Government of Austria

Policy topics Government of Austria is active on

What Government of Austria has said (80)

• 2026-07-13 “Thank you very much. Austria welcomes the initiative put forward by Hungary on cooperation with Bioeconomics. Now, in the topics listed, they very much align with the topics raised by Austria and country and organization led initiatives on sustainable forest based bioeconomy approaches in February 2026. Against this background, there was the Vienna Call for action for promoting bioeconomics in forestry and having targeted measures for more than 60 countries and more than 100 organisations took it on. And here the Visegrad Group. Romania and Croatia are warmly invited to come and join this initiative because there are in existing structures such as Koli that I mentioned a moment ago, and also the word pop platform. Now, Italy has raised a point. An Austria fully welcomes it. The co-finance information on sales promotion measures are an important tool for boosting our agriculture and food sectors, profitability and competitiveness. Here we need to have to make the money available so that we can have satisfactory budget available for EU co-financed sales promotion measures. Thank you.”
  Management of EU forests
• 2026-06-29 “Thank you chair. I believe the planned change in unemployment means that we have to work very closely together, and the various ministers of labor have to work together more closely. This is something that needs electronic support. It has to be a direct between these job centres. And we need to use translation tools now for for the countries which are paying and which are providing the job seeking. Then there has to be con tinuous updating of information. And here the European Labour Organisation Authority can be of great support. The world of work is changing, as we all know, and hence the various competencies set out in 883 have to be looked at so that we can avoid any disadvantages which might come from working from home and for very mobile workers. There are certain legal grey areas, such as the posting of only teleworkers. This is something that has to be addressed through clear and up to date coordination rules when it comes to families. The immediate coverage with family benefits from the child's country of residence would be important. Digitalisation of the documents of entitlement is a priority for Austria, and here we would have to make sure that people abide by the rules on data, and also the overall aim of modernization efforts must be to create concrete, legally certain and above all, practical solutions for the persons concerned, as well as for the institutions and for the authorities. Thank you chair.”
  Regulation of teleworking labour conditions
• 2026-06-29 “Slovenia stresses the importance of coordinated long term targeted policies strengthening the welfare state. We pay special attention to strengthening Social security system as the first safety net, early and preventive measures to break the intergenerational transmission of poverty, reducing regional disparities and close inter-ministerial cooperation. An effective social protection system does not only depend on the existence of rights, but rather on whether people can actually enforce them. Therefore, Slovenia is strengthening a proactive approach based on simplification of procedures, digitalisation of services, better linking of official records and intensive information of residents about their rights. In spite of the progress, there are important challenges remaining. Some beneficiaries are still not exercising their rights due to lack of information or stigma. There is a digital divide and in some cases the system remains too complex. We therefore intend to further strengthen outreach and personal support in the future, so the social rights truly reach all those in need. And if we want to reduce poverty, we need to act decisively, coherently and in the long term at all levels. Thank you.”
  Child poverty policy
• 2026-06-29 “Distinguished chair, thank you for the floor. Slovenia also welcomes the European Union anti-poverty strategy. We are convinced that it can be an important instrument to deliver on the objectives of the European Pillar of Social rights and contribute to a more inclusive and fair Europe. As decision makers, we must be concerned about the fact that around 1 in 5 people in the EU is still at risk of poverty or social exclusion. It is particularly concerning when we talk about child poverty. It has not only been consequential for families, but also for economic consequences of the society as a whole. It has been estimated that the cost of inaction is estimated to be around 3.4 GDP per year. Therefore, child poverty is not only a social problem at present, but also a developmental challenge in the future. Breaking the intergenerational cycle of poverty must be one of the central tasks of social policies in Europe. Therefore, in this context, Slovenia welcomes the strengthened European Child Guarantee. We must be aware that the success of the EU anti-poverty strategy will mainly depend on its effective implementation by the Member States and on sufficient financial support from the EU beyond 2027 as well.”
  Child poverty policy
• 2026-06-29 “Thank you chair. One effective measure here is to provide state support to build residential homes and social housing. And when doing so, public support should be linked to keeping the price stable in order to force residential housing operators and landlords to keep rents affordable. For people in any kind of education. What's really important is flexibility in their contract. For example, the right to terminate the lease upon completion or termination of their course and the option of renewing the contract if the training continues. Moreover, regulation of free rents, especially where there's not much housing supply, has a positive effect on people in training and on middle income groups. Renovation, repurposing or conversion of existing buildings can also introduce increase the clustering of housing stock for these target groups. In addition, decoupling rental prices from the annual inflation rate is a way to help alleviate the burden on people in training and middle income groups. And in Austria, this has proven its worth because people tenants are maintaining their credit rating through this long term stability of rents. Legally, what's important here is that credit and rent payments are statutory capped. It's exclusively for the construction of affordable housing. So the cap of rents ensures affordable housing in the longer term. We think that this principle could be applied to residential home sectors as well. State support for residential homes should be geared towards making operators respect residents rights. One potential condition for state support could be obliging compliance with provisions that protect residents and Austria is currently working on introducing state support for student housing. Thank you.”
  EU housing policy
• 2026-06-26 “46:00 - 11:47:29): the signature of the framework agreement between Iran and The USA, we have at last a perspective for energy transport from The Gulf to resume. However, it's just a perspective, I underscore, because we still don't know how long the situation will continue to extend even being optimistic. However, until the supply chains are reconstructed and damaged infrastructure has been repaired, the International Energy Agency thinks it will take years more than months. Just repairing the Qatar gas fields will take at least 3 to 5 years. Since the Russian aggression on Ukraine, we've been trying to diversify our energy sources here in Europe, turning to Algeria, Qatar, and The USA. But that means that the immediate application of the of the methane regulation has serious risks attached. We support the initiative to temporarily delay the instruction of the of the of some of the aspects of this regulation. It's important that any that that we have adjustments to the legalities of the text. Just a statement would create legal uncertainty for operators, and that's not acceptable. We would therefore appeal to the commission to come forward with illegal text proposal. Thank you.”
  EU approach to energy security (home-made vs import sources)
• 2026-06-25 “Thank you very much. We support the goals in the Benelux note in particular in regard of strengthening the EU Waste Framework Directive and to achieve the best goals, the best outcome. We think that the Circular Economy Act and the revision of the WEE directive should be handled separately. Thank you.”
  Circular economy
• 2026-06-25 “Thank you very much, president, for giving me the floor. Commissioner. Colleagues. The current energy crisis confirms that we need to move away from fossil fuels stage by stage in the mobility sector. We need more use of renewable energy sources. Austria's position on the automotive package has not yet been finalised. We, however, support, in any event, technological clarity and openness with a strong focus on e-mobility and renewable fuels of European origin in order to achieve good value chains and avoid new dependencies. At the same time, we have to be consistent and coherent with existing environmental rules, particularly with the effort sharing goal and the European 2040 environmental targets. Overall, we have to ensure that we decarbonise the transport sector as much as possible and bring in and ensure access for attractive alternatives in order to keep the market and the sector competitive. We should keep burdens as low as possible for administrations and for companies. Finally, I wish to indicate that a number of the aspects are going to have to be discussed in very great detail, including the very interesting question of the proposed Made in Europe approach. We also need clarification around a number of definitions. I wish to thank the presidency for all the efforts made. Hence. Thus forth. Austria intends to be very cooperative. Thank you.”
  Road transport environmental policy
• 2026-06-25 “Thank you very much. We also agree, as regards in particular, the limitations under annex five and clear and practicable rules, which can prevent waste. A number of changes need to be made. We need to avoid making too many changes. Other problem areas we think are online trade, which needs to be where we need to increase accountability and the labelling where we need more flexibility. Thank you.”
  Food labelling harmonisation at EU level
• 2026-06-25 “Thank you very much. It's clear that biodiversity in nature and economic development are very intimately linked. That applies to agriculture and forestry as well as tourism and manufacturing industry. One in all, €10 in the Austrian economy is linked to wood. 1 in 11 jobs is linked to the forestry and wood industries in Austria. We are attempting to support the link between biodiversity and nature through a number of strategies and sustainable financing instruments. On the voluntary agro programme, about 10% of the surface area has been set aside for biodiversity and other sustainable uses. We see a great deal of future potential in the circular economy, as the ECB figures show the finance sector is also an important lever. The taxonomy at the EU level, covering biodiversity and the do no significant harm principle all play an important role. It is of decisive importance that these approaches be used to mobilise private finances, and that we continue to expand the taxonomy to cover more activities in the economy, which can be restructured in an environmentally friendly way. In this way, pioneering EU companies can benefit from the financial markets and become more competitive. It is also important that we have uniform methods so that we can have good data about sustainability. Thank you.”
  Green Taxonomy
• 2026-06-25 “Thank you very much. The water resilience strategy is very important, and we thank the Cyprus presidency for today's exchange of views on question one. The current figures show that Austria is also subject to changes in its water cycle, and changes in the patterns of precipitation in early 2026 in Austria. We received only about half of the normal amount of precipitation. It's the driest year since measurements began, and that makes it clear that we have to tackle water in a cautious way. Higher temperatures also have impacts impacts including on water, drinking water, ecosystems and food production. Between 1980 and 2010, we saw increasing in drought by about 17%. We have to take account of the water dimension in all EU regulations. We have to have common methods to describe water efficiency. That would be a way of helping to use water in a responsible way, in a cross-sectoral basis. It's important, however, to respect subsidiarity and regional differences. Question two A solid basis of data is important to manage ever more scarce water resources. We are working with key research institutes to better and improve our efficiency of management of water. We need scientific basis and data for the next Water Resilience Plan and the National Water Strategy. All of the results from these studies will be ready by the end of the year. Additionally, we are going to be putting together a water extractor registry. We think that this is an important tool to have, but we hope that it won't create any additional burden. Your third question. The financing of sustainable water measures and the EU budget. There's a good role to play here, particularly, for example, in supporting water, smarter technologies and monitoring systems, as well as establishing a European academy in this context. We think that. The stripping of resources from life and the cap would be the wrong signal. We're critical about any changes to the financing that goes to drinking water. We also have to ensure that we increase resiliency in as many ways as we can. Thank you very much.”
  EU policy on water management
• 2026-06-25 “Thank you very much. And thank you also to Sarah for today's initiative giving us the background to the life programme. I think we're all aware that when we're negotiating the new budget, a lot of interests come together. But I think we also all agree that climate and the environment is where, as an area where we have to make progress, and that will require EU resources. Life has been a success story since the 1990s. It's the only EU programme which finances nature and climate protection exclusively. It's the only way to provide EU funding for nature protection projects. We are. Therefore, we therefore very much regret that it is going to be lost. Life has been a catalyzer to tackle environmental challenges, turning them into economic opportunities, also mobilising private financing. We think that the goals of life have to continue into the next MFF period in a transparent and predictable way. It has. We have seen multiple times that every euro invested in nature protection has a has a benefit of many times that. Thank you.”
  Nature protection and restoration in the EU
• 2026-06-25 “President, thank you very much for giving me the floor. The rich program is unique and successful after 20 years. Revisions are necessary. Potential avenues towards the future were laid out in the French paper, which we support. Additionally, to the French proposals, we think that the establishment of sustainable, safe and sustainable by design would be a good idea, particularly in conjunction with the planned substitution and innovation hubs. It's also important that the structures and processes behind the horizon partnership to assess risks from chemicals PRC. Be extended beyond 2029 in order to provide a scientific basis for ongoing EU chemicals policy, I thank you.”
  Chemicals regulation
• 2026-06-25 “Thank you very much. Invasive species are one of the greatest threats to biodiversity, which is why we also support a European approach against such invasive species. At this time, however, we would request that. Exceptions and approvals be provided. Specifically, we think that it needs to be maintained. This is something which has been in Austria since the 19th century. It was put on the list of invasive species a couple of years ago. We abstained at the time and spoke out against the listing. We have around 250 companies in Austria who operate with this species, and it's important for them that it can be continued into the future.”
  Nature protection and restoration in the EU
• 2026-06-22 “Thank you. The management of large predators is fraught with many challenges. So we advocate careful management, effective management that takes into account the concerns of the populations affected and the protection of species. So Austria does support Romania's concerns. In particular, we welcome a European process to discuss flexible management approaches for the brown bear. This should take into account the different basic conditions and challenges between member states. Managing large predators should be tackled holistically, and it should rely on a combination of non-lethal and lethal measures. We also support high quality, comprehensive and transparent monitoring. Thank you.”
  Large Carnivores
• 2026-06-22 “Thank you very much, dear chair. We are grateful to the presidency for the revised proposals, the explicit mention of internal fisheries and aquaculture, and also on the marketing of fishery and agriculture products. We welcome that Austria is positive about the current proposal, but can I point out that aquaculture needs to be more strongly visible and made more specific in this text? Austria fundamentally welcomes the proposals to restructure the MFF, make it more flexible and to make a stronger, stronger focus on key points. We regret that aquaculture policy continues to have no dedicated funding. And they have to compete against areas which are far better funded. Austria wants to take part in the discussion on increasing the importance of aquaculture. Thank you.”
  Funding for fisheries and aquaculture
• 2026-06-22 “Dear chair De Maria and dear Commissioner, dear Kostas, the evaluation of the CFP clearly shows us that future development of EU aquaculture should be more prioritised. Aquaculture is able to make a significant contribution to food security, regional development and environmental sustainability. With this in mind, any future adjustments should promote sustainable growth and modernisation of the sector, particularly through faster permit granting, better spatial planning, more support for innovation and research, and easier access to finance for small and medium sized enterprises. Also, more long term planning certainty is needed in order to encourage private investment and to make fishing more attractive to young people. With a view to the future of the CFP, the role of aquaculture should in any case be significantly bolstered and should be backed up by adequate funding within the CFP. That is the only way to guarantee sustainable production, predictability and successful development of the sector. With this in mind, vision 2040 should provide a coherent policy framework that takes due account of the different structural conditions between the member states. Thank you very much.”
  Funding for fisheries and aquaculture
• 2026-06-22 “Dear chair, dear, dear Oliver, I would like to thank the Cyprus presidency for the intensive efforts they have made to reach a good balance on PRM interests at the beginning of the trilogue negotiations. Austria did have some misgivings, but some of these have been addressed successfully in part. What's successful here is the Species. The definitions of these should not be restricted to fruit and veg, but should also refer to agricultural categories. Now that we've got this trialogue compromise, we're going to be scrutinising it. At any rate, we think that diverse and healthy seed material is a key prerequisite for agriculture. Thank you.”
  Sustainable use of seeds in EU policy
• 2026-06-22 “Thank you. Austria is in favor of future BSE monitoring being in accordance with WOA requirements and we support Belgium's proposals. After all, according to Efsa extrapolations raising the minimum testing age for at risk animals to 60 or 72 months would result in case numbers similar to those under the current minimum age requirements. Thank you.”
  Animal diseases prevention and management in the EU
• 2026-06-16 “Thank you very much, dear Thomas. It's kind of a preview to the next sessions. I will switch to German.Thank you. Commissioner. Cyprus presidency. Thank you very much. Especially to you, Marilena and your team. Thank you for all the efforts you've deployed over the last months, particularly to put together this Lego box on the MFF. It's really trying to square the circle here, trying to get all interests under one roof. It's almost impossible to present a solution at this stage of the negotiations that everyone will be able to go along with. Now let me start with some positives. We recognise that some of the elements in the current Lego box, such as the option to continue the contribution correction mechanism for Austria. Strengthening rule of law, compliance and the Excellency principle are good. However, you'll be surprised to hear that this text is still very far away from a compromise that we would be able to support. The cuts that amount to not even 2% are a drop in the ocean. The overall volume remains far too high. We are missing substantive cuts in the proposal. And just to highlight that, last week, the Austrian government presented its 2027 and 2028 budget to parliament, and that proposal contains some very tough consolidation measures and clear cuts in order to pave a way out of the excessive deficit procedure and in order to be in line with EU fiscal policies. And this is the measure that has to be applied to the union itself. We need to be credible as national governments. We are currently asking a lot of our citizens. Our citizens are having to accept a lot of very painful fiscal political decisions, and we cannot be seen to apply different standards at European level than we do at national level.”
  Size of EU budget
• 2026-06-16 “Now, of course, Austria is willing to make its contribution to a future oriented and affordable MFF, and that is precisely why, if we want to achieve acceptance across all countries, that we are seen to be managing the money of our citizens well and responsibly, we need modern, efficient and predictable structures. Our citizens are rightly expecting of us that we lead by example and are saving where we can. So it's about setting the right priorities. It's about assessing what's more and less important and where we really need an effective European Union. And what, on the other hand, should remain a national competence because that is where it belongs. We need to be able to mobilise private funds more easily and ensure that public money, the tax money, is used in a more targeted fashion. We have to not just discuss about the level of expenditure, but also the aims we're trying to achieve. We need to make sure that we have less bureaucracy, good framework conditions and certainly no additional taxation. We need to remember that the EU's success is not measured by the size of its budget, but is measured by its impact, measured by its actions, and without significant adjustments. This Negro box is still very far away from a landing zone. We need a realistic expenditure that reflects the budgetary realities in the member states. Of course, we will continue to play a constructive role in the upcoming negotiations. And Thomas, I can wish you the very best for your presidency in the upcoming semester and for the work to come.”
  Size of EU budget
• 2026-06-16 “Thank you very much, Magdalena. We welcome that in all three legal acts, there have been significant progress. Nlp, the increased involvement of the regional level and strengthening the rule of law in global Europe. We see a strengthening of the role of the Council on the ECF. We see a strong focus on excellence and European added value, which is important because only that can ensure sustainable value chains. Um, Austria can support all three pgas. But I would also refer to our statement to the minutes on ECF, which I would like to ask to be added to the minutes. Thank you.”
  EU Supervision of the Rule of Law
• “Colleagues, when it comes to competitiveness, it's clearly a key question of our current time when we look at our growth. Europe is growing 1% US, 3%, China four, India 7%. And if we want to maintain our prosperity and our jobs. We need economic growth. So I would call upon us focusing and prioritizing Europe more in all of our discussions, that there be a pause to negotiation of any commission files that are not clearly contributing to additional competitiveness, jobs and stability in our economy. Now, in 2026, 111 commission proposals are being discussed in various settings, and I think we really need to prioritize those topics that are actually going to be of use to our economy. And the I A is exactly one of those instruments that we need to support. But I would call upon a concrete expansion for all of those key technologies where Europe is already a global leader and where European companies are leading globally. If I think of quantum data innovation, microelectronics, electronics, bio pharma, life science, um, processing, manufacturing, anything to do with clean tech and environmental technologies, there are many areas there, um, that are contained, but hydrogen is not fully there and um l e charging stations are not there.”
  Overall simplification of regulation in the EU
• “Thirdly, um, there are countries who are really affected by the question of gas and electricity prices and their knock on effects. And, uh, we have been we've shown solidarity with Ukraine. But those countries which have been particularly affected by this because of high gas prices, they need our support as well. Now when it comes to price zones and reforms. Well, um, when we're setting a CO2 price for a gas power station, we need to also make sure that if it has a negative effect on electricity prices, well, then it's important to now on the car industry. Well, yes, technology openness is good. Um, now the compromise is only a very small compromise. It doesn't go far enough. And, uh, of course, if we're going to then talk about fleet objectives and, uh, that might undermine technological openness by the back door, we need, after all, to allow our vehicle industry to have technological openness. Uh, and now. This focus on the question of key industries. There are industries with enormous amounts of growth rates in Europe, and they need To have state aid benefits, they need quicker procedures. The Net Zero Industry Act could be extended to key technologies. And also we need to focus on how we encourage research because that's the best way for Europe's industries to grow. Thank you.”
  Powertrain choice: EV-only pathway vs. equal support for hybrids, e-fuels, H2
• “Ladies and gentlemen, the most urgent question of our time is industrial resilience. And it's clear that we want the steel, the chemicals and the car industries in Europe to remain in Europe. We welcome everything that's in the action plans. But let me say quite honestly, it's going to become more and more difficult when we talk to those who are working in the industry and when we talk to entrepreneurs in these industries to explain what it is we're actually doing. Just describing the problems is no longer sufficient. We now need to move to an implementation phase. Thanks, therefore, to the Commission for the fact they have acknowledged how urgent this is. We're talking perhaps about too many topics we need to concentrate on. What are the really decisive questions for our industry? Firstly, we now need to make the most of the USA position of weakness because of the Supreme Court judgment. When it comes to the 50% tariffs on aluminium and steel. If we don't have a perspective on that, then we can't, uh, lengthen the tariff deal. Also, we need to reform the ETS and the free certificates, as long as there's no new decision as to how we're going to tackle Cbam, then we cannot allow the free certificates to run out. The system of free ETS certificates has become. A program for Europe to become less competitiveness. So I think that, um, we need to stop pushing industry out of Europe by doing this.”
  Carbon leakage support
• “Now, on the second question, promoting the green transition is something that must be done within a clear, fair, transparent EU framework. Austria remains remains a key advocate of climate and environmental measures, and these must remain a central element of the cap. However, there is no binding green earmarking and that must not lead to competitive disadvantages for ambitious member states. This lack of ring fencing. Our farmers do a huge amount for the environment and the climate, and this is something that can only be done with fair competitive conditions, proper funding and comparable ambitions in all member states. We need a level playing field. This is in addition to sufficient funding, but at the same time, flexibility is needed to account for the different basic conditions in the Member States. For this framework to work, the Cap needs strong EU wide funding Without sufficient funding in place, environmental services and competitiveness will both be jeopardized equally. In conclusion, may I emphasize green architecture is a centerpiece of the future cap. If it is to be properly affected, we must have simplification, flexibility and reliability. Reliability in equal measure for the environment, for the climate and for our farmers. Thank you very much.”
  Agricultural funding
• “Thank you, chair. This is an ideal moment for today's discussion to take a fresh look at the priorities for the new working plan for culture before negotiations get underway. In Austria's view, this plan is the key strategic and operational instrument that the council has in the realm of EU culture policy. On regard regard as regards to the cultural projects of the moment, we see challenges for the coming 4 years, and we wish to tackle these challenges. First and foremost, improved working conditions for cultural creators. Key priorities there would be fair pay, social security, and, gender equality and, opposing misuse of people. We've tackled these themes in the working parties with other ministries and also with the representations of the cultural secretariat. Now cultural rights are fundamental rights. They are a pillar of democracy and civil society. Cultural participants have their individual well-being to benefit from, but they also have the contribution to society. So we need a conscious focus on youth and disadvantaged groups. New forms of access and participation must be given. What's relevant here is cultural education, transmission, and competencies. AI is having significant effects on what culture as it were produces. Cons consumers of cultural products need to be retained, and producers need to be able to live make a living from their work. AI gives challenges which needs differentiated approaches, and various cultural sectors are differently affected. Particularly important is, transparency and authorial or copyright matters. There is interplay here with the commission, and we are glad that many of the current working plans of the culture, of of the council are also in the commission's plans and documents. We look forward to bundling resources here, talking to the institutions together to boost the role of EU in culture. The work plan is essentially a flexible policy tool. It can be adapted as required. And we look forward to the presidency laying the focus on important issues, whether it be pandemic issues or the war in war in Ukraine. This needs to be continue continue to be possible to tweak the plan. In any case, we are glad that the negotiations on the new work done are getting underway, and we assure you of our engagement. Thank you.”
  EU and national cultural identities
• “Thank you. Marcus. Austria's interested in significant progress concerning the market integration and supervision package. And therefore we support the enhanced working party's schedule proposed by the presidency. Of course, it needs to be ensured that there is sufficient preparation time for each working party, and that the relevant documents are circulated in due time before the meetings. In our view, the package focuses on enhancing supervisory convergence and reduce the administrative burden for market participants. And in general, Austria supports this goal and is willing to contribute in a constructive manner to achieve relevant progress. However, certain parts of the file need adjustments. From our point of view. In particular, we oppose the proposed changes with regards to the EU equity consolidated tape and informed decision about the future of real time equity. Data from our point of view, should only be made after the submission of the related Commission report in 28. Uh, furthermore, we are quite critical, uh, with the current proposal regarding direct supervisory, uh, over nearly all crypto asset service providers by asthma. Asthma should be the competent authority for a significant, uh, crypto providers, but we think that, um, there is a need of, uh, an efficient cooperation with the national competent authorities in asthma governance for effective supervision. Uh, we need the European level for sure, but also, uh, the national level and the good cooperation between, uh, these. Thanks a lot.”
  EU supervisory architecture for crypto-asset service providers (CASPs)
• “Thank you, Madam Chair. The Vice President. Dear Commissioner, Dear colleagues, I would like to thank the Presidency for the text and the work done in the last month. Of course, tourism is of high importance in Austria, and we have a long tradition in the field of private accommodation rentals for tourists. Around two thirds of the Austrian accommodation providers are private. Even if the commercial enterprises, of course, offer considerably more beds. In the last decade, short term accommodation rentals have rapidly gained in importance, notably due to the large number of online booking platforms. This has brought advantages to both guests and hosts as well as for tourism regions in general. At the same time, it also has created challenges. We therefore welcome that the regulation will address some of these challenges in the future. Primarily, this concerns transparency. Authorities need to know who the hosts are and where the units are. Only then we can ensure that existing rules will be followed and effective measures can be taken if needed, and only then a level playing field can be created in the tourism ecosystem. It is also important that data which are transmitted by platforms, can be used in the best possible way and efficiently, both by the authorities for policymaking and enforcement purposes as well as for statistical objectives. For Austria, it was essential that the text provides sufficient flexibility and margin for the implementation without going away from the general aim of the proposal. Consequently, Austria welcomes the general approach. Thanks a lot.”
  Liability for online marketplaces
• “Thank you very much, chairman. And we'd like to wish all the best to the new commissioner on the directive. We basically support the objective of the directive to boost road safety. And we support the general approach today. As far as Austria is concerned, there are some questions left open, such as the lack of consideration of the country of residence when it comes to the directive system. We would prefer a simpler and more practical solution And when it comes to implementation, there is this issue of the extra burden as far as the citizens are concerned. So we do hope there will be some improvements coming in during the Trilogues. Thank you.”
  Road transport environmental policy
• “Thanks, Madam President. The proposed directive addresses the prevention and combating of discrimination and essential European objective, which we fully support to ensure the effectiveness of these protections. People should be well informed about their rights in the event of discrimination and legal certainty must be ensured so that they can actually exercise these rights. Therefore, it is crucial that the existing legislation ensures legal certainty. [00:34:00] This requires clear and understandable legal provisions for victims of discrimination and those who support them. Terms like multiple discrimination and the new concept of intersectional discrimination need to be defined precisely. Both the meaning and the differences between these terms must be clear, especially to legal practitioners practitioners. Moreover, the provisions regarding the exemptions in the area of financial services still require more clarifications. A sectoral approach has already proven its worth [00:34:30] at EU level in the application of the principle of equal treatment, irrespective of racial or ethnic origin and in the area of equal treatment for women. At national level, we for instance, have had good experience with our law on equality for people with disabilities since 2006. Sectoral legal acts enable tailor made legal discrimination provisions. I would especially like to thank the Swedish Presidency for its [00:35:00] efforts and the work being done on this important directive. Thanks a lot.”
  EU policy on integration and ethnic, racial and religious discrimination
• “Thank you very much, chair. And thank you very much for all of the presidency's efforts and the work on the Non-paper as well. Unfortunately, there was no substantive discussion. So the situation is such that many of the concerns we raised before still remain today. We need to have a risk assessment in line with the precautionary principle, and we need to have mandatory labelling of GT1 products to guarantee consumers freedom of choice. Now, in addition, we know co-existence with GM free and organic production, and that runs counter to the objectives of the Green Deal. Austria also still has serious concerns about the impact of the patentability of Ncgs, in particular for small and medium sized breeding companies. In Austria's view, therefore, it is essential that the outstanding issues be addressed in detail before a negotiating mandate acceptable to all could be adopted. Thank you very much.”
  New Genomic Techniques
• “Uh thank you Stephanie. Uh, Australia is committed to work constructively towards the finalisation of the negotiations on the Digital Euro and the single currency package in due time. The quickly changing geopolitical environment has shown the need for more European strategic autonomy, and we think the digital Euro clearly is an essential building block in this regard. We need to ensure that privacy concerns of citizens are well addressed and financial stability is preserved. Therefore, we regard the forum discussion on the governance of the digital euros holding limit with institutional checks and balances as a step into the right direction. We support informed discussion on privacy matters and the free compensation model to reach a council position on key outstanding issues. Thank you.”
  Digital euro
• “Finally, I want to think about the implementation of the vision itself, and I think here the cap is really the heart of the European product project. Agriculture is a strategic sector and there are three basic pillars. In order to make sure that we are going to achieve our goals, It has to remain a common European policy. We don't want to end up with fragmentation into 27 different systems. Common instruments are absolutely crucial in making sure that we ensure a level playing field. The cap must work as an integrated system. It must not be dependent on other policy areas. It is crucial that the cap doesn't just involve direct payments, but also rural development and agri environmental measures and investments and transfer of knowledge. Above all, we must make sure that we have an appropriate targeted budget at EU level. We need to ensure that budget, particularly when it comes to rural development, and that will make sure that we can achieve our goals. Obviously, there will be competitiveness or competition to get money from the budget, but we must ensure food security at times of geopolitical strife. So we really need to make sure that sufficient funding is available for that. Thank you.”
  Agricultural funding
• “Thank you very much. Austria would like to thank the presidency for its efforts in order to strike a balanced compromise proposal. We very much welcome the fact that in many aspects, the text has undergone [00:08:00] improvements. The requirements for removing nitrates was mentioned by Austria last time, and we see that we have more realistic deadlines. So a core part of the proposal has been mentioned. Veterinary treatment of foreign EPR system with respect to waste treatment plants. This includes the pharmaceuticals and cosmetics. Now in terms of implementation, we think we have to have a harmonised approach. Whilst the [00:08:30] Commission plays a coordinating role for Austria, it's important in terms of municipal water treatment to have an ambitious approach. We set this out in a non-paper with other member states. It's important that this file not be undermined further, that the directive sets out clear goals and uniform minimum standards, and that exemptions should be limited in time. So to that extent, we think we've now reached the juncture [00:09:00] where we have to close the door to any further watering down of the text. I cannot conceal it by the fact that we're somewhat irritated to see at the last minute a last compromise proposal has been put forward, which would massively undermine this in terms of using external sources for renewables. Despite this very unexpected development, in the spirit of compromise, we can vote in favour [00:09:30] of the presidency's proposal in order to come up with a common position. Thank you.”
  Water pollution
• “Thanks, Marcus. In general, Austria agrees with the proposed scope for direct supervision by ESMA for significant trade venues. Central securities depositories and central counterparties. However, we see the current proposal regarding direct supervision over crypto asset service providers by ESMA. Still very critical. Austria supports a proportional model where ESMA supervises significant costs, while less significant ones are supervised by national competent authorities for significant supervision. Should follow a shared framework with asthma as lead supervisor and ncas remaining involved in the supervisory process. Ncas have acquired lots of knowledge and experience which shall be used properly concerning the definition of significance regarding Csds. Operating under another membership law may indicate cross border relevance, but is not an appropriate criterion for significance regarding CSPs. In addition to the threshold dependent proportionality criterion, cross border activity should be included as a cumulative criterion for identifying significant CSPs, as mentioned for significant costs. Asthma should be the decision making authority with defined supervisory tasks executed by ncas under asthma oversight. The significance should be defined cumulatively based on size and cross border activity. The revenue threshold should be sufficiently high and limited to MCA licensed services. Concerning governance, Austria advocates for more involvement and representation of national competent authorities in governance than proposed matters concerning the NCAA directly, such as cooperation arrangements or the application of supervisory convergence tools need greater involvement on the board of the Board of Supervisors for effective supervision, we need the national and the European level. This means that there is a need for further clarifications and stronger delineation between the respective roles of asthma and the NCAA. Thanks a lot.”
  EU supervisory architecture for crypto-asset service providers (CASPs)
• “(18:34:25 – 18:35:28): Well, also here, have to to, stick to the facts. What what what what was our job? As a commission, our job was to have the legal basis, for the return hubs. That's what the member states asked us to do, and that's what we delivered in the return regulation, on Monday. So the legal basis is there, and now it's, up to the member states to negotiate with third countries. Will it work? Well, I don't know. We have to ask The Netherlands and the the the Germans or the ones who who want want to have it. That's a voluntary a voluntary thing. For us, it was, important to have the the rules, to have the the legislation, which is there now with the new return regulation. And the the return hubs is 1 of the things which comes into force right away. That was also discussed on on Monday. And, the return hubs are part of this, so we are ready. And now it's, up to the member states to negotiate that with third countries. Thank you, commissioner. Nicholas, please.”
  Asylum & border control
• “President and Commissioner Christoph Kozlov. I know that this is an orientation date on this AP simplification package. So in our preparation, we've already Expressed our main concerns in the appropriate bodies. Those concerns remain that concerns our position that the Council and the Special Committee on Agriculture should be responsible here, and we have to have the package accepted as quickly as possible. That's an appeal to the Danish presidency as well. The current developments, as well as the internal reflections of the Commission on Modernisation of the EU budget, require us to raise our voices in favour of European producers. After everything we've heard on proposals for the coming financial framework, we. It seems that the cap could be in danger. We need an effective cap with a separate legal framework and a clearly established budget. It would be a mistake to give up that tried and tested formula. We want to make it clear to producers that we have are supporting their way of life, which is based on the Common Agricultural Policy, and that is completely separate from decisions and other areas of policy. That's a very important point to make. Mere lip service to their interests is not enough. I plea, I give a plea specifically, especially in front of our requirements which arise from the EU treaties.”
  Agricultural funding
• “Thank you for the climate crisis means that [00:13:00] extreme events are happening more and more often, particularly in the Alps, and we see that it's placing a burden on our infrastructure. Our infrastructure needs to become more resilient. All member states need to contribute to that. And doubtlessly there is a particular challenge in the Alps given the topography with natural borders. And that is why it's so important for us to coordinate. The most recent [00:13:30] events have shown us that we need good coordination, cross border and multimodal coordination. That's so important, particularly at operational level across the Alps and for different corridors. There are already different structures and working groups between the different ministers and the operators. Volker has pointed out that we already have a multitude of different governance approaches, [00:14:00] for example the simple alliance or the Zurich process. And I would propose these existing structures be given more life, uh, in order to coordinate at uh, multi-state level, for example, on planned infrastructure measures, uh, and [00:14:30] uh, agreeing on reactions to natural events, as we've seen in some of the border crossing points that Mateo has pointed out, so that we can react more rapidly. Thank you.”
  EU policy on infrastructure for preventing climate-related disasters (floods, droughts, extreme weather etc.)
• “Thank you very much. I would like to thank the Dutch delegation as well for raising this very important topic of pilot fatigue. And I would certainly welcome the fact that we do discuss this within the context of the next EASA management board. I think we do need to tackle this problem heads on and and certainly we need to be able to restore this [00:02:00] strong safety and security culture. I also want to talk about the fact of that. We need to look at social sustainability within the aviation sector. High social conditions and standards need to be guaranteed for all staff, and we need to make sure that we safeguard these high standards and make sure they're not undermined in any way. So once again, we should look at the, uh, this is an opportunity to take social aspects more into account within the aviation [00:02:30] sector and to try to tackle things like social dumping more. Thank you.”
  EU policy on aviation safety
• “(18:41:37 – 18:42:38): My as my Greek is nonexisting, I didn't I didn't get that in the beginning. But I'm very happy, of course, to, to say a few words. First of all, the Cyprus accession, to the Schengen era would be a significant step, of course, forward, for the European Union as a as a whole. And our primary focus as a as a commission is on on ensuring that Cyprus, meets the the the high Schengen standards, of course. So therefore, we evaluated the the situation in Cyprus, and we'll we will present the report soon. But to make that clear, it's the decision when and and how Cyprus joins the the Schengen Area lies within the council, not within the commission. So, there's been a lot of progress, and, thanks very much for the for the good progress and for the good cooperation. It would be, as I said, a significant step, of course. Thank you.”
  Enlargement of Schengen area
• “Thank you very much. And we too would like to thank the Czech Republic for this submission and for this opportunity to express how important it is to. We have a comprehensive cost study underpinning the Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive. We want to make it quite clear. That we support it in content terms, but make it equally clear that the European Commission has to submit an impact assessment by summer 2026 at the latest. We do think that this comprehensive. Analysis is necessary in order to ensure timely and balanced implementation in 2026.”
  Water pollution
• “Thank you very much, president. On the point raised by Portugal. We too recognize the difficult [00:22:30] situation facing the fishing industry in Europe. In order to cushion the impact of these crises. We think that besides NFF, which was addressed by Portugal, other instruments should be investigated. Fortunately, the fishery and aquaculture industry in Austria is characterized by a high degree of resilience and at the moment that does not require any crisis measures. The Austria MFA program is able to ensure [00:23:00] the resilience on the economic viability of the sector, without additional measures being required. Thank you.”
  Funding for fisheries and aquaculture
• “Thank you very much, Marie. Dear Commissioner, I will follow Xavier's example and speak German too. Very briefly, the specific proposals, uh, um, will be presented in due time, at which point we will be able to evaluate them. We welcome the focus on, uh, reducing the administrative burden. Uh, and, uh, whatever measures are proposed, in the end, it should focus on the principle of better legislation for our citizens in the European Union and indeed for businesses as well, because it's only when we can improve, uh, the level of economic development show, uh, the added value of the European. It's only then that it will be possible to really put this into effective practice. Thank you.”
  Overall simplification of regulation in the EU
• “Thank you very much, chair. We support the Swedish initiative here to swiftly improve EU animal welfare legislation. Animal welfare is of major concern to people in the EU as demonstrated by successful citizens initiatives in the past. We share the view that future rules should be based on up to date scientific knowledge and on technological progress. We would call for a step by step approach as a matter of priority. Proposals for previously unregulated animal species such as fattening turkeys, fattening cattle, dairy cattle, sheep, goats and Rabbits should be submitted quickly, and the same goes for proposals on labeling. At the same time, we also need to look at revising existing rules. Now, national and regional circumstances must be sufficiently taken into account, in particular with regard to the necessary transitional periods, to avoid putting too much of a burden on the agricultural sector. Like Sweden, we also believe it's essential that new animal welfare legislation sets out high standards for animal welfare, for food safety and for the security of its supply as well, while at the same time meeting the needs of consumers and ensuring the competitiveness of domestic agriculture through harmonisation within the EU. Thank you.”
  EU requirements on animal welfare for farmers
• “Thank you very much. As several of my colleagues, I'd like to take this opportunity to remind [00:19:30] us all of our own targets. We want to improve air quality. And later, over lunch, we'll be talking about making goods transport more environmentally friendly in order to protect the health of our citizens. And I'm convinced that we have to maintain the level of ambition, and we're grateful for the challenges [00:20:00] that have been openly recognizes. But I'm firmly convinced that the vehicle industry has an important contribution to make to improving emissions. And I would call upon all colleagues to work together to find a compromise that will help us to maintain our level of ambition and not jeopardise the Green Deal. Thank you much for your.”
  Road transport environmental policy
• “Ladies and gentlemen. Commissioner, in the long term, tourism can only be successful if economic strength and social acceptance are both considered. Therefore, we urgently need a legally sound solution for um for regional prices. If somebody lives in a region, works in tourism, making tourism possible, then those people also need to be able to access and afford the tourist attractions or the ski slopes in their region. So we call upon the commission to finally adapt the legal framework to ensure that home rates are made possible. Um, and we therefore support the Council conclusions. They are in line with the 2030 consumer agenda, where we already unanimously decided amongst all member states that there should be a legal possibility for home rates to be applied, and we're expecting the corresponding legal framework in the second half of this year to make sure that it is possible in future. Thank you.”
  Road transport environmental policy
• “Thank you very much, chairman. Austria has long called for a revision of transport rules. And so we welcome the proposal. It's a good step in the right direction. However, there are still some adjustments that need to be made. And there's room for further discussion with a view to better implementation. We need a clear division of responsibilities during transport or when it comes to the use of traces. Austria particularly welcomes attempts to move towards digitalisation. We also welcome the reintroduction of inside temperature measurements to improve animal welfare, and we will continue to make a constructive contribution, to make progress quickly and make improvements to animal welfare. Thank you very much.”
  Road transport environmental policy
• “Thank you. I would also like to thank the Commission, Kadri, for all the work that has been done over the recent months. This has brought before us a product which looks at the electricity market and puts forward some useful suggestions. Now there are a few points that I would like to pick out and I listen very carefully. Article 15 A energy sharing private to private could bring more net stability in the distribution network for the DSOs peak shaving also flexibility for peak periods. This could be integrated and again will release capacity which could be useful. I also welcome the proposals in the regulation on. Article 27 a. All energy suppliers should look at the suppliers of last resort and ensure that they can have extensions to six months for the ban on cutting electricity for vulnerable groups. And then we have Article 66 A there. We have legislation in Austria and there we can finance specific cases where there is a shortage of supply. There is another point where we can improve the proposal and that is systematic interlinking from electricity to gas. This is something that we have spoken in favor of in this round and we should all be able to ensure that people can profit from cheaper renewable energy prices, which will help to provide relief to the consumers to pass it on down the chain. Any accidental profits should be passed along to consumers. We also have the contracts for different if these are designed and used appropriately. This could be very useful if we also have nuclear energy. The external costs and risks have to be looked at too.”
  EU approach to electricity market and prices
• “Thank you very much. President, Commissioner, colleagues, I is something that is going to change our world in the long term. We don't yet know how exactly the world is going to change, [00:03:30] but it's certainly underway already. So I would really like to thank you for giving us the opportunity to have this exchange at the European level, an exchange on such a cross-sectoral topic. I think there are two areas in particular where that we need to focus on in terms of taking action. On the one hand, there's huge potential when it comes to creation within the CSS as well as communicating that works, but at the same time breaking down barriers that exist. And we need to make [00:04:00] sure that the requisite skills needed for the sector are there and are developed. At the same time in Austria. Since 2021, we have a fair pay and fairness process which is ongoing. So we're looking at newly developing technologies there, including AI and the way we can create new instruments which might be needed in order to make sure that creative work is fairly and properly remunerated. And that really is something that [00:04:30] I think is really important that creatives can make a living off of their work, despite any changes to the conditions or other developments. So in the coming few months in Austria, we are going to be really honing in on this topic. First and foremost, we're going to have an in-depth dialogue with stakeholders from the CS, and that will include a high level conference that's going to take place in June. Now, what's of key [00:05:00] importance here is that when it comes to this topic, I think we need to approach it from with a positive mindset. I don't think it's going to benefit anybody if we approach it with fear. I think we need to make sure that the sector is aware of the possibilities and opportunities that AI and new technologies present, and that they can make use of them. So we're going to work on developing a funding program, which will focus on the use [00:05:30] of AI in the cultural and creative sector. So here we're going to be developing and funding innovative projects put forward by creatives and cultural institutions. And we'll also going to be able to to to fund further development of skills and training programs. And that funding program is going to be started in the summer. When it comes to the European level, we welcome the fact that there has been a focus placed and an emphasis placed on digital [00:06:00] skills within the funding programs of the European Commission. Uh, continuous work on the continued work on the use of AI and cultural content is really something that should be the order of the day these days, the proper implementation of the AI act and obligations under copyright law, as well as transparency obligations, are really important when it comes to the data being used, and important measures have [00:06:30] been taken already when it comes to the AI act and the field in general. In order to be able to combat the risks that exist for the CS. So it's important that we look at further steps that we could take, analyze what we could do. And I think instruments in the area of copyright law would be really crucial here. Our goal should be fair remuneration of creatives that that's ensured for the future too, because only then will I actually be able to enhance human creativity. Thank you.”
  EU and national cultural identities
• “Yes. I too would like to extend my sincere condolences to France, [00:21:30] Belgium and Sweden at this juncture and a big thank you to the Commission for their initiative. And also, I'd like to thank the presidency for all their hard work on what is such an important topic so that we can make headway. I think we all agree that the initiative to protect our children is one of the most important roles that we have, and I would like to echo the comments made by Germany, France and others in that we do need to place more of an obligation on providers. A great deal has already been done, [00:22:00] but we still really need to work hard to take this forward, and I'm sure we will succeed in creating a basic regulation, and we must succeed in that endeavor. And I will certainly do my utmost to bring it about. Thank you.”
  Safety features & content control for child protection online
• “Okay. I think we can make a start. I think. Pay tribute to everybody's good humour. Okay. Austria, please. Thank you. Chairman. Commissioner. I'd like to thank you very much for all the effort that you've put into the 2040 climate objectives. These are very important things that we find in the compromise proposal. So a very big thank you to the presidency for Austria, what's particularly important is to have a strong, uh, environment policy and strong objectives. And that's why we've reached this compromise proposal. In addition to that, let me mention the certificates. The emission certificates, the allowances and what we have established for 2034. And I think also this ties in with what we have done for 2026. They should be included in the text in my view. And then as of 2028, there will be another extension measure for these certificates. And we have a statement that we'll add to the minutes. Now as for nuclear policy, we agree that the technological neutrality objective allied with. Uh carbonization. We are against including that in the text.”
  Energy (green transition)
• “President. Commissioner. Christoph. It's good to see that food security is very much at the top of Europe's agenda, and that agriculture is being recognized as a strategic sector. Farmers need to be able to have their income and their ability to produce as the very focus of our strategy, and I welcome that. But we need to ensure that competitiveness remains a priority in the global context as well, in order to ensure better crisis resilience. It is vital that we have an appropriate EU early warning system. And the Cap, as in the way it supports the Union, is vital as part of the European project. And so in the vision that point is acknowledged and to my mind that is of crucial importance and it is vital that we have tangible legal proposals and an appropriate budget putting that into practice. And in any event, you can certainly count on Austria's support when it comes to ensuring a resilient cap, combating problems in rural areas. And like Spain and others, I would like to underscore once again that when it comes to all cap issues addressed by the Council and the bodies, the fora which prepare it, they must have an opportunity to address all these issues as part of the process.”
  Agriculture (green)
• “Thank you. President. The Hungarian minister has already said that we landlocked states are hit by ocean issues. And particularly because we're concerned about climate stability and competitiveness. We are concerned especially about biodiversity. Now on the threats. The threats are well known. I'd like to mention a couple of them in Austria. Two. We have great love of fishing, and we wish to have environmentally friendly fishing in the country. Illegal and uncontrolled fishing must be tackled more harshly. And, uh, we must also protect the fishing stocks. Also, the, uh, diversity agreements must aim to prevent overfishing with strongly protected protected areas. Now, along the banks of the Danube, we mentioned under the Slovene Presidency that there is a source to sea approach, which means that fresh water The sources. Lakes and rivers should be considered as part of the ocean strategy. Sturgeon and other fish which are threatened in Austria's view, should be greater protected. Finally, we also need to avoid pollution of the seas by better waste processing, and for that, rapid transposition and implementation is key. Austria pleads for, uh, rapid implementation of the treaty. And last but not least, studies indicate that this year nine of the seven planetary boundaries have been transgressed, including those on ocean cleanliness, which is already jeopardized. Thank you.”
  EU ocean policy
• “Austria [00:40:00] President. In principle, we welcome the initiatives outlined by the Commission and in the letter of Intent. Let me highlight just three issues. First one is enlargement. It is very positive that President von der Leyen's State of the Union speech clearly stated that the future of the Western Balkan countries lie within the EU. But now we look forward to the announced pre enlargement reforms and policy reviews. The second point is migration. It was very positive in this regard [00:40:30] that the Commission's announcement that the Commission announced to update the legal framework and strengthen cooperation to fight the smuggling of migrants. We also welcomed that President von der Leyen emphasised the importance to swiftly finalize work on the Migration and Asylum Pact, as well as work on partnerships with third countries. However, however, we also need to put a stronger focus on implementation. The Tunisia deal has to be filled with life. The [00:41:00] substantial financial means promised for EU border protection from the EU budget have to be disbursed and we are still waiting for concrete, out-of-the-box proposals for enhanced cooperation with safe third countries, as announced by the President in her letter before the last European Council. And finally, my third point. I want to reaffirm our support for Ukraine in line with the specific character of our security and defence policy.Thank you very [00:41:30] much.”
  Asylum & border control · EU enlargement
• “Chair. Commissioner. In light of the still need for clarification between the member States, so we would ask you not to see these remarks as our approval for the proposed architecture, the announced simplification in the proposed governance structure in the NRP plans and the single fund is simply not there. From the Austrian point of view, the proposal means the dissolution of the independent EMF structures and, and, uh, key measures in the area of aquaculture will be in competition with other policy areas. This, of course, goes to the detriment of playability, visibility and target accuracy. We have been calling for greater budgetary allocations for aquaculture in Austria for years, and this has not been taken into account in the proposal. We see merely a minimum funding for CFP interventions. Aquaculture policy, however, is not, uh is lacking independent, predetermined financing, and we will have to compete on the national level with other policy areas. Of course, this runs counter to the expert discussion with regards to the growing importance of aquaculture in light of providing European citizens with high quality food. Thank you. Uh.”
  Funding for fisheries and aquaculture
• “The chairman. The Commissioner. Thank you very much for the comprehensive presentation of this important, uh, future oriented strategy. I very much welcome the strategy. It proactively addresses one of the key issues for agriculture without young people. Agriculture has no future. Without a strong cap. Agriculture has no prospects. I would like to emphasise that the concrete design of the strategy must be the responsibility of the Member States. Each member state has a different starting point and therefore needs to apply different levers. For example, in Austria, 23.4% of farmers are under 40 years of age. Thus, the Strategist's target of 24% has already been almost reached. Currently, Austria will continue to work proactively to maintain this positive trend. I would like to emphasize also that I very much welcome the continued high priority given to education, because only well trained farmers with the appropriate qualifications can make informed and sustainable business decisions. Finally, I would like to emphasise that all measures can ultimately only be implemented with a strong, integrated and adequately financed cap. Thank you.”
  Agricultural funding
• “Chairman Chislov Commissioner Christoph, colleagues, first of all, let me say thank you very much indeed for your kind words at my renomination. I'm very pleased to be a member again of this group and to talk about the important challenges that we face in EU agriculture. The vision for agriculture and food has arrived just at the right time, and it really tackles just the right topics as well. It's very good to see, Christoph, that you and your services have managed to come up with an excellent basis for the medium term design of a resilient and competitive agricultural sector in the EU. Food security is quite rightly, a key priority for the EU. The document sets out the key ways to meet the multitude of challenges that we face, first of all, promoting entrepreneurship and making sure that we have economically sound businesses and farms. Economic development in the regions is absolutely crucial as well. And thirdly, a sustainable approach to nature when it comes to competitiveness and to the economy, in order to make sure that we have a successful future, what we need is young and innovative farmers who run their farms with confidence and courage, and it is up to us to provide attractive and stable conditions for them to be able to do that.”
  Agriculture (green)
• “Thank you. Chair and Commissioner. Austria welcomes the efforts made to reach a full agreement between the EU and the Ukraine. Of course, we are going to have to scrutinise the full outcome of the negotiations in detail. We must be guided by the need to protect our products and to safeguard the unity of the internal market. Also, quotas in sensible, sensitive agrifood areas like honey are going to have to be open to discussion. They could really lay heavily on the sector and the internal market if we're not careful for the mid to long term, we mustn't have distortions to the market. And also our high agricultural production standards must not be ignored by Ukraine. We need a surveillance system and a protection clause, including measures, measures and monitoring procedures.”
  Agricultural trade: Ukraine imports
• “Thank you, President. Austria. Is [00:49:30] very keen on organic agriculture. In Austria, we already go beyond the aims of the Green Deal and these achievements cannot be jeopardized. So Austria considers the energy. We are critical of these. We also need to bear in mind the varieties and the resilience of food systems. All of this has to be analyzed. So [00:50:00] the two files on the use of peas and bringing seeds into circulation, these have to be borne in mind. And there are other important aspects so that consumers can choose and we can have perhaps a coexistence between GMO products and other products. We are particularly critical of the proposal regarding a patents for plants [00:50:30] and products and the potential impact on small and medium plant producers. The issue of patents is a danger for biodiversity and varieties. Thank you very much.”
  Sustainable use of seeds in EU policy
• “The Austrian initiative at that point got 20 member states to support it, so we are looking forward to a renewed focus on this initiative. As far as I'm concerned, it's full support. Finally, one more thing. In the livestock strategy, it's crucial to take into account, on the one hand, high welfare animal welfare standards and on the other, the competitiveness of livestock farms. Livestock farming plays a vital role in creating added value in the regions. Given current regulatory developments, especially the Industrial Emissions Directive and the application of livestock units. We are seeing disproportionate costs for investment on family farms. I therefore urge you that thresholds be adapted to economic reality and to be raised to at least 560 to 600 L U. We think that there should be a general exemption from the Industrial Emissions Directive for all organic farms, not just poultry farms. Kristoff, I also trust that you will support us in the commission. Yes, to climate protection, but not at the expense of disproportionate burdens on small scale farming. May I finally stress once again that strategies cannot replace the responsibility we have, that the cap be a policy that's in its own right and is able to generate stable farm incomes. Crisis tools can mitigate problems, but we must avoid a budget for agriculture that is consistently too small. We need to focus on this issue in the ongoing negotiations. Negotiations on post 2027 cap. Thank you.”
  EU requirements on animal welfare for farmers · Agricultural funding
• “Thank you very much, chair. We have full understanding for what's been presented on the situation with the cormorants in Sweden. In Austria we only have very few breeding sites for cormorants, and in the latest report, the cormorant still appeared as being in a vulnerable position. But from the Austrian aquaculture perspective, the cormorant is indeed an increasing threat to um cultivators in Austria, particularly in fish ponds, and there have been significant losses reported by the Austrian agriculture due to cormorants.”
  Large Carnivores
• “Thank you very much, chair. With the ECF we are creating a key tool for boosting efficiency and achievement. Member States must have a stronger say in the ECF. So the governance must be shaped such that they really have a strong role to play At the strategic level and that the policy windows can be guaranteed by them. What's important is also enhanced anchoring of transnational research. Excellence in application of industry must not be hampered and competitiveness must be fostered. We also need to mobilise private capital in the ECF regulation. Thank you.”
  "Buy European" provisions
• “Thank you. Chairman. [00:17:30] And thank you from the Austrian delegation to the Swedish and then the Spanish presidency for the very intensive work done on this important legislative proposal. Austria is in favor for as much transparency as possible regarding the origin of honey blends, and since the beginning of the negotiations, we have been in favor of an EU single compulsory [00:18:00] indication of the country of origin plus percentages, and therefore we very much welcome, uh, uh, the achievements of the Spanish presidency. And we support the negotiating mandate, uh, because we need to guarantee transparency for consumers. So thank you very much. And good luck to the Belgian presidency for the negotiations. Then. [00:18:30] And thank you for chairing the meetings in the last six months. Chair.”
  EU policy on country of origin food labelling
• “(18:25:25 – 18:31:20): Thank you very much. And, let me also start with, saying thank you to, to the presidency, Kosel and, Nicolas. Thanks very good very much for the great cooperation we had. Very successful. Nicolas, you just mentioned the the last our last success this, Monday, the return regulation. That was really something. And as you mentioned, it was the the last missing piece actually of the the big migration, reform. And we are moving, forward very well actually in this huge migration reform. The it seems that every council meeting, we have delivered new new reforms, actually. And also, this is true for today. As you said, on Monday, we agreed, on on swifter, on simpler, on, more efficient rules also for for returns. So this is all about bringing our European house in order. That's what we are we are doing. And to this point, we are on on the final stretch now on of the implementation of the pact. And, this is a key element, I would say, of our, reform together with the entry exit system. You were mentioning that, because, together with the return regulation, together also with the safe third country concept, safe country of origin, list. So the main pillars are in place. And just to mention, because you mentioned the entry exit system, this is really something, incredibly important for the security of the European Union. We have seen 90,000,000 registrations, entries and exits, in the in the last, in the last months. That's 2,000,000 a week. 2,000,000 registrations a week. That's quite something. And what is also important on a from a secure security perspective is that we had, over 38,000 refusals of people trying to get into the European Union with false documents, fraud documents. And then that also includes about thousand people, who were refused, who actually post a security threat to the European Union. And then on the implementation part, the packed implementation part, the national legislations have mostly be, adopted. The the border procedure capacity, the screening in most member states has progressed significantly, I would say. But, of course, there is, more work to do, definitely, until the very end. This is not the the finishing line, I would say, in the June 12. Next week is not the finishing line. It's the start, actually, of, of the new system. So the reforms do not stop on the June 12. They they come actually into, into application. A few words on returns maybe because that is really a success story. Thank you again for this great cooperation, and the the presidency, was able to to close it, last Monday. And with this regulation, mean, you I'm sure you know about the key elements, of course. We were discussing that Monday and Tuesday and Wednesday. We have clear obligations for for individuals subject to return decisions. We have a stronger a stronger cooperation mechanism also, between the member states. And we have also stricter rules for, individuals, posing a security, threat. I was mentioning that before. And then, of course, also the possibility, of return hops outside the European Union. After the the summer, and that's, that's sort of the the way ahead, we will also, propose a new frontex mandate. So further to further increase also the the support, to member states and to make sure that that the return decisions actually lead to to actual returns then at the end of end of the day. We were also talking about the external dimension. This is also key because the reforms we are doing is about the, as I mentioned before, about the European house, about our reforms, but now it's about the external dimension as well. And we discussed that today. Our focus has shifted or has to shift also to this, area, as we see that our comprehensive approach, leads actually to results. And that's the good, that's the good good message. Illegal crossings at our external borders have, decreased by 55% in the last 2 years, and by another 40% this year already. Nearly every route actually shows, declining figures in in the first months also of 2026. Just to to give you an example or some examples, arrivals from Turkey to the Aegean Islands, have decreased by 67%. On the Central Med route, illegal border crossings are down by 46%. English channels, minus of 48%. So this is very, promising and is going in the right direction. That's why we have to focus on the external dimension, even more. And talking about the external dimension, we will strengthen cooperation with, partner countries, third countries. Migration cooperation in my view and in our view, must be linked more closely to to the leverage we have, to visa policy, to trade policy, development assistance, also. I think I'll leave it there and, leave it to the question. That was too long anyway. Thank you very much. Thank you, commissioner. I will now open the floor to question. I will start with Yolanda, and then I'll move to Mark.”
  Asylum & border control
• “(18:43:48 – 18:44:43): What was the sentiment? I have to ask my colleagues, but the sentiment was, of course, that there is an unwavering support to the Ukraine. That's that's the first thing. The second thing is that everyone agreed that we need a way forward. Obviously, '27 March 27 is tomorrow almost, so we have to be, we have to be quick, on that. And the third, thing was the the third sentiment is that we were listening very carefully, to to all the member states and that we are coming out with a, with a suggestion, in the next, in the next weeks to come. The sentiment, yeah, it's about prolonging, of course, and it's about making, changes to the to the scope. But I'm not going into detail. Please wait for, for our, for our suggestion, in in a couple of weeks' time. Thank you.”
  EU-Ukraine relations
• “Thank [00:25:00] you very much. The representation of women in political leadership positions is an important precondition and an important indicator for equality between men and women. Despite important progress, the representation of women in politics is not balanced. And as well as dismantling gender, stereotypes of more steps are necessary. We have a number [00:25:30] of different measures in Austria which are mentioned. In 2019, a bonus was introduced for a higher percentage of women in parliamentary clubs. Parliamentary groups, uh uh, the uh, if the percentage of women in the National Assembly or the Parliament is over 40%, then party funding is increased by 3%. Another example is that the Austrian Local Authorities Association has the Girls in Politics, a project which [00:26:00] we do, uh, um, which uh, together with the International Day of Girls and uh, on the 11th of October, girls between 6 and 18 years old will be spending time with male and female mayors for a day to break down traditional role models and gender stereotypes and to awaken their interest in politics. Another example of the activities of the funds to empower and promote women [00:26:30] and girls, the so-called Let's Empower Austria Fund, uh, that's been in existence since 2022, and the idea is to raise visibility of positive role models in 2023. An explorative study on the political participation of girls and young women was done on the main reasons for the current low participation of a young women, which named strategies [00:27:00] to change this. Uh. Female politicians are particularly affected by cyber violence and hate speech. A lot of them withdraw, uh, from public life altogether and political offices, and they also withdraw from digital spaces. And decisive, decisive action is needed. Austria is following a comprehensive program in the protection and prevention of [00:27:30] violence. And cyber violence is a priority, and measures to improve the legal situation of those affected have been taken, including the law. Hate on the internet and, uh, politics needs diversity of perspective and experience. We can only tackle the successfully the future challenges if we factor in the perspectives and needs of women and girls [00:28:00] and just. Is an important precondition and an important indicator for equality between men and women. Despite important progress, the representation of women in politics is not balanced. And as well as dismantling gender, stereotypes of more steps are necessary. We have a number of different measures in Austria which are mentioned. In 2019, a bonus was introduced for a higher percentage of women in parliamentary [00:00:30] clubs. Parliamentary groups, uh uh, the uh, if the percentage of women in the National Assembly or the Parliament is over 40%, then party funding is increased by 3%. Another example is that the Austrian Local Authorities Association has the Girls in Politics, a project which we do, uh, um, which uh, together with the International Day of Girls, uh, on [00:01:00] the 11th of October, girls between 6 and 18 years old will be spending time with male and female mayors for a day to break down traditional role models and gender stereotypes and to awaken their interest in politics. Another example of the activities of the funds to empower and promote women and girls, the so-called Let's Empower Austria Fund, uh, that's been in existence since 2022. [00:01:30] And the idea is to raise the visibility of positive role models in 2023. An explorative study on the political participation of girls and young women was done on the main reasons for the current low participation of a young women, which named strategies to change this.”
  Gender roles, equality and inclusion
• “Thank you very much, president. Thank you. Claudia. Thank you for taking [00:25:00] this initiative. We have had a lot of conversations about this before, and I would agree with you entirely. Today's debate just showed how important exchange and discussion at European level is. And support for Ukraine also shows that cultural policy at the EU level is very important and should continue to be so into the future. And in Austria we are making [00:25:30] that quite clear. We have Battishill, which is a European Capital of Culture this year, and it's really highlighting how important EU policy is. It really reflects its importance and it's great to see. And I think these days in particular, it's important that we continue to support cultural policy as much as possible. Thank you.”
  EU and national cultural identities
• “And thank [00:32:00] you. And a big welcome to you, Ernest. To Martina, to Ileana as well. Art and culture make a unique contribution to the development of our society, and artistic work helps our societies and strengthens our very democracies. Arts and cultural culture don't just deserve more recognition, but also fair compensation and guaranteed social security. We often talk about the role [00:32:30] that culture plays, and all of the various different things that tie in that don't fall under our direct competence and which are difficult, therefore, to regulate. So we need to work together at various different levels involving all of the stakeholders at national and European level, but also at the level of those who actually represent the sectors, the social partners and all of the stakeholders involved. In Austria, we have a clear political acknowledgment of more fairness, and we had three [00:33:00] years of intensive exchange with stakeholders from the cultural sector, with the Bundeslander as well as our towns and communities. And last year all came together to put forward a unsign, a fair pay strategy. We have made significant funds available in order to guarantee fair pay. So what have we managed to achieve in concrete terms? Well, up to 2024, the Federal Ministry for culture. We'll [00:33:30] give an additional €24.5 million and make that available. In order to make fair pay and fair compensation available to artists and cultural professionals. We also have increased awareness of the working conditions of artists and cultural professionals. We've tried to align the various different programs better and ensure that they're more consistent with each other. We have thresholds in place as well that have been put forward by the sector itself. [00:34:00] In terms of minimum requirements. Support for the sector is also something we need to address in terms of the developments in AI, it will become increasingly more important. We can't deny that AI is going to affect the various different parts of the cultural sector, and this can be done in various different innovative and interesting ways. But we need to have a framework in place which makes sure that the people who [00:34:30] work in the field continue to earn money as they deserve to do from their work. We have already talked about copyright and the fact that we need proper regulation there. We cannot go beyond what we're actually striving for here and prevent future opportunities and take those away from the professionals at the European level. Then coming to your second question, I think there are a number of good proposals that have been put forward by the EU expert [00:35:00] Group and by the European Parliament. They're all on the table now. We're continuing to support the promotion of fair pay in all of the EU cultural support programmes. We need to take a look at now at what proposals can actually be implemented and where there's need for room for improvement. It's clear that the various different systems in the member states need to be taken into account, and we can't have a one size fits all proposal, but perhaps we can have a common objective and ensure a fair process for the cultural sector in Europe. [00:35:30] Fair pay, fair contracts. Fair collective agreements should be the standard, should be the status quo. This won't just help the artists and professionals themselves. It will help cultural diversity in Europe too. And at the end of the day, our democratic freedoms as well as Claudia has pointed out to you. Thank you.”
  EU and national cultural identities
• “Thanks a lot. Muchas gracias, dear Chair. The commissioners, Dear colleagues, first of all, many thanks to the Spanish Presidency for the opportunity to address [00:01:00] the EU pharmaceutical package and its importance for industrial policy here in the Compact Council. We have all learned from the past years how important the availability of medicines and the reliable, competitive and innovative European pharmaceutical industry is for open strategic autonomy. This is also defined in the updated EU industrial strategy. I therefore consider it necessary that the EU pharmaceutical package is discussed from the perspective of health care, of [00:01:30] course, but also from that of industrial policy and global location competition. The factors of competitiveness, a reliable legal framework and an attractive policies for investments in research, development, innovation and production must be integral components of the design of this legislation. However, also emphasized that it is not the intention to anticipate the technical discussions in the Epsco Council with this [00:02:00] initiative by Germany and Austria even more. We want to work together constructively in the sense of complementarity between health and industrial policies. We are still well positioned in Europe in the area of the pharmaceutical industry. [00:02:14] This must remain so. Therefore, it is all the more important that the EU pharmaceutical package does not set any measures that hamper innovation and investment and create legal uncertainty that strategically weakens us as a business location, location, especially [00:02:30] in these difficult times. Regarding competitiveness. What is needed is a clear, predictable and globally competitive legal framework that actively promotes innovation, guarantees appropriate protection periods for the European pharmaceutical market and thus makes investment more attractive. The proposed incentives for innovation and security of supply should be discussed together with the potential addressees. Incentives should be unconditional or actively enforceable, but should not start with the reduction [00:03:00] of protection periods or introduce introduced hurdles. For example, we should discuss the reduction of the protection periods for intellectual property by 25% from 8 to 6 years, as provided for in the Commission's current draft. In any case, together with the sectors concerned. Therefore, I also ask the Spanish and the upcoming Belgian presidencies to take into account the strategic importance of the European pharmaceutical sector when planning the upcoming formal and informal combat [00:03:30] councils. Thanks a lot.”
  Pharma IPRs
• “(18:32:15 – 18:33:36): We we have to be precise because, we were we are talking about the if we talk about the the border procedure, that's the entry exit system. But the other thing is the asylum procedures at the external borders. Yes. Yeah. That's what you took. Okay. That's a different a different story. Well, what do I do? We we, we know and we do everything to support the member states that they are ready to do the border procedures well, the asylum procedures. I mix it up as well myself. The asylum procedures, at the external borders, and we have quite quite clear rules, actually. We have the safe country of origin list, for instance, which helps to, to make it more efficient quicker also. And altogether, the numbers are going down. That's the the positive thing. So the the pressure on the borders, are not as big as they as they used to be. So we are supporting the member states. The member states are are ready. We are almost there. Of course, not everything will work perfectly a 100% well, on the very first day. Of course not. I mean, we have to be realistic. Of course, That's what we said before. It's the start of the, of the whole of the whole system. But, we're here to support the member states. There are there the infrastructure is there. The member states, seem to be ready.”
  Asylum & border control
• “Chair. Thank you very much. We also share France's concerns and agree that the competitiveness of the European chemicals industry must be improved urgently. Chemicals law, particularly in recent years, has become a complex web of legislation which is very difficult for the industry. Much of it is useful and leads to greater safety of chemicals and other groups of products. But some of that legislation also goes hand in hand with increased administrative burden. Therefore, we welcome the announcement by the Commission, in particular relating to reach to move forward with simplification measures. From this perspective, we think that it would be a good idea to start with reviews of existing legislation before thinking about any new legislation. Thank you.”
  Classification, labelling and packaging of chemicals
• “President. Commissioner. The origin of food is important, increasingly important for many people in Europe, and extending the existing provisions as set out in the Farm to fork strategy and as announced by the Commission as early as 2022, is something that we consider to be absolutely necessary. We call on the existing and the incoming commission to swiftly submit [00:03:00] a draft proposal to extend the mandatory EU wide country of origin labelling for foods. The aim must be to have more transparency about the food on your plate, and also to make conscious choices in favour of strengthening regional and local farming. Thank you.”
  Food labelling harmonisation at EU level
• “Thank you very much and thank you to the Slovene delegation for this initiative, which we expressed his support for a long time. The European Union has been talked about revising the directive with the origin labeling. We're not sure when this was supposed to be happening. We'd like to know from the commission when they're intending to table this proposal, because on one hand Member States are being called on by the European Commission to take national initiatives with an eye to upcoming harmonisation. But nothing is happening to the EU. Labeling honey with origin would protect consumers against being misled. And it would also be mean that we could promote honey producers and they'd have fair competition.”
  Food labelling harmonisation at EU level
• “Yes. Thank you to the presidency for your work. The Energy Tax Directive is more than 20 years old, so it's clear that we need an update. Therefore, we think the compromise text is really a good basis. But we are looking forward for the further discussions. Thank you, thank you.”
  Energy (green transition) · EU taxation policy (political compass)
• “(18:36:04 – 18:38:13): Well, first of all, there was a a full a 100% solidarity towards Ukraine. That's what we heard in the discussion. Of course, everyone, pointed it out, and and we will, of course, stick to that. We a 100%, support, support the Ukraine furthermore. And, and as we see Russia's brutal war of aggression, against Ukraine, reaching new heights, actually, we discussed a way forward. Yes. We have to do that. It has been 1 year to the day since we prolonged the temporary protection until March 2027. And, of course, we discussed it today, and the view was, I think if I got got it correctly, please correct me if I'm not. The view was that, we should prolong, the temporary protection. We should, of course, discuss it also also with the Ukrainians because it's it's important for us, to to hear the view of the Ukrainians, what they want also. So prolonging the the temporary protection, is key. And then there are different, different approaches. 1 of them, as you mentioned, is that we exclude, exclude men between 23 and and 60, the 1 in the conscription age. And that is also what the Ukrainians, want us to do. That was discussed as well, with some other other topics on that. So we will come up with a proposal. We listened very carefully to the the ministers today, to the member states today, and especially to those who are most affected. That was our approach, the ones most affected, you know, the Czech Republic, the Baltic States, Poland, Germany, Austria. So we really have to listen to them and, to hear their view. And we come up in the next weeks, with a with a new proposal, how we should, go further and what the way forward, is on the temporary protection. But the discussion was about prolonging it and maybe, having some changes in the scope. Also that was that's what we discussed.”
  Asylum & border control
• “(18:31:58 – 18:32:14): different thing. The border procedures for the asylum, where they decide, if they, how do you say in English? Oh, I'm sorry. If they make a chance to get asylum or not. You know what I mean.”
  Asylum & border control
• “Thank you very much, chair. And thank you, Commission for bringing forward this proposal. We welcome the publication of the two animal welfare regulations. This will allow us to review the rules on the transport of animals and on and create rules for dogs and cats. When it comes to proposals to change the rules for animals, for fur production and a ban thereon, we can support. It's been said many times the protection, animal protection and welfare during transport is very important in Austria and Europe. Changes to the existing European rules for animal protection during transport is urgently needed, and has been called for by Austria for many years. Austria already has comparatively high animal welfare standards during transport, so we can support the Commission's proposals for further improvements at the European level. The draft with the new rules. On the well being and traceability of dogs and cats, as well as standards [00:30:30] for breeding. Is also an important topic for Austria. Austria in the past has already called for a ban on the breeding of animals for fur and continues to do so. We will take constructive part in these discussions. Thank you.”
  EU requirements on animal welfare for farmers
• “Thank you Ella. Austria welcomes the targets that are set out in the proposal emphatically and the reduction of waste from food and textiles, which are resource intensive areas. This is why we also support the textile producers look at the responsibility in the productions phase and are made aware of the lifecycle of their products and bear some of the costs of the waste phase. Yet overproduction of textiles must be addressed and must be taken on board. Fast fashion practises must be taken on board eco modelling, so that's a positive step as to the waste of foodstuffs. This is very important. It's not so much the reduction of waste per se, but avoiding edible waste for foodstuffs. So we would like to thank the Belgian council presidency for the work that they've done on the Compromise Text. We think it's moving in the right direction and is a good basis for further negotiations. However, I still do have some points where we think that there is a need for further discussion. For example, the discussion for food stuff, waste, usable and not usable, and the quotas for households and guest economy and the definition of social economy entities and also clear timeframes and timeframe frames that do need to be discussed. And we are aware that in future negotiations with the parliament, we think that improvements to these points can be searched for and I'm sure that Austrian future will be able to vote in favour of the compromise when we have worked on this. Thank you.”
  Ecodesign & durability
• “Thank you very much, chair. Thank you very much, Commissioner. We welcome the European Commission's omnibus initiative, especially considering that we are living through difficult times, especially geopolitically, where we see a rise in production costs and other challenges when it comes to the food and feed chain. And that is why we require practical, balanced and fair framework conditions to ensure the outstanding level of food and feed safety. In the long term, these proposals can contribute to a substantial simplification of existing rules, as well as greater fairness fairness vis a vis the competition for agricultural products with third countries. In the past, Austria has stressed the need for functioning and reliable framework, and we believe that the Commission's proposal is a great starting point, especially relating to further developing more efficient, accelerated and harmonised procedures in the era of authorisation, and Austria will play a constructive role.”
  EU policy on pesticides