. However, we would like to highlight new breeding techniques or genomic techniques. We hope to reach a positive solution there shortly. It's important to reduce regulatory barriers to simplify the processes, but again, we cannot make any concessions regarding food safety. Simplification of flexibility are essential for the green transition of the sector, as it allows us to implement the cap more effectively and to guide the industry towards transition.”
New Genomic Techniques
- “Thank you very much, Madam Chair. And and, dear Commissioner, dear colleagues, we welcome the initiative and in general consider it necessary to update the directive to ensure the protection of human health and the environment. Although the aim of the directive is very important, we have some serious problems regarding the extension of scope and with the new requirements, requirements, the costs of implementing of the proposal and the administrative burden involved, and we see the need to find solutions to those questions. We see that there are cases where the new requirements would bring along bigger ecological footprint than the foreseen environmental benefit. For instance, this concerns the ambition to extend the scope of the directive from 2000, meaning the population equivalent to 2000 agglomerations, and to increase nitrogen removal efficiency of wastewater treatment plants to 85% in cold climate areas. Accomplishing required nitrogen removal efficiency would involve large scale reconstruction of newly built wastewater treatment plants, and would increase the consumption of energy. However, the accompanying accompanying impact to water bodies would be rather small. We are also concerned that the micropollutants removal requirement is linked only with removal efficiency of 80%. This approach does not consider the differences of pharmaceuticals concentrations in the wastewater. Thus, we propose to also include the limit value of micropollutants in alternative to removal efficiency. Regarding proposed extended Producer Responsibility scheme, we are concerned that it would cause unequal treatment between member states with small population and low consumption of Pharmaceuticals. It is also questionable whether the extension of producer responsibility to medical products is fit for purpose, considering the specific characteristics of this sector. It is important to consider wider socio economic implications, so that the availability of medically justified treatment does not deteriorate, and the pressure on the health insurance budget and on the patient co-payment contribution does not increase. We therefore have serious doubts about the introduction of mandatory producer responsibility for pharmaceutical companies. On a more positive note, we agree with the objective of moving towards a climate neutral energy in wastewater treatment sector. However, we think that the wastewater treatment plant facilities should have an option to purchase carbon neutral electricity from the market instead of producing it. In that case, the wastewater treatment plants contribution to climate neutrality is equivalent to Self-production of carbon neutral electricity. So with that, I would like to wish, of course, good luck to the Swedish presidency for further work. Thank you very much.”
Water pollution
- “Thank you chair. Dear colleagues, first we also thank the Polish colleague for raising this issue. We agree that farmers have to deal with increasingly time consuming requirements, leaving them less time for their core Activity, and therefore we would like to support farmers and find ways to reduce administrative burden by providing user friendly services as regards compliance with requirements. As to this implementing regulation, we think that the electronic data can be useful both for professional users and public authorities only if member states are given sufficient time to develop their IT systems and to inform the farmers. Therefore, we are not against Poland's proposal to postpone the entry into force of the implementing regulation by two years. But we will continue the activities that we have already started in order to be ready to apply the implementing regulation. Thank you.”
Digital and precision farming
- “Thank you very much. And thank you to the Danish and the German delegations for raising this topic. Uh, promoting the introduction of alternative control solutions, including bio control Oceans is at the heart of a number of EU strategic documents, and rightly so. Promoting the use of these solutions depends on improving the availability, including by speeding up the procedure for placing them on the market. I agree that these definitions have been used in different ways, and that they do need some attention, and these issues need to be dealt with at the EU level. Farmers are confronted with new plant pests, but the number of suitable solutions in their toolbox is decreasing. And this is why we invite the new commission to address this issue. Thank you.”
EU policy on pesticides
- “Thank you very much. Uh, Mikhail, the Druzhba pipeline was damaged by Russia, not by Ukraine. Russia is destroying Ukrainian energy infrastructure deliberately, and Ukrainian servicemen are repairing the destroyed infrastructure. And these people are under the attack, and some of them have been killed. So we need to understand the circumstances where Ukraine is operating. And this is just an evidence that Russia uses energy supplies as a weapon and cannot be considered as any reliable supplier. The phase out from Russian fossil fuels was already agreed with the Versailles Declaration back in March 22nd. The political direction by the EU has also been clear. We acknowledge the steps Hungary and Slovakia have taken to diversify their energy imports and secure alternative supplies. And we also commend and support Croatia's political and technical efforts to ensure stable energy supplies for Hungary and Slovakia as an alternative route. We support the Commission's commission in continuing its work to identify technical solutions that guarantees security of supply for all member states, and Estonia has consistently urged the European Union and its member states to end imports of Russian energy and to adopt additional sanctions targeting the energy sector and Russia's shadow fleet. Thank you.”
EU approach to energy security (home-made vs import sources)
- “Without such strategic oversight, we risk losing capacity that has been taken years to build. Then, on strategic priority setting, we are pleased with the direction of the text. Early member state involvement and strong strategic coordination underpin coherence between Horizon Europe and the European Competitiveness Fund. This alignment must begin with strategic and political guidance. Coordination at programme committee level may come too late to support the seamless investment pathway. Then, on partnerships, we share the concerns regarding implementation. No member state should be excluded from participation because partnership partnership structures are not compatible with national legislation, while tailor made solutions for every member state may not be feasible, sufficient flexibility and clear guidance on legal and practical issues are needed to ensure broad participation. And finally, Estonia supports strengthening bottom up collaboration across the programme. At the same time, we should avoid duplication with existing instruments and preserve a coherent programme architecture. We therefore support the presidency text, which provides sufficient flexibility while respecting the overall balance of the programme. Thank you.”
EU-level coordination of research agendas
- “Decisions must remain science based, transparent and consistent across the union. Bearing this in mind, we must focus on the challenges of the agri sector. For some crops, pests and diseases, alternatives are not yet available or they are not effective under local conditions. When an existing substance or product is withdrawn without a workable replacement, farmers face yield and quality losses and higher costs. In some regions, production of certain crops may no longer be viable. This mainly affects countries where small markets are not attractive for agrochemical suppliers. Farmers are already reducing risks. They use closed transfer systems, precision application, drift reduction measures, decision support tools and integrated pest management. These steps significantly lowered the risk and helped protect the environment. Wider consequences also matter. If the EU production declines, then imports and dependence on external products will grow. Then environmental impacts may be shifted abroad, and food security and farmers competitiveness may weaken, while consumers still expect safe and affordable food. And to finish up the Food and Feed Safety Simplification Omnibus proposal is aimed to decrease administrative burden and bring simplification. Therefore, we understand and share the concerns that Poland will bring to your attention as well. Thank you for your time.”
EU policy on pesticides
- “Thank you Chair and thank you for organising this debate today. The basis of the 24th target setting will depend on the successful implementation of the 2030 energy and climate objectives. However, already here we see the unique challenges that the ESR and Lulu of targets are posing in sectors like agriculture, land use, transportation and industry. Based on that experience, we see the importance of having the necessary enabling conditions in place, including the availability of necessary zero and low carbon energy and technology solutions. Also, the feasibility of the possible new targets have to be studied in detail. In addition, special attention has to be paid to the hard to abate sectors. Furthermore, the EU framework should allow flexibility to find cost-effective solutions tailored to the special conditions of the member states while maintaining the competitiveness inside single market and EU globally. Last but not definitely not least, we cannot forget the need for a fair and inclusive transition towards climate neutrality support measures and just transition mechanisms are crucial to assist those sectors and communities that are most affected. And finally, regarding demand side measures, we should consider EU wide solutions, especially as regards of circular use of materials. Thank you.”
Climate efforts
- “Transition to clean energy is definitely needed, no question about that. But it must be gradual and aligned with technological readiness to avoid unreasonable costs for companies and societies. Ets has been, I would say, an effective tool for cutting emissions and financing our emission reduction. Different measures in the upcoming ETS review. We, of course support changes that will reduce price volatility. That's a huge issue for companies to improve predictability and to prevent price spikes. It is important that any review continues to safeguard the strengths of the current allocation logic, which has ensured that its revenues actually support domestic green transition. Finally, on automotive, uh, unfortunately, we do not support mandatory targets in the corporate fleet proposal. Why? Companies and a lot of member states have already made long term investment decisions and plannings based on the existing regulatory framework. Introducing additional binding targets at this stage will risk undermining predictability. As I mentioned previously, what's most important for companies to have stability and predictability? Therefore, policy efforts should focus on effective implementation of existing legislation rather than creating new mandatory targets. Thank you.”
EU approach to electricity market and prices
- “And we would like to thank Czechia for raising, once again this very important topic. As mentioned by several colleagues already. Um, indeed, a joint letter from ten member states and 16 undersigned ministers have been sent to the Commission just very recently to once again bring your attention to the fact that the problem of cormorants needs an EU level legislative measure kind of solution. Reducing of the population can only be efficient if hunting of those of this species is allowed in annex two of the birds directive, as demonstrated several times, reducing cormorant populations cannot be achieved only through the use of the existing derogation. Derogations are intended to reduce damage, not for population control. And just for clarification, adding a bird to the annex two of the bird directive does not mean mandatory culling. It's an option, not an obligation. Um, so as we have heard today, the damage is done by the cormorant population go way beyond the Baltic Sea. So we would really urge the commission to take further steps in that regard. And as proposed in the joint letter by the ministers. Thank you.”
Large Carnivores
- “35:28 – 11:38:31): Dear presidency, commissioner, and dear colleagues, let me start by saying that early, meaningful youth participation is not a symbolic gesture. It is a prerequisite for youth friendly policymaking and for strengthening our democracies. Estonia's experience shows that when we involve young people early and meaningfully, the quality of our decisions improves and young people feel that democracy generally includes them.
We have built a system where youth councils, student unions, and regular consultations give young people a real voice. Lowering the voting age to 16 is part of this bigger picture, and it works. Estonia has allowed 16 and 17 year olds to vote in local elections since 2017. In our 2025 local elections, turnout among 16 to 24 year olds rose by 10 percentage points compared to 2021. Young people want to participate when we open the door.
Participation also needs right environment. In Estonia, we start building civic skills from early childhood, encourage inclusive school cultures, and support practical initiatives like participatory budgeting in schools. And beyond elections, young people from age 15 can already manage some of their own data in the population register, which is another step towards early responsibility.
Looking ahead, the next EU youth strategy should focus not just on participation structures, but on real impact. Young people often tell us they do not see how their input influences decisions. We need stronger feedback loops and clearer link between EU youth dialogue and the commission's work program. Strengthening the EU youth coordinator role would help ensure young youth perspectives are integrated across policy areas.
In this context, it is essential that the future Erasmus plus program preserves the continuity of current youth participation activities. As Erasmus plus youth participation projects and European Solidarity Corps solidarity projects are brought together under the umbrella of youth initiatives, this consolidation must not narrow the scope of support or weaken existing measures.
And finally, Estonia strongly supports giving youth work a dedicated and visible place in the next strategy as it is through youth work that participation is encouraged and shared European values such as democracy, solidarity, and sense of belonging are developed. If we want stronger democracies, we must treat young people not as future citizens only, but as citizens already today. Thank you. Thank you, Christina. We move on to Cecile Kidrich and then Italy followed by Austria. Thank you.”
EU volunteering programs
- “Good afternoon. So very packed day today. And so we had a productive meeting, we have 2 more productive meetings coming up. First, Western Balkans. Western Balkans is a strategic priority for the EU. And, this morning, we met with our counterparts from the Western Balkans to discuss, different issues. Ministers gave a political endorsement to deepen the cooperation with our Western Balkans, partners on foreign security and defense matters. And concretely, it means, it means more EU support against hybrid threats, disinformation, a new security and defense partnership with Montenegro, and also greater use of the European peace facility to boost our partners' defense capabilities. But it's clear the partnerships go both ways. In turn, we also expect further reforms, respect for the rule of law, clear alignment with EU foreign policy. The Western Balkans belong to the Europe European Union, and the the steps aligned, today are geared towards this goal.
On Bosnia Herzegovina, of course, we discussed the announced resignation of the high representative Christian Smith. Ministers agree, that it is in the European Union interest not to let the country slip, off its European path and that we have to stick together in finding a successor.
On Ukraine, we had a substantive discussion with foreign ministers Bija. Of course, after the 90,000,000,000 loan, Moscow's record battlefield losses, Ukraine deep strikes into Russia, and Moscow's shrinking military parade. These all things, show that, the dynamics of the war are changing. Ukraine is in much better position, than a year ago, but, of course, there is no time for complacency. And today, we took several steps. First, ministers adopted a strengthened mandate for the EU advisory mission to Ukraine, and this will allow our mission to step up against hybrid threats and support the reintegration of veterans. Second, we are also advancing our work regarding the EU security guarantees for the time of, truce, and this includes, strengthening the EU satellite center, so it could support the ceasefire monitoring, but also countering sanctions circumvention. And third, we are drawing up, sanctions to cut, off, Gremlins revenue streams. Ministers also, addressed the issue of peace negotiations in coordination with Ukraine. EU has always supported attempts to achieve a just and lasting peace. For Europe, to take more active role, we must agree amongst ourselves what we want to talk to Russia about and, what are our red lines. And the upcoming Gimnich meeting is a good place to do that, to have that discussion. And all these issues are linked to the broader principle, and there can be no just and lasting lasting peace without accountability for Russia. And the EU will formally join the special tribunal for the crime of aggression, this week. And today, ministers gave their green light for the EU to become to the International Claims Commission.
All of the horrors inflicted by Russia's war, the abduction of Ukraine and children is 1 of its worst. Stealing children is a calculated Russian attack on Ukraine's future. In response, ministers today adopted 23 new listings targeting those responsible. And after this press conference, I will co host a meeting, of the International Coalition for the Return of Ukraine and Children, well, where we will discuss also what more can we do. And the aim must be to return every, every child that has been stolen by Russia.
Ministers also discussed the Ukraine succession. Ukraine has made a remarkable reform progress under the most difficult circumstances, and there is now new momentum, and we must use it to advance Ukraine's path into the EU. This means opening all the negotiation clusters before summer. And getting Ukraine, into the EU is not charity. It's an investment into our own security. And our message to Putin is clear. Ukraine's European future is more important to us than destruction of Ukraine is to Russia.
On the Middle East, ministers agree that we need to strengthen cooperation with the Gulf countries in the wake of the Iran war. We will accelerate our work, regarding the strategic partnership agreements with all 6, Gulf country, the Gulf cooperation countries, and, we are ready to front load our security and defense cooperation. In the Strait Of Hormuz, the ceasefire is under heavy, strain, following Iran's recent, strikes in the region. The Iran hardliner grip on the world's most, important energy shipping line is untenable. EU is expanding its Iran sanctions to also include those responsible for obstructing the freedom of navigation. We, discussed also, strengthening the operation, SPIRES, which is a naval mission and which can contribute to the freedom of navigation. And this could also be our contribution to the coalition of the willing by France and UK. And EU can also bring decades of hard earned, experience from nuclear talks with Iran should, they resume.
In Gaza, humanitarian situation remains dire. Of course, talks have stalled between Israel and Hamas, and Hamas is, refusing to give up its weapons, and that increases, odds for a new war. But we have also seen the surge of settler violence in West Bank. Today, we reached a political agreement, to sanction Israeli extremist settlers and entities. This goes together with new sanctions on leading Hamas figures. This means that we move from the political deadlock that was there for a long time. Violence and extremism carry consequences. Also, we had, discussions on, the trade issues, limiting, trade with illegal Israeli settlements. So there was also a call by many member states to, take this forward. So, we will continue to work with the commission on presenting proposals.
On Syria, ministers decided on the full resumption of the cooperation agreement, which had been partly suspended, under Assad regime, and this is important signal, in normalization of the EU Syria relations. We also agreed to lift the sanctions on Syria's, interior and defense ministers. And later today, we will also host a high level political dialogue with Syria. You, moved fast to support the political transition and reconstruction after the Assad regime fell, and today, we are ready to take next steps. At the same time, we expect, to see continued progress on inclusive and legitimate political transition by Syrian authorities.
We also had Canadian minister with us today. Canada is the most European of all the non European countries in the world. And amid the chaos in the world, Canada and EU can be stabilizing force, for foreign policy and trade. Sorry for being so long, but it was, very intense discussions. A lot of topics. So ready to take your questions. Yeah.”
EU relations with Western Balkans